Abstract
Local and regional governments in the U.S. rely increasingly on voter-approved local option sales taxes (LOSTs) to fund transportation capital investments, maintenance, and operations. LOSTs typically present voters with lists of local transportation projects and programs to be funded by a ¼ to 1 percent sales tax increase. Most research on LOSTs are case studies, which make generalizations about LOSTs difficult. We conducted a comprehensive, multi-jurisdictional analysis of LOST measures in California, the U.S. state with the greatest number of LOST measures. We examined 76 LOST measures put to voters between 1976 and 2016 to assess factors associated with voter support. LOSTs in California are enacted by counties, which we examined in addition to smaller intra-county geographies using both regression models and case studies. We tested several explanatory variables for association with voter support including macroeconomic and political context, planned measure expenditures, voter characteristics, and spatial distribution of proposed projects. We found that funding dedicated to public transit and returned to local jurisdictions predicts support at the county level, and that LOSTs that create new taxes—as opposed to extending or renewing existing taxes—are less popular with voters, all else equal. Our analyses of sub-county geographies revealed that political party affiliation is the strongest predictor of local voter support for LOSTs and that voters living adjacent to funded projects tended to be more supportive of LOSTs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In 1995, the California Supreme Court ruled in Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. Guardino that LOSTs are a “special” purpose tax under Proposition 62, and therefore require approval by a two-thirds supermajority of voters (1995). Prior to this decision, LOSTs passed with a simple majority of votes.
Limited availability of historical voting data precluded our ability to capture the temporal range of California LOSTs, and limit the local analysis to LOSTs placed on the ballot in the past 20 years.
Measure B only goes into effect if the BART rail expansion funded by Measure A is completed.
This is the minimum that would be spent on alternative transport; cities can fund additional transit and active transportation programs with local return funds at their discretion.
References
Agrawal, A.W., Nixon, H.: What do Americans think about federal tax options to support transportation? Results from year nine of a national survey. Mineta Transportation Institute, USA (2018)
Ansolabehere, S.D., Iyengar, S., Simon, Adam: Replicating experiments using aggregate and survey data: the case of negative advertising and turnout. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 93(4), 901–909 (1999)
Anthony, D.: An economic theory of democracy. Harper and Row, New York (1957)
Bishop, B.: The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America is Tearing Us Apart. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, USA (2009)
Bowler, S., Donovan, T.: Economic conditions and voting on ballot propositions. A. Polit. Quart. 22(1), 27–40 (1994)
California Department of Transportation. California Household Travel Survey (2012). https://www.nrel.gov/transportation/secure-transportation-data/tsdc-california-travelsurvey.html
Chapman, R.G., Palda, K.S.: Electoral turnout in rational voting and consumption perspectives. J. Consum. Res. 9(4), 337–346 (1983)
Cox, G.W., Munger, M.C.: Closeness, expenditures, and turnout in the 1982 US House elections. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 83(1), 217–231 (1989)
Dawson, P.A., Zinser, J.E.: Political finance and participation in congressional elections. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 425(1), 59–73 (1976)
Donovan, T., Bowler, S.: Demanding Choices: Opinion, Voting, and Direct Democracy. University of Michigan Press, Michigan (1998)
Fernandez, R., Rodrik, D.: Resistance to reform: status quo bias in the presence of individual-specific uncertainty. Am. J. Econ. Rev. 81(5), 1146–1155 (1991)
Filer, J.E., Kenny, L.W., Morton, R.B.: Redistribution, income, and voting. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 63–87 (1993)
Forestieri, K.: VTA weighs transit options for Highway 85. Mountain View Voice. https://www.mv-voice.com/news/2017/12/27/vta-weighs-transit-options-for-highway-85 (2017)
Franklin, M.N.: Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies Since 1945. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
Franko, W., Tolbert, C.J., Witko, C.: Inequality, self-interest, and public support for “Robin Hood” tax policies. Polit. Res. Quart. 66(4), 923–937 (2013)
Gerber, E.R.: The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1999)
Geys, B.: Explaining voter turnout: a review of aggregate-level research. Elect. Studies 25(4), 637–663 (2006)
Green, A.D., Neiman, M., Bockman, S., Sirotnik, B.: Public support for transportation sales taxes in California: a two county assessment. Calif. J. Polit. Policy 5(4), 645–670 (2013)
Haas, P.J., Massey, K.S., Valenty, L.O., Werbel, R.: Why Campaigns for Local Transportation Initiatives Succeed or Fail: An Analysis of Four Communities and National Data. Mineta Transportation Institute, USA (2000)
Hannay, R., Wachs, M.: Factors influencing support for local transportation sales tax measures. Transportation 34(1), 17–35 (2007)
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Choices, values, and frames. Am. Psychol. 39, 341–350 (1984)
Laska, A., Puentes, R.: Transportation at the Ballot Box 2018. Eno Center for Transportation, USA (2019)
Lau, R.R., Pomper, G.M.: Effects of negative campaigning on turnout in US Senate elections, 1988–1998. J. Polit. 63(3), 804–819 (2001)
Lederman, J., Brown, A., Taylor, B.D., Wachs, M.: Lessons learned from 40 years of local option transportation sales taxes in California. Transportation Research Record: 0361198118782757 (2018)
Lewis, R., Herrman, T., Bean, M.: Sustainable Transportation at the Ballot Box. University of Oregon Sustainable Cities Initiative, Oregon (2017)
Manville, M.: Measure M and the Potential Transformation of Mobility in Los Angeles. University of California Institute of Transportation Studies, California (2019)
Manville, M., Cummins, B.: Why do voters support public transportation? Public choices and private behavior. Transportation 42(2), 303–332 (2015)
McCaffery, E.J., Baron, J.: Thinking about tax. Psychol. Public Policy Law 12(1), 106 (2006)
Meagher, C.: Despite major endorsements, no easy ride for measure A. Santa Barbara Independent. http://www.independent.com/news/2008/oct/09/despite-major-endorsements-no-easy-ride-measure/ (2008)
Nixon, H., Agrawal, A.W.: Would Americans pay more in taxes for better transportation? Answers from seven years of national survey data. Transportation 1–22 (2018)
Santa Barbara County Association of Governments.: Measure D 2006—Santa Barbara County (2006)
Smith, M.A.: The contingent effects of ballot initiatives and candidate races on turnout. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 700–706 (2001)
UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies.: LOST Promises Measure Data. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PAs62StlclFJXSxABsasVTvAMgQhirtxMA6cuGnxCfI/edit?pli=1#gid=207788548 (2020)
Welsh, N.: The Battle Over Measure A, Road Funding, and Trikes. Santa Barbara Independent. http://www.independent.com/news/2008/aug/07/battle-over-measure-road-funding-and-trikes/ (2008)
Acknowledgements
The authors thank many parties who made this project possible. We thank the UC Berkeley Statewide Database staff who provided guidance on voting data and precincts, as well as all county staff who provided voting data and records for sales tax measures. We also thank Maxwell Albrecht, Madeline Brozen, and John Gahbauer at the UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies for their assistance with this research.
Funding
This work was supported by the University of California Center of Economic Competitiveness in Transportation, funded under the federal University Transportation Centers program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors know of no conflicts of interest in conducting this research.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, A., Lederman, J., Taylor, B.D. et al. Analyzing voter support for California’s local option sales taxes for transportation. Transportation 48, 2103–2125 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-020-10123-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-020-10123-x