Skip to main content
Log in

Demand management of congested public transport systems: a conceptual framework and application using smart card data

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transportation demand management, long used to reduce car traffic, is receiving attention among public transport operators as a means to reduce congestion in crowded public transportation systems. Though far less studied, a more structured approach to public transport demand management (PTDM) can help agencies make informed decisions on the combination of PTDM and infrastructure investments that best manage crowding. Automated fare collection data, readily available in many public transport agencies, provide a unique platform to advance systematic approaches for the design and evaluation of PTDM strategies. The paper discusses the main steps for developing PTDM programs: (a) problem identification and formulation of program goals; (b) program design; (c) evaluation; and (d) monitoring. The problem identification phase examines bottlenecks in the system based on a spatiotemporal passenger flow analysis. The design phase identifies the main design parameters based on a categorization of potential interventions along spatial, temporal, modal, and targeted user group parameters. Evaluation takes place at the system, group, and individual levels, taking advantage of the detailed information obtained from smart card transaction data. The monitoring phase addresses the long-term sustainability of the intervention and informs potential changes to improve its effectiveness. A case study of a pre-peak fare discount policy in Hong Kong’s MTR network is used to illustrate the application of the various steps with focus on evaluation and analysis of the impacts from a behavioral point of view. Smart card data from before and after the implementation of the scheme from a panel of users was used to study policy-induced behavior shifts. A cluster analysis inferred customer groups relevant to the analysis based on their usage patterns. Users who shifted their behavior were identified based on a change point analysis and a logit model was estimated to identify the main factors that contribute to this change: the amount of time a user needed to shift his/her departure time, departure time variability, fare savings, and price sensitivity. User heterogeneity suggests that future incentives may be improved if they target specific groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anupriya, A., Graham, D., Hörcher, D., Anderson, R.J.: The impact of early bird scheme on commuter trip scheduling in Hong Kong: a causal analysis using travel card data. Paper Presented at the Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, United States (2018)

  • Arthur, D., Vassilvitskii, S.: k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, New Orleans, Louisiana (2007)

  • Bai, J.: Least squares estimation of a shift in linear processes. J. Time Ser. Anal. 15(5), 453–472 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.1994.tb00204.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S., Fujii, S., Friman, M., Gärling, T.: Behaviour theory and soft transport policy measures. Transp. Policy 18(1), 228–235 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamford, C.G., Carrick, R.J., Hay, A.M., MacDonald, R.: The use of association analysis in market segmentation for public transport: a case study of bus passengers in West Yorkshire, UK. Transportation 14(1), 21–32 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batarce, M., Muñoz, J.C., Ortúzar, J., de Dios Ortúzar, J.: Valuing crowding in public transport: implications for cost-benefit analysis. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 91, 358–378 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, M.E., Lerman, S.R., Lerman, S.R.: Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, vol. 9. MIT Press, Cambridge (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., Campbell, D.: Hedonic Relativism and Planning the Good Society. Academic Press, New York (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R.: Transit pricing research. Transportation 17(2), 117–139 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02125332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, G.: Exploring the impact of the “Free before 7” campaign on reducing overcrowding on Melbourne’s trains. Paper Presented at the 32nd Australasian Transport Research Forum, Auckland, New Zealand (2009)

  • Currie, G.: Design and impact of a scheme to spread peak rail demand using pre-peak free fares. Paper Presented at the European Transport Conference Glasgow, Scotland (2011)

  • Dale, S., Frost, M.W., Ison, S.G., Warren, P.: Evaluating transport demand management interventions. Paper Presented at the Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, United States (2015)

  • Ekström, J., Sumalee, A., Lo, H.K.: Optimizing toll locations and levels using a mixed integer linear approximation approach. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 46(7), 834–854 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2012.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, L., Nordlund, A.M., Garvill, J.: Expected car use reduction in response to structural travel demand management measures. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 13(5), 329–342 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2010.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, E.: Transportation demand management planning, development, and implementation. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 56(4), 442–456 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369008975448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärling, T., Eek, D., Loukopoulos, P., Fujii, S., Johansson-Stenman, O., Kitamura, R., Vilhelmson, B.: A conceptual analysis of the impact of travel demand management on private car use. Transp. Policy 9(1), 59–70 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(01)00035-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärling, T., Fujii, S.: Travel behavior modification: theories, methods, and programs. Paper Presented at the 11th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research, Kyoto, Japan (2006)

  • Gärling, T., Schuitema, G.: Travel demand management targeting reduced private car use: effectiveness, public acceptability and political feasibility. J. Soc. Issues 63(1), 139–153 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00500.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliano, G.: Transportation demand management: promise or panacea? J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 58(3), 327–335 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369208975811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J., Koutsopoulos, H., Wilson, N., Attanucci, J.: Automated inference of linked transit journeys in London using fare-transaction and vehicle location data. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2343, 17–24 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3141/2343-03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulet-Langlois, G., Koutsopoulos, H.N., Zhao, J.: Inferring patterns in the multi-week activity sequences of public transport users. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 64, 1–16 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene-Roesel, R., Castiglione, J., Guiriba, C., Bradley, M.: BART perks: using incentives to manage transit demand. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118792765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen, A., Koutsopoulos, H.N., Lau, S., Au, T., Zhao, J.: Reducing subway crowding: analysis of an off-peak discount experiment in Hong Kong. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2544, 38–46 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3141/2544-05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamdouch, Y., Florian, M., Hearn, D.W., Lawphongpanich, S.: Congestion pricing for multi-modal transportation systems. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 41(3), 275–291 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2006.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henn, L., Douglas, N., Sloan, K.: Surveying Sydney rail commuters’ willingness to change travel time. Paper Presented at the 34th Australasian Transport Research Forum Adelaide, Australia (2011)

  • Hörcher, D., Graham, D.J., Anderson, R.J.: Crowding cost estimation with large scale smart card and vehicle location data. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 95, 105–125 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.10.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurdle, J.: Use of public transit in US reaches highest level since 1956, advocates report. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/10/us/use-of-public-transit-in-us-reaches-highest-level-since-1956-advocates-report.html (2014)

  • Jolliffe, I.: Principal component analysis. In: Lovric, M. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, pp. 1094–1096. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kachroo, P., Gupta, S., Agarwal, S., Ozbay, K.: Optimal control for congestion pricing: theory, simulation, and evaluation. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 18(5), 1234–1240 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2601245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutsopoulos, H.N., Ma, Z., Noursalehi, P., Zhu, Y.: Transit data analytics for planning, monitoring, control and information. In: Antoniou, C., Dimitriou, L., Pereira, F. (eds.) Mobility Patterns, Big Data and Transport Analytics, 1st edn, p. 448. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroes, E., Kouwenhoven, M., Debrincat, L., Pauget, N.: Value of crowding on public transport in Île-de-France, France. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2417, 37–45 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3141/2417-05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S.-M., Wong, F.C.L.: The effectiveness of differential pricing on route choice. Transportation 21(3), 307–324 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Hensher, D.A.: Crowding and public transport: a review of willingness to pay evidence and its relevance in project appraisal. Transp. Policy 18(6), 880–887 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loukopoulos, P.: A classification of travel demand management measures. In: Steg, L. (ed.) Threats from Car Traffic to the Quality of Urban Life: Problems, Causes and Solutions, pp. 273–292. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lta, S.: Travel smart. http://www.lta.gov.sg/content/ltaweb/en/public-transport/mrt-and-lrt-trains/travel-smart.html (2014)

  • Luo, D., Cats, O., Lint, H.V.: Analysis of network-wide transit passenger flows based on principal component analysis. Paper Presented at the 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS) (2017)

  • Ma, Z., Ferreira, L., Mesbah, M.: Measuring service reliability using automatic vehicle location data. Math. Probl. Eng. 2014, 1–12 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Z., Koutsopoulos, H.N.: Optimal design of promotion based transit demand management strategies. Working paper (2018)

  • Ma, Z., Koutsopoulos, H.N., Chen, Y., Wilson, N.H.M.: Estimation of denied boarding in urban rail systems: alternative formulations and comparative analysis. Transp. Res. Rec. (2019) (in press)

  • Mark, S., Phil, C.: Developments in transit fare policy reform. Paper Presented at the 29th Australasian Transport Research Forum Queensland, Australia (2006)

  • Maruyama, T., Sumalee, A.: Efficiency and equity comparison of cordon- and area-based road pricing schemes using a trip-chain equilibrium model. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 41(7), 655–671 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maunsell, F.: Demand management techniques-peak spreading. Department for Transport, Transport for London and Network Rail, London, United Kingdom (2007)

  • Pelletier, M.-P., Trépanier, M., Morency, C.: Smart card data use in public transit: a literature review. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 19(4), 557–568 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2010.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pluntke, C., Prabhakar, B.: INSINC: a platform for managing peak demand in public transit, pp. 31–39. JOURNEYS (Magazine of the Land Transport Authority Academy, Singapore) (2013)

  • Prud’homme, R., Koning, M., Lenormand, L., Fehr, A.: Public transport congestion costs: the case of the Paris subway. Transp. Policy 21, 101–109 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G.: Appraisal and evaluation of travel demand management measures. Paper Presented at the 30th Australasian Transport Research Forum, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (2007)

  • Rousseeuw, P.J.: Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 20, 53–65 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schade, J., Schlag, B.: Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 6(1), 45–61 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(02)00046-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlag, B., Teubel, U.: Public acceptability of transport pricing. IATSS Res. 21, 134–142 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B., Moniruzzaman, M.: Review of TDM appraisal and evaluation tools. Perth, Australia (2014)

  • Steg, L.: Factors influencing the acceptability and effectiveness of transport pricing. In: Schlag, B. (ed.) Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies, pp. 187–202. Pergamon Press, Oxford (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Steg, L., Vlek, C.: The role of problem awareness in willingness-to-change car use and in evaluating relevant policy measures. Paper Presented at the Traffic and Transport Psychology: Theory and Application, Amsterdam, Netherlands (1997)

  • Taylor, C., Nozick, L., Meyburg, A.: Selection and evaluation of travel demand management measures. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1598, 49–60 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibshirani, R., Walther, G., Hastie, T.: Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Stat. Methodol.) 63(2), 411–423 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirachini, A., Hurtubia, R., Dekker, T., Daziano, R.A.: Estimation of crowding discomfort in public transport: results from Santiago de Chile. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 103, 311–326 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z.-J., Li, X.-H., Chen, F.: Impact evaluation of a mass transit fare change on demand and revenue utilizing smart card data. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 77, 213–224 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wie, B.-W.: Dynamic Stackelberg equilibrium congestion pricing. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 15(3), 154–174 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2007.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wie, B.-W., Tobin, R.L.: Dynamic congestion pricing models for general traffic networks. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 32(5), 313–327 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(97)00043-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H., Tang, Y.: Managing rail transit peak-hour congestion with a fare-reward scheme. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 110, 122–136 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yap, M., Cats, O., van Arem, B.: Crowding valuation in urban tram and bus transportation based on smart card data. Transportmetrica A: Transp. Sci. 22, 1–20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2018.1537319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeileis, A., Kleiber, C., Krämer, W., Hornik, K.: Testing and dating of structural changes in practice. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 44(1), 109–123 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(03)00030-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Yan, X., An, M., Sun, L.: The impact of beijing subway’s new fare policy on riders’ attitude, travel pattern and demand. Sustainability 9(5), 689 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Fujii, H., Managi, S.: How does commuting behavior change due to incentives? An empirical study of the Beijing Subway System. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 24, 17–26 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., Koutsopoulos, H.N., Wilson, N.H.M.: Inferring left behind passengers in congested metro systems from automated data. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. (2017a). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., Koutsopoulos, H.N., Wilson, N.H.M.: A probabilistic passenger-to-train assignment model based on automated data. Transp. Res. B Methodol. (2017b). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2017.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Hong Kong MTR for their support for this research. Discussions with staff about their experiences in developing and evaluating PTDM policies also provided valuable insight. The authors also thank Nick Allen and Adam Rosenfield for their review and proofreading.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AH: Literature search and review, Experiment design, Analysis, Modeling, Manuscript writing; HNK: Content planning, Analysis, Modeling, Manuscript writing; ZM: Analysis, Modeling, Manuscript writing and editing; JZ: Content planning, Analysis, Manuscript writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenliang Ma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Halvorsen, A., Koutsopoulos, H.N., Ma, Z. et al. Demand management of congested public transport systems: a conceptual framework and application using smart card data. Transportation 47, 2337–2365 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10017-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10017-7

Keywords

Navigation