Abstract
Encouraging the integration of active transportation with transit is increasingly being pursued as a strategy by transit agencies to boost alternative means to access transit services. Using the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Areas’ GO Transit as a case study, we conduct an investigation into the land-use and socioeconomic variables influencing the use of active transportation to access commuter rail stations. The percentage of transit users that arrive by active modes is explored using a binomial logit model. Population density, proportion of residential land, population age, low automobile ownership and median income are found to be positively associated with the integration of active transportation and transit. The proportion of commercial/institutional land, street density, and the amount of car parking at stations are negatively associated with access by active transport. The research helps to identify several policies that may increase the level of integration between active transport and public transit in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area.




Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A more recent 2016 TTS survey was released since this research was originally conducted.
References
Anselin, L.: Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1988)
Bachand-Marleau, J., Larsen, J., El-Geneidy, A.M.: Much-anticipated marriage of cycling and transit. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2247(1), 109–117 (2011)
Badland, H., Schofield, G.: Perceptions of replacing car journeys with non-motorized travel: exploring relationships in a cross-sectional adult population sample. Prev. Med. 43(3), 222–225 (2006)
Bopp, M., Gayah, V., Campbell, M.: Examining the link between public transit use and active commuting. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 12(4), 4256–4274 (2015)
Bracher, T.: Demand characteristics and co-operation strategies for the bicycle and railway transport chain. World Transp. Policy Pract 6(3), 18–24 (2000)
Brons, M., Givoni, M., Rietveld, P.: Access to railway stations and its potential in increasing rail use. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 43(2), 136–149 (2009)
Cervero, R.: Walk-and-ride: factors influencing pedestrian access to transit. J. Public Transp. 3(4), 1–23 (2001)
Cervero, R., Caldwell, B., Cuellar, J.: Bike-and-ride: build It and they will come. J. Public Transp. 16(4), 83–105 (2013)
Cervero, R., Kockelman, K.: Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, design and diversity. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2(3), 199–219 (1997)
Cervero, R., Sarmiento, O.L., Jacoby, E., Gomez, L.F., Neiman, A.: Influences of built environments on walking and cycling: lessons from Bogotá. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 3(4), 203–226 (2009)
City of Toronto: Vision zero road safety plan (2017–2021) (2017). Retrieved April 04, 2018, from https://www.toronto.ca/services-payments/streets-parking-transportation/road-safety/vision-zero/vision-zero-plan-overview/
Crowley, D., Shalaby, A., Zarei, H.: Access walking distance, transit use, and transit-oriented development in North York City Center, Toronto,Canada. Transp. Res. Rec. 2110(12), 96–105 (2009)
Data Management Group: 2011 transportation tomorrow survey—data presentation (2011). Retrieved January 17, 2016, from http://dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2011/tts2011_presentation.pdf
Durand, C., Tang, X., Kelley, G., Sener, I., Oluyomi, A., Knell, G., Porter, A., Hoelscher, D., Kohl, H.: The association of trip distance with walking to reach public transit: data from the California household travel survey. J. Transp. Health 3(2), 154–160 (2016)
El-Geneidy, A., Grimsrud, M., Wasfi, R., Tetreault, P., Surprenant-Legault, J.: New evidence on walking distances to transit stops: identifying redundancies and gaps using variable service areas. Transportation 41(1), 193–210 (2014)
Engel-Yan, J., Rudra, M., Livett, C., Nagorsky, R.: Strategic station access planning for commuter rail: balancing park-and-ride with other modes. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2419, 82–91 (2014)
Ewing, R., Cervero, R.: Travel and the built environment: a meta-analysis. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 76(3), 265–294 (2010)
Forsyth, A., Krizek, K.J.: Promoting walking and bicycling: assessing the evidence to assist planners. Built Environ. 36(4), 429–446 (2010)
Givoni, M., Rietveld, P.: The access journey to the railway station and its role in passengers’ satisfaction with rail travel. Transp. Policy 14(5), 357–365 (2007)
Handy, S.: Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behavior. Transp. Res. Part D Transp Environ. 1(2), 151–165 (1996)
Handy, S.L., Xing, Y.: Factors correlated with bicycle commuting: a study in six small U.S. cities. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 5(2), 91–110 (2011)
Higgins, C., Kanaroglou, P.: A latent class method for classifying and evaluating the performance of station area transit-oriented development in the Toronto region. J. Transp. Geogr. 54, 61–72 (2016)
Hochmair, H.H.: Assessment of bicycle service areas around transit stations. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 9(1), 15–29 (2012)
Ibeale: Line and Junction Connectivity. ESRI, San Diego (2012)
Kager, R., Bertolini, L., te Brömmelstroet, M.: Characterisation of and reflections on the synergy of bicycles and public transport. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract 85, 208–219 (2016)
Ker, I., Ginn, S.: Myths and realities in walkable catchments: the case of walking and transit. Road Transp. Res. 12(2), 69 (2003)
Khan, M., Kockelman, K., Xiong, X.: Models for anticipating non-motorized travel choices, and the role of the built environment. Transp. Policy 35, 117–126 (2014)
Krizek, K., Stonebraker, E.: Bicycling and transit: a marriage unrealized. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2144, 161–167 (2010)
Krizek, K., Stonebraker, E.: Assessing options to enhance bicycle and transit integration. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2217(2217), 162–167 (2011)
Krizek, K., Handy, S., Forsyth, A.: Explaining changes in walking and bicycling behaviour: challenges for transportation research. Environ. Plan. 36, 725–740 (2009)
Lachapelle, Ugo, Pinto, D.: Longer or more frequent walks: examining the relationship between transit use and active transportation in Canada. J. Transp. Health 3(2), 173–180 (2016)
Langlois, M., Lierop, D., Wasfi, R., El-Geneidy, A.: Chasing sustainability: do new transit-oriented development residents adopt more sustainable modes of transportation? Transp. Res. Rec. 2531(1), 83–92 (2015)
Lee, J., Choi, K., Leem, Y.: Bicycle-based TOD as an alternative to overcome the criticisms of the conventional TOD. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 8318(October), 150128125628000 (2015)
Loureiro, N., Gaspar de Matos, M.: Why don’t they walk or cycle? Reflections on active home-school transportation among Portuguese adolescents: the role of environmental perceptions. Urban Plan. Transp. Res. 2(1), 265–273 (2014)
Martens, K.: The bicycle as a feedering mode: experiences from three European countries. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 9(4), 281–294 (2004)
Metrolinx: Green paper #2 mobility hubs: development of a regional transportation plan for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (for consultation), pp. 1–54. Toronto, ON (2008). Retrieved February 14, 2016, from http://www.metrolinx.com/en/regionalplanning/mobilityhubs/Mobility_Hubs_green_paper.pdf
Metrolinx: GO Transit rail parking and station access plan. Prepared by Steer Davies Gleave. (June). Toronto, ON (2013). Retrieved February 14, 2016 from http://www.metrolinx.com/en/regionalplanning/projectevaluation/studies/GO_Transit_Rail_Parking_and_Station_Access_Plan_EN.pdf
Metrolinx: GO rail station access plan. (December), pp. 1–294. Toronto, ON (2016). Retrieved April 04, 2018, from http://www.metrolinx.com/en/regionalplanning/projectevaluation/studies/GO_Rail_Station_Access_Plan_EN.pdf
Metrolinx: 2041 Regional Transportation Plan. Toronto, ON (2018). Retrieved from: http://www.metrolinx.com/en/regionalplanning/rtp/
Metrolinx: Regional express rail. Toronto, ON. Web. Retrieved May 04, 2018, from http://www.metrolinx.com/en/regionalplanning/rer/
Mitra, R., Smith Lea, N., Cantello, I., Hanson., G.: Cycling behaviour and potential in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area. Toronto, ON. Transportation and Land Use Planning Research Laboratory at Ryerson University (2016). Retrieved April 04, 2018, from http://transformlab.ryerson.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Cycling-potential-in-GTHA-final-report-2016.pdf
Morency, C., Trepanier, M., Demers, M.: Walking to transit: an unexpected source of physical activity. Transp. Policy 18(6), 800–806 (2011)
Pan, H., Shen, Q., Xue, S.: Intermodal transfer between bicycles and rail transit in Shanghai, China. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2144(1), 181–188 (2010)
Panter, J.R., Jones, A.P., van Sluijs, E.M.: Environmental determinants of active travel in youth: a review and framework for future research. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-5-34
Park, S., Kang, J., Choi, K.: Finding determinants of transit users’ walking and biking access trips to the station: a pilot case study. J. Civil Eng. 18(2), 651–658 (2014)
Pikora, T., Giles-Corti, B., Bull, F., Jamrozik, K., Donovan, R.: Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling. Soc. Sci. Med. 56, 1693–1703 (2003)
Pucher, J., Buehler, R.: Integrating bicycling and public transport in North America. J. Public Transp. 12, 79–104 (2009)
Pucher, J., Buehler, R., Bassett, D., Dannenberg, A.: Walking and cycling to health: a comparative analysis of city, state, and international data. J. Public Health 100(10), 1986–1992 (2010)
Rastogi, R., Krishna Rao, K.V.: Travel characteristics of commuters accessing transit: case study. J. Transp. Eng. 129(6), 684–694 (2003)
Rietveld, P.: The accessibility of railway stations: the role of the bicycle in the Netherlands. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 5(1), 71–75 (2000)
Rodriguez, D., Joo, J.: The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 9(2), 151–173 (2004)
Ryan, S., Frank, L.: Pedestrian environments and transit ridership. J. Public Transp. 12(1), 39–57 (2009)
Sallis, J., Frank, D., Saelens, B., Kraft, M.: Active transportation and physical activity: opportunities for collaboration on transportation and public health research. Transp. Res. Part A 38, 249–268 (2004)
Scholossberg, M., Brown, N.: Comparing transit-oriented development sites by walkability indicators. Transp. Res. Rec. 1887(1), 34–42 (2004)
Tilahun, N., Thakuriah, P., Li, M., Keita, Y.: Transit use and the work commute: analyzing the role of last mile issues. J. Transp. Geogr. 54(2016), 359–368 (2016)
Toronto Cycling Think & Do Tank: A snapshot of urban cycling in Toronto, pp. 1–8 (2015). Retrieved February 14, 2016 from http://www.torontocycling.org/uploads/1/3/1/3/13138411/a_snapshot_of_urban_cycling_in_toronto_23_june_tl.pdf
Trimet: Trimet Bike Plan. Portland, OR (2016). Retrieved April 04, 2018 from https://trimet.org/bikeplan/
Vu, L.: Cyclists defend using sidewalk where pedestrian was struck and killed. The Toronto Star. Toronto, Ontario (2011). Retrieved July 04, 2017, from https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2011/09/01/cyclists_defend_using_sidewalk_where_pedestrian_was_struck_and_killed.html
Winters, M., Brauer, M., Setton, E.M., Teschke, K.: Built environment influences on healthy transportation choices: bicycling versus driving. J. Urban Health 87(6), 969–993 (2010)
Winters, M., Teschke, K.: Route preferences among adults in the near market for bicycling: findings of the Cycling in Cities study. Am. J. Health Promot 25(1), 40–47 (2010)
Woldeamanuel, M., Kent, A.: Measuring walk access to transit in terms of sidewalk availability, quality and connectivity. J. Urban Plan. Develop. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000296
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chan, K., Farber, S. Factors underlying the connections between active transportation and public transit at commuter rail in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area. Transportation 47, 2157–2178 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10006-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10006-w


