Advertisement

Joint modeling of evacuation departure and travel times in hurricanes

  • Hemant Gehlot
  • Arif M. Sadri
  • Satish V. Ukkusuri
Article

Abstract

Hurricanes are costly natural disasters periodically faced by households in coastal and to some extent, inland areas. A detailed understanding of evacuation behavior is fundamental to the development of efficient emergency plans. Once a household decides to evacuate, a key behavioral issue is the time at which individuals depart to reach their destination. An accurate estimation of evacuation departure time is useful to predict evacuation demand over time and develop effective evacuation strategies. In addition, the time it takes for evacuees to reach their preferred destinations is important. A holistic understanding of the factors that affect travel time is useful to emergency officials in controlling road traffic and helps in preventing adverse conditions like traffic jams. Past studies suggest that departure time and travel time can be related. Hence, an important question arises whether there is an interdependence between evacuation departure time and travel time? Does departing close to the landfall increases the possibility of traveling short distances? Are people more likely to depart early when destined to longer distances? In this study, we present a model to jointly estimate departure and travel times during hurricane evacuations. Empirical results underscore the importance of accommodating an inter-relationship among these dimensions of evacuation behavior. This paper also attempts to empirically investigate the influence of social ties of individuals on joint estimation of evacuation departure and travel times. Survey data from Hurricane Sandy is used for computing empirical results. Results indicate significant role of social networks in addition to other key factors on evacuation departure and travel times during hurricanes.

Keywords

Hurricane evacuation Departure time Travel time Joint modelling Social networks 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to National Science Foundation for the Grant CMMI-1131503 to support the research presented in this paper. A number of questions used for the survey questionnaire were derived from earlier research on the Hurricane Sandy evacuation done by Dr. Hugh Gladwin and Dr. Betty Morrow supported by National Science Foundation Grants CMMI-1322088 and CMMI-1520338. The survey was conducted by Dr. Hugh Gladwin of Florida International University. However, the authors are solely responsible for the findings presented in this study.

Author Contributions

All the authors have contributed to the design of the study, conduct of the research, and writing the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication.

Compliance with ethical standards

Competing financial interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

References

  1. Agresti, A., Agresti, B.F.: Statistical analysis of qualitative variation. Sociol. Methodol. 9, 204–237 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, E.J.: Predicting response to hurricane warnings: a reanalysis of data from four studies. Mass. Emerg. 4(1), 9–24 (1979)Google Scholar
  3. Baker, E.J.: Hurricane evacuation behavior. Int. J. Mass. Emerg. Disasters 9(2), 287–310 (1991)Google Scholar
  4. Baker, E.J.: Hurricane evacuation in the United States. Storms 1, 306–319 (2000)Google Scholar
  5. Bertsekas, D.P., Tsitsiklis, J.N.: Introduction to Probability, vol. 1. Athena Scientific, Belmont (2002)Google Scholar
  6. Bhat, C.R.: A model of post home-arrival activity participation behavior. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 32(6), 387–400 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blake, E.S., Kimberlain, T.B., Berg, R.J., Cangialosi, J.P., Beven Ii, J.L.: Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Sandy. Natl. Hurric. Center 12, 1–10 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. Bytheway, B.: The evacuation of older people: the case of hurricane Katrina. In: Annual Conference of the Royal Geographical Society and Institute of British Geographers, London, vol. 7, p. 2012. http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/Bytheway. Accessed April 2012
  9. Cheng, G., Wilmot, C.G., Baker, E.J.: A destination choice model for hurricane evacuation. In: Proceedings of the 87th Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 13–17 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. Coleman, T., Branch, M.A., Grace, A.: Optimization Toolbox. For Use with MATLAB Users Guide for MATLAB 5, Version 2, Release II (1999)Google Scholar
  11. Dalziell, E., Nicholson, A.: Risk and impact of natural hazards on a road network. J. Transp. Eng. 127(2), 159–166 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dash, N., Gladwin, H.: Evacuation decision making and behavioral responses: individual and household. Nat. Hazards Rev. 8(3), 69–77 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dixit, V., Pande, A., Radwan, E., Abdel-Aty, M.: Understanding the impact of a recent hurricane on mobilization time during a subsequent hurricane. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2041, 49–57 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dixit, V., Wilmot, C., Wolshon, B.: Modeling risk attitudes in evacuation departure choices. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2312, 159–163 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dow, K., Cutter, S.L.: Emerging hurricane evacuation issues: hurricane Floyd and South Carolina. Nat. Hazards Rev. 3(1), 12–18 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drabek, T.E.: Disaster responses within the tourist industry. Int. J. Mass Emerg. Disasters 13(1), 7–23 (1995)Google Scholar
  17. Drabek, T.E., Boggs, K.S.: Families in disaster: reactions and relatives. J. Marriage Family, 30, 443–451 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grajczyk, A., Zöllner, O.: How older people watch television. Gerontology 44(3), 176–181 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Habib, K.M.N., Day, N., Miller, E.J.: An investigation of commuting trip timing and mode choice in the Greater Toronto area: application of a joint discrete-continuous model. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 43(7), 639–653 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Halgin, D.S., Borgatti, S.P.: An introduction to personal network analysis and tie churn statistics using E-NET. Connections 32(1), 37–48 (2012)Google Scholar
  21. Halverson, J.B., Rabenhorst, T.: Hurricane Sandy: the science and impacts of a superstorm. Weatherwise 66(2), 14–23 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hasan, S., Ukkusuri, S.V.: A threshold model of social contagion process for evacuation decision making. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 45(10), 1590–1605 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hasan, S., Ukkusuri, S., Gladwin, H., Murray-Tuite, P.: Behavioral model to understand household-level hurricane evacuation decision making. J. Transp. Eng. 137(5), 341–348 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hasan, S., Mesa-Arango, R., Ukkusuri, S.: A random-parameter hazard-based model to understand household evacuation timing behavior. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 27, 108–116 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huang, S.K., Lindell, M.K., Prater, C.S., Wu, H.C., Siebeneck, L.K.: Household evacuation decision making in response to Hurricane Ike. Nat. Hazards Rev. 13(4), 283–296 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang, S.K., Lindell, M.K., Prater, C.S.: Multistage model of hurricane evacuation decision: empirical study of hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Nat. Hazards Rev. 18(3), 05016,008 (2016a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huang, S.K., Lindell, M.K., Prater, C.S.: Who leaves and who stays? A review and statistical meta-analysis of hurricane evacuation studies. Environ. Behav. 48(8), 991–1029 (2016b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson, M.E.: Multivariate Statistical Simulation: A Guide to Selecting and Generating Continuous Multivariate Distributions. Wiley, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  29. Kaplan, A.M., Haenlein, M.: Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus. Horiz. 53(1), 59–68 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. King, G.: Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, L.F.: Generalized econometric models with selectivity. Econ. J. Econ. Soc. 51, 507–512 (1983)Google Scholar
  32. Lee, B., Timmermans, H.J.: A latent class accelerated hazard model of activity episode durations. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 41(4), 426–447 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindell, M.K., Prater, C.S.: Critical behavioral assumptions in evacuation time estimate analysis for private vehicles: examples from hurricane research and planning. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 133(1), 18–29 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lindell, M.K., Lu, J.C., Prater, C.S.: Household decision making and evacuation in response to Hurricane Lili. Nat. Hazards Rev. 6(4), 171–179 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lindell, M.K., Kang, J.E., Prater, C.S.: The logistics of household hurricane evacuation. Nat. Hazards 58(3), 1093–1109 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Merchant, D.K., Nemhauser, G.L.: A model and an algorithm for the dynamic traffic assignment problems. Transp. Sci. 12(3), 183–199 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mesa-Arango, R., Hasan, S., Ukkusuri, S.V., Murray-Tuite, P.: Household-level model for hurricane evacuation destination type choice using hurricane Ivan data. Nat. Hazards Rev. 14(1), 11–20 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Murray-Tuite, P., Wolshon, B.: Evacuation transportation modeling: an overview of research, development, and practice. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 27, 25–45 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Murray-Tuite, P., Yin, W., Ukkusuri, S., Gladwin, H.: Changes in evacuation decisions between Hurricanes Ivan and Katrina. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2312, 98–107 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. News, N.: Houston Officials Defend Not Ordering Hurricane Harvey Evacuation nbc news. https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/hurricane-harvey/houston-officials-defend-not-ordering-hurricane-harvey-evacuation-n796561. Accessed 11 May 2010 (2017)
  41. Ng, M., Diaz, R., Behr, J.: Departure time choice behavior for hurricane evacuation planning: the case of the understudied medically fragile population. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 77, 215–226 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Noland, R.B., Polak, J.W.: Travel time variability: a review of theoretical and empirical issues. Transp. Rev. 22(1), 39–54 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Páez, A., Habib, K.M.N., Bonin, J.: A joint ordinal-continuous model for episode generation and duration analysis. In: 88th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, vol. 1115 (2009)Google Scholar
  44. Pel, A.J., Bliemer, M.C., Hoogendoorn, S.P.: A review on travel behaviour modelling in dynamic traffic simulation models for evacuations. Transportation 39(1), 97–123 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Perry, R.W., Greene, M.R.: Citizen Response to Volcanic Eruptions: The Case of Mt. St Helens Irvington, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  46. Perry, R.W., Lindell, M.K., Greene, M.R.: Evacuation Planning in Emergency Management. LexingtonBooks, Toronto (1981)Google Scholar
  47. Sadri, A.M., Ukkusuri, S.V., Murray-Tuite, P.: A random parameter ordered probit model to understand the mobilization time during hurricane evacuation. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 32, 21–30 (2013a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sadri, A.M., Ukkusuri, S.V., Murray-Tuite, P., Gladwin, H.: How to evacuate: model for understanding the routing strategies during hurricane evacuation. J. Transp. Eng. 140(1), 61–69 (2013b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sadri, A.M., Ukkusuri, S.V., Murray-Tuite, P., Gladwin, H.: Analysis of hurricane evacuee mode choice behavior. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 48, 37–46 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sadri, A.M., Ukkusuri, S.V., Murray-Tuite, P., Gladwin, H.: Hurricane evacuation route choice of major bridges in Miami Beach, Florida. Transp. Res. Rec. J Transp. Res. Board 2532, 164–173 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sadri, A.M., Ukkusuri, S.V., Gladwin, H.: Modeling joint evacuation decisions in social networks: the case of Hurricane Sandy. J. Choice Model. 25, 50–60 (2017a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sadri, A.M., Ukkusuri, S.V., Gladwin, H.: The role of social networks and information sources on hurricane evacuation decision making. Nat. Hazards Rev. 18(3), 04017,005 (2017b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sadri, A.M., Ukkusuri, S.V., Lee, S., Clawson, R., Aldrich, D., Nelson, M.S., Seipel, J., Kelly, D.: The role of social capital, personal networks, and emergency responders in post-disaster recovery and resilience: a study of rural communities in Indiana. Nat. Hazards 90, 1–30 (2017c)Google Scholar
  54. Sorensen, J.H.: When shall we leave? Factors affecting the timing of evacuation departures. Int. J. Mass Emerg. Disasters 9(2), 153–165 (1991)Google Scholar
  55. Train, K.: Qualitative Choice Analysis: Theory, Econometrics, and an Application to Automobile Demand, vol. 10. MIT Press, Cambridge (1986)Google Scholar
  56. Ukkusuri, S.V., Han, L., Doan, K.: Dynamic user equilibrium with a path based cell transmission model for general traffic networks. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 46(10), 1657–1684 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Washington, S.P., Karlaftis, M.G., Mannering, F.: Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2010)Google Scholar
  58. Wolshon, B.: Planning for the evacuation of new orleans. Inst. Transp. Eng. ITE J. 72(2), 44 (2002)Google Scholar
  59. Wu, H.C., Lindell, M.K., Prater, C.S.: Logistics of hurricane evacuation in Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 15(4), 445–461 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wu, H., Lindell, M., Prater, C., Huang, S.: Logistics of hurricane evacuation in Hurricane Ike. In: Logistics: Perspectives, Approaches and Challenges Nova. Science Hauppauge, pp. 127–140 (2013)Google Scholar
  61. Yin, W., Murray-Tuite, P., Ukkusuri, S.V., Gladwin, H.: An agent-based modeling system for travel demand simulation for hurricane evacuation. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 42, 44–59 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lyles School of Civil EngineeringPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.Moss School of Construction, Infrastructure and SustainabilityFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations