Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nudging people towards more sustainable residential choice decisions: an intervention based on focalism and visualization

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There have been numerous behavior change studies focused on sustainable travel mode choices. In this study we focused on the residential choices that in turn influence travel habits. We designed and implemented two interventions, which we term the “focalism” and “visualization” interventions, based on literature in psychological economics. The focalism intervention was motivated by literature that suggests people make suboptimal choices when looking for a new home. While focus is given to immediately tangible features like the quality of the house, important but less tangible factors like access to transportation are relatively overlooked. The visualization intervention was based on literature showing that providing information at decision points when long-ingrained habits are vulnerable to change, such as at the time of a residential move, can be influential on choices. We designed both interventions to be interactive so that the intervention was “discovered” by respondents rather than presented directly as information. With the focalism intervention, we pointed out differences in how respondents ranked their search priorities for new housing and neighborhoods, versus how they ranked what they reported makes them happy. With the visualization intervention, we explained to respondents that moving is an opportunity to make changes in one’s life, and we prompted them to think through what they desired to change. We evaluated the influence of these interventions on residential housing decisions by surveying respondents about their priorities in residential search before and after the interventions, and by collecting information about their housing, neighborhoods, travel patterns, and reported well-being. The surveys were web-based, with one survey conducted before respondents moved and a second survey conducted afterward. Participants were randomly assigned to a focalism treatment group, a visualization treatment group, or a control group. 380 respondents answered the pre-move survey, and 184 of these answered the post-move survey. In the pre-move survey, we found that both the focalism and visualization interventions resulted in a significant increase in the fraction of people who planned to travel more sustainably relative to the control group. More importantly, we found that after the post-move survey, respondents in the focalism group, but not the visualization group, significantly reduced their travel time to work and increased their cycling, walking, carpooling, carsharing and transit use in comparison to the control group. Meanwhile, those in the visualization treatment group had significantly higher reported well-being after the move; those in the focalism treatment group also improved their stated well-being, though less significantly; and there was no change in the control group. These results suggest that it might be relatively easy to nudge residential choices towards both more sustainable travel and greater well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 7 (5%) out of 140 respondents in the visualization treatment group, 4 (3%) of 140 respondents in the focalism treatment group, and 4 (4%) of 89 respondents in the control group did not complete the full pre-move survey and were excluded from analysis.

References

  • Albarracín, D., Gillette, J.C., Earl, A.N., Glasman, L.R., Durantini, M.R., Ho, M.H.: A test of major assumptions about behavior change: a comprehensive look at the effects of passive and active HIV-prevention interventions since the beginning of the epidemic. Psychol. Bull. 131(6), 856 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F.M., Withey, S.B.: Social Indicators of Well-Being: The Development and Measurement of Perceptual Indicators. Plenum, New York (1976)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S.: Is a residential relocation a good opportunity to change people’s travel behavior? Results from a theory-driven intervention study. Environment and Behavior 38(6), 820–840 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S.: Using a residential relocation as starting point for breaking car use habits. In: Proceedings: Cases in Sustainable Consumption and Production, pp. 365–374 (2007)

  • Ben-Elia, E., Ettema, D.: Carrots versus sticks: rewarding commuters for avoiding the rush-hour—a study of willingness to participate. Transp. Policy 16(2), 68–76 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berke, E.M., Koepsell, T.D., Moudon, A.V., Hoskins, R.E., Larson, E.B.: Association of the built environment with physical activity and obesity in older persons. Am. J. Public Health 97(3), 486–492 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brög, W., Erl, E., Mense, N.: Individualised marketing changing travel behaviour for a better environment. In: Paper Presented at the OECD Workshop: Environmentally Sustainable Transport, vol. 5, pp. 6–12 (2002)

  • Cantril, H.: The Pattern of Human Concerns. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.L., Handy, S.L.: Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: a focus on empirical findings. Transp. Rev. 29(3), 359–395 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, D.G.: Deconstructing development density: quality, quantity and price effects on household travel. Transp. Res. A 42(7), 1009–1031 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, D.G.: Residential choice, the built environment, and non-work travel: evidence using new data and methods. Environ. Plan. A 41(5), 1072–1089 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, D.G.: Are movers irrational? On travel patterns, housing characteristics, social interactions, and happiness before and after a move. In: Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, at Washington, DC (2014). https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1289535

  • Chatman, D.G., A. Broaddus, C. Young, Brill, M.: The Role of Behavioral Economics in Residential Choice: A Pilot Study of Travel Patterns, Housing Characteristics, Social Connections, and Subjective Well-Being. University of California Transportation Center, Berkeley (2013). http://www.uctc.net/research/papers/UCTC-FR-2013-05.pdf

  • Comerford, D.A.: Attenuating focalism in affective forecasts of the commuting experience: Implications for economic decisions and policy making. J Econ. Psychol. 32(5), 691–699 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derzon, J.H., Lipsey, M.W.: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of mass communication for changing substance use knowledge, attitudes and behavior. In: Mass Media and Drug Prevention: Classic and Contemporary Theories and Research, pp. 231–258. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2002)

  • Ewing, R., Cervero, R.: Travel and the built environment. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 76(3), 265–294 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii, S., Taniguchi, A.: Determinants of the effectiveness of travel feedback programs—a review of communicative mobility management measures for changing travel behaviour in Japan. Transp. Policy 13(5), 339–348 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D.T., Wilson, T.D.: Miswanting. In: Forgas, J. (ed.) Thinking and Feeling: The Role of Affect in Social Cognition, pp. 178–197. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, S., Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.: Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 10(6), 427–444 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jariyasunant, J., Carrel, A., Ekambaram, V., Gaker, D.J., Kote, T., Sengupta, R., Walker, J.L.: The Quantified Traveler: Using Personal Travel Data to Promote Sustainable Transport Behavior. University of California Transportation Center, Berkeley (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Merugu, D., Prabhakar, B.S., Rama, N.: An incentive mechanism for decongesting the roads: A pilot program in bangalore. In: Proceedings of ACM NetEcon Workshop (2009)

  • Mitchell, T.R., Thompson, L., Peterson, E., Cronk, R.: Temporal adjustments in the evaluation of events: the “rosy view”. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 33(4), 421–448 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, D., Canny, J.: The persuasive power of human-machine dialogue. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Hasle, P., Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds.) Persuasive technology. PERSUASIVE 2008. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 5033. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, D.A., Rogers, J.: Can housing and accessibility information influence residential location choice and travel behavior? An experimental study. Environ. Plan. 41(3), 534–550 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, D.A., Song, J., Weinstein, M.A.: Can Consumer Information Tighten the Transportation/Land-Use Link? A Simulation Experiment (No. FHWA/CA/OR-2005/03). Mineta Transportation Institute, San José (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G., Ampt, E.: Travel blending: an Australian travel awareness initiative. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 6(2), 95–110 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi, A., Hara, F., Takano, S.E., Kagaya, S.I., Fujii, S.: Psychological and behavioral effects of travel feedback program for travel behavior modification. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1839(1), 182–190 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verplanken, B., Wood, W.: Interventions to break and create consumer habits. J. Public Policy Mark. 25(1), 90–103 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Timothy D., Wheatley, Thalia, Meyers, Jonathan M., Gilbert, Daniel T., Axsom, Danny: Focalism: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78(5), 821–836 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Yanqiao Wang and Anne Spevack of UC Berkeley for their help in data collection and research design. We are grateful to our funding sources: the Berkeley Energy and Climate Institute (BECI) and the National Science Foundation (NSF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Abhinav Bhattacharyya, Caroline Le Floch, Daniel G. Chatman & Joan L. Walker

  2. Tsinghua University, Haidian District, Beijing, China

    Wen Jin

Authors
  1. Abhinav Bhattacharyya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wen Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Caroline Le Floch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniel G. Chatman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joan L. Walker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhinav Bhattacharyya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhattacharyya, A., Jin, W., Le Floch, C. et al. Nudging people towards more sustainable residential choice decisions: an intervention based on focalism and visualization. Transportation 46, 373–393 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9936-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9936-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation