Advertisement

Transportation

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 493–513 | Cite as

Subjective well-being and travel: retrospect and prospect

  • Patricia L. MokhtarianEmail author
Article

Abstract

Although the improvement of well-being is often an implicitly-assumed goal of many, if not most, public policies, the study of subjective well-being (SWB) and travel has so far been confined to a relatively small segment of the travel behavior community. Accordingly, one main purpose of this paper is to introduce a larger share of the community to some fundamental SWB-related concepts and their application in transportation research, with the goal of attracting others to this rewarding area of study. At the same time, however, I also hope to offer some useful reflections to those already working in this field. After discussing some basic issues of terminology and measurement of SWB, I present from the literature four conceptual models relating travel and subjective well-being. Following one of those models, I review five ways in which travel can influence well-being. I conclude by examining some challenges associated with assessing the impacts of travel on well-being, as well as challenges associated with applying what we learn to policy.

Keywords

Quality of life Experiences while traveling Travel-based multitasking Out-of-home activities Positive utility of travel Motility 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on a keynote talk delivered at the 14th triennial conference of the International Association for Travel Behaviour Research, Windsor, UK, July 2015. As a relative newcomer to the study of SWB per se, I am grateful for the insightful suggestions offered by veteran scholars Tommy Gärling and Margareta Friman. Comments by Jonas De Vos and Atiyya Shaw were also very helpful in improving an earlier draft.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

I hereby affirm that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adjenughwure, K.: The monetary value of a pleasant and productive train trip: developing an experimental method for estimating the monetary value of activities performed during travel. Master’s Thesis, Transport, Infrastructure, and Logistics, Delft University of Technology (2017). https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:fec31781-e374-4eb4-9e8a-02064fca0c63?collection=education. Accessed 18 June 2018
  2. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M.: Attitude-behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychol. Bull. 84(5), 888–918 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allardt, E.: Having, loving and being: an alternative to the Swedish model of welfare research. In: Nussbaum, M.C., Sen, A. (eds.) The Quality of Life, pp. 88–94. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer, M., Paleti, R., Konduri, K.C., Pendyala, R.M., Bhat, C.R.: Modeling the connection between activity-travel patterns and subjective well-being. Transp. Res. Rec. 2382, 102–111 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banister, D., Bowling, A.: Quality of life for the elderly: the transport dimension. Transp. Policy 11, 105–115 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumgartner, H., Steenkamp, J.B.E.M.: Response styles in marketing research: a cross-national investigation. J. Mark. Res. 38(May), 143–156 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becker, G.S.: A theory of the allocation of time. Econ. J. 75, 493–517 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bissell, D.: Passenger mobilities: affective atmospheres and the sociality of public transport. Environ. Plan. D 28, 270–289 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brakewood, C., Barbeau, S., Watkins, K.E.: An experiment evaluating the impacts of real-time transit information on bus riders in Tampa, Florida. Transp. Res. A 69, 409–412 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. Carrion, C., Levinson, D.: Value of travel time reliability: a review of current evidence. Transp. Res. A 46, 720–741 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. Conti, G., Pudney, S.: If you’re happy and you know it, clap your hands! Survey design and the analysis of satisfaction. Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Report No. 2008-39, November (2008)Google Scholar
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R.: Validity and reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 175(9), 526–537 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cummins, R.A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., van Vugt, J., Misajon, R.: Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: the Australian unity wellbeing index. Soc. Indic. Res. 64, 159–190 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Currie, G., Delbosc, A.: Modelling the social and psychological impacts of transport disadvantage. Transportation 37(6), 953–966 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis, D.L., Maurstad, A., Dean, S.: My horse is my therapist: the medicalization of pleasure among women equestrians. Med. Anthropol. Q. 29(3), 298–315 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Vos, J., Witlox, F.: Travel satisfaction revisited. On the pivotal role of travel satisfaction in conceptualizing a travel behavior process. Transp. Res. A 106, 364–373 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. De Vos, J., Schwanen, T., Witlox, F.: The road to happiness: From mood during leisure trips and activities to satisfaction with life. Paper No. 17-00826 presented at the 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January (2017)Google Scholar
  18. De Vos, J., Schwanen, T., van Acker, V., Witlox, F.: Travel and subjective well-being: a focus on findings, methods and future research needs. Transp. Rev. 33(4), 421–442 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Plenum Press, New York (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Delbosc, A.: The role of well-being in transport policy. Transp. Policy 23, 25–33 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DeSerpa, A.C.: Microeconomic theory and the valuation of travel time: some clarification. Reg. Urban Econ. 2, 401–410 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener, E.: Subjective well-being. Psychol. Bull. 95(3), 542–575 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Diener, E., Lucas, R.E., Schimmack, U., Helliwell, J.F.: Well-Being for Public Policy. Oxford University Press, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., Biswas-Diener, R.: New well-being measures: short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Soc. Indic. Res. 97(2), 143–156 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ettema, D., Verschuren, L.: The effect of multitasking on the value of travel time savings. Transp. Res. Rec. 2010, 19–25 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Olsson, L.E., Friman, M.: Out-of-home activities, daily travel, and subjective well-being. Transp. Res. A 44, 723–732 (2010)Google Scholar
  27. Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Eriksson, L., Friman, M., Olsson, L.E., Fujii, S.: Satisfaction with travel and subjective well-being: development and test of a measurement tool. Transp. Res. F 14, 167–175 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ettema, D., Friman, M., Gärling, T., Olsson, L.E., Fujii, S.: How in-vehicle activities affect work commuters’ satisfaction with public transport. J. Transp. Geogr. 24, 215–222 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Evans, G.W., Wener, R.E., Phillips, D.: The morning rush hour: predictability and stress. Environ. Behav. 34(4), 521–530 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Frei, C., Mahmassani, H.S., Frei, A.: Making time count: traveler activity engagement on urban transit. Transp. Res. Part A 76, 58–70 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Friman, M., Edvardsson, B., Gärling, T.: Frequency of negative critical incidents and satisfaction with public transport services. I. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 8, 95–104 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gärling, T., Gamble, A.: Life satisfaction and emotional well-being: psychological, economic and social factors, Chapter 25. In: Ranyard, R. (ed.) Economic Psychology, pp. 405–420. Wiley, West Sussex (2018)Google Scholar
  33. Gärling, T., Gärling, A., Loukopoulos, P.: Forecasting psychological consequences of car use reduction: a challenge to an environmental psychology of transportation. Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. 51(1), 90–106 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Geurs, K., Haaijer, R., van Wee, B.: Option value of public transport: methodology for measurement and case study for regional rail links in the Netherlands. Transp. Rev. 26(5), 613–643 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Headey, B., Veenhoven, R., Wearing, A.: Top-down versus bottom-up theories of subjective well-being. Soc. Indic. Res. 24, 81–100 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hennessy, D.A., Wiesenthal, D.L.: Traffic congestion, driver stress, and driver aggression. Aggress. Behav. 25, 409–423 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hensher, D.A.: The Value of Business Travel Time. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1977)Google Scholar
  38. Horowitz, A.: The subjective value of time spent in travel. Transp. Res. 12, 385–393 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huta, V., Ryan, R.M.: Pursuing pleasure or virtue: the differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. J. Happiness Stud. 11, 735–762 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huta, V., Waterman, A.S.: Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. J. Happiness Stud. 15, 1425–1456 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jain, J., Lyons, G.: The gift of travel time. J. Transp. Geogr. 16, 81–89 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jones, P.M.: Mobility and the individual in Western industrial society, Chap. 3. In: Nijkamp, P., Reichman, S. (eds.) Transportation Planning in a Changing World, pp. 29–47. Gower Pub. Company, Hants (1987)Google Scholar
  43. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A.B., Schkade, D.A., Schwarz, N., Stone, A.A.: A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the Day Reconstruction Method. Science 306(5702), 1776–1780 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kaufman, V., Bergman, M.M., Joye, D.: Motility: mobility as capital. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 28(4), 745–756 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Keseru, I., Macharis, C.: Travel-based multitasking: review of the empirical evidence. Transp. Rev. 38(2), 162–183 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kitamura, R., Fujii, S., Pas, E.I.: Time-use data, analysis and modeling: toward the next generation of transportation planning methodologies. Transp. Policy 4(4), 225–235 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lucas, J.L., Heady, R.B.: Flextime commuters and their driver stress, feelings of time urgency, and commute satisfaction. J. Bus. Psychol. 16(4), 565–571 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lyons, G., Chatterjee, K.: A human perspective on the daily commute: costs, benefits and trade-offs. Transp. Rev. 28(2), 181–198 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., Diener, E.: The benefits of frequent positive affect: does happiness lead to success? Psychol. Bull. 131(6), 803–855 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Malokin, A., Circella, G., Mokhtarian, P.L.: Do Multitasking Millennials Value Travel Time Differently? A revealed preference study of Northern California commuters. Available from the authors (2016)Google Scholar
  51. Malokin, A., Circella, G. Mokhtarian, P.L.: How do activities conducted while commuting influence mode choice? Using revealed preference models to inform public transportation advantage and autonomous vehicle scenarios. Under review at Transp. Res. A (2017)Google Scholar
  52. Mansfield, T.J., Gibson, J.M.: Estimating active transportation behaviors to support health impact assessment in the United States. Front. Public Health 4(63), 1–18 (2016)Google Scholar
  53. Maslow, A.H.: A theory of human motivation. Psychol. Rev. 50, 370–396 (1943)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mokhtarian, P.L., Pendyala, R.M.: Travel satisfaction and well-being. In: Friman, M., Ettema, D., Olsson, L.E. (eds.) Quality of Life and Daily Travel. Springer, Berlin (2018)Google Scholar
  55. Mokhtarian, P.L., Salomon, I.: How ‘derived’ is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transp. Res. A 35, 695–719 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mokhtarian, P.L., Salomon, I., Singer, M.E.: What moves us? An interdisciplinary exploration of reasons for traveling. Transp. Rev. 35(3), 250–274 (2015a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mokhtarian, P.L., Papon, F., Goulard, M., Diana, M.: What makes travel pleasant and/or tiring? An investigation based on the French National Travel Survey. Transportation 42(6), 1103–1128 (2015b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mollenkopf, H., Hieber, A., Wahl, H.-W.: Continuity and change in older adults’ perceptions of out-of-home mobility over ten years: a qualitative—quantitative approach. Ageing Soc. 31(5), 782–802 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Musselwhite, C., Haddad, H.: Mobility, accessibility and quality of later life. Qual. Ageing Older Adults 11(1), 25–37 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nordbakke, S., Schwanen, T.: Well-being and mobility: a theoretical framework and literature review focusing on older people. Mobilities 9(1), 104–129 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Olsson, L.E., Gärling, T., Ettema, D., Friman, M., Fujii, S.: Happiness and satisfaction with work commute. Soc. Indic. Res. 111(1), 255–263 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264191655-en. Accessed January 27 2017 (2013)
  63. Ory, D.T., Mokhtarian, P.L.: When is getting there half the fun? Modeling the liking for travel. Transp. Res. A 39(2–3), 97–123 (2005)Google Scholar
  64. Pavot, W., Diener, E.: Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychol. Assess. 5(2), 164–172 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reardon, L., Abdallah, S.: Well-being and transport: taking stock and looking forward. Transp. Rev. 33(6), 634–657 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ritter, M., Graff, K.: Effects of dance/movement therapy: a meta-analysis. Arts Psychother. 23(3), 249–260 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Russell, M., Mokhtarian, P.L.: How real is a reported desire to travel for its own sake? Exploring the ‘teleportation’ concept in travel behaviour research. Transportation 42, 333–345 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52, 141–166 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ryff, C.D.: Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological wellbeing. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 57(6), 1069–1081 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schwanen, T., Wang, D.: Well-being, context, and everyday activities in space and time. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 104(4), 833–851 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schwanen, T., Banister, D., Bowling, A.: Independence and mobility in later life. Geoforum 43(6), 1313–1322 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Seeman, T.: Social ties and health: the benefits of social integration. Ann. Epidemiol. 6(5), 442–451 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Singleton, P.A., Mokhtarian, P.L.: Reviewing concepts, measures, and evidence of the positive utility of travel (in progress)Google Scholar
  74. Stone, A.A., Shiffman, S.S., Devries, M.W.: Ecological momentary assessment. In: Kahneman, D., Diener, E., Schwarz, N. (eds.) Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  75. Susilo, Y.O., Lyons, G., Jain, J., Atkins, S.: Rail passengers’ time use and utility assessment: 2010 findings from Great Britain with multivariate analysis. Transp. Res. Rec. 2323, 99–109 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tang, J., Zhen, F., Cao, J., Mokhtarian, P.L.: How do passengers use travel time? A case study of Shanghai-Nanjing high speed rail. Transportation 45, 451–477 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Thomas, V., Azmitia, M.: Tapping into the app: updating the experience sampling method for the 21st century. Emerg. Adulthood 4(1), 60–67 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tirachini, A., Hensher, D.A., Rose, J.M.: Crowding in public transport systems: effects on users, operation and implications for the estimation of demand. Transp. Res. A 53, 36–52 (2013)Google Scholar
  79. US Department of Health and Human Services: Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Atlanta (1996)Google Scholar
  80. Varghese, V., Jana, A.: Impact of ICT on multitasking during travel and the value of travel time savings: empirical evidences from Mumbai, India. Travel Behav. Soc. 12, 11–12 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Västfjäll, D., Friman, M., Gärling, T., Kleiner, M.: The measurement of core affect: a Swedish self-report measure derived from the affect circumplex. Scand. J. Psychol. 43, 19–31 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Vuk, G., Bowman, J.L., Daly, A., Hess, S.: Impact of family in-home quality time on person travel demand. Transportation 43, 705–724 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wardman, M., Lyons, G.: The digital revolution and worthwhile use of travel time: implications for appraisal and forecasting. Transportation 43, 507–530 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Waterman, A.S., Schwartz, S.J., Zamboanga, B.L., Ravert, R.D., Williams, M.K., Agocha, V.B., Kim, S.Y., Donnellan, M.B.: The questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being: psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. J. Posit. Psychol. 5(1), 41–61 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54(6), 1063–1070 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wener, R.E., Evans, G.W., Phillips, D., Nadler, N.: Running for the 7:45: the effects of public transit improvements on commuter stress. Transportation 30, 203–220 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ziliak, S.T., McCloskey, D.N.: Size matters: the standard error of regressions in the American Economic Review. J. Socio-Econ. 33(5), 527–546 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations