Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of carriers’ ability to transfer toll increases: an empirical analysis of freight agents’ relative market power

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Design of effective freight policies requires a comprehensive understanding of freight agents’ interactions. A critical component of the interaction is the freight agents’ relative market power in determining delivery price, time, and frequency. However, empirical studies of freight agents’ market power are limited. This study explores freight carriers’ market power relative to receivers’ by investigating carriers’ ability to transfer toll increases. A stated preference survey is conducted to understand carriers’ willingness to transfer hypothetical toll increases to receivers. The relationship of various factors and the ability to transfer toll increases is first examined by descriptive statistics. Then, regression models are estimated as a function of respondents’ socioeconomic factors, market conditions, hypothetical toll increases, and other factors. Marginal effects of influential factors are obtained to reveal policy implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson, M., Smith, A., Wikberg, Å., Wheat, P.: Estimating the marginal cost of railway track renewals using corner solution models. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract 46(6), 954–964 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.: A new generalized heterogeneous data model (GHDM) to jointly model mixed types of dependent variables. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 79, 50–77 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow, W., Norton, E.: Choosing between and interpreting the Heckit and two-part models for corner solutions. Health Serv. Outcomes Res. Methodol. 4(1), 5–18 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, H.A.: A discrete–continuous model of households’ vehicle choice and usage, with an application to the effects of residential density. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 42(9), 736–758 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H.: Multilevel Statistical Models. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Habib, K., Day, N., Miller, E.: An investigation of commuting trip timing and mode choice in the Greater Toronto Area: application of a joint discrete-continuous model. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 43(7), 639–653 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W.M.: Discrete/continuous models of consumer demand. J. Econom. Soc. 52(3), 541–561 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, J.W., Leu, R., Rohrer, P.: Ordinary least squares and sample-selection models of health-care demand Monte Carlo comparison. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 5(4), 499–506 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1987.10509618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J.: Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1), 153–161 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D.A., Puckett, S.M.: Refocusing the modelling of freight distribution: development of an economic-based framework to evaluate supply chain behaviour in response to congestion. Transportation 32(6), 573–602 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holguín-Veras, J.: Necessary conditions for off-hour deliveries and the effectiveness of urban freight road pricing dand alternative financial policies in competitive markets. Transportation 42(2), 392–413 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Holguín-Veras, J., Allen, B.: Time of day pricing and its multi-dimensional impacts: a stated preference analysis. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 55, 12–26 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holguín-Veras, J., Polimeni, J., Cruz, B., Xu, N., List, G., Nordstrom, J., Haddock, J.: Off-peak freight deliveries: challenges and stakeholders’ perceptions. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1906, 42–48 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3141/1906-05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holguín-Veras, J., Pérez, N., Cruz, B., Polimeni, J.: Effectiveness of financial incentives for off-peak deliveries to restaurants in Manhattan, New York. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1966, 51–59 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3141/1966-07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holguín-Veras, J., Silas, M., Polimeni, J., Cruz, B.: An investigation on the effectiveness of joint receiver–carrier policies to increase truck traffic in the off-peak hours. Netw. Spatial Econ. 8(4), 327–354 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-006-9011-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holguín-Veras, J., Xu, N., de Jong, G., Maurer, H.: An experimental economics investigation of shipper–carrier interactions in the choice of mode and shipment size in freight transport. Netw. Spatial Econ. 11(3), 509–532 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-009-9107-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holguín-Veras, J., Aros-Vera, F., Browne, M.: Agent interactions and the response of supply chains to pricing and incentives. Econ. Transp. 4(3), 147–155 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2015.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, Y., Prashker, J.: The applicability of non-cooperative game theory in transport analysis. Transportation 33(5), 481–496 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, A.: The concept of monopoly and the measurement of monopoly power. In: Essential Readings in Economics, pp. 55–76. Macmillan Education UK, London (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24002-9_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, S., Yu, S.: On the choice between sample selection and two-part models. J. Econom. 72(1), 197–229 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malchow, M.B., Kanafani, A.: A disaggregate analysis of port selection. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 40(4), 317–337 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W., Duan, N., Rogers, W.: Monte Carlo evidence on the choice between sample selection and two-part models. J. Econom. 35(1), 59–82 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ni, L., Wang, X., Zhang, D.: Impacts of information technology and urbanization on less-than-truckload freight flows in China: An analysis considering spatial effects. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 92, 12–25 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puhani, P.: The Heckman correction for sample selection and its critique. J. Econ. Surv. 14(1), 53–68 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashidi, T.H., Auld, J., Mohammadian, A.K.: A behavioral housing search model: two-stage hazard-based and multinomial logit approach to choice-set formation and location selection. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 46(7), 1097–1107 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soro, W., Wang, X.: Effects of road pricing on freight carrier behaviors analyzed with experimental economics. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2288, 66–73 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3141/2288-08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stathopoulos A, Valeri E, Marcucci E (2012) Stakeholder reactions to urban freight policy innovation. J Transp Geogr 22:34-45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Transportation.: Moving ahead for progress in the 21st century act (“MAP-21”; P.L. 112-141). Retrieved January 19, 2018, from https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/mission/policy/map-21-moving-ahead-progress-21st-century-act (2012)

  • Vance, C., Iovanna, R.: Gender and the automobile: analysis of nonwork service trips. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2013, 54–61 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3141/2013-08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verlinde, S., Macharis, C., Witlox, F.: How to consolidate urban flows of goods without setting up an urban consolidation centre? Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 39, 687–701 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2012.03.140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X.C., Zhang, D.: Truck freight demand elasticity with respect to tolls in New York State. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 101, 51–60 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston, C.: A disaggregate model of the demand for intercity freight transportation. Econom. J. Econom. Soc. 49, 981–1006 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J.: Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2010)

  • Xiao, F., Yang, H.: Three-player game-theoretic model over a freight transportation network. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 15(4), 209–217 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D., Wang, X.: Understanding many-to-many matching relationship and its correlation with joint response. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 108, 249–260 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRB.2017.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., Wang, X.: Decision-making process for developing urban freight consolidation centers: analysis with experimental economics. J. Transp. Eng. 140(2), 4013003 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000632

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research reported in this paper was supported by the University Transportation Research Center Region II as part of the Project “Assessing Behavior Changes under the Influence of Travel Demand Management Strategies.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaokun Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, D., Wang, X., Holguín-Veras, J. et al. Investigation of carriers’ ability to transfer toll increases: an empirical analysis of freight agents’ relative market power. Transportation 46, 2291–2308 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9930-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9930-3

Keywords

Navigation