Abstract
Design of effective freight policies requires a comprehensive understanding of freight agents’ interactions. A critical component of the interaction is the freight agents’ relative market power in determining delivery price, time, and frequency. However, empirical studies of freight agents’ market power are limited. This study explores freight carriers’ market power relative to receivers’ by investigating carriers’ ability to transfer toll increases. A stated preference survey is conducted to understand carriers’ willingness to transfer hypothetical toll increases to receivers. The relationship of various factors and the ability to transfer toll increases is first examined by descriptive statistics. Then, regression models are estimated as a function of respondents’ socioeconomic factors, market conditions, hypothetical toll increases, and other factors. Marginal effects of influential factors are obtained to reveal policy implications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson, M., Smith, A., Wikberg, Å., Wheat, P.: Estimating the marginal cost of railway track renewals using corner solution models. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract 46(6), 954–964 (2012)
Bhat, C.: A new generalized heterogeneous data model (GHDM) to jointly model mixed types of dependent variables. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 79, 50–77 (2015)
Dow, W., Norton, E.: Choosing between and interpreting the Heckit and two-part models for corner solutions. Health Serv. Outcomes Res. Methodol. 4(1), 5–18 (2003)
Fang, H.A.: A discrete–continuous model of households’ vehicle choice and usage, with an application to the effects of residential density. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 42(9), 736–758 (2008)
Goldstein, H.: Multilevel Statistical Models. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)
Habib, K., Day, N., Miller, E.: An investigation of commuting trip timing and mode choice in the Greater Toronto Area: application of a joint discrete-continuous model. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 43(7), 639–653 (2009)
Hanemann, W.M.: Discrete/continuous models of consumer demand. J. Econom. Soc. 52(3), 541–561 (1984)
Hay, J.W., Leu, R., Rohrer, P.: Ordinary least squares and sample-selection models of health-care demand Monte Carlo comparison. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 5(4), 499–506 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1987.10509618
Heckman, J.: Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1), 153–161 (1979)
Hensher, D.A., Puckett, S.M.: Refocusing the modelling of freight distribution: development of an economic-based framework to evaluate supply chain behaviour in response to congestion. Transportation 32(6), 573–602 (2005)
Holguín-Veras, J.: Necessary conditions for off-hour deliveries and the effectiveness of urban freight road pricing dand alternative financial policies in competitive markets. Transportation 42(2), 392–413 (2008)
Holguín-Veras, J., Allen, B.: Time of day pricing and its multi-dimensional impacts: a stated preference analysis. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 55, 12–26 (2013)
Holguín-Veras, J., Polimeni, J., Cruz, B., Xu, N., List, G., Nordstrom, J., Haddock, J.: Off-peak freight deliveries: challenges and stakeholders’ perceptions. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1906, 42–48 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3141/1906-05
Holguín-Veras, J., Pérez, N., Cruz, B., Polimeni, J.: Effectiveness of financial incentives for off-peak deliveries to restaurants in Manhattan, New York. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1966, 51–59 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3141/1966-07
Holguín-Veras, J., Silas, M., Polimeni, J., Cruz, B.: An investigation on the effectiveness of joint receiver–carrier policies to increase truck traffic in the off-peak hours. Netw. Spatial Econ. 8(4), 327–354 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-006-9011-6
Holguín-Veras, J., Xu, N., de Jong, G., Maurer, H.: An experimental economics investigation of shipper–carrier interactions in the choice of mode and shipment size in freight transport. Netw. Spatial Econ. 11(3), 509–532 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-009-9107-x
Holguín-Veras, J., Aros-Vera, F., Browne, M.: Agent interactions and the response of supply chains to pricing and incentives. Econ. Transp. 4(3), 147–155 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2015.04.002
Hollander, Y., Prashker, J.: The applicability of non-cooperative game theory in transport analysis. Transportation 33(5), 481–496 (2006)
Lerner, A.: The concept of monopoly and the measurement of monopoly power. In: Essential Readings in Economics, pp. 55–76. Macmillan Education UK, London (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24002-9_4
Leung, S., Yu, S.: On the choice between sample selection and two-part models. J. Econom. 72(1), 197–229 (1996)
Malchow, M.B., Kanafani, A.: A disaggregate analysis of port selection. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 40(4), 317–337 (2004)
Manning, W., Duan, N., Rogers, W.: Monte Carlo evidence on the choice between sample selection and two-part models. J. Econom. 35(1), 59–82 (1987)
Ni, L., Wang, X., Zhang, D.: Impacts of information technology and urbanization on less-than-truckload freight flows in China: An analysis considering spatial effects. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 92, 12–25 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.030
Puhani, P.: The Heckman correction for sample selection and its critique. J. Econ. Surv. 14(1), 53–68 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00104
Rashidi, T.H., Auld, J., Mohammadian, A.K.: A behavioral housing search model: two-stage hazard-based and multinomial logit approach to choice-set formation and location selection. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 46(7), 1097–1107 (2012)
Soro, W., Wang, X.: Effects of road pricing on freight carrier behaviors analyzed with experimental economics. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2288, 66–73 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3141/2288-08
Stathopoulos A, Valeri E, Marcucci E (2012) Stakeholder reactions to urban freight policy innovation. J Transp Geogr 22:34-45
U.S. Department of Transportation.: Moving ahead for progress in the 21st century act (“MAP-21”; P.L. 112-141). Retrieved January 19, 2018, from https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/mission/policy/map-21-moving-ahead-progress-21st-century-act (2012)
Vance, C., Iovanna, R.: Gender and the automobile: analysis of nonwork service trips. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2013, 54–61 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3141/2013-08
Verlinde, S., Macharis, C., Witlox, F.: How to consolidate urban flows of goods without setting up an urban consolidation centre? Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 39, 687–701 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2012.03.140
Wang, X.C., Zhang, D.: Truck freight demand elasticity with respect to tolls in New York State. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 101, 51–60 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.035
Winston, C.: A disaggregate model of the demand for intercity freight transportation. Econom. J. Econom. Soc. 49, 981–1006 (1981)
Wooldridge, J.: Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2010)
Xiao, F., Yang, H.: Three-player game-theoretic model over a freight transportation network. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 15(4), 209–217 (2007)
Zhang, D., Wang, X.: Understanding many-to-many matching relationship and its correlation with joint response. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 108, 249–260 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRB.2017.12.011
Zhou, Y., Wang, X.: Decision-making process for developing urban freight consolidation centers: analysis with experimental economics. J. Transp. Eng. 140(2), 4013003 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000632
Acknowledgements
The research reported in this paper was supported by the University Transportation Research Center Region II as part of the Project “Assessing Behavior Changes under the Influence of Travel Demand Management Strategies.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, D., Wang, X., Holguín-Veras, J. et al. Investigation of carriers’ ability to transfer toll increases: an empirical analysis of freight agents’ relative market power. Transportation 46, 2291–2308 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9930-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9930-3