Disparities in access to opportunities across neighborhoods types: a case study from the Los Angeles region

Article
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

This study investigates the disparities in access to various types of opportunities in ethnic neighborhoods, as compared to wealthy white neighborhoods (the reference). Focusing on the heterogeneity within ethnic neighborhoods, I distinguish between different types of neighborhoods based on their racial/ethnic makeup and median household income. The Los Angeles region provides an interesting empirical setting because of its racial diversity and its auto-centric spatial structure. The results show that the various types of ethnic neighborhoods differ not only in spatial patterns within the region but also in terms of relative access to opportunities. Nevertheless, I find that all types of the low-income ethnic neighborhoods have higher levels of access to jobs and non-work opportunities, except for access to parks/open spaces, than do the reference neighborhoods. This holds true regardless of accessibility measures and travel modes. However, the relative access to opportunities for middle-to-high-income ethnic neighborhoods varies by accessibility measure. Considering that each accessibility measure has its own set of meanings and planning implications, diverse measures should be taken into account for policy interventions. The present study also adds further evidence of modal disparities, which are much greater than spatial disparities, in access to opportunities.

Keywords

Accessibility Neighborhood disparities Modal disparities Ethnic neighborhoods Non-work opportunities 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Dr. Genevieve Giuliano for her constructive feedback and support. Valuable comments from Dr. Marlon Boarnet and Dr. Manuel Pastor are very much appreciated. The author would like to thank Dr. Horner and four anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions. Thanks to the Southern California Association of Governments for sharing data. The author also thanks participants at the 2016 ACSP annual meeting and the 2017 AAG annual meeting for helpful comments. All errors and omissions are the responsibility of the author.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Blumenberg, E.: En-gendering effective planning: spatial mismatch, low-income women, and transportation policy. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 70(3), 269–281 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boarnet, M.G., Giuliano, G., Hou, Y., Shin, E.J.: Transportation and Access to Employment in City Heights. USC Center for Social Innovation. https://socialinnovation.usc.edu/files/2016/11/Baornet-and-Giuliano-Final-Reportformatted-.pdf (2014). Accessed 1 June 2017
  3. Boarnet, M.G., Giuliano, G., Hou, Y., Shin, E.J.: First/last mile transit access as an equity planning issue. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 103, 296–310 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Church, A., Frost, M., Sullivan, K.: Transport and social exclusion in London. Transp. Policy 7(3), 195–205 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooke, Thomas J.: City-Suburb differences in African American male labor market achievement. Prof. Geogr. 48(4), 458–467 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Covington, K.L.: Spatial mismatch of the poor: an explanation of recent declines in job isolation. J. Urb. Aff. 31(5), 559–587 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cutler, D.M., Glaeser, E.L.: Are ghettos good or bad? Q. J. Econ. 112(3), 827–872 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeRango, K.: Can commutes be used to test the spatial mismatch hypothesis? Urb. Stud. 38(9), 1521–1529 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Easley, J.: Spatial mismatch beyond black and white: levels and determinants of job access among Asian and Hispanic subpopulations. Urb. Stud. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017696254
  10. Fan, Y.: The planners’ war against spatial mismatch lessons learned and ways forward. J. Plan. Lit. 27(2), 153–169 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fan, Y., Guthrie, A., Levinson, D.: Impact of light-rail implementation on labor market accessibility: a transportation equity perspective. J. Transp. Land Use 5(3), 28–39 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frey, W.H.: The New Metro Minority Map: Regional Shifts in Hispanics, Asians, and Blacks from Census 2010. Brookings Institute, Washington (2011)Google Scholar
  13. Giuliano, G.: Travel, location and race/ethnicity. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 37(4), 351–372 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gottlieb, P.D., Lentnek, B.: Spatial mismatch is not always a central-city problem: an analysis of commuting behaviour in Cleveland, Ohio, and its suburbs. Urb. Stud. 38(7), 1161–1186 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grengs, J.: Job accessibility and the modal mismatch in Detroit. J. Transp. Geogr. 18(1), 42–54 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grengs, J.: Equity and the social distribution of job accessibility in Detroit. Environ. Plan. 39(5), 785–800 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grengs, J.: Nonwork accessibility as a social equity indicator. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 9(1), 1–14 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hansen, W.G.: How accessibility shapes land use. J. Am. Inst. Plan. 25(2), 73–76 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hess, D.B.: Access to employment for adults in poverty in the Buffalo-Niagara region. Urb. Stud. 42(7), 1177–1200 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hilmers, A., Hilmers, D.C., Dave, J.: Neighborhood disparities in access to healthy foods and their effects on environmental justice. Am. J. Public Health 102(9), 1644–1654 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holzer, H.J.: The spatial mismatch hypothesis: What has the evidence shown? Urb. Stud. 28(1), 105–122 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holzer, H.J., Ihlanfeldt, K.R., Sjoquist, D.L.: Work, search, and travel among white and black youth. J. Urb. Econ. 35(3), 320–345 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Horner, M.W.: Exploring metropolitan accessibility and urban structure. Urb. Geogr. 25(3), 264–284 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Horner, M.W., Duncan, M.D., Wood, B.S., Valdez-Torres, Y., Stansbury, C.: Do aging populations have differential accessibility to activities? Analyzing the spatial structure of social, professional, and business opportunities. Trav. Behav. Soc. 2(3), 182–191 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Horner, M.W., Mefford, J.N.: Investigating urban spatial mismatch using job–housing indicators to model home–work separation. Environ. Plan. A 39(6), 1420–1440 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Horner, M.W., Schleith, D.: Analyzing temporal changes in land-use–transportation relationships: a LEHD-based approach. Appl. Geogr. 35(1), 491–498 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ihlanfeldt, K.R., Sjoquist, D.L.: The spatial mismatch hypothesis: a review of recent studies and their implications for welfare reform. Hous. Policy Debate 9(4), 849–892 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Joassart-Marcelli, P.: Leveling the playing field? Urban disparities in funding for local parks and recreation in the Los Angeles region. Environ. Plan. A 42(5), 1174–1192 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones, A.P., Bentham, G., Horwell, C.: Health service accessibility and deaths from asthma. Int. J. Epidemiol. 28(1), 101–105 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kain, J.F.: Housing segregation, negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization. Q. J. Econ. 82(2), 175–197 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kain, J.F.: The spatial mismatch hypothesis: three decades later. Hous. Policy Debate 3(2), 371–460 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kawabata, M.: Job access and employment among low-skilled autoless workers in US metropolitan areas. Environ. Plan. A 35(9), 1651–1668 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kawabata, M., Shen, Q.: Commuting inequality between cars and public transit: the case of the San Francisco Bay Area, 1990–2000. Urb. Stud. 44(9), 1759–1780 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kenyon, S.: Reshaping patterns of mobility and exclusion? The impact of virtual mobility upon accessibility, mobility and social exclusion. In: Sheller, M., Urry, J. (eds.) Mobile Technologies of the City, pp. 102–120. Routledge, London (2006)Google Scholar
  35. Li, W.: Anatomy of a new ethnic settlement: the Chinese ethnoburb in Los Angeles. Urb. Stud. 35(3), 479–501 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li, W.: Building ethnoburbia: the emergence and manifestation of the Chinese ethnoburb in Los Angeles’ San Gabriel Valley. J. Asian Am. Stud. 2(1), 1–28 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu, C.Y., Painter, G.: Travel behavior among Latino immigrants: the role of ethnic concentration and ethnic employment. J. Plann. Educ. Res. 32(1), 62–80 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Logan, J.R., Alba, R.D.: Locational returns to human capital: minority access to suburban community resources. Demography 30(2), 243–268 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Logan, J.R., Stults, B.J.: The Persistence of Segregation in the Metropolis: New Findings from the 2010 Census. Russell Sage Foundation and Brown University, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  40. Logan, J.R., Zhang, W., Alba, R.D.: Immigrant enclaves and ethnic communities in New York and Los Angeles. Am. Sociol. Rev. 67(2), 299–322 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lucas, K., Wee, B., Maat, K.: A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches. Transportation 43(3), 473–490 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Macintyre, S.: Deprivation amplification revisited; or, is it always true that poorer places have poorer access to resources for healthy diets and physical activity? Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 4, 32 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Massey, D.S., Denton, N.A.: Trends in the residential segregation of Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians: 1970-1980. Am. Sociol. Rev. 52(6), 802–825 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Morland, K., Roux, A.V.D., Wing, S.: Supermarkets, other food stores, and obesity: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Am. J. Prev. Med. 30(4), 333–339 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nguyen, M.T.: The self-segregation of Asians and Hispanics: the role of assimilation and racial prejudice. Race Soc. 7(2), 131–151 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Owen, A., Levinson, D.M.: Modeling the commute mode share of transit using continuous accessibility to jobs. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 74, 110–122 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Painter, G., Liu, C.Y., Zhuang, D.: Immigrants and the spatial mismatch hypothesis: employment outcomes among immigrant youth in Los Angeles. Urb. Stud. 44(13), 2627–2649 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Peach, C.: Good segregation, bad segregation. Plan. Perspect. 11(4), 379–398 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Powell, L.M., Slater, S., Mirtcheva, D., Bao, Y., Chaloupka, F.J.: Food store availability and neighborhood characteristics in the United States. Prev. Med. 44(3), 189–195 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reardon, S.F., Farrell, C.R., Matthews, S.A., O’Sullivan, D., Bischoff, K., Firebaugh, G.: Race and space in the 1990s: changes in the geographic scale of racial residential segregation, 1990–2000. Soc. Sci. Res. 38(1), 55–70 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Richardson, A.S., Boone-Heinonen, J., Popkin, B.M., Gordon-Larsen, P.: Are neighbourhood food resources distributed inequitably by income and race in the USA? Epidemiological findings across the urban spectrum. BMJ Open 2(2), e000698 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rose, D., Richards, R.: Food store access and household fruit and vegetable use among participants in the US Food Stamp Program. Public Health Nutr. 7(8), 1081–1088 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sanchez, T.W., Shen, Q., Peng, Z.R.: Transit mobility, jobs access and low-income labour participation in US metropolitan areas. Urb. Stud. 41(7), 1313–1331 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schleith, D., Horner, M.: Commuting, job clusters, and travel burdens: analysis of spatially and socioeconomically disaggregated longitudinal employer-household dynamics data. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 2452, 19–27 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schuetz, J., Giuliano, G., Shin, E. J.: Does zoning help or hinder transit-oriented (re) development? Urb. Stud. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017700575
  56. Scott, D., Horner, M.: Examining the role of urban form in shaping people’s accessibility to opportunities: an exploratory spatial data analysis. J. Transp. Land Use 1(2), 89–119 (2008)Google Scholar
  57. Shen, Q.: Location characteristics of inner-city neighborhoods and employment accessibility of low-wage workers. Environ. Plan. 25(3), 345–365 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shen, Q.: A spatial analysis of job openings and access in a US metropolitan area. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 67(1), 53–68 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shin, E.J.: Ethnic neighborhoods, social networks, and inter-household carpooling: a comparison across ethnic minority groups. J. Transp. Geogr. 59, 14–26 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smoyer-Tomic, K.E., Spence, J.C., Amrhein, C.: Food deserts in the prairies? Supermarket accessibility and neighborhood need in Edmonton, Canada. Prof. Geogr. 58(3), 307–326 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stoll, M.A., Covington, K.: Explaining racial/ethnic gaps in spatial mismatch in the US: the primacy of racial segregation. Urb. Stud. 49(11), 2501–2521 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Taylor, B.D., Ong, P.M.: Spatial mismatch or automobile mismatch? An examination of race, residence and commuting in US metropolitan areas. Urb. Stud. 32(9), 1453–1473 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Timberlake, J.M., Howell, A.J., Staight, A.J.: Trends in the suburbanization of racial/ethnic groups in US metropolitan areas, 1970 to 2000. Urb. Aff. Rev. 47(2), 218–255 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang, F., McLafferty, S., Escamilla, V., Luo, L.: Late-stage breast cancer diagnosis and health care access in Illinois. Prof. Geogr. 60(1), 54–69 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wen, M., Lauderdale, D.S., Kandula, N.R.: Ethnic neighborhoods in multi-ethnic America, 1990–2000: resurgent ethnicity in the ethnoburbs? Soc. Forces 88(1), 425–460 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wolch, J., Wilson, J.P., Fehrenbach, J.: Parks and park funding in Los Angeles: an equity-mapping analysis. Urb. Geogr. 26(1), 4–35 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhou, M.: Chinatown: The Socioeconomic Potential of an Urban Enclave. Temple University Press, Philadelphia (1992)Google Scholar
  68. Zhu, P., Liu, C., Painter, G.: Does residence in an ethnic community help immigrants in a recession? Reg. Sci. Urb. Econ. 47(1), 112–127 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Urban Studies, Division of Social SciencesYale-NUS CollegeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations