Skip to main content

Impacts of the urban parking system on cruising traffic and policy development: the case of Zurich downtown area, Switzerland

Abstract

Cruising-for-parking is a common phenomenon in many urban areas worldwide. Properly understanding and mitigating cruising can reduce travel times, alleviate traffic congestion, and improve the local environment. Most of the existing studies estimating cruising traffic are based on empirical data and/or detailed simulation models. Both approaches have large data requirements, and the detailed simulation models tend to have high computational costs. In this paper, we present a case study of an area within the city of Zurich, Switzerland, using a recently proposed macroscopic model to analyze the current conditions of cruising-for-parking. The results are validated with empirical data. The macroscopic model, inspired by a bottleneck model, reproduces the dynamics of both, the parking and the traffic system, as well as their interactions. As such, it calculates the delays encountered by drivers while waiting for parking, and the impact of such delays on the overall traffic stream, which involves not only the searching traffic but also the through traffic. It is shown that the macroscopic parking model could, additionally, incorporate the data generated by agent-based models, cooperatively producing valid and trustworthy results of cruising estimations, while requiring comparatively few data inputs and relatively low computational costs. The study shows that in a small area of Zurich (0.28 km2) with a demand of 2687 trips in a typical working day, cruising-for-parking generates 83 h of additional travel time and 1038 km of additional travel distance. Surprisingly, the worst conditions are observed at noon, corresponding to a maximum number of 30 searchers with an average search time of 13 min. Additionally, four types of parking policies are discussed, and their potential impacts on traffic performance are either quantitatively or qualitatively illustrated. The four policies include: the adjustment of the parking supply, the adjustment of parking time controls, the adoption of dynamic parking charges, and the provision of parking forecasts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

(Reproduced with permission from Gemeinderat Zürich 2015)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

References

  1. Anderson, S.P., de Palma, A.: The economics of pricing parking. J. Urban Econ. 55(1), 1–20 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnott, R., Inci, E.: An integrated model of downtown parking and traffic congestion. J. Urban Econ. 60(3), 418–442 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnott, R., Inci, E.: The stability of downtown parking and traffic congestion. J. Urban Econ. 68(3), 260–276 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arnott, R., Rowse, J.: Modeling parking. J. Urban Econ. 124, 97–124 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arnott, R., Rowse, J.: Downtown parking in auto city. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 39(1), 1–14 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arnott, R., de Palma, A., Lindsey, R.: A temporal and spatial equilibrium analysis of commuter parking. J Public Econ 45(3), 301–335 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arnott, R., de Palma, A., Lindsey, R.: A structural model of peak-period congestion: a traffic bottleneck with elastic demand. Am. Econ. Rev. 83(1), 161–179 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Axhausen, K.W., Polak, J.W.: Choice of parking: stated preference approach. Transportation 18(1), 59–81 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Belloche, S.: On-street parking search time modelling and validation with survey-based data. Transp. Res. Procedia 6, 313–324 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Benenson, I., Martens, K., Birfir, S.: PARKAGENT: an agent-based model of parking in the city. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 32(6), 431–439 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bodenbender, A.: A CGE model of parking in Zürich: Implementation and policy test (MSc thesis). IVT, ETH Zürich, Zürich (2013)

  12. Boyles, S.D., Tang, S., Unnikrishnan, A.: Parking search equilibrium on a network. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 81, 390–409 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cao, J.: Effects of parking on urban traffic performance. Doctoral Dissertation, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zürich), Zurich, No. 23527 (2016)

  14. Cao, J., Menendez, M.: Methodology to evaluate cost and accuracy of parking patrol surveys. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2359, 1–9 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cao, J., Menendez, M.: Generalized effects of on-street parking maneuvers on the performance of nearby signalized intersections. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2483, 30–38 (2015a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cao, J., Menendez, M.: System dynamics of urban traffic based on its parking-related-states. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 81, 718–736 (2015b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cao, J., Menendez, M., Nikias, V.: The effects of on-street parking on the service rate of nearby intersections. J. Adv. Transp. 50(4), 406–420 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cassidy, M.J., Bertini, R.L.: Some traffic features at freeway bottlenecks. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 33B, 25–42 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/2009/08/24/best-paid-cities-lifestyle-real-estate-worlds-income-salary.html (2009)

  20. Gallo, M., D’Acierno, L., Montella, B.: A multilayer model to simulate cruising for parking in urban areas. Transp. Policy 18(5), 735–744 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ge, Q., Menendez, M.: An efficient sensitivity analysis approach for computationally expensive microscopic traffic simulation models. Int. J. Transp. 2(2), 49–64 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ge, Q., Menendez, M.: Extending Morris method for qualitative global sensitivity analysis of models with dependent inputs. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 162(2017), 28–39 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ge, Q., Ciuffo, B., Menendez, M.: Combining screening and metamodel-based methods: an efficient sequential approach for the sensitivity analysis of model outputs. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 134(2015), 334–344 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Glazer, A., Niskanen, E.: Parking fees and congestion. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 22(1), 123–132 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Haddad, J., Geroliminis, N.: On the stability of traffic perimeter control in two-region urban cities. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 46(9), 1159–1176 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Haddad, J., Ramezani, M., Geroliminis, N.: Cooperative traffic control of a mixed network with two urban regions and a freeway. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 54, 17–36 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Horni, A., Montini, L., Waraich, R.A., Axhausen, K.W.: An agent-based cellular automaton cruising-for-parking simulation. Transp. Lett. 5(4), 167–175 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Leurent, F., Boujnah, H.: A user equilibrium, traffic assignment model of network route and parking lot choice, with search circuits and cruising flows. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 47, 28–46 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Levy, N., Martens, K., Benenson, I.: Exploring cruising using agent-based and analytical models of parking. Transp. A Transp. Sci. 9(9), 773–797 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Litman, T.: Parking taxes: evaluating options and impacts. In: Transportation, vol. 19 (2010)

  31. Loder, A., Ambühl, L., Menendez, M., Axhausen, K.W.: Empirics of multi-modal traffic networks: using the 3D macroscopic fundamental diagram. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 82, 88–101 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Montini, L., Horni, A., Rieser-Schussler, N.: Searching for parking in GPS data. Eidgenssische Technische Hochschule Zurich, IVT, Institute for Transport Planning and Systems (2012)

  33. Ortigosa, J., Menendez, M., Tapia, H.: Study on the number and location of measurement points for an MFD perimeter control scheme: a case study of Zurich. EURO J. Transp. Logist. 3(3–4), 245–266 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Parkleitsystem Stadt Zürich (2016). http://www.pls-zh.ch/. Accessed May 2016

  35. Pierce, G., Shoup, D.: SFpark: parking by demand. Access 43(Fall), 20–28 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Qian, Z.S., Xiao, F.E., Zhang, H.M.: Managing morning commute traffic with parking. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 46(7), 894–916 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shoup, D.C.: The High Cost of Free Parking. Planners Press, American Planning Association, Chicago (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Shoup, D.C.: Cruising for parking. Transp. Policy 13(6), 479–486 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Stadt-Zurich (2016). www.stadt-zuerich.ch/parkkarten. Accessed May 2016

  40. Timeanddata (2016). https://www.timeanddate.com/sun/switzerland/zurich. Accessed May 2016

  41. Van Ommeren, J.N., Wentink, D., Rietveld, P.: Empirical evidence on cruising for parking. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 46(1), 123–130 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Vickrey, W.S.: Congestion theory and transport investment. Am. Econ. Rev. (Pap. Proc.) 59(2), 251–261 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Waraich, R.A., Axhausen, K.W.: Agent-based parking choice model. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2319(1), 39–46 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Waraich, R.A., Dobler, C., Axhausen, K.W.: (2012) Modelling parking search behaviour with an agent-based approach. In: 13th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, pp. 1–12

  45. Waraich, R.A., Dobler, C., Weis, C., Axhausen, K.W.: (2013). Optimizing parking prices using agent-based approach. In: 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board

  46. Washbrook, K., Haider, W., Jaccard, M.: Estimating commuter mode choice: a discrete choice analysis of the impact of road pricing and parking charges. Transportation 33(6), 621–639 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Weinberger, R., Kaehny, J., Rufo, M.: U.S. Parking Policies: An Overview of Management Strategies Institute for Transportation and Development Policy. Institution for Transportation and Development Policy, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Weis, C., Vrtic, M., Widmer, P., Axhausen, K.W.: (2012). Influence of parking on location and mode choice: a stated choice survey. In: Vorgetragen bei 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

  49. Yang, H., Liu, W., Wang, X., Zhang, X.: On the morning commute problem with bottleneck congestion and parking space constraints. Transp. Res. Part B 58(4), 106–118 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Yang, K., Zheng, N., Menendez, M.: Multi-scale perimeter control approach in a connected-vehicle environment. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.08.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang, X.N., Yang, H., Huang, H.J.: Improving travel efficiency by parking permits distribution and trading. Transp. Res. Part B 45(7), 1018–1034 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Zürich, G.: Verordnung über private Fahrzeugabstellplätze (Parkplatzverordnung). https://www.stadt-zuerich.ch/portal/de/index/politik_u_recht/amtliche_sammlung/inhaltsverzeichnis/7/741/500/500-verordnung-ueber-private-fahrzeugabstellplaetze–parkplatzve.html (2015)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by ETH Research Grant ETH-40 14-1.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JC and MM designed the research; RW provided the input data from MATSim; JC performed the research and wrote the paper in collaboration with MM; all authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica Menendez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, J., Menendez, M. & Waraich, R. Impacts of the urban parking system on cruising traffic and policy development: the case of Zurich downtown area, Switzerland. Transportation 46, 883–908 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9832-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cruising-for-parking
  • Parking management and policy
  • Traffic operation
  • Macroscopic parking model
  • Parking search time
  • Number of parking searchers
  • Probability of finding parking