, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 451–477 | Cite as

How do passengers use travel time? A case study of Shanghai–Nanjing high speed rail

  • Jia Tang
  • Feng Zhen
  • Jason Cao
  • Patricia L. Mokhtarian


Traditional travel behavior theory regards travel time as a waste. Recent studies suggest that it carries a positive utility, among other reasons for the benefit of the activities conducted while traveling. However, most studies of travel time use have focused on conventional trains in developed countries. Few have systematically examined the permeation of information and communication technology (ICT) into travel time use and the correlates of activity participation in developing countries, particularly on high speed rail (HSR). Using a survey conducted on the Shanghai–Nanjing corridor (N = 901), this study examines how HSR passengers use their travel time and explores the correlates of the different types of activities of business and non-business travelers, respectively, through multivariate probit models. We found that 96% of the respondents use ICT during their HSR journey and that most passengers spend some of their travel time on work-related activities. Moreover, items carried and advance planning as well as work-related travel attributes contribute significantly to activity participation. However, the factors affecting time use of business and non-business travelers differ. HSR service design should facilitate passenger engagement in various activities and improvement of their travel experience. A stable internet connection, adequate power sockets, and a noise-free environment will promote both work and leisure activities on the HSR.


Time use Quality of service Train ICT Travel satisfaction HSR 



The study was funded by the Nature Science Foundation of China (#41571146; #41371149; #413001166).


  1. Blumen, O.: Dissonance in women’s commuting? The experience of exurban employed mothers in Israel. Urban Stud. 37(4), 731–748 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, B., O’Hara, K.: Place as a practical concern of mobile workers. Environ. Plan. A 35(9), 1565–1587 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC): China Statistical Report on Internet Development. (2017)
  4. China Railway: Examing HSR Development Based on Ridership Data. (2016)
  5. China Railway: The Operation Mileage of High Speed Rail in China has Already Exceeded 22,000 km. (2017)
  6. Circella, G., Mokhtarian, P.L., Poff, L.K.: A conceptual typology of multitasking behavior and polychronicity preferences. Electron. Int. J. Time Use Res. 9(1), 59–107 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ettema, D., Alexander, B., Hagen, M.V.: Spending time on the move: a comparison between travel modes. In: Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA (2010)Google Scholar
  8. Ettema, D., Friman, M., Gärling, T., Olsson, L.E., Fujii, S.: How in-vehicle activities affect work commuters’ satisfaction with public transport. J. Transp. Geogr. 24, 215–222 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frei, C., Mahmassani, H.S.: Private time on public transit: dimensions of information and telecommunication use of Chicago transit riders. In: Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA (2011)Google Scholar
  10. Gamberini, L., Spagnolli, A., Miotto, A., Ferrari, E., Corradi, N., Furlan, S.: Passengers’ activities during short trips on the London Underground. Transportation 40(2), 251–268 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gripsrud, M., Hjorthol, R.: Working on the train: from ‘dead time’to productive and vital time. Transportation 39(5), 941–956 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guo, Z., Derian, A., Zhao, J.: Smart devices and travel time use by bus passengers in Vancouver, Canada. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 9(5), 335–347 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holley, D., Lyons, G., Jain, J.: Towards an understanding of the use and value of business travel time. In: Proceedings of the 38th Universities Transport Study Group Conference, Dublin, Ireland (2006)Google Scholar
  14. Holley, D., Jain, J., Lyons, G.: Understanding business travel time and its place in the working day. Time Soc. 17(1), 27–46 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jain, J., Lyons, G.: The gift of travel time. J. Transp. Geogr. 16(2), 81–89 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jara-Díaz, S.R., Munizaga, M.A., Greeven, P., Guerra, R., Axhausen, K.: Estimating the value of leisure from a time allocation model. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 42(10), 946–957 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kenyon, S., Lyons, G.: Introducing multitasking to the study of travel and ICT: examining its extent and assessing its potential importance. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 41(2), 161–175 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keseru, I., Macharis, C.: Travel-based multitasking: review of the empirical evidence. Transp. Rev. (2017). doi: 10.1080/01441647.2017.1317048 Google Scholar
  19. Keseru, I., Bulckaen, J., Macharis, C., Minnen, J., Glorieux, I., Pieter, T.: Is travel time wasted? Evidence from a time use survey in Flanders, Belgium. In: 14th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Windsor, UK (2015)Google Scholar
  20. Lyons, G., Urry, J.: The use and value of travel time. Unpublished paper (2004)Google Scholar
  21. Lyons, G., Urry, J.: Travel time use in the information age. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 39(2), 257–276 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lyons, G., Jain, J., Holley, D.: The use of travel time by rail passengers in Great Britain. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 41(1), 107–120 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lyons, G., Jain, J., Susilo, Y., Atkins, S.: Comparing rail passengers’ travel time use in Great Britain between 2004 and 2010. Mobilities 8(4), 560–579 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lyons, G., Jain, J., Weir, I.: Changing times—a decade of empirical insight into the experience of rail passengers in Great Britain. J. Transp. Geogr. 57, 94–104 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Metz, D.: The myth of travel time saving. Transp. Rev. 28(3), 321–336 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller, T.R.: The Value of Time and the Benefit of Time Saving: A Literature Synthesis and Recommendations on Values. The Urban Institute, Washington (1989)Google Scholar
  27. Mokhtarian, P.L., Salomon, I.: How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 35(8), 695–719 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mokhtarian, P.L., Salomon, I., Handy, S.L.: The impacts of ICT on leisure activities and travel: a conceptual exploration. Transportation 33(3), 263–289 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mokhtarian, P.L., Salomon, I., Singer, M.E.: What moves us? An interdisciplinary exploration of reasons for traveling. Transp. Rev. 35(3), 250–274 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Hara, K., Perry, M., Sellen, A., Brown, B.: Exploring the Relationship Between Mobile Phone and Document Activity During Business Travel. Springer, London (2002)Google Scholar
  31. Ohmori, N., Harata, N.: How different are activities while commuting by train? A case in Tokyo. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 99(5), 547–561 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Redmond, L.S., Mokhtarian, P.L.: The positive utility of the commute: modeling ideal commute time and relative desired commute amount. Transportation 28(2), 179–205 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rhee, K.A., Kim, J.K., Lee, B.J., Kim, S., Lee, Y.I.: Analysis of effects of activities while traveling on travelers’ sentiment. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2383, 27–34 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Russell, M., Price, R., Signal, L., Stanley, J., Gerring, Z., Cumming, J.: What do passengers do during travel time? Structured observations on buses and trains. J. Pub. Transp. 14(3), 123–146 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Salomon, I., Mokhtarian, P.L.: What happens when mobility-inclined market segments face accessibility-enhancing policies? Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 3(3), 129–140 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sellen, A.J., Harper, R.H.R.: The Myth of the Paperless Office. MIT press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  37. Sørensen, C.: Digital nomads and mobile services. Receiv. Mag. 6. (2002)
  38. Susilo, Y., Lyons, G., Jain, J., Atkins, S.: Rail passengers’ time use and utility assessment: 2010 findings from Great Britain with multivariate analysis. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2323, 99–109 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tencent: Report on WeChat Influence. (2016a)
  40. Tencent: WeChat Statistical Report (2016b)
  41. The State Council of China: China New Type Urbanization Planning (2014–2020) (Published in 2014)Google Scholar
  42. The State Council of China: Mid-Term and Long-Term Railway Network Development Program (2016–2025) (Published in 2016)Google Scholar
  43. Transportation Research Board (TRB): Transit Cooperative Research Program 165: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual (Third Edition) (2013)Google Scholar
  44. van der Waerden, P., Timmermans, H., ven Neerven, R.: Extent, nature and covariates of multitasking of rail passengers in an urban corridor: a Dutch case study. Transp. Res. Rec. 2110, 106–111 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Watts, L., Urry, J.: Moving methods, travelling times. Environ. Plan. D Soc. Space 26(5), 860–874 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Young, G., Valdez, E.A., Kohn, R.: Multivariate probit models for conditional claim-types. Insur. Math. Econ. 44(2), 214–228 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang, J., Timmermans, H.: Scobit-based panel analysis of multitasking behavior of public transport users. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2157, 46–53 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhao, J., Zhao, Y., Li, Y.: The variation in the value of travel-time savings and the dilemma of high-speed rail in China. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 82, 130–140 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhen, F., Cao, J., Tang, J.: Exploring correlates of passenger satisfaction with high speed rail and service improvement priorities. Presented at the World Symposium on Transport and Land use Research (WSTLUR), Brisbane, Australia, July 3–6, 2017Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jia Tang
    • 1
  • Feng Zhen
    • 1
  • Jason Cao
    • 2
  • Patricia L. Mokhtarian
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Architecture and Urban PlanningNanjing UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Humphrey School of Public AffairsUniversity of MinnesotaTwin CitiesUSA
  3. 3.School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations