Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Passengers’ response to transit fare change: an ex post appraisal using smart card data

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fare change is an effective tool for public transit demand management. An automatic fare collection system not only allows the implementation of complex fare policies, but also provides abundant data for impact analysis of fare change. This study proposes an assessment approach for analyzing the influence when substituting a flat-fare policy with a distance-based fare policy, using smart card data. The method can be used to analyze the impact of fare change on demand, riding distances, as well as price elasticity of demand at different time and distance intervals. Taking the fare change of Beijing Metro implemented in 2014 as a case study, we analyze the change of network demand at various levels, riding distances, and demand elasticity of different distances on weekdays and weekends, using the method established and the smart card data a week before and after the fare change. The policy implication of the fare change was also addressed. The results suggest that the fare change had a significant impact on overall demand, but not so much on riding distances. The greatest sensitivity to fare change is shown by weekend passengers, followed by passengers in the evening weekday peak time, while the morning weekday peak time passengers show little sensitivity. A great variety of passengers’ responses to fare change exists at station level because stations serve different types of land usage or generate trips with distinct purposes at different times. Rising fares can greatly increase revenue, and can shift trips to cycling and walking to a certain extent, but not so much as to mitigate overcrowding at morning peak times. The results are compared with those of the ex ante evaluation that used a stated preference survey, and the comparison illustrates that the price elasticity of demand extracted from the stated preference survey significantly exaggerates passengers’ responses to fare increase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrate, G., Piacenza, M., Vannoni, D.: The impact of integrated tariff systems on public transport demand: evidence from Italy. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 39(2), 120–127 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association of Train Operating Companies (ATOC): Passenger Demand Forecasting Handbook. Passenger Demand Forecasting Council, London (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, J., Newhouser, R., Rahbee, A., Sayeda, S.: Origin and destination estimation in New York City with automated fare system data. Transp. Res. Rec. 1817, 183–187 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beijing Transportation Research Center: 2016 Beijing transport development annual report (2016) (in Chinese)

  • Bresson, G., Dargay, J., Madre, J., Pirotte, A.: The main determinants of the demand for public transport: a comparative analysis of England and France using shrinkage estimators. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 37(7), 605–627 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, A., Lai, A., Chow, J.: Non-additive public transit fare pricing under congestion with policy lessons from toronto case study. In: Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting (No. 16-1710) (2016)

  • Chen, F., Fang, J., Wu, Q.: Study of standing passenger density in subway cars based on passengers’ spatial comfort: case study of Beijing subway line 4. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2540, 84–91 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CityMetric: How much do Londoners spend on commuting. http://www.citymetric.com/transport/how-much-do-londoners-spend-commuting-1668 (2015). 19th Sep 2016

  • Dargay, J., Hanly, M.: The demand for local bus services in England. Transp. Econ. Policy 36, 73–91 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Devillaine, F., Munizaga, M., Trépanier, M.: Detection of activities of public transport users by analyzing smart card data. Transp. Res. Rec. 2276, 48–55 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J.E.I.V.: Transit pricing and fares: traveler response to transportation system changes. Transp. Res. Board 12, 1–59 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, S., Bartholomew, K., Li, X., Páez, A., Habib, K.M.N.: Assessing social equity in distance based transit fares using a model of travel behavior. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 67, 291–303 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finance Bureau of Beijing (FBB): Report on Budget Execution of 2013 and Budget Draft of 2014 of Beijing. http://www.mof.gov.cn/zhuantihuigu/2014yshb/201402/t20140219_1044590.html (2014). 19th Sep 2016

  • Gkritza, K., Karlaftis, M.G., Mannering, F.L.: Estimating multimodal transit ridership with a varying fare structure. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 45(2), 148–160 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grange, L., González, F., Muñoz, J.C., Troncoso, R.: Aggregate estimation of the price elasticity of demand for public transport in integrated fare systems: the case of transantiago. Transp. Policy 29, 178–185 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D.: Assessing systematic sources of variation in public transport elasticities: some comparative warnings. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 42(7), 1031–1042 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, R.: Impact of transit fare increase on ridership and revenue: metropolitan transportation authority, New York city. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1927, 239–248 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmgren, J.: Meta-analysis of public transport demand. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 41(10), 1021–1035 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iseki H., Liu C., Knaap G.: Origin-Destination Land Use Ridership Model for Fare Policy Analysis for the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education, University of Maryland, College Park. http://smartgrowth.umd.edu/assets/documents/announcements/landuseridershipmodel_finalreport.pdf (2015). 19th Sep 2016

  • Litman, T.: Transit price elasticities and cross-elasticities. J. Public Transp. 7(2), 37–58 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litman, T.: Transportation elasticities: How prices and other factors affect travel behavior. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. http://www.vtpi.org/elasticities.pdf (2011)

  • Munizaga, M., Palma, C.: Estimation of a disaggregate multimodal public transport origin–destination matrix from passive smartcard data from Santiago, Chile. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 24, 9–18 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulley, N., Balcombe, R., Mackett, R., Titheridge, H., Preston, J., Wardman, M., Shires, J., White, P.: The demand for public transport: the effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership. Transp. Policy 13, 295–306 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, M., Trépanier, M., Morency, C.: Smart card data use in public transit: a literature review. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 19(4), 557–568 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • People’s Daily Online: The annual operation cost of Beijing Subway in public release for the first time. http://bj.people.com.cn/n/2014/1013/c14540-22589431.html (2014). 19th Sep 2016

  • Sharaby, N., Shiftan, Y.: The impact of fare integration on travel behavior and transit ridership. Transp. Policy 26, 63–70 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimek, P.: Dynamic estimates of fare elasticity for US public transit. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Trans. Res. Board 2538, 96–101 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F., Bly, P.: The Demand for Public Transport. Report of an international collaborative study, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Yang, X.: Analysis and suggestion of fare changes of Beijing urban rail transit–contrast between Beijing and other cities. China Econ. 1, 76–77 (2015). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Li, X., Chen, F.: Impact evaluation of a mass transit fare change on demand and revenue utilizing smart card data. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 77, 213–224 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.: 51408029).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, 100044, China

    Zi-jia Wang & Feng Chen

  2. Beijing Engineering and Technology Research Center of Rail Transit Line Safety and Disaster Prevention, Beijing, 100044, China

    Feng Chen

  3. Beijing Transportation Information Center, Beijing, 100161, China

    Bo Wang & Jian-ling Huang

Authors
  1. Zi-jia Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Feng Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bo Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jian-ling Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Zj., Chen, F., Wang, B. et al. Passengers’ response to transit fare change: an ex post appraisal using smart card data. Transportation 45, 1559–1578 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9775-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9775-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation