Skip to main content
Log in

A disaggregate study of urban rail transit feeder transfer penalties including weather effects

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transfers between urban rail transit (URT) and its feeder modes represent a considerable barrier to its ridership and the network-wide usage of public transit. The aim of this research is to quantify the time-independent transfer penalty between URT system and feeder modes and to explore its variability by different factors. Based on Melbourne URT origin and destination survey data, this study focused on URT access and egress journeys and estimated URT feeder transfer penalties by formulating feeder mode choice models. With three-hourly weather data and demographical data introduced, this paper conducted disaggregate analyses to investigate the variability of URT feeder transfer penalty across weather conditions, trip types and individual characteristics. According to the model estimation results, the values of transfer penalty vary according to the direction of transfer and the preference ordering for different transfer combinations is URT-tram, URT-bus, tram-URT, bus-URT and auto-URT. It found that local weather elements in terms of air temperature and precipitation are significant factors resulting in the variability of the transfer perception by URT travellers. Transfer penalties for access journeys increase with the rise of air temperature. The non-linear effects of precipitation on URT feeder transfer penalties were observed. In addition, commuters perceive smaller transfer penalties than other travellers for all of the transfer combinations except for bus-URT transfers. Travelers from remote areas perceive smaller transfer penalties for access trips. Travellers’ loyalty to public transit restrains transfer penalties. The male travellers perceive higher transfer penalties than the female. The elderly travellers impose low transfer penalties to access journeys but high transfer penalties for egress journeys. Finally, the paper explored policy implications and details areas for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Algers, S., Hansen, S., Tegner, G.: Role of waiting time, comfort, and convenience in modal choice for work trip. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 534, 38–51 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Aultman-Hall, L., Lane, D., Lambert, R.: Assessing the impact of weather and season on pedestrian traffic volumes. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2140, 35–43 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böcker, L., Dijst, M., Prillwitz, J.: Impact of everyday weather on individual daily travel behaviours in perspective: a literature review. Transp. Rev. 33(1), 71–91 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batsos, D., Tzouvadakis, J.: New metro system as a catalyst for successful planning interventions in Athens. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 137(1), 49–55 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Meteorology, Australia: Melbourne Regional Office: Climate Statistics for Australian Locations (2015)

  • Call, D.A.: The effect of snow on traffic counts in western New York State. Weather Clim. Soc. 3, 71–75 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascetta, E.: Transportation Systems Analysis: Models and Applications. Springer, New York (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cools, M., Moons, E., Creemers, L., Wets, G.: Changes in travel behavior in response to weather conditions: do type of weather and trip purpose matter? Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2157, 22–28 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CTPS: Transfer Penalties in Urban Mode Choice Modeling, Central Transportation Planning Staff (1997)

  • Currie, G.: Melbourne Metropolitan Bus Plan: An Overview of Key Findings. Bus Industry Confederation National Conference. Queenstown, New Zealand (2003)

  • Currie, G.: The demand performance of bus rapid transit. J. Public Transp. 8(1), 41–55 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, G. Setting Long Headways for Coordination and Service Timing Benefits: When Less is More. In: Proceedings of the 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., US, Transportation Research Board (2009)

  • Currie, G., Shalaby, A.: Success and challenges in modernising streetcar systems: experience in Melbourne and Toronto. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2006, 31–39 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, G., Tivendale, K.: An inclusive planning process for citywide bus network restructuring: experience and impacts. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2145, 18–29 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datla, S., Sharma, S.: Variation of impact of cold temperature and snowfall and their interaction on traffic volume. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2169, 107–115 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, N.J., Jones, M.: Estimating Transfer Penalties and Standardised Income Values of Time by Stated Preference Survey. Australasian Transport Research Forum, Brisbane, Queensland (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Geerts, J.F., Hamers, V.: Service reliability and transfer convenience on the Brussels Tramway Network. In: European Transport Conference. Strasburg, France, Association for European Transport (2004)

  • Guo, Z., Wilson, N.H.M.: Assessment of the transfer penalty for transit trips. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1872, 10–18 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Z., Wilson, N.H.M., Rahbee, A.: The impact of weather on transit ridership in Chicago, Illinois. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2034, 3–10 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, A.F.: Assessment of transfer penalty to bus riders in Taipei: a disaggregate demand modeling approach. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1139, 8–14 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, A.J., Zlosel, D.J.: Transfer penalties: another look at transit riders’ reluctance to transfer. Transportation 10(3), 279–282 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J.D.: A logit model of public transport route choice. ITE J. 60(12), 26–30 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Keay, K., Simmonds, I.: The association of rainfall and other weather variables with road traffic volume in Melbourne, Australia. Accid. Anal. Prev. 37, 109–124 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Guo, H.L., Li, H., Xu, G.H., Wang, Z.R., Kong, C.W.: Transit-oriented land planning model considering sustainability of mass rail transit. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 136(3), 243–248 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, R., Pendyala, R., Polzin, S.: Assessment of intermodal transfer penalties using stated preference data. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1607, 74–80 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda-Moreno, L., Nosal, T.: Weather or not to cycle: temporal trends and impact of weather on cycling in an urban environment. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2247, 42–52 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarrete, F.J., Ortúzar, J.D.: Subjective valuation of the transit transfer experience: the case of Santiago de Chile. Transp. Policy 25, 138–147 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, G., Nelson, J., Mulley, C., Tenger, G., Lind, G., Lange, T.: Public Transport: Planning the Networks. HiTrans, Stavanger, Norway (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • PTV: Origin Destination Survey—Train 2012. Melbourne, Victoria, Public Transpot Victoria. Trim Ref: DOC/13/138382 (2012)

  • Sabir, M.: Weather and travel behaviour. Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam (2011)

  • Stern, R.: Passenger Transfer System Review. Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP), Transportation Research Board, Washington DC. Synthesis 19 (1996)

  • Sturman, A., Tapper, N.: The Weather and Climate of Australia and New Zealand Melbourne. Oxford University Press, Australia (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, L., Thakuriah, P.V.: Ridership effects of real-time bus information system: a case study in the City of Chicago. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 22, 146–161 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardman, M., Hine, J., Stradling, S.: Interchange and Travel Choice. Scottish Executive Central Research Unit. Edinburgh, Scotland, Institute for Transport Studies at the University of Leeds Transport Research Institute at Napier University (2001)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Public Transport Victoria for providing access to the rail OD surveys and also the China Scholarship Council and South East University in China and Monash University in Australia for funding Ms Gong’s research in Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graham Currie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gong, X., Currie, G., Liu, Z. et al. A disaggregate study of urban rail transit feeder transfer penalties including weather effects. Transportation 45, 1319–1349 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9768-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9768-0

Keywords

Navigation