Nudging for responsible carsharing: using behavioral economics to change transportation behavior

Article

Abstract

Principles of behavioral economics have been used to change human behavior effectively in a variety of disciplines. For the field of transportation, however, there have only been a few cases where behavioral economics was applied to change behavior in randomized field experiments. In our current study, we aimed to increase vehicle inspection behavior among carsharing users, as an example to apply behavioral principles to transportation. Specifically, we developed a simple nudge in the form of a reminder card to visually remind users to inspect the vehicle prior to their trip. The effects of the card were tested in a randomized field experiment by observing and interviewing users of a carsharing service. We found that significantly more users inspected the vehicle in the presence of the reminder card, compared to a control group where no card was used. Over 4 weeks, the improvement in inspection behavior was constant. Critically, the inspection increased even in the absence of the reminder card in the last 2 weeks of the experiment in one of the two observation sites, revealing a persistence effect of the reminder card. The current study not only demonstrates the effectiveness of a simple reminder based on the behavioral principle of salience, but also offers the potential to apply behavioral economics to the field of transportation.

Keywords

Nudge Reminder Behavioral economics Carsharing Field experiment 

Supplementary material

11116_2016_9727_MOESM1_ESM.tiff (3.6 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 3653 kb)

References

  1. Allcott, H., Mullainathan, S.: Behavior and energy policy. Science, 327(5970):1204–1205 (2010). http://www.jstor.org/stable/40544368
  2. Bardhi, F., Eckhardt, G.M.: Access-based consumption: the case of car sharing. J. Consum. Res. 39(4), 881–898 (2012). doi:10.1086/666376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brody, P., Pureswaran, V.: The next digital gold rush: how the internet of things will create liquid. Transpar. Mark. Strategy Leadersh. 43(1), 36–41 (2015). doi:10.1108/SL-11-2014-0094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, C., Winter, A.: In Your Own Words: Operators Manage Security Issues–Article–Auto Rental News http://www.autorentalnews.com/article/story/2014/05/in-your-own-words-operators-manage-security-issues/page/2.aspx (2015). Accessed 14 May 2015
  5. Cabinet Office: Behavioural insights team, Department of Energy and Climate Change, Communities and Local Government. Behav. Change Energy Use 1–35 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. Car2go: car2go Vancouver Website. https://www.car2go.com/en/vancouver/ (2014). Accessed 21 Nov 2014
  7. Car2go: car2go trip process agreement (Canada), 1–15 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. Car2go: car2go Vancouver website: how does car2go work? https://www.car2go.com/en/vancouver/how-does-car2go-work/ (2015). Accessed 8 Feb 2015
  9. Castleman, B.L., Page, L.C.: Freshman year financial aid nudges: an experiment to increase FAFSA renewal and college persistence. J. Hum. Res. (2015). doi:10.3368/jhr.51.2.0614-6458R Google Scholar
  10. Cialdini, R.B., Reno, R.R., Kallgren, C.A.: A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J Personal. Soc. Psychol. 58(6), 1015–1026 (1990). doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CNW Canada Ltd.: car2go poised for growth in Vancouver this spring. http://www.newswire.ca/en/story/940701/car2go-poised-for-growth-in-vancouver-this-spring/ (2012). Accessed 18 Feb 2015
  12. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research, 4th edn. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago (1971)Google Scholar
  13. Hardy, H., Kumar, V., Doros, G., Farmer, E., Drainoni, M.-L., Rybin, D., et al.: Randomized controlled trial of a personalized cellular phone reminder system to enhance adherence to antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Patient Care STDs (2011). doi:10.1089/apc.2010.0006 Google Scholar
  14. Kahan, P.D.M.: Cultural Cognition as a Conception of the Cultural Theory of Risk. In: Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P., Peterson, M. (eds.) Handbook of Risk Theory, pp. 725–759. Springer, Dordrecht (2012). doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kahneman, D.: A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am. Psychol. 58(9), 697–720 (2003). doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2), 263 (1979). doi:10.2307/1914185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karlan, D., McConnell, M., Mullainathan, S., Zinman, J.: Getting to the top of mind: how reminders increase saving. Manag. Sci. (2016). doi:10.1287/mnsc.2015.2296 Google Scholar
  18. Kessler, J.B., Zhang, C.Y.: Behavioral Economics and Health. Oxford Textbook of Public Health, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  19. Lamberton, C.P., Rose, R.L.: When is ours better than mine? a framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. J. Mark. 76(4), 109–125 (2012). doi:10.2139/ssrn.1939289 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mahtani, K.R., Heneghan, C.J., Glasziou, P.P., Perere, P.: Reminder packaging for improving adherence to self-administered long-term medications. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 7(9), 1–61 (2011). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005025.pub3 Google Scholar
  21. Mason, M.: Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 11(3), 1–16 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. Metcalfe, R., Dolan, P.: Behavioural economics and its implications for transport. J. Transp. Geogr. 24(C), 503–511 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Modo the Car Co-op: Pro-tip: checking for damage-modo. http://www.modo.coop/blog/pro-tip-checking-for-damage/ (2015). Accessed 13 May 2015
  24. Newton, K.H., Wiltshire, E.J., Elley, C.R.: Pedometers and text messaging to increase physical activity randomized controlled trial of adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 32(5), 813–815 (2009). doi:10.2337/dc08-1974 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nickerson, D.W., Rogers, T.: Do you have a voting plan? Implementation intentions, voter turnout, and organic plan making. Psychol. Sci. 21(2), 194–199 (2010). doi:10.1177/0956797609359326 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pop-Eleches, C., Thirumurthy, H., Habyarimana, J.P., Zivin, J.G., Goldstein, M.P., de Walque, D., et al.: Mobile phone technologies improve adherence to antiretroviral treatment in a resource-limited setting: a randomized controlled trial of text message reminders. Aids 25(6), 825–834 (2011). doi:10.1097/QAD.0b013e32834380c1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rifkin, J.: The age of access: can civilization survive with the commercial sphere as the primary mediator of human life? RESURGENCE-LONDON-NAVERN ROAD (2001)Google Scholar
  28. Schultz, P.W., Nolan, J.M., Cialdini, R.B., Goldstein, N.J., Griskevicius, V.: The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol. Sci. 18(5), 429–434 (2007). doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shaheen, S.A., Cohen, A.P.: Carsharing and personal vehicle services: Worldwide market developments and emerging trends. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 7(1), 5–34 (2013). doi:10.1080/15568318.2012.660103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shaheen, S.A., Sperling, D., Wagner, C.: A short history of carsharing in the 90’s. Inst. Transp. Stud. (1999)Google Scholar
  31. Shaheen, S., Cohen, A.: Innovative mobility carsharing outlook: carsharing market overview, analysis, and trends. http://tsrc.berkeley.edu/sites/tsrc.berkeley.edu/files/Innovative%20Mobility%20Industry%20Outlook_Carsharing_Spring%202013%20FINAL_0.pdf (2013). Accessed 7 Oct 2014
  32. Shaheen, S., Cohen, A.: Innovative mobility carsharing outlook: carsharing market overview, analysis and trends. http://tsrc.berkeley.edu/sites/tsrc.berkeley.edu/files/Fall%202014%20Carsharing%20Outlook%20Final.pdf (2014). Accessed 17 Feb 2015
  33. Simon, H.A.: Models of bounded rationality: empirically grounded economic reason. MIT Press, Cambridge (1982)Google Scholar
  34. Slovic, P., Zionts, D., Woods, A.K., Goodman, R., Jinks, D.: Psychic numbing and mass atrocity. New York University School of Law Public Law Legal Theory Research Paper Series Working Paper, pp. 1–17 (2011)Google Scholar
  35. Sunstein, C.R.: Nudging: a very short guide. J. Consum. Policy 37(4), 583–588 (2014). doi:10.1007/s10603-014-9273-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thaler, R.: Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 1(1), 39–60 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thaler, R.H., Benartzi, S.: Save More Tomorrow™: using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. J. Polit. Econ. 112(S1), S164–S187 (2004). doi:10.1086/380085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thaler, R.H., Shefrin, H.M.: An economic theory of self-control. J. Polit. Econ. (1981). doi:10.2307/1833317 Google Scholar
  39. Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.R.: Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin, Ney York (2009)Google Scholar
  40. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model. Q. J. Econ. 106(4), 1039–1061 (1991). doi:10.2307/2937956 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. University of California Berkeley Transportation Sustainability Research Center Website. (2015) Accessed 17 Feb 2015Google Scholar
  42. Vervloet, M., Linn, A.J., van Weert, J.: The effectiveness of interventions using electronic reminders to improve adherence to chronic medication: a systematic review of the literature. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. (2012). doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000748 Google Scholar
  43. Wisdom, J., Downs, J.S., Loewenstein, G.: Promoting healthy choices: information versus convenience. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. (2010). doi:10.1257/app Google Scholar
  44. Zipcar: Zipcar privacy policy. http://www.zipcar.ca/privacy-policy (2015). Accessed 3 March 2015

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Resources, Environment and SustainabilityUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  3. 3.Liu Institute for Global IssuesUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations