Advertisement

Transportation

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 89–103 | Cite as

Integration of a phone-based household travel survey and a web-based student travel survey

  • Hubert VerreaultEmail author
  • Catherine Morency
Article
  • 468 Downloads

Abstract

A significant share of transportation forecasting models are based on household travel survey data, frequently gathered through phone-based travel surveys. Over the last decade, these surveys have faced a variety of issues, namely a decrease in response rates and increases in potential sampling biases since their sampling frames are typically constructed using a list of land-line numbers. Although the weighting process can manage some of these issues, their scale is becoming a problem. In recent years, several experiments have been conducted in order to integrate multiple survey methods and data sources to obtain better quality databases. This paper reports on an experimentation conducted in 2012 in the region of Sherbrooke, in the province of Quebec, Canada. A web based travel survey was conducted among the regions’ student population—in parallel to the large-scale household phone travel survey- in order to increase both the representativeness of the sampling frame and the response rate among 20–29 year-olds. This paper presents the methodology used to integrate both survey samples in order to create a more representative view of typical travel behaviors in the region of Sherbrooke. The paper demonstrates that by combining the samples, we succeed in reducing heterogeneity in sampling rates among population segments which translates into an increase in trip rates (global and transit) for the target population. Challenges related to the combination of survey methods and samples are discussed.

Keywords

Multi-frame survey Data integration Web survey Household travel survey 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the Quebec Ministry of Transportation for funding the research project and providing access to survey data for research purposes. They particulary thank the contributions of Assia Bellazoug et Folly Adjogou from de Quebec Ministry of Transportation for their contribution to the development of the methodology. The authors also wish to acknowledge the contributions of Assumpta Cerda for her thorough review of the paper.

References

  1. Bayart, C., Bonnel, P.: Combining web and face-to-face in travel surveys: comparability challenges? Transportation 39(6), 1147–1171 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayart, C., Bonnel, P., Morency C.: Survey mode integration and data fusion: methods and challenges. Resource paper for Workshop on Best Practices in Data Fusion. 8th International Conference on Survey Methods in Transport Annecy, 33 p. France, 25–31 May 2008Google Scholar
  3. Behrens, R., Freedman, M., McGuckin, N.: The challenges of surveying “hard to reach” groups: synthesis of a workshop. In: Bonnel, P., Lee-Gosselin, M., Zmud, J., Madre, J.-L. (eds.) Transport Survey Methods: Keeping Up with a Changing World. Emerald, Bingley (2009)Google Scholar
  4. Bourbonnais, P., Morency, C.: Web-based travel survey: a demo. In: Smud, J., Lee-Gosselin, M., Zmud Munizaga, M., Carrasco, J.A. (eds.) Transport Survey Methods: Best practice for Decision Making. Emerald, Bingley (2013)Google Scholar
  5. Evans, J.R., Mathur, A.: The value of online surveys. Internet Res. 15(2), 195–219 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Konstadinos, G., Pendyala, R.: Total design data needs for the new generation large scale activity microsimulation models. Keynote Paper presented at the Chile Conference on Survey Methods, 30 p (2012)Google Scholar
  7. LaMondia, J., Goulias, K.G., Armoogum, J.: Harnessing technology to collect behavioural data ?. In: Pendyala, M.,Bhat, C. (eds.) Travel Behaviour Research in an Evolving World : Selected Papers from the 12th international Conference on Travel Behaviour Research (2009)Google Scholar
  8. Liss, S.: Planning for the next national household travel survey, Part 1, daily trips. Data for Understanding Our Nation’s Travel National Household Travel Survey Conference Transportation research circular E-C071, TRB, 5 p (2005)Google Scholar
  9. Lohr, S.: Dual frame surveys: recent developments and challenges. Proceedings of the 45th meeting of the Italian Statistical Society, 12 p (2010)Google Scholar
  10. Miller, E.J., Habib, K.N., Lee-Gosselin, M., Morency, C., Roorda, M., Shalaby, A.: Changing practices in data collection on the movement of people. Project report, TAC-ATC, 294 p (2012)Google Scholar
  11. Roux, S., Armoogum, J.: Analysis bias due to survey non response in the French National Travel Survey 2007–08. World Conference on Transport Research Society. 12th World Conference on Transport Research, Lisbonne, Portugal. 14 p (2010)Google Scholar
  12. Roux, S., Marchal, P., Armoogum, J.: Acceptability of the Use of New Technologies by Interviewees in Surveys. Eurocities DATTA, Lausanne, 8 p (2009)Google Scholar
  13. Sen, S., Zmud, J., Arce, C.: Efficiency and effectiveness of cell phone samples in transportation surveys. Transp. Res. Rec. 2105, 44–50 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sharp, J., McGuckin, N., Bose, J., Murakami, E.: Travel survey methods, workshop summary. Data for Understanding Our Nation’s Travel National Household Travel Survey Conference Transportation research circular E-C071, TRB, 5 p (2005)Google Scholar
  15. Steeh, C.: A new era for telephone surveys. Presented at Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Phoenix, Ariz., (2004)Google Scholar
  16. Stopher, P.R.: The travel survey toolkit: where from here ? In: Bonnel, P., Lee-Gosselin, M., Zmud, J., Madre, J.-L. (eds.) Transport Survey Methods: Keeping Up with a Changing World. Bingley, Emerald (2009)Google Scholar
  17. Stopher, P.R., Greaves, S.: Household travel surveys: where are we going? Transp. Res. Part A 41(5), 367–381 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. Tucker, C., Brick, J., Meekins, B., Morganstein, D.: Household telephone service and usage patterns in the U. S. in 2004, ASA Section on Survey Research Method (2007)Google Scholar
  19. Venigalla, M.: Household travel survey data fusion issues. Ressource paper, National Household Travel Survey Conference: Inderstandins Our Nations’s Travel, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil, Geological, and Mining EngineeringEcole Polytechnique de MontréalMontréalCanada
  2. 2.Mobilite research Chair, Department of Civil, Geological, and Mining EngineeringPolytechnique MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations