Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling park-and-ride location choice of heterogeneous commuters

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is extensive literature on drive-to-transit trips, yet very few studies focus on commuters’ park-and-ride location choice decisions. This study investigates park-and-ride location choice behavior of heterogeneous commuters in the Austin Metropolitan Statistical Area. Data from a transit on-board survey conducted by Capital Metro in 2010 were used. Besides, schedule-based transit networks and a detailed regional highway network were used to calculate path attributes. A thorough analysis on the choice set generation was conducted, and two criteria were used to determine the most appropriate park-and-ride choice set for each observed trip. Finally, user heterogeneity was accounted by adding interaction terms in the utility functions and by using mixed logit models. Empirical models reveal that designation of a park-and-ride facility by transit agency and the frequency of transit paths to destination have the highest positive effect, while transit transfers, auto travel time, and walking time have the most significant negative impact on the utility of a park-and-ride location. More specifically, correlation analysis reveals that travelers who are more likely to be motivated by short auto travel time are also more likely to be motivated by few transfers and short walking time. In addition, this study implies that non-Caucasians prefer higher fraction of their auto path on freeways; and commuters with higher income are less motivated by high transit service frequency. The estimated models in this study can have immediate application in travel forecasting, specifically for drive-to-transit trip assignment, as well as in setting policy for park-and-rides service design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Calthorpe, P., Dittmar, H., Ohland, G.: The new transit town: best practices in transit-oriented development. Island Press, Washington DC (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakour, V., Eluru, N.: Analyzing commuter train user behavior: a decision framework for access mode and station choice. Transportation 41(1), 211–228 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, B., Yang, L.: Modeling commuter rail station choice and access mode combinations, pp. 10–14. In Transportation research Board annual meeting, Washington DC (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Debrezion, G., Pels, E., Rietveld, P.: Choice of departure station by railway users. Eur. Transp. 37, 78–92 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Debrezion, G., Pels, E., Rietveld, P.: Modelling the joint access mode and railway station choice. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 45(1), 270–283 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, K. S., Miller, E. J., Badoe, D.: Modeling rail access mode and station choice. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1413, 49–59 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Habib, K., Mahmoud, M., Coleman, J.: Effect of parking charges at transit stations on park-and-ride mode choice: lessons learned from stated preference survey in Greater Vancouver, Canada. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2351, 163–170 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hole, A.: Fitting mixed logit models by using maximum simulated likelihood. Stata J. 7, 388–401 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastrenakes, C.: Development of a rail station choice model for NJ transit. Transp. Res. Board 1162, 16–21 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Khani, A., Beduhn, T. J., Duthie, J., Boyles, S., Jafari, E.: A Transit Route Choice Model for Application in Dynamic Transit Assignment, In Innovations in Travel Modeling. Baltimore, MD (2014b)

  • Khani, A., Bustillos, B., Noh, H., Chiu, Y.C., Hickman, M.: Modeling transit and intermodal tours in a dynamic multimodal network. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2467, 21–29 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khani, A., Hickman, M., Noh, H.: Trip-based path algorithms using the transit network hierarchy. Netw Spat. Econ. 15(3), 635–653 (2014a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khani, A., Lee, S., Hickman, M., Noh, H., Nassir, N.: Intermodal path algorithm for time-dependent auto network and scheduled transit service. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2284, 40–46 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud, M., Habib, K., Shalaby, A.: Park-and-Ride access station choice model for cross-regional commuting: case study of Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, Canada. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2419, 92–100 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D.: Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Front. Econom., New York (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassir, N., Hickman, M., Malekzadeh, A., Irannezhad, E.: Modeling Transit Access Stop Choices. In: Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting, No. 15-3775) (2015)

  • Revelt, D., Train, K.: Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level. Rev. Econ. Stat. 80(4), 647–657 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, B., Hickman, M., Nassir, N.: Park-and-Ride Lot Choice Model Using Random Utility Maximization and Random Regret Minimization. In: Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, No. 16-4527 (2016)

  • Train, K.E.: Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wardman, M., Whelan, G. A.: Using geographical information systems to improve rail demand models. Final report to Engineering and Physical science Research council (1999)

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to acknowledge the Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority for providing the data. This research was partially supported by the U.S. Department of Transportation through the Data-Supported Transportation Operations and Planning (D-STOP) Tier 1 University Transportation Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hao Pang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pang, H., Khani, A. Modeling park-and-ride location choice of heterogeneous commuters. Transportation 45, 71–87 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9723-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9723-5

Keywords

Navigation