Car today, gone tomorrow: The ephemeral car in low-income, immigrant and minority families
- 856 Downloads
Most transportation research in the United States uses cross-sectional, “snapshot” data to understand levels of car access. Might this cross-sectional approach mask considerable variation over time and within households? We use a panel dataset, the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), for the years 1999–2011 to test this question. We find that for most families, being “carless” is a temporary condition. While 13 % of families in the US are carless in any given year, only 5 % of families are carless for all seven waves of data we examine in the PSID. We also find that poor families, immigrants, and people of color (particularly, blacks) are considerably more likely to transition into and out car ownership frequently and are less likely to have a car in any survey year than are non-poor families, the US-born, and whites.
KeywordsCar ownership Panel data Poverty Immigration
This material is based upon work supported by the US Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program under Grant Number DTRT12-G-UTC21.
Disclaimer: The contents of this article reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the US Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The US Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof.
- Berube, A., Raphael, S., Deakin, E.: Socioeconomic differences in household automobile ownership rates: Implications for evacuation policy. In: Quigley, J.M., Rosenthal, L.A. (eds.) Disasters, Cities, Public Policy, pp. 197–221. Public Policy Press, Berkeley (2008)Google Scholar
- Currie, G., Stanley, J., Stanley, J. (eds.): No way to go: Transport and Social Disadvantage in Australian Communities. Monash University Publishing, Clayton (2007)Google Scholar
- Dargay, J., Hanly, M.: Volatility of car ownership, commuting mode and time in the UK. Transp. Res. Part A 41, 934–948 (2007)Google Scholar
- Fitzgerald, J. M.: Attrition in models of intergenerational links using the PSID with extensions to health and to sibling models. B E J. Econ. Anal. Policy 11 (2011). doi: 10.2202/1935-1682
- Goodwin, P.B.: Circumstances in which people reduce car ownership—a comparative analysis of three panel data sets. J. Int. Assoc. Traffic Saf. Sci. 12, 60–65 (1988)Google Scholar
- Hill, D.H.: The gasoline price responsiveness of personal transportation demand. In: Hill, D.H., Hill, M.S., Morgan, J.N. (eds.) Five Thousand American Families: Patterns of Economic Progress, vol. 9, pp. 269–298. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (1981)Google Scholar
- Institute for Social Research (2013) Panel Study of Income Dynamics wave 37 questionnaire 2011. Accessed 15 April 2015. ftp://ftp.isr.umich.edu/pub/src/psid/questionnaires/q2011.pdf
- Lucas, K. (ed.): Running on Empty: Transport, Social Exclusion and Evironmental Jstice. Policy Press, Bristol (2004)Google Scholar
- McGonagle, K.A., Schoeni, R.F., Sastry N., Freedman, V.A.: The Panel Study of Income Dynamics: overview, recent innovations, and potential for life course research. Longitud. Life Course Stud. 3, 268–284 (2012)Google Scholar
- Nolan, A.: A dynamic analysis of household car ownership. Transp. Res. Part A 44, 446–455 (2010)Google Scholar
- Oakil, A., Ettema, D., Arentze, T., Timmermans, H.: Changing household car ownership level and life cycle events: a action in anticipation or an action on occurrence. Transportation 14, 1–16 (2013)Google Scholar
- Panel Study of Income Dynamics Produced and distributed by the Survey Research Center Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. Accessed 2014Google Scholar
- Pucher, J., Renne, J.L.: Socioeconomics of urban travel: evidence from the NHTS. Transp Q. 57, 49–77 (2003)Google Scholar
- Rice, L.: Transportation spending by low-income California households: lssons for the San Francisco Bay Area. Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco (2004)Google Scholar
- Simonsohn, U.: New Yorkers commute more everywhere: Contrast effects in the field. Rev. Econ. Stat. 88, 1–9 (2006)Google Scholar
- Train, K.: Qualitative Choice Analysis: Theory, Eonometrics, and An Aplication to Automobile Demand, 2nd edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1993)Google Scholar
- United States Census Bureau: The 2011 American Community Survey questionnaire. FORM ACS-1(INFO)(2011)KFI, OMB No. 0607-0810. http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/questionnaires/2011/Quest11.pdf (2010). Accessed 15 April 2015