Advertisement

Transportation

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 271–291 | Cite as

Household structure and gender differences in travel time: spouse/partner presence, parenthood, and breadwinner status

  • Yingling Fan
Article

Abstract

Despite having more similar roles at work and home than ever before, US men and women continue to exhibit different travel behavior. An open question is whether the remaining gender differences in travel differ by traditional and emergent aspects of household structure such as spouse/partner presence, parenthood, and breadwinner status. Using data from the 2003–2010 American Time Use Survey, this study offers a unique, empirical travel time analysis of metropolitan workers stratified by household structure. Results show that gender differences in travel time respond to multiple aspects of household structure in complex and interactive ways. Gender difference in work travel time is only observable when spouse/partner presence and parenthood interact, i.e., in couple households with children. Gender difference in household support travel reacts to parenthood but not spouse/partner presence. Gender difference in travel time between employed females and employed males in single-breadwinner couples is no different from gender difference in double-breadwinner couples. The results call for policy initiatives and research inquiries that pay greater attention to the large gender disparities in work travel in couple households with children and the large gender disparities in household support travel in all households with children including single-parent households. Although incapable of ruling out the influences of internalized gender differences (e.g., preference theory) and gendered structural contexts (e.g., labor market segmentation), the findings provide clear evidence that traditional gender roles and relations remain operative in contemporary households in the US.

Keywords

Travel behavior Gender Family Household structure Parenthood Marriage Breadwinner 

References

  1. Abraham, K.G., Maitland, A., Bianchi, S.M.: Nonresponse in the American Time Use Survey—Who is missing from the data and how much does it matter? Public Opin. Q. 70(5), 676–703 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basner, M., Fomberstein, K.M., Razavi, F.M., Banks, S., William, J.H., Rosa, R.R., et al.: American Time Use Survey: sleep time and its relationship to waking activities. Sleep 30(9), 1085–1095 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. Beirão, G., Cabral, J.S.: Market segmentation analysis using attitudes toward transportation: exploring the differences between men and women. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2067(1), 56–64 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bepko, C., Krestan, J.-A., Writers, M.: Too Good for Her Own Good: Breaking Free from the Burden of Female Responsibility. Harper and Row, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  5. Bianchi, S.: Maternal employment and time with children: dramatic change or surprising continuity? Demography 37(4), 401–414 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blumberg, R.L., Coleman, M.T.: A theoretical look at the gender balance of power in the American couple. J. Fam. Issues 10(2), 225–250 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blumen, O.: Gender differences in the journey to work. Urban Geogr. 15(3), 223–245 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boarnet, M.G., Hsu, H.P.: The gender gap in non-work travel: the relative roles of income earning potential and land use. J. Urban Econ. 86, 111–127 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bureau of Labor Statistics: Women in the Labor Force: A Databook. Report 1034. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook-2011.pdf (2011a)
  10. Bureau of Labor Statistics: Table 230. Educational Attainment by Race, Hispanic Origin, and Sex: 1970 to 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0230.pdf (2011b)
  11. Clark, W.A.V., Wang, W.W.: Job access and commute penalties: balancing work and residence in Los Angeles. Urban Geogr. 26(7), 610–626 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coltrane, S.: Research on household labor: modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. J. Marriage Fam. 62(4), 1208–1233 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooke, T.J., Ross, S.L.: Sample selection bias in models of commuting time. Urban Stud. 36(9), 1597–1611 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crane, R.: Is there a quiet revolution in women’s travel? Revisiting the gender gap in commuting. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 73(3), 298–316 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crane, R., Takahashi, L.: Sex changes everything: the recent narrowing and widening of travel differences by gender. Public Works Manag Policy 13(4), 328–337 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davidson, D.J., Freudenburg, W.R.: Gender and environmental risk concerns: a review and analysis of available research. Environ. Behav. 28(3), 302–339 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deka, D.: The living, moving and travel behaviour of the growing American solo: implications for cities. Urban Stud. 51, 634–654 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duncan, S., Edwards, R., Reynolds, T.: Motherhood, paid work and partnering: values and theories. Work Employ. Soc. 17(2), 309–330 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elliott, J.R., Joyce, M.S.: The effects of race and family structure on women’s spatial relationship to the labor market. Sociol. Inq. 74(3), 411–435 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. England, K.V.L.: Suburban pink collar ghettos: the spatial entrapment of women? Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 83(2), 225–242 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ericksen, J.A.: An analysis of the journey to work for women. Soc. Probs. 24, 428 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fenstermaker, S., West, C.: Doing Gender, Doing Difference: Inequality, Power, and Institutional Change. Routledge, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  23. Frändberg, L., Vilhelmson, B.: More or less travel: personal mobility trends in the Swedish population focusing on gender and cohort. J. Transp. Geogr. 19(6), 1235–1244 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Giuliano, G.: Public transportation and the travel needs of women. Traffic Q. 33(4), 607–616 (1979)Google Scholar
  25. Giuliano, G.: Her money or her time: a gendered view of contemporary transport policy. In: Herbel, S., Gaines, D. (eds.) Women’s Issues in Transportation: Summary of the 4th International Conference. Conference Overview and Plenary Papers, vol. 1, pp. 78–93. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board (2009)Google Scholar
  26. Goddard, T., Handy, S., Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.: Voyage of the SS Minivan: women’s travel behavior in traditional and suburban neighborhoods. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1956, 141–148 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gordon, P., Kumar, A., Richardson, H.W.: Gender differences in metropolitan travel behaviour. Reg. Stud. 23(6), 499–510 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gossen, R., Purvis, C.L.: Activities, time, and travel: changes in women’s travel time expenditures, 1990–2000. In: Paper presented at the Research on Women’s Issues in Transportation: Report of a Conference. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board (2004)Google Scholar
  29. Gould, J., Zhou, J.: A commitment to continue? Comparing women and men commuters who choose transit over driving alone. In: Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings, vol. 46, Irvine, California, 2009Google Scholar
  30. Greenstein, T.: Husbands’ participation in domestic labor: interactive effects of wives’ and husbands’ gender ideologies. J. Marriage Fam. 58(3), 585–595 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hakim, C.: Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
  32. Hanson, S.: Gender and mobility: new approaches for informing sustainability. Gend. Place Cult. 17(1), 5–23 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hanson, S., Johnston, I.: Gender differences in work-trip length: explanations and implications. Urban Geogr. 6(3), 193–219 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hanson, S., Pratt, G.: Gender, Work and Space. Routledge, London (1995)Google Scholar
  35. Hjorthol, R.J.: Same city—different options: an analysis of the work trips of married couples in the metropolitan area of Oslo. J. Transp. Geogr. 8(3), 213–220 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hjorthol, R.: Daily mobility of men and women—a barometer of gender equality. In: Uteng, T.P., Cresswell, T. (eds.) Gendered mobilities, pp.93–212. Ashgate, Aldershot (2008)Google Scholar
  37. Ishii-Kuntz, M., Coltrane, S.: Predicting the sharing of household labor: are parenting and housework distinct? Sociol. Perspect. 35(4), 629–647 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Johnston-Anumonwo, I.: The influence of household type on gender differences in work trip distance. Prof. Geogr. 44(2), 161–169 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Johnston-Anumonwo, I.: Race, gender, and constrained work trips in Buffalo, NY, 1990. Prof. Geogr. 49(3), 306–317 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. King, M., Ruggles, S., Alexander, T., Leicach, D., & Sobek, M. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Current Population Survey: Version 2.0. [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: Minnesota Population Center [producer and distributor] (2011)Google Scholar
  41. Kuhnimhof, T., Armoogum, J., Buehler, R., Dargay, J., Denstadli, J.M., Yamamoto, T.: Men shape a downward trend in car use among young adults—evidence from six industrialized countries. Transp. Rev. 32(6), 761–779 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Law, R.: Beyond ‘women and transport’? Towards new geographies of gender and daily mobility. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 23(4), 567–588 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lee, B.S., McDonald, J.F.: Determinants of commuting time and distance for Seoul residents: the impact of family status on the commuting of women. Urban Stud. 40(7), 1283–1302 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Liu, S., Murray-Tuite, P., Schweitzer, L.: Analysis of child pick-up during daily routines and for daytime no-notice evacuations. Transp. Res. A 46(1), 48–67 (2012)Google Scholar
  45. MacDonald, H.I.: Women’s employment and commuting: explaining the links. J. Plan. Lit. 13(3), 267 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Madden, J.F.: Why women work closer to home. Urban Stud. 18(2), 181–194 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Matthies, E., Kuhn, S., Klöckner, C.A.: Travel mode choice of women: the result of limitation, ecological norm, or weak habit? Environ. Behav. 34(2), 163–177 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mauch, M., Taylor, B.D.: Gender, race, and travel behavior: analysis of household-serving travel and commuting in San Francisco bay area. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1607(1), 147–153 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McGuckin, N., Murakami, E.: Examining trip-chaining behavior: comparison of travel by men and women. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1693(1), 79–85 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mohammadian, A. K.: Gender differences in automobile choice behavior. In: Research on Women’s Issues in Transportation: Report of a Conference. Technical Papers, Chicago, Illinois, vol. 2, 2004Google Scholar
  51. Mokhtarian, P.L., Ye, L., Yun, M.: The effects of gender on commuter behavior changes in the context of a major freeway reconstruction. In: Research on Women’s Issues in Transportation: Report of a Conference. Technical Papers, Irvine, California, vol. 2, 2009Google Scholar
  52. Neto, R.S., Duarte, G., Páez, A.: Gender and commuting time in São Paulo metropolitan region. Urban Stud. 52(2), 298–313 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Plaut, P.O.: The intra-household choices regarding commuting and housing. Transp. Res. A 40(7), 561–571 (2006)Google Scholar
  54. Polk, M.: Are women potentially more accommodating than men to a sustainable transportation system in Sweden? Transp. Res. D 8(2), 75–95 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Polk, M.: The influence of gender on daily car use and on willingness to reduce car use in Sweden. J. Transp. Geogr. 12(3), 185–195 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Preston, V., McLafferty, S., Hamilton, E.: The impact of family status on black, white, and Hispanic women’s commuting. Urban Geogr. 14(3), 228–250 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rapino, M.A., Cooke, T.J.: Commuting, gender roles, and entrapment: a national study utilizing spatial fixed effects and control groups. Prof. Geogr. 63(2), 277–294 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Roberts, J., Hodgson, R., Dolan, P.: “It’s driving her mad”: gender differences in the effects of commuting on psychological health. J. Health Econ. 30(5), 1064–1076 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rosenbloom, S.: Understanding women’s and men’s travel patterns: the research challenge. In: Paper Presented at the Research on Women’s Issues in Transportation: Report of a Conference. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board (2004)Google Scholar
  60. Rosenbloom, S., Burns, E.: Gender differences in commuter travel in Tucson: implications for travel demand management programs. Transp. Res. Rec. 1404, 82–90 (1993)Google Scholar
  61. Rosenbloom, S., Plessis-Fraissard, M.: Women’s travel in developed and developing countries: two versions of the same story? In: Herbel, S, Gaines, D. (eds.) Women’s Issues in Transportation: Summary of the 4th International Conference. Conference Overview and Plenary Papers, vol. 1. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board (2009)Google Scholar
  62. Rutherford, B.M., Wekerle, G.R.: Captive rider, captive labor: spatial constraints and women’s employment. Urban Geogr. 9(2), 116–137 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sang, S., O’Kelly, M., Kwan, M.-P.: Examining commuting patterns: results from a journey-to-work model disaggregated by gender and occupation. Urban Stud. 48(5), 891–909 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Scheiner, J., Sicks, K., Holz-Rau, C.: Gendered activity spaces: trends over three decades in Germany. Erdkunde, 65(4), 371–387 (2011)Google Scholar
  65. Scheiner, J., Holz-Rau, C.: Gendered travel mode choice: a focus on car deficient households. J. Transp. Geogr. 24, 250–261 (2012a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Scheiner, J., Holz-Rau, C.: Gender structures in car availability in car deficient households. Res. Transp. Econ. 34(1), 16–26 (2012b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Scheiner, J.: Gendered key events in the life course: effects on changes in travel mode choice over time. J. Transp. Geogr. 37, 47–60 (2014a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Scheiner, J.: The gendered complexity of daily life: effects of life-course events on changes in activity entropy and tour complexity over time. Travel Behav. Soc. 1(3), 91–105 (2014b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schwanen, T.: Gender differences in chauffeuring children among dual-earner families. Prof. Geogr. 59(4), 447–462 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sermons, M.W., Koppelman, F.S.: Representing the differences between female and male commute behavior in residential location choice models. J. Transp. Geogr. 9(2), 101–110 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Singell, L.D., Lillydahl, J.H.: An empirical analysis of the commute to work patterns of males and females in two-earner households. Urban Stud. 23(2), 119–129 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Singley, S.G., Hynes, K.: Transitions to parenthood: work-family policies, gender, and the couple context. Gend. Soc. 19(3), 376–397 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Kalof, L.: Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environ. Behav. 25(5), 322–348 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sultana, S.: Effects of married-couple dual-earner households on metropolitan commuting: evidence from the Atlanta metropolitan area. Urban Geogr. 26(4), 328–352 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Turner, T., Niemeier, D.: Travel to work and household responsibility: new evidence. Transportation 24(4), 397–419 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. U.S. Census Bureau: Current Population Survey: Design and Methodology. Technical Paper 66, October 2006Google Scholar
  77. Wachs, M.: Men, women, and wheels: the historical basis of sex differences in travel patterns. Transp. Res. Rec. 1135, 10–16 (1987)Google Scholar
  78. Wachs, M.: Women’s travel issues: creating knowledge, improving policy, and making change. In: Herbel, S., Gaines, D. (eds.) Women’s Issues in Transportation: Summary of the 4th International Conference. Conference Overview and Plenary Papers, vol. 1, pp. 63–78. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board (2009)Google Scholar
  79. Weinberger, R.: Men, women, job sprawl, and journey to work in the Philadelphia region. Public Works Manag. Policy 11(3), 177–193 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. White, M.J.: A model of residential location choice and commuting by men and women workers. J. Reg. Sci. 17(1), 41–52 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. White, M.J.: Sex differences in urban commuting patterns. Am. Econ. Rev. 76(2), 368–372 (1986)Google Scholar
  82. Wood, W., Eagly, A.H.: A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychol. Bull. 128(5), 699 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wyly, E.K.: Race, gender, and spatial segmentation in the Twin Cities. Prof. Geogr. 48(4), 431–444 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zolnik, E.: Multilevel models of commute times for men and women. In: Páez, A., Gallo, J., Buliung, R.N., Dall’erb, S. (eds.) Progress in Spatial Analysis, pp. 195–215. Springer, Berlin (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public AffairsUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations