Advertisement

Transportation

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 199–224 | Cite as

Factors affecting children’s journeys to school: a joint escort-mode choice model

  • Sylvia Y. He
  • Genevieve Giuliano
Article

Abstract

A child’s mode of travelling to school is influenced by, or dependent on, parental choices. Thus, an increasing proportion of car trips may reflect parental choices and constraints. Whether a parent can escort their children to school may depend on their scheduling and spatial constraints, e.g., work schedule and job location in relation to home and school locations. This research aims to understand the effect of household bundling constraints on a child’s escort-mode choice. In this study, school trip data are drawn from the 2001 SCAG (Southern California Association of Governments) Post Census Regional Household Travel Survey. The study area is the five-county Los Angeles region. Our findings show that the parents’, especially the mother’s, increased working hours and more distant job locations result in an increased likelihood of several alternative escort-mode choices. Mothers who work longer hours and further away from home are less likely to chauffeur their children. These trips have been substituted by alternative escort choices such as independent travel and being escorted by fathers, or alternative mode choices such as active commuting and busing. The effect of increased working hours may be offset by the option of flexible working hours, which allows parents to arrange more escort trips. This study elucidates an important aspect in explaining children’s changing mode choice in journeys to school and sheds light on current policy efforts in reducing children’s car dependency.

Keywords

Children Escort choice Mode choice Parental employment School trip Work arrangement 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to Editor Patricia Mokhtarian and the three anonymous referees for their constructive comments and advice.

References

  1. Babey, S.H., Hastert, T.A., Huang, W., Brown, E.R.: Sociodemographic, family, and environmental factors associated with active commuting to school among US adolescents. J. Public Health Policy 30, 203–220 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barker, J.: ‘Manic Mums’ and ‘Distant Dads’? Gendered geographies of care and the journey to school. Health Place 17, 413–421 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, C.A.: Space and place: urban parents’ geographical preferences for schools. Urban Rev. 39, 375–404 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black, C., Collins, A., Snell, M.: Encouraging walking: the case of journey-to-school trips in compact urban areas. Urban Stud. 38, 1121–1141 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cherlin, A.: Infant care and full-time employment. In: Booth, A. (ed.) Child Care in the 1990s: Trends and Consequences, pp. 209–214. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1992)Google Scholar
  6. Clifton, K.J.: Independent mobility among teenagers: exploration of travel to after-school activities. Transp. Res. Rec. 1854, 74–80 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davison, K.K., Werder, J.L., Lawson, C.T.: Children’s active commuting to school: current knowledge and future directions. Prev. Chronic Dis. 5, 1–11 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. DiGuiseppi, C., Roberts, I., Li, L., Allen, D.: Determinants of car travel on daily journeys to schools: Cross sectional survey of primary school children. Br. Med. J. 316, 1426–1428 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ewing, R., Schroeer, W., Greene, W.: School location and student travel: analysis of factors affecting mode choice. Transp. Res. Rec. 1895, 55–63 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferri, E., Smith, K.: Parenting in the 1990s. Family Policy Studies Centre/Joseph Rowntree Foundation, London (1995)Google Scholar
  11. Hausman, J., McFadden, D.: Specification tests for the multinomial logit model. Econometrica 52, 1219–1240 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hägerstrand, T.: What about people in regional science? Pap. Reg. Sci Assoc. 24, 7–21 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. He, S.: The effect of school quality and residential environment on mode choice of school trips. Transp. Res. Rec. 2213, 96–104 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. He, S.Y.: Will you escort your child to school? The effect of spatial and temporal constraints of parental employment. Appl. Geogr. 42, 116–123 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Long, J.S., Freese, J.: Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using STATA, 2nd edn. STATA Press, College Station (2006)Google Scholar
  16. McDonald, N.C.: Household interactions and children’s school travel: the effect of parental work patterns on walking and biking to school. J. Transp. Geogr. 16, 324–331 (2008a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McDonald, N.C.: Children’s mode choice for the school trips: the role of distance and school location in walking to school. Transportation 35, 23–35 (2008b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McFadden, D.: Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka, P. (ed.) Frontiers in Econometrics, pp. 105–142. Academic Press, New York (1974)Google Scholar
  19. McLanahan, S.S., Wedemeyer, N.V., Adelberg, T.: Network structure, social support, and psychological well-being in the single-parent family. J. Marriage Fam. 43, 601–612 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McLanahan, S., Booth, K.: Mother-only families: problems, prospects, and politics. J. Marriage Fam. 51, 557–580 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McMillan, T.E.: Urban form and a child’s trip to school: the current literature and a framework for future research. J. Plan. Lit 19, 440–456 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McMillan, T.E.: The relative influence of urban form on a child’s travel mode to distance. Transp. Res. Part A 41, 69–79 (2007)Google Scholar
  23. Müller, S., Tscharaktschiew, S., Haase, K.: Travel-to-school mode choice modeling and patterns of school choice in urban areas. J. Transp. Geogr. 16, 342–357 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. NHTS Brief: Travel to school: the distance factor. Available at http://nhts.ornl.gov/briefs/Travel%20To%20School.pdf (2008)
  25. Ozer, E.M.: The impact of childcare responsibility and self-efficacy on the psychological health of professional working mothers. Psychol. Women Q. 19, 315–335 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Paleti, R., Copperman, R.B., Bhat, C.R.: An empirical analysis of children’s after school out-of-home activity-location engagement patterns and time allocation. Transportation 38, 273–303 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peterson, R.R., Gerson, K.: Determinants of responsibility for child care arrangements among dual-earner couples. J. Marriage Fam. 54, 527–536 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pred, A.: The choreography of existence: comments on hagerstrand’s time-geography and its usefulness. Econ. Geogr. 53, 207–221 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sayer, L.C., Bianchi, S.M., Robinson, J.P.: Are parents investing less in children? Trends in mothers’ and fathers’ time with children. Am. J. Sociol. 110, 1–43 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. SCAG: Final Report of Survey Methodology: Year 2001 Post-Census Regional Travel Survey. Southern California Association of Governments (2003)Google Scholar
  31. Scarr, S.: American child care today. Am. Psychol. 53, 95–108 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schlossberg, M., Greene, J., Phillips, P.P., Johnson, B., Parker, B.: School trips: effects of urban form and distance on travel mode. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 72, 337–346 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schwanen, T.: Gender differences in chauffeuring children among dual-earner families. Prof. Geogr. 59, 447–462 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schwanen, T., Ettema, D., Timmermans, H.: If you pick up the children, I’ll do the groceries: spatial differences in between-partner interactions in out-of-home household activities. Environ. Plan. A 39, 2754–2773 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sirard, J.R., Slater, M.E.: Walking and bicycling to school: a review. Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 2, 372–396 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spiess, C.K., Wrohlich, K.: The parental leave benefit reform in Germany: costs and labour market outcomes of moving towards the Nordic model. Popul. Res. Policy Rev. 27, 575–591 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Staines, G.L., Pleck, J.H.: The Impact of Work Schedules on the Family. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (1983)Google Scholar
  38. Timperio, A., Crawford, D., Telford, A., Salmon, J.: Perceptions about the local neighborhood and walking and cycling among children. Prev. Med. 38, 39–47 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tudor-Locke, C., Ainsworth, B.E., Popkin, B.M.: Active commute to school: an overlooked source of childrens’ physical activity. Sports Med. 31, 309–313 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Versantvoort, M.C.: How work affects care—a comparative analysis for the Netherlands, Norway, and the United States. In: Taskforce Part-Time Plus (ed.) 24orMore—Increasing Female Labour Participation, vol. 22. Taskforce Part-Time Plus, Den Haag (2010)Google Scholar
  41. Vovsha, P., Petersen, E., Donnelly, R.: Impact of intrahousehold interactions on individual daily activity-travel patterns. Transp. Res. Rec. 1898, 87–97 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vovsha, P., Petersen, E.: Escorting children to school: statistical analysis and applied modeling approach. Transp. Res. Rec. 1921, 131–140 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Waygood, E.O.D: What is the role of mothers in transit-oriented development? Women’s Issues Transp. Transp. Res. Board Conf. Proc. 2, 163–178 (2009)Google Scholar
  44. Yarlagadda, A.K., Srinivasan, S.: Modeling children’s school travel mode and parental escort decisions. Transportation 35, 201–218 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhu, X., Lee, C.: Walkability and safety around elementary schools: economic and ethnic disparities. Am. J. Prev. Med. 34, 282–290 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zwerts, E., Allaert, G., Janssens, D., Wets, G., Witlox, F.: How children view their travel behaviour: a case study from Flanders (Belgium). J. Transp. Geogr. 18, 702–710 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and Resource ManagementChinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong
  2. 2.Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations