Advertisement

Women’s complex daily lives: a gendered look at trip chaining and activity pattern entropy in Germany

  • 859 Accesses

  • 15 Citations

Abstract

It has long been argued in feminist studies that women’s daily lives are more complex than men’s. This is largely due to the gendered division of work, according to which women juggle more varied obligations, including employment, household work and caregiving. Complex activity patterns in turn encourage women to organise their trips in a more efficient manner in trip chains. This paper studies the complexity of activity patterns (measured by Shannon entropy) and trip chaining patterns from a gender specific perspective. The data used is the German Mobility Panel 1994–2012 which records respondents’ trips over the period of a week. The outcome variables are regressed on sociodemographics, residential and workplace spatial context attributes, cohort and period effects. Gender differences in the effects of variables are tested using interaction terms. The results suggest that women’s patterns are more complex than men’s. Some effects differed distinctly between men and women, suggesting that men and women are differently affected by circumstances impacting the complexity of their lives, most notably by having children and by having a partner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Notes

  1. 1.

    A new time use survey was carried out in Germany in 2012/2013, but the data are not yet available.

  2. 2.

    These two types are mostly named work and non-work trip chains in the literature. However, the term 'non-work' masks that this type of trip chain includes much unpaid work, such as shopping, errands, and escort trips.

  3. 3.

    The GMP is conducted by the University of Karlsruhe on behalf of the Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Development (BMVBS). The data are provided for research use by the Clearingstelle Verkehr (www.clearingstelle-verkehr.de).

  4. 4.

    Models including age plus age squared, but excluding cohort, were run for comparison. These models turned out to be virtually identical to those including cohort.

References

  1. Alexander, B., Hubers, C., Schwanen, T., Dijst, M., Ettema, D.: Anything, anywhere, anytime? Developing measurement instruments to assess the spatial and temporal fragmentation of activities. Environ. Plan. B 38(4), 678–705 (2011). doi:10.1068/b35132

  2. Anxo D., Flood L., Mencarini L., Pailhé A., Solaz A., Tanturri M.L.: Time allocation between work and family over the life-cycle: a comparative gender analysis of Italy, France, Sweden and the United States. IZA Discussion Paper 3193. IZA, Bonn (2007)

  3. Bianchi, S.M., Milkie, M.A., Sayer, L.C., Robinson, J.P.: Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Soc. Forces 79(1), 191–228 (2000). doi:10.1093/sf/79.1.191

  4. Bianchi, S.M., Robinson, J.P., Milkie, M.A.: Changing Rhythms of American Family Life. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (2007)

  5. Bittman, M., Wajcman, J.: The rush hour: the character of leisure time and gender equity. Soc. Forces 79(1), 165–189 (2000). doi:10.1093/sf/79.1.165

  6. Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P., Handy, S.: Differentiating the influence of accessibility, attitudes, and demographics on stop participation and frequency during the evening commute. Environ. Plan. B 35(3), 431–442 (2008). doi:10.1068/b32056

  7. Chen C.: An activity-based approach to accessibility. PhD thesis, University of California, Irvine (1996)

  8. Cooke, L.P.: Policy, preferences, and patriarchy: the division of domestic labor in East Germany, West Germany, and the United States. Soc. Polit. 13(1), 117–143 (2006). doi:10.1093/sp/jxj005

  9. Coulter, P.B.: Measuring Inequality. A Methodological Handbook. Westview Press, Boulder (1989)

  10. Crane, R.: Is there a quiet revolution in women’s travel? Revisiting the gender gap in commuting. J Am. Plan. Assoc. 73(3), 298–316 (2007). doi:10.1080/01944360708977979

  11. Cullen I., Godson V.: Urban Networks: The Structure of Activity Patterns. Prog Plann 4(1), 1–96. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1975). doi: 10.1016/0305-9006(75)90006-9

  12. Currie, G., Delbosc, A.: Exploring the trip chaining behaviour of public transport users in Melbourne. Transp. Policy 18(1), 204–210 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.003

  13. Ellison R.B., Greaves S.: Travel time competitiveness of cycling in Sydney. Proceedings of the 33rd Australasian Transp Res Forum, Canberra, 29 Sept-1 Oct 2010 (2010)

  14. Fisher, K., Egerton, M., Gershuny, J.I., Robinson, J.P.: Gender convergence in the American Heritage Time use Study (AHTUS). Soc. Indic. Res. 82(1), 1–33 (2007). doi:10.1007/s11205-006-9017-y

  15. Fortin, N.M.: Gender role attitudes and the labour-market outcomes of women across OECD countries. Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 21(3), 416–438 (2005). doi:10.1093/oxrep/gri024

  16. Frank, L., Bradley, M., Kavage, S., Chapman, J., Lawton, T.K.: Urban form, travel time, and cost relationships with tour complexity and mode choice. Transportation 35(1), 37–54 (2008). doi:10.1007/s11116-007-9136-6

  17. Garson GD (2010) Generalized linear models and generalized estimating equations. http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/gzlm_gee.htm. Accessed 15 Mar 2011

  18. Geisler E., Kreyenfeld M.: How policy matters: Germany’s parental leave benefit reform and fathers’ behavior, 1999–2009. MPIDR Working paper WP 2012–2021. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock (2012)

  19. Gershuny, J., Kan, M.Y.: Half-way to gender equality in work? Evidence from the multinational time use study. In: Scott, J., Dex, S., Plagnol, A. (eds.) Gendered Lives: Gender Inequalities in Production and Reproduction, pp. 74–94. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2012)

  20. Gille, M., Marbach, J.: Arbeitsteilung von Paaren und ihre Belastung mit Zeitstress. In: Bundesamt, Statistisches (ed.) Alltag in Deutschland, pp. 86–113. Analysen zur Zeitverwendung, Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden (2004)

  21. Grunow, D., Schulz, F., Blossfeld, H.P.: What determines change in the division of housework over the course of marriage? Int. Sociol. 27(3), 289–307 (2012). doi:10.1177/0268580911423056

  22. Hedeker, D., Gibbons, R.D., Flay, B.R.: Random-effects regression models for clustered data with an example from smoking prevention research. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 62(4), 757–765 (1994). doi:10.1037/0022-006X.62.4.757

  23. Hensher, D., Reyes, A.: Trip chaining as a barrier to the propensity to use public transport. Transportation 27(4), 341–361 (2000). doi:10.1023/A:1005246916731

  24. Hilbrecht M.J.: Parents, employment, gender and well-being: a time use study. PhD thesis, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada (2009)

  25. Hjorthol, R., Vagane, L.: Allocation of tasks, arrangement of working hours and commuting in different Norwegian households. J. Transp. Geogr. 35, 75–83 (2014)

  26. Juster, F.T., Ono, H., Stafford, F.P.: An assessment of alternative measures of time use. Sociol. Methodol. 33(1), 19–54 (2003). doi:10.1111/j.0081-1750.2003.t01-1-00126

  27. Kan, M.Y., Sullivan, O., Gershuny, J.: Gender convergence in domestic work: discerning the effects of interactional and institutional barriers from large-scale data. Sociology 45(2), 234–251 (2011). doi:10.1177/0038038510394014

  28. Kanji, S., Schober, P.: Are couples with young children more likely to split up when the mother is the main or an equal earner? Sociology 48(1), 38–58 (2014). doi:10.1177/0038038512467710

  29. Kézdi, G.: Robust standard error estimation in fixed-effects panel models. Hung. Stat. Rev. Spec. 9, 96–116 (2004)

  30. KIT (Institut für Verkehrswesen, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie): Das Deutsche Mobilitätspanel (MOP). Informationen zur Datennutzung (Panelhandbuch). Stand 2012. KIT, Karlsruhe (2012)

  31. Kroesen, M.: Modeling the behavioral determinants of travel behavior: an application of latent transition analysis. Transp. Res. A 65, 56–67 (2014)

  32. Krygsman, S., Arentze, T., Timmermans, H.: Capturing tour mode and activity choice interdependencies: a co-evolutionary logit modelling approach. Transp. Res. A 41(10), 913–933 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.tra.2006.03.006

  33. Kuhnimhof, T., Armoogum, J., Buehler, R., Dargay, J., Denstadli, J.M., Yamamoto, T.: Men shape a downward trend in car use among young adults—evidence from six industrialized countries. Transp. Rev. 32(6), 761–779 (2012). doi:10.1080/01441647.2012.736426

  34. Kwan, M.-P.: Gender, the home-work link, and space-time patterns of non-employment activities. Econ. Geogr. 75(4), 370–394 (1999). doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.1999.tb00126.x

  35. Kwan, M.-P.: Gender differences in space-time constraints. Area 32(2), 145–156 (2000). doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2000.tb00125.x

  36. Kwan, M.-P., Schwanen, T., Ren, F.: Gendered rigidity of space-time constraints and human activity patterns: an activity-based approach. In: Wang, D., Li, S.-M. (eds.) Transportation and Geography, pp. 951–959. Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies, Hong Kong (2009)

  37. Lee, M., McNally, M.G.: An empirical investigation on the dynamic processes of activity scheduling and trip chaining. Transportation 33(6), 553–565 (2006). doi:10.1007/s11116-006-7728-1

  38. MacDonald, H.I.: Women’s employment and commuting: explaining the links. J Plan. Lit. 13(3), 267–283 (1999). doi:10.1177/08854129922092397

  39. McGinnity F., Russell H. Gender Inequalities in Time Use. The Distribution of Caring, Housework and Employment Among Women and Men in Ireland. The Equality Authority, Dublin (2008)

  40. McGuckin, N., Murakami, E.: Examining trip-chaining behavior: a comparison of travel by men and women. Transp. Res. Rec. 1693, 79–85 (1999)

  41. McGuckin N., Nakamoto Y. Differences in trip chaining by men and women. In: Transportation Research Board (ed) Research on Women’s Issues in Transportation Vol. 1: Conference Overview and Plenary Papers. Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings 35. National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 49–55 (2005)

  42. McQuaid, R.W., Chen, T.: Commuting times—the role of gender, children and part-time work. Res. Transp. Econ. 34(1), 66–73 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2011.12.001

  43. Mencarini, L., Sironi, M.: Happiness, housework and gender inequality in Europe. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 28(2), 203–219 (2012). doi:10.1093/esr/jcq059

  44. Næss, P.: Gender differences in the influences of urban structure on daily travel. In: Priya Uteng, T., Cresswell, T. (eds.) Gendered Mobilities, pp. 173–192. Ashgate, Aldershot (2008)

  45. Nichols A., Schaffer M.: Clustered Errors in Stata (2007). www.docstoc.com. Accessed 18 Jan 2011

  46. Offer, S., Schneider, B.: Revisiting the gender gap in time-use patterns. Multitasking and well-being among mothers and fathers in dual-earner families. Am. Sociol. Rev. 76(6), 809–833 (2011). doi:10.1177/0003122411425170

  47. Paleti R., Pendyala R. M., Bhat C. R., Konduri K. C.: A joint tour-based model of tour complexity, passenger accompaniment, vehicle type choice, and tour length. Technical paper, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ (2011)

  48. Sandow, E.: Commuting behaviour in sparsely populated areas: evidence from northern Sweden. J. Transp. Geogr. 16(1), 14–27 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.04.004

  49. Sayer, L.C.: Trends in housework. In: Treas, J., Drobnic, S. (eds.) Dividing the Domestic: Men, Women & Household Work in Cross-National Perspective, pp. 19–38. Stanford University Press, Stanford (2010)

  50. Scheiner, J.: Social inequalities in travel behaviour: trip distances in the context of residential self-selection and lifestyles. J. Transp. Geogr. 18(6), 679–690 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.09.002

  51. Scheiner, J.: Gender roles between traditionalism and change: Time use for out-of-home activities and trips in Germany, 1994–2008. In: Gerike, R., Hülsmann, F., Roller, K. (eds.) Strategies for Sustainable Mobilities: Opportunities and Challenges, pp. 79–102. Ashgate, Farnham (2013)

  52. Scheiner, J.: The gendered complexity of daily life: effects of life-course events on changes in activity entropy and tour complexity over time. Travel Behav. Soc. 1(3), 91–105 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2014.04.001

  53. Scheiner J., Bauer U., Wohltmann H., Rittmeier B., Schlump C.: Mobilität, Erreichbarkeit und soziale Exklusion. Fähigkeiten und Ressourcen einer ländlichen Bevölkerung für eine angemessene Versorgung und Teilhabe am öffentlichen Leben. BBSR-Online-Publikation 27/2012. BBSR, Bonn (2012)

  54. Scheiner, J., Holz-Rau, C.: Gendered travel mode choice: a focus on car deficient households. J. Transp. Geogr. 24, 250–261 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.02.011

  55. Schendera, C.: Regressionsanalyse mit SPSS. Oldenbourg, München (2008)

  56. Schmöcker, J.-D., Su, F., Noland, R.B.: An analysis of trip chaining among older London residents. Transportation 37(1), 105–123 (2010). doi:10.1007/s11116-009-9222-z

  57. Schwanen, T.: Car use and gender: the case of dual-earner families in Utrecht, The Netherlands. In: Lucas, K., Blumenberg, E., Weinberger, R. (eds.) Auto Motives: Understanding Car Use Behaviours, pp. 151–171. Bingley, Emerald (2011)

  58. Schwanen, T., Kwan, M.-P., Ren, F.: How fixed is fixed? Gendered rigidity of space-time constraints and geographies of everyday activities. Geoforum 39(6), 2109–2121 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.09.002

  59. Sicks K., Scheiner J., Holz-Rau C.: Born to shop? Gender-specific activity travel in Germany. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Research on Women’s Issues in Transportation, Paris, April 2014

  60. Statistisches Bundesamt: Auf dem Weg zur Gleichstellung. Wirtschaft und Statistik, August 2014, pp. 465–477 (2014)

  61. Strathman, J.G., Dueker, K.J.: Understanding trip chaining. In: US Department of Transportation (ed) Special Reports on Trip and Vehicle Attributes. US DoT/FHWA, Washington, DC, pp. 1–1 to 1–27 (1995)

  62. Taylor, B.D., Mauch, M.: Gender, race, and travel behavior: an analysis of household-serving travel in the San Francisco Bay area. In: US Department of Transportation (ed) Women’s Travel Issues. Proceedings from the Second National Conference. Baltimore, October 1996. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, pp. 371–405 (1997)

  63. Thill, J.-C., Thomas, I.: Toward conceptualizing trip-chaining behavior: a review. Geogr. Anal. 19(1), 1–17 (1987). doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1987.tb00110.x

  64. Timmermans, H., van der Waerden, P., Alves, M., Polak, J., Ellis, S., Harvey, A.S., Kurose, S., Zandee, R.: Spatial context and the complexity of daily travel patterns: an international comparison. J. Transp. Geogr. 11(1), 37–46 (2003). doi:10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00050-9

  65. Treas, J., Drobnic, S.: Dividing the Domestic: Men, Women & Household Work in Cross-National Perspective. Stanford University Press, Stanford (2010)

  66. van der Lippe, T.: Women’s employment and housework. In: Treas, J., Drobnic, S. (eds.) Dividing the Domestic: Men, Women & Household Work in Cross-National Perspective, pp. 41–58. University Press, Stanford (2010)

  67. van der Lippe, T., de Ruijter, J., de Ruijter, E., Raub, W.: Persistent inequalities in time use between men and women: a detailed look at the influence of economic circumstances, policies and culture. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 27(2), 164–179 (2011). doi:10.1093/esr/jcp066

  68. van Wee, B., Bohte, W., Molin, E., Arentze, T., Liao, F.: Policies for synchronization in the transport–land-use system. Transp. Policy 31, 1–9 (2014)

  69. Vande Walle, S., Steenberghen, T.: Space and time related determinants of public transport use in trip chains. Transp. Res. A 40(2), 151–162 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.tra.2005.05.001

  70. Wagner, M., Franzmann, G.: Die Pluralisierung der Lebensformen. Z Bevölkerungswissenschaft 25(1), 151–173 (2000)

  71. Wooldridge, J.M.: Cluster-sample methods in applied econometrics. Am. Econ. Rev. 93(2), 133–138 (2003). doi:10.1257/000282803321946930

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) as part of the project ‘Alltag im Wandel des Geschlechterverhältnisses: Aktivitäten, Wege, Verkehrsmittel und Zeitverwendung’ (Everyday life in the context of changing gender relations: activities, trips, travel modes and time use, 2009–2015).

Author information

Correspondence to Joachim Scheiner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scheiner, J., Holz-Rau, C. Women’s complex daily lives: a gendered look at trip chaining and activity pattern entropy in Germany. Transportation 44, 117–138 (2017) doi:10.1007/s11116-015-9627-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Activity pattern
  • Gender
  • Trip chain
  • Tour complexity
  • Travel behaviour
  • Entropy