Transportation

, Volume 43, Issue 5, pp 749–769 | Cite as

Precise estimation of connections of metro passengers from Smart Card data

  • Sung-Pil Hong
  • Yun-Hong Min
  • Myoung-Ju Park
  • Kyung Min Kim
  • Suk Mun Oh
Article

Abstract

The aim of this study is to estimate both the physical and schedule-based connections of metro passengers from their entry and exit times at the gates and the stations, a data set available from Smart Card transactions in a majority of train networks. By examining the Smart Card data, we will observe a set of transit behaviors of metro passengers, which is manifested by the time intervals that identifies the boarding, transferring, or alighting train at a station. The authenticity of the time intervals is ensured by separating a set of passengers whose trip has a unique connection that is predominantly better by all respects than any alternative connection. Since the connections of such passengers, known as reference passengers, can be readily determined and hence their gate times and stations can be used to derive reliable time intervals. To detect an unknown path of a passenger, the proposed method checks, for each alternative connection, if it admits a sequence of boarding, middle train(s), and alighting trains, whose time intervals are all consistent with the gate times and stations of the passenger, a necessary condition of a true connection. Tested on weekly 32 million trips, the proposed method detected unique connections satisfying the necessary condition, which are, therefore, most likely true physical and schedule-based connections in 92.6 and 83.4 %, respectively, of the cases.

Keywords

Physical and schedule-based connection estimation Smart Card data Metro network Passenger’s behaviors 

References

  1. Asakura, Y., Iryo, T., Nakajima, Y., Kusakabe, T., Takagi, Y., Kashiwadani, M.: Behavioural analysis of railway passengers using smart card data. In: Proceedings of the Urban Transport, pp. 599–608. Malta (2008)Google Scholar
  2. Bagchi, M., White, P.R.: The potential of public transport smart card data. Transp. Policy 12(5), 464–474 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bureau of Public Roads: Traffic Assignment Manual. U.S, Department of Commerce (1964)Google Scholar
  4. Cox, T., Houdmont, J., Griffiths, A.: Rail passenger crowding, stress, health and safety in Britain. Transp. Res. Part A 40, 244–258 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. Cronbach, L.J.: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3), 297–334 (1951)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Cea, J., Fernandez, J.E.: Transit assignment for congested public tranport system: an equilibrium model. Transp. Sci. 27(2), 133–147 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Einmahl, J.H.J., Smeets, S.G.W.R.: Ultimate 100 m world records through through extreme-value theory. Stat. Neerl. 65(1), 32–42 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fu, Q., Liu, R., Hess, S.: A bayesian modelling framework for individual passenger’s probabilistic route choices: a case study on the London underground. In: 93rd Transportation Research Board (TRB) Annual Meeting (2014)Google Scholar
  9. Guo, Z., Wilson, N.: Transfer behavior and transfer planning in public transport systems: a case of the London underground. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Advanced Systems for Public Transport, Hong Kong (2009)Google Scholar
  10. Jang, W.: Travel time and transfer analysis using transit smart card data. Transp. Res. Rec. 2144, 142–149 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kato, H., Kaneko, Y., Inoue, M.: Comparative analysis of transit assignment: evidence from urban railway system in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Transportation 37, 775–799 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ko, S.-J., Kim, K.M., Hong, S.-P.: Estimation of transfer times and alighting times of the metro passengers in Seoul metropolitan area. Working paperGoogle Scholar
  13. Kusakabe, T., Iryo, T., Asakura, Y.: Estimation method for railway passengers’ train choice behaviour with smart card transaction data. Transportation 37, 731–749 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lam, W.H.K., Lo, H.K.: Traffic assignment methods. In: Hensher, D.A., Button, K.J., Haynes, K.E., Stopher, P.R. (eds.) Handbook of Transport Geography and Spatial Systems, pp. 609–625 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. Lehtonen, M., Rosenberg, M., Rasanen, J., Sirkia, A.: Utilization of the smart card payment system (scps) data in public tranport planning and statistics. In: Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Chicago, Illinois, 14–17 October 2002Google Scholar
  16. Morency, C., Trépanier, M., Agard, B.: Measuring transit use variability with smart-card data. Transp. Policy 14(3), 193–203 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nielsen, O.A.: A stochastic transit assignment model considering differences in passengers utility functions. Transp. Res. Part B 34(5), 377–402 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nour, A., Casello, J.M., Hellinga, B.: Anxiety-based formulation to estimate generalized cost of transit travel time. Transp. Res. Rec. 2143, 108–116 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Park, J.Y., Kim, D.-J., Lim, Y.: Use of smart card data to define public transit use in Seoul, South Korea. Transp. Res. Rec. 2063, 3–9 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pelletier, M.-P., Trèpanier, M., Morency, C.: Smart card data use in public transit: a literature review. Transp. Res. Part C 19, 557–568 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Raveau, S., Muñoz, J.C., de Grange, L.: A topological route choice model for metro. Transp. Res. Part A 45, 138–147 (2011)Google Scholar
  22. Rinks, D.B.: Revenue allocation methods for integrated transit systems. Transp. Res. Part A 20(1), 39–50 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seaborn, C.: Application of smart card fare payment data to bus network planning in London. UK. MS thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge (2008)Google Scholar
  24. Seaborn, C., Attanucci, J., Wilson, N.: Analyzing multimodal public transport journeys in London with smart card fare payment data. Transp. Res. Rec. 2121, 55–62 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shin, S.G., Cho, Y., Lee, C.: Integrated transit service evaluation methodologies using transportation card data (In Korean). Technical Report 2007-R-09, Seoul Development Institute (2007)Google Scholar
  26. Trépanier, M., Tranchant, N., Chapleau, R.: Individual trip destination estimation in a transit smart card automated fare collection system. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 11(1), 1–14 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tsamboulas, D.A., Antoniou, C.: Allocating revenues to public transit operators under an integrated fare system. Transp. Res. Rec. 1986, 29–37 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Utsunomiya, M., Attanuchi, J., Wilson, N.H.: Potential uses of transit smart card registration and transaction data to improve transit planning. Transp. Res. Rec. 1971, 119–126 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Weidmann, U., Orth, H., Dorbritz, R.: Development of measurement system for public transport performance. Transp. Res. Rec. 2274, 135–143 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhou, F., Xu, R.-H.: Model of passenger flow assignment for urban rail transit based on entry and exit time constraints. J. Transp. Res. Board 2284, 57–61 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sung-Pil Hong
    • 1
  • Yun-Hong Min
    • 1
    • 3
  • Myoung-Ju Park
    • 1
    • 4
  • Kyung Min Kim
    • 1
    • 2
  • Suk Mun Oh
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringSeoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Policy-Technology Convergence Research DivisionKorea Railroad Research InstituteUiwang-citySouth Korea
  3. 3.Intelligence Computing LaboratorySamsung Electronics Co. Ltd.Suwon CitySouth Korea
  4. 4.Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems EngineeringKyung Hee UniversityYongin CitySouth Korea

Personalised recommendations