Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparing cities’ cycling patterns using online shared bicycle maps

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bicycle sharing systems are increasingly being deployed in urban areas around the world, alongside online maps that disclose the state (i.e., location, number of bicycles/number of free parking slots) of stations in each city. Recent work has demonstrated how regularly monitoring these online maps allows for a granular analysis of a city’s cycling trends; further, the literature indicates that different cities have unique spatio-temporal patterns, reducing the generalisability of any insights or models derived from a single system. In this work, we analyse 4.5 months of online bike-sharing map data from ten cities which, combined, have 996 stations. While an aggregate comparison supports the view of cities having unique usage patterns, results of applying unsupervised learning to the temporal data shows that, instead, only the larger systems display heterogeneous behaviour, indicating that many of these systems share intrinsic similarities. We further show how these similarities are reflected in the predictability of stations’ occupancy data via a cross-city comparison of the error that a variety of approaches achieve when forecasting the number of bicycles that a station will have in the near future. We close by discussing the impact of uncovering these similarities on how future bicycle sharing systems can be designed, built, and managed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. E.g., http://bikes.oobrien.com/global.php, as of March 19, 2015.

References

  • Ahmed, N.K., Atiya, A.F., Gayar, N.E., El-Shishiny, H.: An empirical comparison of machine learning models for time series forecasting. Econom. Rev. 29(5–6), 594–621 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austwick, M.Z., O’Brien, O., Strano, E., Viana, M.: The structure of spatial networks and communities in bicycle sharing systems. PLoS One 8(9), e74685 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benchimol, M., Benchimol, P., Chappert, B., Taille, A.D.L., Laroche, F., Meunier, F., Robinet, L.: Balancing the stations of a self-service “bike hire” system. RAIRO Oper. Res. 45, 37–61 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, D., Clifford, J.: Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series. In: KDD Workshop, vol. 10, pp. 359–370, Seattle (1994)

  • Borgnat, P., Abry, P., Flandrin, P., Rouquier, J.-B.: Studying lyon’s Ve´lo’V: a statistical cyclic model. In: European Conference on Complex Systems, Warwick University, Coventry, UK, September 2009

  • Crone, S.F., Hibon, M., Nikolopoulos, K.: Advances in forecasting with neural networks? empirical evidence from the nn3 competition on time series prediction. Int. J. Forecast. 27(3), 635–660 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Defense of United States of America: Global Positioning System Standard Positioning Service Performance Standard, 4th edn. Department of Defense, Washington (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Stork, D.G.: Pattern classification and scene analysis. Part 1, pattern classification. Wiley, Chichester (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Froehlich, J., Neumann, J., Oliver, N.: Sensing and predicting the pulse of the city through shared bicycling. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1420–1426. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (2009)

  • Girardin, F., Calabrese, F., Fiore, F.D., Ratti, C., Blat, J.: Digital footprinting: uncovering tourists with user-generated content. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 7(4), 36 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guenther, M.C., Bradley, J.T.: Journey data based arrival forecasting for bicycle hire schemes. Preprint (2010)

  • Lathia, N., Ahmed, S., Capra, L.: Measuring the impact of opening the london shared bicycle scheme to casual users. Elsevier Transp. Res.—Part C (Emerg. Technol.) 22, 88 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, O., Cheshire, J., Batty, M.: Mining bicycle sharing data for generating insights into sustainable transport systems. J. Transp. Geogr. 34, 262–273 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, S., Marsden, G., Shaheen, S., Cohen, A.: Understanding the diffusion of public bikesharing systems: evidence from Europe and North America. J. Transp. Geogr. 31, 94–103 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shawcross, V., Pidgeon, C., Borwick, V., Cleverly, J., Jones, J., McCartney, J., O'Connell, S., Qureshi, M., Tracey, R.: Pedal Power: the Cycle Hire Scheme and Cycle Superhighways. Greater London Authority Transport Committee (Nov. 2010). Available at http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/FINAL%20REPORT.pdf (as of March 19, 2015)

  • Quinlan, J.R.: C4. 5: Programs for Machine Learning, vol. 1. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Randriamanamihaga, A., Côme, E., Oukhellou, L., Govaert, G. Clustering the Vélib’ Origin-Destinations flows by means of poisson mixture models—Draft (2013)

  • Ripley, B.D.: Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Robusto, C.: The cosine-haversine formula. Am. Math. Mon. 64(1), 38–40 (1957)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saez-Trumper, D., Quercia, D., Crowcroft, J.: Ads and the city: considering geographic distance goes a long way. In: ACM RecSys, Dublin, Ireland (2012)

  • Sakoe, H., Chiba, S.: Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 26(1), 43–49 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, B., Shea, J., Sinha, S., Hogue, A.: Learning to rank for spatiotemporal search. In: ACM WSDM, Rome, Italy (2013)

  • Shu, J., Chou, M. C., Liu, Q., Teo, C.-P., Wang, I.-L.: Models for effective deployment and redistribution of bicycles within public bicycle-sharing systems. Submitted to Operations Research (2011)

  • Vasconcelos, M., Ricci, S., Almeida, J., Benevenuto, F., Almeida, V.: Tips, dones, and todos: uncovering user profiles in foursquare. In: ACM WSDM, Seattle, Washington (2012)

  • Venetis, P., Gonzalez, H., Jensen, C., Halevy, A.: Hyper-local, directions-based ranking of places. In: VLDB Endowment, Seattle, USA (2011)

  • Yan, M., Ye, K.: Determining the number of clusters using the weighted gap statistic. Biometrics 63(4), 1031–1037 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Advait Sarkar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarkar, A., Lathia, N. & Mascolo, C. Comparing cities’ cycling patterns using online shared bicycle maps. Transportation 42, 541–559 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9599-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9599-9

Keywords

Navigation