Abstract
The 2007–2008 French National Travel Survey (FNTS) included questions about the trip experience for a random subsample of the respondents’ daily travel, offering a rare opportunity to examine a national profile of attitudes toward travel. This study analyzes the self-reported (mental and/or physical) fatigue associated with the selected trip, and its (un)pleasantness. Only 8 % of trips were tiring, and fewer than 4 % were unpleasant, indicating that travel is by no means universally distasteful. We present a bivariate probit model of the mental and physical fatigue associated with the trip, and binary logit models of whether the trip was pleasant (yes/no) or unpleasant (yes/no). For the most part, socioeconomic variables and indicators of trip length, distance, purpose, and mode have logical relationships to fatigue and pleasantness. However, 11 variables out of 31 common to both sets of models have impacts on fatigue that are opposite to those on un/pleasantness, pointing to conditions under which a trip can be fatiguing but pleasant, or conversely. Accordingly, a key contribution of the research is to demonstrate the value of jointly considering both constructs in order to more comprehensively capture the overall attitudes toward the travelling activity. It is also of interest that activities conducted during the trip appear in both sets of models. In particular, the results suggest that although listening to the radio/music decreases the tendency to rate the trip as mentally fatiguing, it tends to be seen as ameliorating the disutility of a tedious trip more than increasing the pleasantness of the trip. Among the policy-relevant findings, we note the especially negative attitudes towards multimodal trips and trips mainly involving driving cars.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Of course, in some contexts, notably those of holiday travel or journeys of self-discovery, such a perspective is not at all new. The novelty of the development described here lies in the application of some of those same principles to the ordinary travel of everyday life.
We are indebted to a reviewer for this observation.
References
Abou-Zeid, M., Witter, R., Bierlaire, M., Kaufmann, V., Ben-Akiva, M.: Happiness and travel mode switching: findings from a Swiss public transportation experiment. Transp. Policy 19(1), 93–104 (2012)
Archer, M., Paleti, R., Konduri, K.C., Pendyala, R.M., Bhat, C.R.: Modeling the connection between activity-travel patterns and subjective well-being. Transp. Res. Rec. 2382, 102–111 (2013)
Ben-Akiva, M., Lerman, S.R.: Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge (1985)
Bergstad, C.J., Gamble, A., Gärling, T., Hagman, O., Polk, M., Ettema, D., Friman, M., Olsson, L.E.: Subjective well-being related to satisfaction with daily travel. Transportation 38(1), 1–15 (2011)
Bhat, C.R., Pulugurta, V.: A comparison of two alternative behavioral mechanisms for car ownership decisions. Transp. Res. Part B 32(1), 61–75 (1998)
Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.L.: How do individuals adapt their personal travel? Objective and subjective influences on the consideration of travel-related strategies for San Francisco Bay Area commuters. Transp. Policy 12, 291–302 (2005)
Chib, S., Greenberg, E.: Analysis of multivariate probit models. Biometrika 85(2), 347–361 (1998)
Choo, S., Collantes, G.O., Mokhtarian, P.L.: Wanting to travel, more or less: exploring the determinants of the deficit and surfeit of personal travel. Transportation 32, 135–164 (2005)
Diana, M.: Relationship between specific (dis)utility and the frequency of driving a car. Transp. Res. Rec. 1926, 88–95 (2005)
Diana, M.: Making the “primary utility of travel” concept operational: a measurement model for the assessment of the intrinsic utility of reported trips. Transp. Res. A 42(3), 455–474 (2008)
Ettema, D., Friman, M., Gärling, T., Olsson, L.E., Fujii, S.: How in-vehicle activities affect work commuters’ satisfaction with public transport. J. Transp. Geogr. 24, 215–222 (2012)
Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Olsson, L.E., Friman, M.: Out-of-home activities, daily travel, and subjective well-being. Transp. Res. A 44(9), 723–732 (2010)
Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Eriksson, L., Friman, M., Olsson, L.E., Fujii, S.: Satisfaction with travel and subjective well-being: development and test of a measurement tool. Transp. Res. F 14, 167–175 (2011)
Evans, G.W., Wener, R.E., Phillips, D.: The morning rush hour: predictability and commuter stress. Environ. Behav. 34(4), 521–530 (2002)
Frei, C., Mahmassani, H.S.:: Private time on public transit: dimensions of information and telecommunication use of Chicago transit riders. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, January 2011
Friman, M., Fujii, S., Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Olsson, L.E.: Psychometric analysis of the satisfaction with travel scale. Transp. Res. A 48, 132–145 (2013)
Gatersleben, B., Uzzell, D.: Affective appraisals of the daily commute: comparing perceptions of drivers, cyclists, walkers, and users of public transport. Environ. Behav. 39(3), 416–431 (2007)
Gottholmseder, G., Nowotny, K., Pruckner, G.J., Theurl, E.: Stress perception and commuting. Health Econ. 18, 559–576 (2009)
Gripsrud, M., Hjorthol, R.: Working on the train: from ‘dead time’ to productive and vital time. Transportation 39, 941–956 (2012)
Hensher, D.A., Rose, J.M., Greene, W.H.: Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)
Horowitz, A.J.: Subjective value of time in bus transit travel. Transportation 10, 149–164 (1981)
LaJeunesse, S., Rodriguez, D.A.: Mindfulness, time affluence, and journey-based affect: exploring relationships. Transp. Res. F 15, 196–205 (2012)
Lansink, A.O., van den Berg, M., Huirne, R.: Analysis of strategic planning of Dutch pig farmers using a multivariate probit model. Agric. Syst. 78(1), 73–84 (2003)
Lin, W.: Wasting time? The differentiation of travel time in urban transport. Environ. Plan. A 44(10), 2477–2492 (2012)
Lucas, J.L., Heady, R.B.: Flextime commuters and their driver stress, feelings of time urgency, and commute satisfaction. J. Bus. Psychol. 16(4), 565–571 (2002)
Lyons, G., Jain, J., Holley, D.: The use of travel time by rail passengers in Great Britain. Transp. Res. A 41, 107–120 (2007)
Meissonnier, J.: Pour mieux analyser les comportements de déplacement, faut-il ajuster les protocoles d’enquête? Les Cahiers Scientifiques du Transport 62, 3–32 (2012)
Mokhtarian, P.L., Salomon, I.: How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transp. Res. A 35(8), 695–719 (2001)
Mokhtarian, P.L., Salomon, I., Redmond, L.S.: Understanding the demand for travel: It’s not purely ‘derived’. Innovation 14(4), 355–380 (2001)
Morris, E.A., Erick G.: Mood and mode: does how we travel affect how we feel? Transportation (2014). doi:10.1007/s11116-014-9521-x
Novaco, R.W., Collier, C.: Commuting stress, ridesharing, and gender: analyses from the 1993 State of the Commute study in Southern California. Transp. Res. Rec. 1433, 170–176 (1994)
Novaco, R.W., Kliewer, W., Broquet, A.: Home environmental consequences of commute travel impedance. Am. J. Community Psychol. 19(6), 881–909 (1991)
Olsson, L.E., Garling, T., Ettema, D., Friman, M., Fujii, S.: Happiness and satisfaction with work commute. Soc. Indic. Res. 111(1), 255–263 (2013)
Ory, D.T., Mokhtarian, P.L.: When is getting there half the fun? Modeling the liking for travel. Transportation Research A 39(2–3), 97–123 (2005)
Páez, A., Whalen, K.: Enjoyment of commute: a comparison of different transportation modes. Transp. Res. A 44(7), 537–549 (2010)
Papon, F.: Traveling to reach destination, or for the sake of it: a typology of trips after French National Travel Survey data. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Toronto, Canada, 15–20 July 2012
Papon, F., Armoogum, J., Diana, M.: Specific experimental trials versus large-scale mobility surveys insets to investigate transport-related behavioural issues: the case of the primary utility of travel. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Survey Methods in Transport, Annecy, France, 25–31 May 2008
Potoglou, D., Susilo, Y.O.: Comparison of vehicle-ownership models. Transp. Res. Rec. 2076, 97–105 (2008)
Roberts, J., Hodgson, R., Dolan, P.: “It’s driving her mad”: gender differences in the effects of commuting on psychological health. J. Health Econ. 30, 1064–1076 (2011)
Russell, J.A.: Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychol. Rev. 110(1), 145–172 (2003)
Russell, M.L. (2012) Travel time use on public transport: what passengers do and how it affects their wellbeing. Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy, University of Otago, New Zealand. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10523/2367. Accessed 9 Sep 2014
Salomon, I., Mokhtarian, P.L.: What happens when mobility-inclined market segments face accessibility-enhancing policies? Transp. Res. D 3(3), 129–140 (1998)
Sandow, E., Westin, K.: Preferences for commuting in sparsely populated areas. J. Transp. Land Use 2(3/4), 87–107 (2010)
Stokols, D., Novaco, R.W., Stokols, J., Campbell, J.: Traffic congestion, type A behavior, and stress. J. Appl. Psychol. 63(4), 467–480 (1978)
Stutzer, A., Frey, B.S.: Stress that doesn’t pay: the commuting paradox. Scandinavian J. Econ. 110(2), 339–366 (2008)
Susilo, Y.O., Lyons, G., Jain, J., Atkins, S.: Rail passengers’ time use and utility assessment—2010 findings from Great Britain with multivariate analysis. Transp. Res. Rec. 2323, 99–109 (2012)
van Exel, Nicolaas J.A., Rietveld, P.: Perceptions of public transport travel time and their effect on choice-sets among car drivers. J. Transp. Land Use 2(3/4), 75–86 (2010)
Wener, R.E., Evans, G.W.: Comparing stress of car and train commuters. Transp. Res. F 14, 111–116 (2011)
Wener, R., Evans, G.W., Boately, P.: Commuting stress: psychophysiological effects of the trip and spillover into the workplace. Transp. Res. Rec. 1924, 112–117 (2005)
Acknowledgments
Model development and other analyses were conducted by the third author while performing an internship at the University of California, Davis. This internship was funded by the École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l’État (ENTPE). The authors wish also to thank Jimmy Armoogum and Zehir Kolli from IFSTTAR for their help in the interpretation and processing of the FNTS dataset, and four anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on a previous version of this manuscript. Preliminary findings from this research were presented at the 13th IATBR (International Association for Travel Behaviour Research) Conference in Toronto, Canada, July 15–20, 2012.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mokhtarian, P.L., Papon, F., Goulard, M. et al. What makes travel pleasant and/or tiring? An investigation based on the French National Travel Survey. Transportation 42, 1103–1128 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9557-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9557-y