, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 529–542 | Cite as

Changing demographics and young adult driver license decline in Melbourne, Australia (1994–2009)

  • Alexa Delbosc
  • Graham Currie


In the last decade young people in North America, Australia and much of Europe are becoming less likely to hold a driver’s license and, if they can drive, they are driving less. This is a remarkable trend which is not yet well understood. This paper is an empirical analysis exploring the relationship between young adult driver licensing and young adult demographics and living arrangements. In many developed countries, young adults are becoming increasingly less likely to be in full-time work, more likely to be in part-time work or studying, more likely to be living at home with parents and they are getting married and having children later in life. Against the background of these trends, a binary logistic regression model of travel survey data (1994–2009) for Melbourne, Australia is used to explore the association between these demographics and young adult license-holding. The model established that full-time employment and child-rearing are associated with higher young adult licensing rates whereas part-time work and studying were associated with lower licensing rates. However the impact of living at home with parents was not clear and requires further study. Together it is theorised that these changes in living arrangements may be restricting the disposable income of some young adults and reducing or postponing license take-up. The paper concludes with the implications of findings for policy and opportunities for future research.


Car licensing Young adults Demographic trends 



The authors would like to thank the Victorian Department of Transport for making the VATS and VISTA data available for analysis. An earlier form of this paper was presented at the 92nd Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting (Delbosc and Currie 2013a). Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.


  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics: Home and away: the living arrangements of young people. Australian Social Trends. Report 4102.0 (2009a)Google Scholar
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics: Household income and income distribution, 2007–2008 (2009b)Google Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics: Population by age and sex, Victoria. 3101.0 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics: Education and work, Australia (1991–2011). Report 6227.0 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. Australian Bureau of Statistics: Australian social trends 2012: locve me do, commonwealth of Australia. Report 4102.0 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. Australian Bureau of Statistics: Labour force, Australia. Report 6202.0 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. Berg, H.-Y.: Understanding Subgroups of Novice Drivers: A Basis for Increased Safety and Health. Linköping University, Linköping (2001)Google Scholar
  8. Bureau of Labor Statistics: “School’s out”. Spotlight on statistics Retrieved 10 October 2012, from (2011)
  9. Cobb-Clark, D.A.: Leaving home: what economics has to say about the living arrangements of young Australians. Aust. Econ. Rev. 41(2), 160–176 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, B., Dutzik, T., Baxandall, P.: Transportation and the New Generation: Why Young People Are Driving Less and What It Means for Transportation Policy. Frontier Group, Santa Barbara (2012)Google Scholar
  11. Delbosc, A., Currie, G.: Using online discussion forums to study attitudes toward cars and transit among young people in Victoria. 35th Australasian Transport Research Forum, Perth (2012)Google Scholar
  12. Delbosc, A., Currie, G.: Are changed living arrangements influencing youth driver license decline? Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2013a)Google Scholar
  13. Delbosc, A., Currie, G.: Causes of youth licensing decline: a synthesis of evidence. Transp. Rev. 33(3), 271–290 (2013b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Federal Highway Administration: Licensed drivers, by sex and age group, 1963–1995 (Table DL-220) (2011)Google Scholar
  15. Gray, M., Qu, L., Weston, R.: Fertility and Family Policy in Australia. Australian Institue of Family Studies, Melbourne (2008)Google Scholar
  16. Kalmbach, R., Bernhart, W., Kleimann, P.G., Hoffman, M.: Automotive Landscape 2025: Opportunities and Challenges Ahead. Roland Berger, Munich (2011)Google Scholar
  17. Kuhnimhof, T., Armoogum, J., Buehler, R., Dargay, J., Denstadli, J.M., Yamamoto, T.: Men shape a downward trend in car use among young adults—evidence from six industrialized countries. Transp. Rev. 32(6), 761–779 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuhnimhof, T., Buehler, R., Dargay, J.: A new generation: travel trends for young Germans and Britons. Transp. Res. Rec. 2230, 58–67 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Le Vine, S., Jones, P.: On the Move: Making Sense of Car and Train Travel Trends in Britain. RAC Foundation, London (2012)Google Scholar
  20. Le Vine, S.E., Jones, P.M., Polak, J.W.: Has the historical growth in car use come to an end in great britain? 37th European Transport Conference. Leeuwenhorst, Netherlands (2009)Google Scholar
  21. Licaj, I., Haddak, M., Pochet, P., Chiron, M.: Individual and contextual socioeconomic disadvantages and car driving between 16 and 24 years of age: a multilevel study in the Rhône Département (France). J. Transp. Geogr. 22, 19–27 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McDonald, N., Trowbridge, M.: Does the built environment affect when American teens become drivers? Evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey. J. Saf. Res. 40, 177–183 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Newman, P., Kenworthy, J.: ‘Peak car use’: understanding the demise of automobile dependence. World Transp. Policy Pract. 17(2), 31–42 (2011)Google Scholar
  24. Noble, B.: Why are some young people choosing not to drive? European Transport Conference, Strasbourg (2005)Google Scholar
  25. Office for National Statistics: Young people in the labour market—2011. London (2011)Google Scholar
  26. Preusser, D.F., Ferguson, S.A., Williams, A.F., Leaf, W.A., Farmer, C.M.: Teenager driver licensure rates in four states. J. Saf. Res. 29(2), 97–105 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Prevedouros, P.D., Schofer, J.L.: Factors affecting automobile ownership and use. Transp. Res. Rec. 1364, 152–160 (1992)Google Scholar
  28. Puentes, R., Tomer, A.: The Road… Less Traveled: An Analysis of Vehicle Miles Traveled Trends in the U.S. Metropolitan Infrastructure Initiatives Series. Brookings Institution, Washington DC (2008)Google Scholar
  29. Raimond, T., Milthorpe, F.: Why are young people driving less? trends in license-holding and travel behaviour. Australasian Transport Research Forum, Canberra (2010)Google Scholar
  30. Ryan, J.M., Han, G.: Vehicle-ownership model using family structure and accessibility application to Honolulu, Hawaii. Transp. Res. Rec. 1676, 1–10 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Scheiner, J., Holz-Rau, C.: Travel mode choice: affected by objective or subjective determinants? Transportation 34(4), 487–511 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Senserrick, T.M.: Recent developments in young driver education, training and licensing in Australia. J. Saf. Res. 38(2), 237–244 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sivak, M., Schoettle, B.: Recent changes in the age composition of U.S. drivers: implications for the extent, safety, and environmental consequences of personal transportation. Traffic Inj. Prev. 12, 588–592 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sivak, M., Schoettle, B.: Recent changes in the age composition of drivers in 15 countries. Traffic Inj. Prev. 13, 126–132 (2012)Google Scholar
  35. Taylor, P., Parker, K., Kochhar, R., Fry, R., Funk, C., Patten, E., Motel, S.: Young, Underemployed and Optimistic: Coming of Age, Slowly, in a Tough Economy. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C (2012)Google Scholar
  36. United States Census: National estimates by age, sex, race: 1900–1979 (2004)Google Scholar
  37. VicRoads: VicRoads license breakdown by age, 2001–2011 (2012)Google Scholar
  38. Woldeamanuel, M.G., Cyganski, R., Schulz, A., Justen, A.: Variation of households’ car ownership across time: application of a panel data model. Transportation 36, 371–387 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zumkeller, D., Chlond, B., Manz, W.: Infrastructure development in Germany under stagnating demand conditions: a new paradigm? Transp. Res. Rec. 1864, 121–128 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Transport Studies, Department of Civil EngineeringMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations