Abstract
The acceptability of road pricing has attracted considerable attention among researchers over the last decade, as is evident in the amount of literature about transport and environmental economics. The general conclusion from these studies has been that there is low acceptability for road pricing among car users. In this paper, we add more knowledge to the existing literature by conducting an acceptability study of road pricing in Vienna, where such a study has never been conducted before. We used a replication study approach where a previous approach used in the EU research project AFFORD (acceptability of fiscal and financial measures and organisational requirements for demand management) was replicated for Vienna and further supplemented with a conjoint analysis. In order to examining whether the Vienna study confirms previous findings. We investigated the acceptability of two concrete policy packages factors influencing this acceptability, and preference patterns that can be used in designing a road pricing policy for Vienna. The survey reveals a higher acceptability if road pricing schemes lead to perceived personal benefits. According to the multivariate analyses, the “personal outcome expectations”, “social norm” and “perceived effectiveness” variables account for more than 50 % of the criterion variance and therefore these are the most influential factors. Road pricing schemes can be an effective transport management instrument for a city particularly if they are associated with direct investment in public transport and public infrastructure. Thus, personal benefits can be perceived more easily and direct effects can be expected.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991)
Bamberg, S., Rölle, D., Weber, C.: Does habitual car use not lead to more resistance to change of travel mode? Transportation 30, 97–108 (2003)
Dawes RM (1980) Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, vol 31
De Groot, J., Steg, L.: General beliefs and the theory of planned behavior: the role of environmental concerns in the TPB. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 37(8), 1817–1836 (2007)
Dill, J., Wiensten, A.: How to pay for transportation? Survey of public preferences in California. Transp. Policy 14, 346–356 (2007)
Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: an Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley Series in Social Psychology. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading (1975)
Frey, B.S.: Why are efficient transport policy instruments so seldom used? In: Schade, J., Schlag, B. (eds.) Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies, pp. 63–75. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)
Frey, H., Rauh, W.: City Maut in Österreichs Städten. VCÖ-Hintergrundbericht, VCÖ, Wien (2006)
Fujii, S., Gärling, T., Jakobsson, C., Jou, R.-C.: A cross-country study of fairness and infringement on freedom as determinants of car owners’ acceptance of road pricing. Transportation 31, 285–295 (2004)
Gärling, T., Gillhom, R., Gärling, A.: Reintroduction attitude theory in travel behavior research. The validity of an interactive interview procedure to predict car use. Transportation 25, 129–146 (1998)
Gärling, T., Jakobsson, C., Loukopoulos, P., Fujii, S.: Acceptability of road pricing. In: Verhoef, E., Bliemer, M., Steg, L., Bv, Wee (eds.) Pricing in Road Transport. A Multi-Disciplinary Perspective, pp. 193–208. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2008)
Harland, P., Staats, H., Wilke, H.A.M.: Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 29(12), 2505–2528 (1999)
Harsman B, Pädam S, Wijkmark B (2000) Ways and Means to Increase the Acceptance of Urban Road Pricing. Deliverable D4, EU-Project PRIMA, funded by the European Commission
Hensher, D.A., Pucket, S.M.: Road user charging: the global relevance of recent developments in the United Kingdom. Transp. Policy 12(4), 377–383 (2005)
Hubbard, R., Armstrong, J.S.: Replications and extensions in marketing—rarely published but quite contrary. Int. J. Res. Mark. 11, 233–248 (1994)
Ittner, H., Becker, R., Kals, E.: Willingness to support traffic policy measures: the role of justice. In: Schade, J., Schlag, B. (eds.) Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies, pp. 249–265. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)
Jaensirisak, S., May, A.D., Wardman, M.: Acceptability of road user charging: the influence of selfish and social perspectives. In: Schade, J., Schlag, B. (eds.) Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies, pp. 203–218. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)
Jaensirisak, S., Wardman, M., May, A.D.: Explaining variations in public acceptability of road pricing schemes. J Transp Econ Policy 39, 127–153 (2005)
Jakobsson, C., Fujii, S., Gärling, T.: Determinants of private car users’ acceptance of road pricing. Transp. Policy 7(2), 153–158 (2000)
Jones, P.: Gaining public support for road pricing through a package approach. Traffic Eng Control 4, 194–196 (1991)
Jones, P.: Road pricing: the public viewpoint. In: Johansson, B., Mattson, L.G. (eds.) Road Pricing. Theory, Empirical Assessment and Policy, pp. 159–180. Kluwer, Boston (1995)
Jones, P.: Urban road pricing: public acceptability and barriers to implementation. In: Button, K.J., Verhoef, E.T. (eds.) Road Pricing, Traffic Congestion and the Environment. Issues of Efficiency and Social Feasibility, pp. 263–284. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (1998)
Kals, E.: Verantwortliches Umweltverhalten: Umweltschützende Entscheidungen erklären und fördern. Beltz PVU, Weinheim (1996)
König A (2009) Replication as Research Strategy
Kottenhoff, K., Freij, K.B.: The role of public transport for feasibility and acceptability of congestion charging—the case of Stockholm. Transp. Res. Part A 43, 297–305 (2009)
May, A.D.: Road pricing: an international perspective. Transportation 19, 313–333 (1992)
MC-ICAM (2003) Pricing of Urban and Interurban Road Transport: Barriers, Constraints and Implementation Paths. Leeds
Mittelstaedt, R.A., Zorn, T.S.: Econometric replication: lessons from the experimental sciences. Quaterly J Bus Econ 23(1), 9–15 (1984)
Odeck, J., Brathen, S.: On public attitudes toward implementation of toll roads—the case of Oslo toll ring. Transp. Policy 4(2), 73–83 (1997)
Odeck, J., Brathen, S.: Toll financing in Norway: the success, the failures and perspectives for the future. Transp. Policy 9(4), 253–260 (2002)
Odeck, J., Brathen, S.: Travel demand elasticities and users attitudes: a case study of Norwegian toll projects. Transp. Res. Part A 42, 77–94 (2008)
Odeck, J., Kjerkreit, A.: Evidence on users’ attitudes towards road user charges—a cross-sectional survey of six Norwegian toll schemes. Transp. Policy 17, 349–358 (2010)
Rienstra, S.A., Rietveld, P., Verhoef, E.T.: The social support for policy measures in passenger transport. A statistical analysis for the Netherlands. Transp. Res. Part D 4(3), 181–200 (1999)
Schade, J.: Individuelle Akzeptanz von Straßenbenutzungsentgelten. In: Schlag, B. (ed.) Empirische Verkehrspsychologie, pp. 227–244. Pabst Science Publishers, Berlin (1999)
Schade, J.: European research results on transport pricing acceptability. In: Schade, J., Schlag, B. (eds.) Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies, pp. 109–123. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)
Schade J (2005) Akzeptanz von Straßenbenutzungsgebühren: Entwicklung und Überprüfung eines Modells. Dustri
Schade, J., Schlag, B.: Acceptability of Urban Transport Pricing. Government Institute of Economic Research, Helsinki (2000)
Schade, J., Schlag, B.: Akzeptierbarkeit von Nachfragemanagement- und Preismaßnahmen in europäischen Städten. Internationales Verkehrswesen 53(3), 72–77 (2001)
Schade, J., Schlag, B.: Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003a)
Schade, J., Schlag, B.: Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 6(1), 45–61 (2003b)
Schade, J., Schlag, B.: Kognitive Bedingung der öffentlichen Akzeptanz von Straßenbenutzungsgebühren. Umweltpsychologie 8(1), 210–224 (2004)
Schlag B (1998) Zur Akzeptanz von Straßenbenutzungsgebühren. Internationales Verkehrswesen 50:308–312
Schlag, B., Schade, J.: Public acceptability of traffic demand management in Europe. Traffic Eng Control 41(8), 314–318 (2000)
Schlag, B., Teubel, U.: Public Acceptability of Transport Pricing. Dresden University of Technology, Traffic and Transportation Psychology, Dresden (1997)
Schuitema, G., Steg, L.: The role of revenue use in the acceptability of transport pricing policies. Transp. Res. Part F 11, 221–231 (2008)
Schuitema, G., Steg, L., Vlek, C.: Are pricing policies effective to change car use? IATSS Res. 31(1), 21–31 (2007)
Sikow-Magny, C.: Efficient pricing in transport—overview of European commission’s transport research programme. In: Schade, J., Schlag, B. (eds.) Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies, pp. 13–26. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)
Steg, L., Vlek, C.: The role of problem awareness in willingness-to-change car-use and in evaluating relevant policy measures. In: Rothengatter, T., Vaya, E.C. (eds.) Traffic and Transport Policy, pp. 465–475. Pergamon, Amsterdam (1997)
Steierwald, G., Künne, H.D., Vogt, W. (eds.): Stadtverkehrsplanung Grundlagen, Methoden, Ziele vol 2. Springer, Berlin (2005)
Steininger KW, Gobiet W, Binder C, Friedel B, Gebetsroither B, Kriebernegg G, Niederl A, Omann I, Seebauer S (2005) Technologien und Wirkungen von Pkw-Road Pricing im Vergleich
Ubbels, B., de Jong, G.: Review of Evidence on the Effects of Road Pricing. European Transport Conference, Netherlands (2009)
Ubbels, B., Verhoef, E.: Acceptability of road pricing and revenue use in the Netherlands. Eur. Transp. 32, 69–94 (2006)
Van Acker, V., Van Wee, B., Witlox, F.: When transport geography meets social psychology: toward a conceptual model of travel behaviour. Transp. Rev. 30(2), 219–240 (2010)
Verhoef, E., Bliemer, M., Steg, L., Van Wee, B. (eds.): Pricing in road transport: A multi-disciplinary perspective. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2008)
Vickrey, W.: Pricing in urban and suburban transport. Am. Econ. Rev. 53(2), 452–465 (1963)
Viegas, J.M.: Making urban road pricing acceptable and effective: searching for quality and equity in urban mobility. Transp. Policy 8(4), 289–294 (2001)
Winslott-Hiselius, L., Brundell-Freij, K., Vagland, A., Bystrom, C.: The development of public attitudes towards the Stockholm congestion trial. Transp. Res. Part A 43, 269–282 (2009)
Acknowledgments
We thank Prof. James Odeck for his constructive criticism and helpful suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fürst, E.W.M., Dieplinger, M. The acceptability of road pricing in Vienna: the preference patterns of car drivers. Transportation 41, 765–784 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9485-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9485-2