Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of fuel price on vehicle miles traveled (VMT): do the poor respond in the same way as the rich?

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of fuel price on travel demand for different income groups reveal the choices and constraints they are faced with. The first purpose of this study is to understand these underlying choices and constraints by examining the variation of fuel price elasticity of vehicle miles travelled (VMT) across income groups. On the other hand, the rebound effect—increase in VMT as a result of improvement in fuel efficiency may offset the negative effect of fuel price on VMT. The second purpose of this study is to compare the relative magnitudes of the fuel price elasticity of VMT and the rebound effect. A system of structural equations with VMT and fuel efficiency (MPG, miles per gallon) as endogenous variables is estimated for households at different income levels from 2009 National Household Travel Survey. Higher income households show greater fuel price elasticity than lower income households. Fuel price elasticities are found to be −0.41 and −0.35 for the two highest income groups, while an elasticity of −0.24 for the lowest income group is identified. The rebound effect is found to be only significant for the lowest income households as 0.7. These findings suggest the potential ability of using fuel price as a tool to affect VMT. The study results also suggest possible negative consequences faced by lower income households given an increase in fuel price and call for more studies in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We were aware of the possible inaccuracy in self-reported figures. To ensure the quality of self-reported VMT used, we only used the self-reported VMT of those households with a ratio between self-reported VMT and the estimated VMT ranging from 0.25 to 4 or with the difference between self-reported VMT and estimated VMT less than 10,000 (this criteria is used by Oak Ridge National Laboratory in identifying outliers of self-reported VMT). Otherwise, VMT used was the estimated VMT. Households with the estimated VMT only account for 5 % of the households in our sample.

  2. In 2009 NHTS, trip purposes of maintenance trips are following: Day care, Medical/dental services, Shopping/errands, Buy goods: groceries/clothing/hardware store, Buy services: video rentals/dry cleaner/post office/car service/bank, Buy gas, Family personal business/obligations, Use professional services: attorney/accountant, Attend funeral/wedding, Use personal services: grooming/haircut/nails, Pet care: walk the dog/vet visits, Attend meeting: PTA/home owners association/local government, Transport someone, Pick up someone, Take and wait, Drop someone off, Meals, Get/eat meal.

  3. In 2009 NHTS, trip purposes of discretionary trips are following: Social/recreational, Go to gym/exercise/play sports, Rest or relaxation/vacation, Visit friends/relatives, Go out/hang out: entertainment/theater/sports event/go to bar, Visit public place: historical site/museum/park/library, Social event, Coffee/ice cream/snacks.

References

  • American Community Survey. http://www.census.gov/acs/www/data_documentation/2011_release/ (2007–2011). Accessed 20 Mar 2013

  • Bawa, K., Ghosh, A.: A model of household grocery shopping behavior. Mark. Lett. 10, 149–160 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout, P.H.G., Muskens, J.C., Velthuijsen, J.W.: Defining the rebound effect. Energy Policy 28, 425–432 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R., Sen, S., Eluru, N.: The impact of demographics, built environment attributes, vehicle characteristics, and gasoline prices on household vehicle holdings and use. Transp. Res. B 43, 1–18 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, M.: Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? Ecol. Econ. 36, 119–132 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blow, L., Crawford, I.: The distributional effects of taxes on private motoring. Institute for Fiscal Studies, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, C., Sterner, T.: Analysing gasoline demand elasticities: a survey. Energy Econ. 13, 203–210 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Energy Information Administration: EIA estimation methodologies. http://nhts.ornl.gov/2009/pub/EIA.pdf (2011). Accessed 30 June 2012

  • Espey, M.: Gasoline demand revisited: an international meta-analysis of elasticities. Energy Econ. 20, 273–295 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R., Deanna, M., Li, S.-C.: Land use impacts on trip generation rates. Transp. Res. Rec. 1518, 1–6 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, R.A.: Credit cards as spending facilitating stimuli: a conditioning interpretation. J. Consum. Res. 13, 348–356 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frondel, M., Peters, J., Vance, C.: Identifying the rebound: evidence from a German household panel. Energy J. 29, 145–163 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, P.K.: The effects of the corporate average fuel efficiency standards in the US. J. Ind. Econ. 46, 1–33 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golob, T.F.: Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research. Transp. Res. B 37, 1–25 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, P., Dargay, J., Hanly, M.: Elasticities of road traffic and fuel consumption with respect to price and income: a review. Transp. Rev. 24, 275–292 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, D.L.: Vehicle use and fuel economy: how big is the ‘rebound’ effect? Energy J. 13, 117–144 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, D.L., Kahn, J.R., Gibson, R.C.: Fuel economy rebound effect for U.S. household vehicles. Energy J. 20, 1–31 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Greening, L.A., Greene, D.L., Difiglio, C.: Energy efficiency and consumption—the rebound effect—a survey. Energy Policy 28, 389–401 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haughton, J., Sarkar, S.: Gasoline tax as a corrective tax: estimates for the United States, 1970–1991. Energy J. 17, 103–126 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, E.C.: Differences in consumer purchase behavior by credit card payment system. J. Consum. Res. 6, 58–66 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoe, S.L.: Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modeling technique. Quant. Method Inq. 3, 76–83 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, O., Schipper, L.: Measuring the long-run fuel demand of cars: separate estimations of vehicle stock, mean fuel intensity, and mean annual driving distance. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 31, 277–292 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C.T.: Another look at U.S. Passenger vehicle use and the ‘rebound’ effect from improved fuel efficiency. Energy J. 14, 99–110 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kain, J.F.: The spatial mismatch hypothesis: three decades later. Hous. Policy Debate 3, 371–392 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, R.: Panel analysis in transportation planning: an overview. Transp. Res. A 24A, 401–415 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannering, F.L.: An econometric analysis of vehicle use in multivehicle households. Transp. Res. A 17A, 183–189 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mclafferty, S., Preston, V.: Spatial mismatch and labor market segmentation for African-American and Latina women. Econ. Geogr. 68, 406–431 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Bestmile: developing a best estimate of annual vehicle mileage for 2009 NHTS vehicles. http://nhts.ornl.gov/2009/pub/BESTMILE.pdf (2011). Accessed 30 June 2012

  • Oum, T.H., Ii, W.G.W., Yong, J.: Concepts of price elasticities of transport demand and recent empirical estimates: an interpretative survey. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 26, 139–154 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Puller, S.L., Greening, L.A.: Household adjustment to gasoline price change: an analysis using 9 years of US survey data. Energy Econ. 21, 37–52 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, G., Catchesides, T.: Distributional consequences of gasoline taxation in the United Kingdom. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1924, 103–111 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, K.A., Dender, K.V.: Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: the declining rebound effect. Energy J. 28, 25–51 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Soman, D.: Effects of payment mechanism on spending behavior: the role of rehearsal and immediacy. J. Consum. Res. 27, 460–474 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorrell, S., Dimitropoulos, J., Sommerville, M.: Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: a review. Energy Policy 37, 1356–1371 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, S.E.: Distributional effects of alternative vehicle pollution control policies. J. Public Econ. 88, 735–757 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton, W.C.: The long-run structure of transportation and gasoline demand. Bell J. Econ. 13, 439–454 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tingting Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, T., Chen, C. Impact of fuel price on vehicle miles traveled (VMT): do the poor respond in the same way as the rich?. Transportation 41, 91–105 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9478-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9478-1

Keywords

Navigation