Abstract
Of the many public initiatives used to promote the use of bicycles in the urban environment, the one that has achieved the most spectacular results in a short period of time is the public bicycle hire system. The experience of Seville is one of the most successful internationally, where 6.6 % of mechanised trips were being made by bicycle within 30 months. This paper analyses this experience in the university community, which represents one-third of system users. We conclude that the people who are most satisfied with the system are those who use it for leisure and recreation activities, non-residents of the city, more environmentally aware people and those who have no alternative mode of transportation. Their satisfaction is also closely linked to their appreciation of the bicycles’ level of comfort, the ease with which users can hire bicycles and return them and the small amount of paperwork involved required to sign up for the system. However, user appreciation has fallen over time because the system’s rapid success has caused it to become overloaded. This experience therefore provides one main lesson: the system’s success can result in eventual difficulties.
This is a preview of subscription content,
to check access.Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beirão, G., Cabral, J.A.S.: Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: a qualitative study. Transp. Policy 14(6), 478–489 (2007)
Bernhoft, I.M., Carstensen, G.: Preferences and behaviour of pedestrians and cyclists by age and gender. Transp. Res. F 11(2), 83–95 (2008)
Bouf, D., Hensher, D.A.: The dark side of making transit irresistible: the example of France. Transp. Policy 14(6), 523–532 (2007)
Bührmann, S.: Public bicycles, new and innovative concepts for helping European transport sustainability. Niches Policy Notes, Brussels (2007)
Cameron, A.C., Trivedi, P.K.: Microeconometrics. Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)
Castillo-Manzano, J.I., López-Valpuesta, L.: Urban retail fabric and the metro: a complex relationship. Lessons from middle-sized Spanish Cities. Cities 26(3), 141–147 (2009)
Castillo-Manzano, J.I., López-Valpuesta, L., González-Laxe, F.: The effects of the LCC boom on the urban tourism fabric: the viewpoint of tourism managers. Tour. Manag. 32(5), 1085–1095 (2011)
Castillo-Manzano, J.I., Sánchez-Braza, A.: An evaluation of the establishment of a taxi flat rate from city to airport: the case of Seville. Urban Stud. 48(9), 1909–1924 (2011)
Cavill, N., Kahlmeier, S., Rutter, H., Racioppi, F., Oja, P.: Economic analyses of transport infrastructure and policies including health effects related to cycling and walking: a systematic review. Transp. Policy 15(5), 291–304 (2008)
Chapman, L.: Transport and climate change: a review. J. Transp. Geogr. 15(5), 354–367 (2007)
Coutts, C.: Greenway accessibility and physical-activity behavior. Environ. Planing 35(3), 552–563 (2008)
Creutzig, F., He, D.: Climate change mitigation and co-benefits of feasible transport demand policies in Beijing. Transp. Res D 14(2), 120–131 (2009)
DeMaio, P.J., Gifford, J.: Will smart bikes succeed as public transportation in the United States? J. Public Transp. 7(2), 1–15 (2004)
DeMaio, P.J.: Bike-sharing: history, impacts, models of provision, and future. J. Public Transp. 12(4), 41–56 (2009)
Dickinson, J.E., Kingham, S., Copsey, S., Pearlman, D.J.: Employer travel plans, cycling and gender: will travel plan measures improve the outlook for cycling to work in the UK? Transp. Res. D 8(1), 53–67 (2003)
Dill, J., Carr, T.: Bicycle commuting and facilities in major U.S. cities: if you build them, commuters will use them-another look. Transp. Res. Rec. 1828, 116–123 (2003)
Gardner, B., Abraham, C.: What drives car use? A grounded theory analysis of commuters’ reasons for driving. Transp. Res. F 10(3), 187–200 (2007)
Gatersleben, B., Appleton, K.M.: Contemplating cycling to work: attitudes and perceptions in different stages of change. Transp. Res. A 41(4), 302–312 (2007)
Hegger, R.: Public transport and cycling: living apart or together? Public Transp. Int. 56(2), 38–41 (2007)
Holguín-Veras, J., Wang, Q., Xu, N., Ozbay, K., Cetin, M., Polimeni, J.: The impacts of time of day pricing on the behavior of freight carriers in a congested urban area: implications to road pricing. Transp. Res. A 40(9), 744–766 (2006)
Holguín-Veras, J., Wang, Q., Xu, N., Ozbay, K.: The impacts of time of day pricing on car user behavior: findings from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey’s initiative. Transportation 38(3), 427–443 (2011)
Holmgren, J., Jansson, J.A., Ljungberg, A.: Public transport in towns-inevitably on the decline? Res. Transp. Econ. 23(1), 65–74 (2008)
Hopkinson, P., Wardman, M.: Evaluating the demand for new cycle facilities. Transp. Policy 3(4), 241–249 (1996)
Horton, D.: Environmentalism and the bicycle. Environ. Politics 15(1), 41–58 (2006)
Hunt, J.D., Abraham, J.E.: Influences on bicycle use. Transportation 34(4), 453–470 (2007)
Kraus, M., Yoshida, Y.: The commuter’s time-of-use decision and optimal pricing and service in urban mass transit. J. Urban Econ. 51(1), 170–195 (2002)
Martens, K.: Promoting bike-and-ride: the Dutch experience. Transp. Res. A 41(4), 326–338 (2007)
Nakamura, K., Kockelman, K.M.: Congestion pricing and road space rationing: an application to the San Francisco Bay Bridge corridor. Transp. Res. A 36(5), 403–417 (2002)
Noland, R.B., Ishaque, M.M.: Smart bicycles in an urban area: evaluation of a pilot scheme in London. J. Public Transp. 9(5), 71–95 (2006)
Parkin, J., Wardman, M., Page, M.: Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data. Transportation 35(1), 93–109 (2008)
Proost, S., Dender, K.V.: Optimal urban transport pricing in the presence of congestion, economies of density and costly public funds. Transp. Res. A 42(9), 1220–1230 (2008)
Pucher, J., Buehler, R.: Why Canadians cycle more than Americans: a comparative analysis of bicycling trends and policies. Transp. Policy 13(3), 265–279 (2006)
Pucher, J., Buehler, R.: Making cycling irresistible: lessons from The Netherlands Denmark and Germany. Transp. Rev. 28(4), 495–528 (2008)
Pucher, J., Dill, J., Handy, S.: Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. Prev. Med. 50(Suppl 1), S106–S125 (2010)
Rietveld, P., Daniel, V.: Determinants of bicycle use: do municipal policies matter? Transp. Res. A 38(7), 531–550 (2004)
Rose, G.: E-bikes and urban transportation: emerging issues and unresolved questions. Transportation 39(1), 81–96 (2012)
Tilahun, N.Y., Levinson, D.M., Krizek, K.J.: Trails, lanes, or traffic: valuing bicycle facilities with an adaptive stated preference survey. Transp. Res. A 41(4), 287–301 (2007)
Vandenbulcke, G., Thomas, I., De Geus, B., Degraeuwe, B., Torfs, R., Meeusen, R., Int Panis, L.: Mapping bicycle use and the risk of accidents for commuters who cycle to work in Belgium. Transp. Policy 16(2), 77–87 (2009)
Wardman, M., Tight, M., Page, M.: Factors influencing the propensity to cycle to work. Transp. Res. A 41(4), 339–350 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Castillo-Manzano, J.I., Sánchez-Braza, A. Managing a smart bicycle system when demand outstrips supply: the case of the university community in Seville. Transportation 40, 459–477 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-012-9424-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-012-9424-7