Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

She’s got a ticket to ride: gender and public transit passes

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drawing on a household survey spanning 1997–2007 from Germany, this analysis investigates the decision to purchase a weekly or monthly transit pass against the backdrop of two questions: (1) Does gender play a role in determining the probability that an individual owns a pass? (2) If so, how is this role mitigated or exacerbated by other socioeconomic attributes of the individual and the household in which they reside? These questions are pursued through a combination of descriptive analyses and econometric methods, the latter of which relies on variants of the probit- and heteroskedastic probit model to control for the effects of unobserved heterogeneity that could otherwise induce biased estimates. The model uncovers several determinants of transit pass patronage over which policy makers have direct leverage, including fuel prices, the siting of transit stops, and the density of transit service. Moreover, while women are found to have a higher probability of owning a transit pass than men, the model identifies few variables whose impact differs according to gender, with the two exceptions being the number of children in the household and the distance to work. This absence of differential effects implies that policy measures to increase ridership are likely to have a roughly uniform impact among women and men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aral: Fuel prices. http://www.aral.de/toolserver/retaileurope/histFuelPrice.do?categoryId=4000533&contentId=58642 (2009). Accessed 30 July 2009

  • Buehler, R., Pucher, J., Kunert, U.: Making transport sustainable: insights from Germany. Paper prepared for the Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program. http://www.brookings.edu/reports/2009/~/media/Files/rc/reports/2009/0416_germany_transportation_buehler/0416_germany_transportation_report.pdf (2009). Accessed 22 Oct 2009

  • Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Stau und Stadtentwicklung (BMVBS). http://www.bmvbs.de/Verkehr/-,1491/Oeffentlicher-Personennahverke.htm (2009). Accessed 28 July 2009

  • DESTATIS—Statistisches Bundesamt: Verkehr in Deutschland 2006, Wiesbaden (2006)

  • European Environmental Agency (EEA): Climate for a transport change. TERM 2007: indicators tracking transport and the environment in the European Union. EEA Report, No 1/2008, Copenhagen (2008)

  • Frondel, M., Vance, C.: Driving for fun? Comparing the effect of fuel prices on weekday and weekend fuel consumption. Energy Econ. 32, 102–109 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P., Kumar, A., Richardson, H.W.: Gender differences in metropolitan travel behavior. Reg. Stud. 23, 499–510 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilano, G.: Public transport and the travel needs of women. Traffic Quart. 6, 72–83 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, K.: Gender and transport in developed countries. Paper commissioned by UNED as in put for the Expert Workshop “Gender Perspectives for Earth Summit 2002: Energy, Transport, Information for Decision-Making,” Berlin (2001)

  • Hanson, S., Johnston, I.: Gender differences in work-trip length: explanations and implications. Urban Geogr. 6, 193–219 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heine, H., Mautz, R., Rosenbaum, W.: Mobilität im Alltag. Warum wir nicht vom Auto lassen. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT): Deutsches Mobilitätspanel (MOP)—wissenschaftliche Begleitung und erste Auswertung, Bericht 2008. Institut für Verkehrswesen, Universität Karlsruhe. http://daten.clearingstelle-verkehr.de/192/19/zwischenbericht_mop_08_09.pdf (2008). Accessed 20 Nov 2010

  • King, G., Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J.: Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. Am. J. Political Sci. 44, 347–361 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, I.: The Journey to Work. George Allen and Unwin, Sydney (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthies, E., Kuhn, S., Klöckner, C.A.: Travel mode choice of women: the result of limitation, ecological norm, or weak habit? Environ. Behav. 34, 163–177 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MOP: The German Mobility Panel. http://mobilitaetspanel.ifv.uni-karlsruhe.de/ (2009). Accessed 12 Nov 2010

  • Patterson, Z., Haider, M., Ewing, G.: A gender-based analysis of work trip mode choice of suburban Montreal commuters using stated preference data. Transp. Res. Rec. 1924, 85–93 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickup, L.: Women’s gender-role and its influence on travel behavior. Built Environ. 10, 61–68 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Preißner, C.L., Hunecke, M., Sander, C., Backhaus, W.: Mobilitätsbedürfnisse und Mobilitätsverhalten in der Alltagsgestaltung von Frauen. In: Hunecke, M. (ed.) Gestaltungsoptionen für eine zukunftsfähige Mobilität—Eine empirische Studie zum Zusammenwirken von Raumstruktur und Lebensstil im Mobilitätsverhalten von Frauen und Männern in vier ausgewählten Kölner Stadtquartieren. WerkstattBericht 27, Gelsenkirchen (2000)

  • Rosenbloom, S.: Trends in women’s travel patterns. In: Proceedings of the Second National Conference of Women’s Travel Issues, Baltimore, pp. 16–34 (1996)

  • Rosenbloom, S., Burns, E.: Why working women drive alone: implications for travel reduction programs. Transp. Res. Rec. 1459, 39–45 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sermons, M.W., Koppelman, F.S.: Representing the differences between female and male commute behavior in residential location models. J. Transp. Geogr. 9, 101–110 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, T., Niemeier, D.: Travel to work and household responsibility: new evidence. Transportation 24, 397–419 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance, C., Hedel, R.: The impact of urban form on automobile travel: disentangling causation from correlation. Transportation 34, 575–588 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance, C., Iovanna, R.: Gender and the automobile: an analysis on nonwork service trips. Transp. Res. Rec. 2013, 54–61 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance, C., Buchheim, S., Brockfeld, E.: On the role of gender as a determinant of car use: Evidence from Germany. In: Research on Women’s Issues in Transportation Conference Proceedings, Washington, vol. 2, pp. 59–67 (2005)

  • Williams, R.: Using heterogeneous choice models to compare logit and probit coefficients across groups. Sociol. Meth. Res. 37, 531–559 (2009a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R.: OGLM: Stata module to estimate Ordinal Generalized Linear Models. http://econpapers.repec.org/software/bocbocode/s453402.htm (2009b). Accessed April 1, 2009

  • Yatchew, A., Griliches, Z.: Specification error in probit models. Rev. Econ. Stat. 66, 134–139 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Manuel Frondel and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on an earlier draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin Vance.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 presents the coefficient estimates and elasticities from the models in Table 3.

Table 4 Coefficient and elasticity estimates from the models (n = 18,497)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vance, C., Peistrup, M. She’s got a ticket to ride: gender and public transit passes. Transportation 39, 1105–1119 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9381-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9381-6

Keywords

Navigation