Abstract
A unique set of activity scheduling data is utilized in this paper to provide much needed empirical analysis of the sequence in which activities are planned in everyday life. This is used to assess the validity of the assumption that activities are planned in accordance to a fixed hierarchy of activity types: mandatory activities first (work/school), followed by joint maintenance, joint discretionary, allocated maintenance, and individual discretionary activities. Such an assumption is typical of current generation activity and tour-based travel demand models. However, the empirical results clearly do not support such assumptions. For instance, fewer than 50% of mandatory activities were actually planned first in related out-of-home tours; remaining activity types also did not take any particular precedence in the planning sequence. Given this, a search was made for the more salient attributes of activities (beyond activity type) that would better predict how they are planned within tours. Several ordered response choice models for different tour sizes were developed for this purpose, predicting the choice order of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. planned activity in the tour as a function of activity type, activity characteristics (duration, frequency, travel time, and involved persons), and individual characteristics. Activity duration played the most significant role in the models compared to any other single variable, wherein longer duration activities tended to be planned much earlier in tours. This strongly suggests that the amount of time-use, rather than the nature of the event as indicated by activity type, is a primary driver of within-tour planning order and offers potential for a much improved and valid fit.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arentze, T.A., Timmermans, H.J.P.: ALBATROSS: A Learning Based Transportation Oriented Simulation System. The European Institute of Retailing and Services Studies, Eindhoven, The Netherlands (2000)
Bhat, C.R., Pulugurta, V.: A comparison of two alternative behavioral choice mechanisms for household auto ownership decisions. Transp. Res. B 32, 61–77 (1998)
Bowman, J.L., Ben-Akiva, M.E.: Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedules. Transp. Res. A 35(1), 1–28 (2001)
Bowman, J.L., Bradley, M., Shiftan, Y., Lawton, K.T., Ben-Akiva, M: demonstration of an activity-based model system for Portland. In: 8th World Conference on Transport Research, Antwerp, Belgium (1998)
Data Management Group: Transportation Tomorrow Survey 2001: Design and Conduct of the Survey. Joint Program in Transportation, University of Toronto, Toronto (2003)
Davidson, W., Donnelly, R., Vovsha, P., Freedman, J., Ruegg, S., Hicks, J., Castiglione, J., Picado, R.: Synthesis of first practices and operational research approaches in activity-based travel demand modeling. Transp. Res. A 41(5), 464–488 (2007)
Doherty, S.T.: Rules for assessing activity scheduling survey respondents’ data quality. J. Transp. Res. Board 1870, 109–115 (2004)
Doherty, S.T.: Interactive methods for activity scheduling processes. In: Goulias, K. (ed.) Transportation Systems Planning: Methods And Applications, pp. 7-1–7-25. CRC Press, New York (2002)
Doherty, S.T.: How far in advance are activities planned? Measurement challenges and analysis. J. Transp. Res. Board 1926, 41–49 (2005)
Doherty, S.T., Miller, E.J.: A computerized household activity scheduling survey. Transportation 27(1), 75–97 (2000)
Doherty, S.T., Nemeth, E., Roorda, M., Miller, E.J.: Design and assessment of the Toronto area computerized household activity scheduling survey. J. Transp. Res. Board 1894, 140–149 (2004)
Ettema, D., Borgers, A., Timmermans, H.: Simulation model of activity scheduling behavior. Transp. Res. Rec. 1413, 1–11 (1993)
Gärling, T., Kalén, T., Romanus, J., Selart, M.: Computer simulation of household activity scheduling. Environ. Plan. A 30, 665–679 (1998)
Goulias, K.G., Bradley, M., Noronha, V., Golledge, R., Vovsha, P.S.: Data needs for innovative modelling workshop. In: National Household Travel Survey Conference: Understanding our Nation’s Travel, Washington D.C., November 1–2. http://trb.org/Conferences/NHTS/Workshop-DataNeeds.pdf (2004)
Greene, W.: Limdep Version 8.0, Econometric Modeling Guide. Econometric Software, Inc, Plainview, NY (2002)
Greene, W.: Econometric Analysis. Prentice Hall, London (2003)
Kemperman, A., Borgers, A., Oppewal, H., Timmermans, H.: Predicting the duration of theme park visitors’ activities: an ordered logit model using conjoint choice data. J. Travel Res. 41(4), 375–384 (2003)
Kitamura, R., Chen, C., Pendyala, R.M., Narayanan, R.: Micro-simulation of daily activity-travel patterns for travel demand forecasting. Transportation 27(1), 25–51 (2000)
Kockelman, K., Zhao, Y., Blanchard-Zimmerman, C.: Meeting the intent of ADA in sidewalk cross-slope design. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 38(1), 101–110 (2001)
Limanond, T., Niemeier, D.A., Mokhtarian, P.L.: Specification of a tour-based neighborhood shopping model. Transportation 32, 105–134 (2005)
Miller, E.J., Roorda, M.J.: A prototype model of household activity/travel scheduling. J.Transp. Res. Board 1831, 114–121 (2003)
Mohammadian, A., Doherty, S.T.: A mixed logit model of activity scheduling time horizon incorporating spatial-temporal variables. J. Transp. Res. Board 1926, 33–40 (2005)
Mohammadian, A., Doherty, S.T.: Modeling activity scheduling time horizon: duration of time between planning and execution of pre-planned activities. Transp. Res. A 40(6), 475–490 (2006)
Shiftan, Y.: Practical approach to model trip chaining. Transp. Res. Rec. 1645, 17–23 (1998)
Stinson, M.A., Bhat, C.: Frequency of bicycle commuting: internet-based survey analysis. Transp. Res. Rec. 1878, 122–130 (2004)
Vovsha, P., Bradley, M., Bowman, J.: Activity-based travel forecasting models in the United States: progress since 1995 and prospects for the future. In: Timmermans, H. (ed.) Progress in Activity-Based Analysis, pp. 389–414. Oxford, Elsevier (2005)
Yagi, S., Mohammadian, A.: An activity-based microsimulation model of travel demand in the Jakarta metropolitan area. J. Choice Model. 3(1), 32–57 (2010)
Zaviona, W., McElevy, R.D.: A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. J. Math. Soc. 4, 103–120 (1975)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the generous financial support received for this project from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and from the GEOIDE (Geomatics for Informed Decisions) Network of Centres of Excellence Program of the Canadian federal research councils. Special thanks go to Joshua Auld for his assistance in table preparation, to the diligent field workers who collected the data, and all those who generously supplied their time in completing the survey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doherty, S.T., Mohammadian, A. The validity of using activity type to structure tour-based scheduling models. Transportation 38, 45–63 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-010-9285-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-010-9285-x