Skip to main content
Log in

A methodological approach for developing and assessing business models for flexible transport systems

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flexible transport services include a wide range of demand responsive transport systems that provide non-conventional passenger and freight transportation services. Several alternative business models varying according to the local market conditions, the socio-economic, legal, and institutional framework may be developed for the provision of Flexible Transport Systems (FTS). The objective of this paper is twofold: first to present an integrated methodological framework for developing and assessing alternative FTS business models and second to demonstrate its applicability to a case study regarding the prioritization of alternative FTS business models for the provision of flexible passenger transport services in Helsinki.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambrosino, G., Mageean, J., Nelson, J., et al.: Experience and applications of DRT in Europe. In: Amrossino, G., Nelson, J.D., Romanazzo, M. (eds.) Demand Responsive Transport Services: Towards the Flexible Mobility Agency. ENEA Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Environment (2004)

  • Bearse, P., Gurmu, S., Rapaport, C., et al.: Paratransit demand for disabled. Transport. Res. Part B 38, 809–831 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brake, J., Nelson, J., Wright, S.: Demand Responsive Transport: towards the emergence of a new market segment. J. Transp. Geogr. 12, 323–337 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CONNECT consortium: Deliverable 10: innovative solutions and test cases concerning business development. CONNECT project FP6-PLT-506959 funded by the European Commission (2005a)

  • CONNECT consortium: Deliverable 12: updated business development knowledge base repository. CONNECT project FP6-PLT-506959 funded by the European Commission (2005b)

  • CONNECT consortium: Deliverable 14: recommendations for business development. CONNECT project FP6-PLT-506959 funded by the European Commission (2006)

  • Engels, D., Ambrosino, G.: Service typologies and scenarios. In: Amrossino, G., Nelson, J.D., Romanazzo, M. (eds.) Demand Responsive Transport Services: Towards the Flexible Mobility Agency ENEA Italian National Agency fir New Technologies, Energy and Environment (2004)

  • Fitzgerald, J., Shaunesey, D., Stern, S.: The effect of education programs on paratransit demand of people with disabilities. Transport. Res. Part A 34, 261–285 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mageean, J., Nelson, J.: The evaluation of demand responsive transport services in Europe. J. Transport. Geogr. 11, 255–270 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., Allen, J.: The entrepreneur’s business model: toward a unified perspective. J. Bus. Res. 58, 726–735 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagano, A., Metaxatos, P.: Organizational structures for brokerage of paratransit services. Proceedings of the 85th annual meeting of the transportation research board, CD-ROM, Washington, DC (2006)

  • Palmer, K., Dessouky, M., Abdelmaguid, T.: Impacts of management practices and advanced technologies on demand responsive transit systems. Transport. Res. Part A 38, 495–509 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. The Analytic Hierarchy Process Series, vol. I. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, USA (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.: Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, USA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakano, R., Benjamin, J.: An evaluation procedure of costs of regional non-emergency human transport services—the case of PART connections service in Piedmont/Triad region. Proceedings of the 85th annual meeting of the transportation research board, CD-ROM, Washington, DC (2006)

  • Shtub, A., Bard, J., Globershon, S.: Project Management: Engineering, Technology and Implementation. Prentice Hall, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zografos, K.: An integrated methodological framework for developing and assessing FTS business models. Proceedings of the second CONNECT workshop: flexible mobility services: business models, organizational and contractual issues, CD-ROM, CREMONA, 23–24 May 2005

  • Zografos, K., Driggs, R., Zanakis, S.: A multicriteria decision making methods for evaluating alternative transportation projects. In: Proceedings of the 8th IFAC symposium on transportation systems, pp. 148–154. Technical University of Crete (1997)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research reported in this paper has been partially supported by the European Commission, Directorate General Research (DG RESEARCH) and the Greek General Secretariat for Research and Technology (GGSRT), through the project Co-ordination of CONcepts for NEw Collective Transport (CONNECT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantinos G. Zografos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zografos, K.G., Androutsopoulos, K.N. & Sihvola, T. A methodological approach for developing and assessing business models for flexible transport systems. Transportation 35, 777–795 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-008-9176-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-008-9176-6

Keywords

Navigation