Skip to main content
Log in

An empirical investigation on the dynamic processes of activity scheduling and trip chaining

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Investigation of the dynamic processes of activity scheduling and trip chaining has been an interest of transportation researchers over the past decade because of its relevance to the effectiveness of congestion management and intelligent transportation systems. To empirically examine the processes, a computerized survey instrument is developed to collect household activity scheduling data. The instrument is unique in that it records the evolution of activity schedules from intentions to final outcomes for a weekly period. This paper summarizes the investigation on the dynamic processes of activity scheduling and trip chaining based on data collected from a pilot study of the instrument. With the data, ordered logit models are applied to identify factors that are pertinent to the scheduling horizon of activities. Results of the empirical analysis show that a daily schedule often starts with certain activities occupying a portion of the schedule and other activities are then arranged around these pre-occupants. Activities of shorter duration are more likely to be opportunistically inserted in a schedule already anchored by their longer duration counterparts. Persons with children often expect more constraining activities than those with no children. The analysis also shows that female respondents tend to be more structured in terms of how the week is planned. Additionally, analysis of travel patterns reveals that many trip-chains are formed opportunistically. Travel time required to reach an activity is positively related to the scheduling horizon for the activity, with more distant stops being planned earlier than closer locations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, T., Ben-Akiva, M.: A theoretical and empirical model of trip chaining behavior. Transportation Res. B 13B, 243–257 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arentze, T.A., Timmermans H.J.P.: Albatross: A Learning Based Transportation Oriented Simulation System. European Institute of Retailing and Services Studies, Eindhoven, The Netherlands (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Axhausen, K.W.: The data needs of activity scheduling models. Paper presented at the International Conference on Activity based Approaches: Activity Scheduling and the Analysis of Activity Patterns, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands, May 25–28, 1995

  • Axhausen, K., Gärling, T.: Activity-based approaches to travel analysis: conceptual frameworks, models, and research problems. Transport Rev. 12, 323–341 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, M., Bowman, J.L.: Activity based disaggregate travel demand model system with daily activity schedules. Paper presented at the International Conference on Activity based Approaches: Activity Scheduling and the Analysis of Activity Patterns, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands, May 25–28, 1995

  • Ben-Akiva, N., Bowman, J., Ramming, S., Walker, J.: Behavioral realism un urban transportation planning models. Paper presented at Transportation Models in the Policy-Making Process: A Symposium in Memory of Greig Harvey, Asilomar Conference Center, California, March 6, 1998

  • Brant, R.: Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics 46, 1171–1178 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, I., Godson, V.: Urban networks: the structure of activity patterns. Prog. Plann. 4(1), 1–96 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, S., Miller, E.: A computerized household activity scheduling survey. Transportation 27(1), 1–23 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärling, T., Kwan, M.-P., Golledge, R.G.: Computational-process modelling of household activity scheduling. Transportation Res. B 28B, 355–364 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H.: Econometric Analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes-Roth, B., Hayes-Roth, F.: A cognitive model of planning. Cogn. Sci. 3, 275–310 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, R.: Incorporating trip chaining into analysis of destination choice. Transportation Res. B 18B, 67–81 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurani, K.S., Kitamura, R.: Recent Developments in the Prospects for Modeling Household Activity Schedules. A report prepared for the Los Alamos National Laboratory (1996)

  • Lee, M., McNally, M.G.: Experiments with a computerized self-administrative activity survey. Transportation Res. Rec. 1748, 125–131 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., McNally, M.G.: On the structure of weekly activity/travel patterns. Transportation Res. Part A 37, 823–839 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J.S., Freese, J.: Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. Stata Press, College Station, Texas (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmassani, H.S., Jou, R.: Bounded rationality in commuter decision dynamics: incorporating trip chaining in departure time and route switching decisions. In: Gärling, T., Laitila, T., Westin, K. (eds.) Theoretical Foundations of Travel Choice Modeling. Pergamon, Oxford (1997)

  • McFadden, D.: Disaggregate behavioral travel demand’s RUM Side: a 30 year retrospective. Paper presented at the meeting of International Association of Travel Behavior Research, Brisbane, Australia, July 2, 2000

  • McKelvey, R.D., Zavoina, W.: A statistic model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. J.␣Math. Sociol. 4, 103–120 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, M.G. and Recker, W.W. (1986) On the formation of household travel/activity patterns: a simulation approach. Final report prepared for U.S. DOT, Contract No. DTRS-57-81-C-0048

  • Metropolitan Transportation Commission: Regional Travel Characteristics Report: Bay Area Travel Survey 2000: vol. I+II (2000)

  • Meyer, J.S., Rebok, G.W.: Planning-in-action across the life span. In: Shlechter, T.M., Toglia, M.P. (eds.) New Directions in Cognitive Science, pp. 1–2. Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Prelec, D.: Values and principles: some limitations on traditional economic analysis. In: Etzioni, A., Lawrence, P. (eds.) Perspectives on Socioeconomics. M.E. Sharpe, London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebok, G.W.: Plans, actions, and transactions in solving everyday problems. In: Sinnott, J.D. (ed.) Everyday Problem Solving: Theory and Applications. Praeger, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.: Invariants in human behavior. Annual Rev. Psychol. 41(1), 1–19 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, M., McNally, M.G. An empirical investigation on the dynamic processes of activity scheduling and trip chaining. Transportation 33, 553–565 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-006-7728-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-006-7728-1

Keywords

Navigation