Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A measurement and Comparison of Cost Competitiveness of Container Ports in Southeast Asia

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Terminal users face a variety of costs associated with the container terminal and those that are harder to quantify should not be ignored for they might represent a larger component of the overall costs associated with using a particular terminal. Similarly, the competitive advantage of a container terminal operator goes beyond the elements that can be quantified. The paper uses and modifies Cournot’s simultaneous quantity-setting model as a means to derive the overall costs of using the terminal. The application of this model to the perspective of competition between container terminal operators in Singapore, Port Klang and Tanjung Pelepas finds that the increasingly cost competitive operators in Port Klang and Tanjung Pelepas were able to close the gap with PSA Corporation in Singapore in the overall costs of using their terminal facilities between 1998 and 2002 although PSAC continued to enjoy a dominant share of the container-handling market in the region. The paper also highlights the tremendous amount of opportunities available to these terminal operators to advance and capitalise on their competitive advantages beyond aggressive price competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asian Shipper FaxNews: Northport reports lower profits, expands berths. May 7 (2002)

  • Baird, A.J.: The economics of transhipment. In: Grammenos, C.T. (ed.) The Handbook of Maritime Economics and Business, pp. 832–859. LLP, London (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, J.: Review of Cournot’s book in Journal des Savants; reprinted in English translation by Friedman J.W. In: Daughety, A.F (ed.) Cournot Oligopoly. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988, pp. 73–81. (1883)

  • Bowley, A.L.: The Mathematical Groundwork of Economics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1924)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramness, G.: The general conjectural model of oligopoly: some classical results revisited. Warwick Economic Research Papers, 142 (1979)

  • Bresnahan, T.F., Salop, S.C.: Quantifying the competitive effects of production joint ventures. Int. J. Ind. Org. 4, 155–175 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cournot, A.A.: Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth; with Irving Fisher’s original notes. R.D. Irwin, Homewood, Illinois (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K.: The productivity and efficiency of ports and terminals: methods and applications. In: Grammenos, C.T. (ed.) The Handbook of Maritime Economics and Business, pp. 803–831. LLP, London (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • De Langen, P.W. (2002) Clustering and performance: the case of maritime clustering in The Netherlands. Maritime Policy Manage. 29, 209–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drewry Shipping Consultants Limited: Intra-Asia Container Trades – Dynamism Beyond Bounds. Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Economides, N.: The principle of minimum differentiation revisited. Eur. Econ. Rev. 24, 345–368 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairplay Daily News (2004) Tanjung Pelepas already in profit. May 14

  • Flor, L., Defilippi, E.: Port infrastructure: an access model for the essential facility. Maritime Econ. Logistics 5, 116–132 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gateway: Container traffic hits 3.7 million TEUs. October (2001)

  • Gibbons, R.: Game Theory for Applied Economists. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haralambides, H.E., Cariou, P., Benacchio, M.: Costs, benefits and pricing of dedicated container terminals. Int. J. Maritime Econ. 4, 21–34 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H.H.: Stability in competition. In: Stigler, G.J., Boulding, K.E. (eds.) A.E.A. Readings in Price Theory. Richard D. Irwin, Chicago (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  • Informa UK Limited: Containerisation International Yearbook. Informa Asia Publishing, Hong Kong (2001–2004)

  • Informa UK Limited: Proving credentials. Containerisation International Magazine June 2002. (Informa Asia Publishing, Hong Kong 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Klang Multi Terminal Sdn Bhd.: (2002) http://www.westportmalaysia.com.my

  • Klang Multi Terminal Sdn Bhd.: (2000) http://www.westport.com.my/faboutus/fact.htm

  • Kleywegt, A., Goh, M.L., Wu, G.Y., Zhang, H.W.: Competition between the Ports of Singapore and Malaysia. The Logistics Institute – Asia Pacific, National University of Singapore, Singapore (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd’s List: Tanjung Pelepas aims high. January 8 (2002a)

  • Lloyd’s List: No regrets as Maersk settles in at Tanjung Pelepas. May 24 (2002b)

  • Lobo, A., Jain, V.: Port users’ perspective of the container transhipment business: hierarchy of service quality attributes and dimensions. Singapore Maritime Port J. 4, 154–161 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, M., Grigalunas, T.: A spatial-economic multimodal transportation simulation model for US coastal container ports. Maritime Econ. Logistics 5, 158–178 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maggi, G.: Strategic trade policies with endogenous mode of competition. Am. Econ. Rev. 86, 237–258 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Malaysia Business Times: Local ports expect growth despite cloudy world economy. February 7 (2002)

  • Malaysia Shipping Times: Westport sees three-fold rise in pre-tax for 2000. February 12 (2001)

  • New Straits Times: Northport commits surplus to expand, enhance capacity. April 7 (2003)

  • Northport (Malaysia) Bhd.: (2001) http://www.northport.com.my/corporate_relations/fin _hlights.htm

  • Northport (Malaysia) Bhd.: (2002) http://www.northport.com.my

  • Ocean Shipping Consultants Limited: The World Containerport Outlook to 2015. (Ocean Shipping Consultants Limited, Surrey England 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E.: The Competitive Advantage of Nations: With a New Introduction. The Free Press, Singapore, pp. 69–175, 543–615 (1998)

  • PSA Corporation. (1998–2002) Annual Report. http://www.psa.gov.sg

  • PSA PortView: PSA gives huge discounts and assures customers of a more flexible and dynamic approach to business (2002)

  • Robinson, R.: Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: the new paradigm. Maritime Policy Manage. 29, 241–255 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffin, R.J.: Cournot oligopoly and competitive behaviour. Rev. Econ. Stud. 38, 493–502 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, R.J., Hoffmann, J., Micco, A., Pizzolitto, G.V., Sgut, M., Wilmsmeier, G.: Port efficiency and international trade: port efficiency as a determinant of maritime transport costs. Maritime Econ. Logistics 5, 199–218 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaked, A., Sutton, J.: Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econ. Stud. 49, 3–13 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Business Times: Smooth sailing for Syed Mokhtar’s PTP port deal. December 14 (2002a)

  • Singapore Shipping Times: Klang’s Northport begins terminal 3 expansion. August 21 (2002b)

  • Singapore Business Times: Malaysia’s PTP posts 30% in 2002. January 2 (2003a)

  • Singapore Business Times: PSA’s Singapore box volumes up 8.8% in July. August 8 (2003b)

  • Singapore Business Times: PSA ventures into new territory. September 2 (2003c)

  • Team Northport: Northport Throughput 1997–2001. November (2001)

  • The Star: Tanjung Pelepas port begins operations. October 11 (1999)

  • The Star: Port Klang box traffic up despite stiff competition. August 26 (2002a)

  • The Star: PTP pull off a coup. December 31 (2002b)

  • Tiwari, P., Itoh, H., Doi, M.: Shippers’ port and carrier selection behaviour in China: a discrete choice analysis. Maritime Econ. Logistics 5, 23–39 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veldman, S.J., Bückmann, E.H.: A model on container port competition: an application for the West European container hub-ports. Maritime Econ. Logistics 5, 3–22 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, G.Y., Kleywegt, A.: Comparative Study on Port Tariffs of Ports in Asia. The Logistics Institute – Asia Pacific, National University of Singapore, Singapore (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Z., Yang, Z.: Dynamic programming of port position and scale in the hierarchised container ports network. Maritime Policy Manage. 29, 163–177 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, 639798, Singapore

    Jasmine S. L. Lam

  2. Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore, 460 Alexandra Road #19-00 PSA Building, 119963, Singapore

    Wei Yim Yap

Authors
  1. Jasmine S. L. Lam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wei Yim Yap
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jasmine S. L. Lam.

Additional information

The author would like to stress that the views presented do not represent those of his organization.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lam, J.S.L., Yap, W.Y. A measurement and Comparison of Cost Competitiveness of Container Ports in Southeast Asia. Transportation 33, 641–654 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-006-7474-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-006-7474-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation