Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating commuter mode choice: A discrete choice analysis of the impact of road pricing and parking charges

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Automobile use leads to external costs associated with emissions, congestion, noise and other impacts. One option for minimizing these costs is to introduce road pricing and parking charges to reduce demand for single occupant vehicle (SOV) use, while providing improvements to alternatives to encourage mode switching. However, the impact of these policies on urban mode choice is uncertain, and results reported from regions where charging has been introduced may not be transferable. In particular, revealed preference data associated with cost recovery tolls on single facilities may not provide a clear picture of driver response to tolls for demand management. To estimate commuter mode choice behaviour in response to such policies, 548 commuters from a Greater Vancouver suburb who presently drive alone to work completed an individually customized discrete choice experiment (DCE) in which they chose between driving alone, carpooling or taking a hypothetical express bus service when choices varied in terms of time and cost attributes. Attribute coefficients identified with the DCE were used in a predictive model to estimate commuter response to various policy oriented combinations of charges and incentives. Model results suggest that increases in drive alone costs will bring about greater reductions in SOV demand than increases in SOV travel time or improvements in the times and costs of alternatives beyond a base level of service. The methods described here provide an effective and efficient way for policy makers to develop an initial assessment of driver reactions to the introduction of pricing policies in their particular regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burris MW (2003). The toll-price component of travel demand elasticity. International Journal of Transport Economics 30(1): 45–59

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCorla-Souza P and Kane AR (1992). Peak period tolls: Precepts and prospects. Transportation 19: 293–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne JP (1984). Elasticity measures and disaggregate choice models. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 18: 189–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing G & Sarigollu E (1998) Car fuel-type choice under travel demand management and economic incentives. Transportation Research D 3: 429–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannelly KJ, McLeod MS, Flannelly L and Behnke RW (1991). Direct comparison of commuter’s interests in using different modes of transportation. Transportation Research Record 1321: 90–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene WH (1998). LIMDEP Version 7.0. Econometric Software Inc, Plainview

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagler Bailly Ltd. (1999) The Potential of Fuel Taxes to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Transportation. Transportation Table Study No. 3, National Climate Change Process

  • Higgins TJ (1997). Congestion pricing: public polling perspective. Transportation Quarterly 51: 97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman I, McKnight C, Pucher J, Paaswell R and Berechman J (1995). Bridge and tunnel toll elasticities in New York. Some recent evidence. Transportation 22: 97–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hug K, Mock-Hecker R and Wurtenberger J (1997). Transport demand management by electronic fee collection in a zone-based pricing scheme. The Stuttgart MobilPASS field trial. Transportation Research Record 1576: 69–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt JD and McMillan JDP (1997). Stated preference examination of attitudes toward carpooling to work in calgary. Transportation Research Record 1598: 9–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppelman FS, Bhat CR and Schofer JL (1993). Market research evaluation of actions to reduce suburban traffic congestion: commuter travel behaviour and response to demand reduction actions. Transportation Research A 27(5): 383–393

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG Peat Marwick Stevenson Kellogg (1993) The cost of transporting people in the British Columbia Lower Mainland. Background report prepared for the Greater Vancouver Regional District as part of Transport 2021

  • Kuppam A, Pendyala R and Gollakoti M (1998). Stated response analysis of the effectiveness of parking pricing strategies for transportation control. Transportation Research Record 1649: 39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen OI and Ostmoe K (2001). The experience of urban toll cordons in norway. Lessons for the future. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 35(3): 457–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Litman T (2001) Online Transportation Demand Management Encyclopaedia. Victoria Transportation Policy Institute

  • Litman T, Komanoff C, & Howell H (1998) Road Relief: Tax and Pricing Shifts for a Fairer, Cleaner, Less Congested Transportation System in Washington. Energy Outreach Center

  • Louviere J, Hensher D and Swait J (2000). Stated Choice Methods, Analysis and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka, P (eds) Frontiers in Econometrics, pp. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony M, Geraghty D and Humphreys I (2000a). Distance and time based road pricing trial in Dublin. Transportation 27: 269–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony M, Geraghty D and Humphreys I (2000b). Potential response to road user charging in Dublin, Ireland. Transportation Research Record 1732: 50–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Oum TH, Waters WG and Yong J-S (1992). Concepts of price elasticities of transport demand and recent empirical estimates. Journal of transport economics and policy 26: 139–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickrell D (1999). Cars and clean air: a reappraisal. Transportation Research Record Part A 33: 527–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Polak J, Jones P, & Vythoulkas P (1991) The Trondheim Toll Ring: Results of a Stated Preference Study of Travelers’ Responses Deliverable 17, Transportation Studies Unit University of Oxford and Solveig Meland Terje Tretvik, Division of Transport Engineering, SINTEF, Trondheim Norway

  • Toh RS and Phang S-Y (1997). Curbing urban traffic congestion in Singapore: A comprehensive review. Transportation Journal 37(2): 24–33

    Google Scholar 

  • TransLink (2000) Regional Travel Survey. GVRD Results. TransLink Marketing Department and Canadian Facts

  • Transport for London (2003) Congestion Charging: Six Months On October 2003

  • Washbrook K (2002) Assessing the Potential of Road and Parking Charges to Reduce Demand for Single Occupancy Vehicle Commuting in the Greater Vancouver Region. Report No. 298, School of Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University, June 2002

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Washbrook.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Washbrook, K., Haider, W. & Jaccard, M. Estimating commuter mode choice: A discrete choice analysis of the impact of road pricing and parking charges. Transportation 33, 621–639 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-005-5711-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-005-5711-x

Key words

Navigation