Abstract
This study investigates the determinants of people’s desire to increase or decrease the amount of travel they do. We use data from 1,357 working commuters, residents of three different neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area, California. The dependent variables are indicators of Relative Desired Mobility for ten categories of travel (short- and long-distance overall and by several mode- and purpose-specific categories). These variables are measured on a five-point ordinal scale ranging from “much less” to “much more”, through which the respondents indicated the amount of travel they want to do (in the category in question) compared to what they are doing now. Censored ordered probit models were developed for these variables, with explanatory variables including general travel attitudes, specific liking for travel in each of the same separate categories, objective and subjective measures of the amount currently traveled in each category, and personality, lifestyle, and socio-demographic characteristics. The results support the hypotheses that the liking for travel has a strong positive impact, and subjective qualitative assessments of mobility have a strong negative impact, on the desire to increase one’s travel. Finally, a number of general types of effects on Relative Desired Mobility were identified, among them complementarity and substitution effects. The results of this study can provide policy makers and researchers with new and valuable insight into key principles that affect individual travel demand.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cao X & Mokhtarian PL (forthcoming) How do individuals adapt their personal travel? Objective and subjective influences on the consideration of travel-related strategies. Transport Policy.
S Choo PL Mokhtarian (2004) ArticleTitleWhat type of vehicle do people drive The role of attitude and lifestyle in influencing vehicle type choice. Transportation Research A 38 IssueID3 201–222
S Choo GO Collantes PL Mokhtarian (2001) Modeling Individual’s Relative Desired Travel Amounts. Institute of Transportation Studies University of California Davis
MJ Clay PL Mokhtarian (2004) ArticleTitlePersonal travel management: The adoption and consideration of travel-related strategies Transportation Planning and Technology 27 IssueID3 181–209
GO Collantes PL Mokhtarian (2002) Determinants of Subjective Assessments of Personal Mobility. Institute of Transportation Studies University of California Davis
Curry RW (2000Attitudes toward Travel: The Relationships among Perceived Mobility, Travel Liking, and Relative Desired Mobility.Master’s Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, June. Available on the Internet at http://its. ucdavis.edu/publications/2002/rr-00-06.pdf
WH Greene (1995) LIMDEP Version 7.0 User’s Manual Econometric Software Bellport, NY
G Hupkes (1982) ArticleTitleThe law of constant travel time and trip-rates Futures 14 38–46
PM Jones (1978) Destination choice and travel attributes D Hensher Q Dalvi (Eds) Determinants of Travel Choice Praeger New York 266–311
P Kennedy (1998) A Guide to Econometrics EditionNumber4 MIT Press MA:Cambridge
RD McKelvey W Zavoina (1975) ArticleTitleA statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables Journal of Mathematical Sociology 4 IssueID1 103–120
PL Mokhtarian I Salomon LS Redmond (2001) ArticleTitleUnderstanding the demand for travel: It’s not purely “derived”Innovation The European Journal of Social Science Research 14 IssueID4 355–380
PL Mokhtarian I Salomon (2001) ArticleTitleHow derived is the demand for travel Some conceptual and measurement considerations Transportation Research A 35 IssueID8 695–719
DT Ory PL Mokhtarian I Salomon LS Redmond GO Collantes S Choo (2004) ArticleTitleWhen is commuting desirable to the individual Growth and Change 35 IssueID3 334–359
Redmond LS (2000) Identifying and Analyzing Travel-related Attitudinal, Personality, and Lifestyle Clusters in the San Francisco Bay Area.Master’s Thesis, Transportation Technology and Policy Graduate Group, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, September. Available on the Internet at http://its.ucdavis.edu/publications/2002/RR-08-08.pdf
LS Redmond PL Mokhtarian (2001) ArticleTitleThe positive utility of the commute: Modeling ideal commute time and relative desired commute amount Transportation 28 IssueID2 179–205
S Reichman (1976) Travel adjustments and life styles–A behavioral approach PR Stopher AH Meyburg (Eds) Behavioral Travel-Demand Models MA: Lexington Books Lexington
I Salomon PL Mokhtarian (1998) ArticleTitleWhat happens when mobility-inclined market segments face accessibility-enhancing policies Transportation Research D 3 IssueID3 129–140
Schwanen T & Mokhtarian PL (2004) The extent and determinants of dissonance between actual and preferred residential neighborhood type. Environment and Planning B 31.
SG Stradling ML Meadows S Beatty (2000) ArticleTitleHelping drivers out of their cars: Integrating transport policy and social psychology for sustainable change Transport Policy 7 207–215
MR Veall KF Zimmermann (1992) ArticleTitlePseudo-R2 in the ordinal probit model Journal of Mathematical Sociology 16 IssueID4 333–342
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choo, S., Collantes, G.O. & Mokhtarian, P.L. Wanting to travel, more or less: Exploring the determinants of the deficit and surfeit of personal travel. Transportation 32, 135–164 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-004-2219-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-004-2219-8