Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Administrative Evil and Street Level Discretion

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two of the most widely discussed concepts in the public administration literature are administrative evil and street level discretion. Today, few would deny, that administrators (particularly street level bureaucrats) exercise personal judgment in carrying out their broadly defined responsibilities. Street level bureaucrats have considerable power in how they perform their day-to-day duties. They often use their discretion judiciously, however, at times public sector representatives abuse their power when they inflict unnecessary pain and suffering on others. Three case studies are presented in this paper. One case study describes illicit behavior by military personnel in a war zone during the Vietnam War. Two case studies describe and the actions of police officers in the cities of Baltimore and New York. These case studies identify situations where relatively low-level personnel felt empowered to act with impunity in depriving people of human and legal rights. The cases illustrate the need for strict oversight in organizations, especially in organizations where use of deadly force is authorized under specific conditions. As illustrated by the three cases, abuse of discretion can facilitate administrative evil. The environment of organizations is viewed as strongly influencing compliance or lack of compliance with reasonable norms of behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All information for this paper was obtained from referenced secondary sources.

References

  • Balfour, D., Adams, G., & Nichels, A. (2020). Unmasking administrative evil (5th ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balla, S. J., & Gormley, W. T. (2017). Bureaucracy & democracy: accountability & performance. Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardach, E. (1977). The implementation game: what happens after a bill becomes a law. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belknap, M. (2002). The vietnam war on trial: the my Lai massacre and court martial of Lieutenant Calley. University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, W. (2015). Broken windows and quality-of-life policing in New York City. New York City Police Department. Retrieved February 2, 2023 from https://www.nyc.gov/assets/nypd/downloads/pdf/analysis_and_planning/qol.pdf

  • Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate cultures: the rites and rituals of corporate life. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Justice. (2017). Federal officials decline prosecution in the death of Freddie Gray. Office of Public Affairs. Retrieved January 4, 2023 from https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/federal-officials-decline-prosecution-death-freddie-gray

  • Estes, K. W. (2000). The marine officer’s guide (6th ed.). Naval Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni-Halevy, E. (1983). Bureaucracy and democracy: a political dilemma. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, M. (2022). Must we stay divided over education? Washington View, 103, 62–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer, H. (1941). Administrative responsibility in democratic government. Public Administration Review, 1(4), 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, C. J. (1935). Responsible government service under the American constitution. In C. J. Friedrich, W. C. Beyer, S. D. Spero, J. F. Miller, & G. A. Graham (Eds.), Problems of the american public service (monograph 7). McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaus, J. M. (1936). The responsibility of public administrators. In J. M. Gaus, J. D. White, & M. Dimock (Eds.), The frontiers of public administration (pp. 26–44). University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershen, M. (1971). Destroy or die: the true story of My Lai. Arlington House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, D. A. (2015). The mysterious death of Freddie Gray. The Atlantic. Retrieved January 5, 2023 https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/04/the-mysterious-death-of-freddie-gray/391119/.

  • Hammer, R. (1970). One morning in the war: the tragedy at Son My. Coward-McCann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersh, S. (1970). My Lai 4: a report on the massacre and its aftermath. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C., James, O., Peters, B. G., & Scott, C. (2004). Controlling modern government. Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (2009). Responsibility versus accountability in the Friedrich-Finer debate. Journal of Management History, 15(1), 66–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, H. (1960). 2006. A study in administrative behavior. Resources for the Future Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koulish, R. (2016). The databasing of Freddie Gray. The University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender & Class., 16(2), 179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koven, S. (2008). Responsible governance: a case study approach. Sharpe Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koven, S. G. (2019). The case against bureaucratic discretion. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leys, W. A. (1943). Ethics and administrative discretion. Public Administration Review, 3(1), 10–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, B. (2019). Normalizing covert surveillance: the subterranean world of policing. British Journal of Sociology, 70(5), 2070–2091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, N. C. (2016). From Edward to Eric Garner and beyond: the importance of Constitutional limitations on lethal use of force in police reform. Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 12(1), 53–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1965). Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human Relations, 18(1), 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, R. (2020). The ethics of dissent: Managing guerrilla government (3rd ed.). Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Okafor, V. O. (2015). Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, Eric Garner, et al.: A survey of emergent grassroots protests & public perceptions of justice. The Journal of Pan African Studies, 7(8), 43–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, J. (2011). Carl J. Friedrich on responsibility and authority. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 471–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rector, K. (2015). The 45-minute mystery of Freddie Gray’s death. The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved January 7, 2023 http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/baltimore-city/bs-md-gray-ticker-20150425-story.html

  • Reston, M. (2021). Republican Youngkin wins Virginia governor’s race, CNN projects. CNN. Retrieved February 2. 2023 https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/02/politics/virginia-election-results/index.html.

  • Robertiello, E. (Ed.). (2017). The use and abuse of police power in America. ABC-LIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roethlisberger, F. (2005). The Hawthorne experiments. In J. M. Shafritz, J. S. Ott, & Jang, Y. S. (Eds.), Classics of organizational theory, (6th ed. pp. 158–166). Thompson Wadsworth.

  • Schein, E. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowa, J., & Selden, S. C. (2003). Administrative discretion and active representation: An expansion of the theory of representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review., 63(6), 700–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, V. (1975). Without sympathy or enthusiasm. University of Alabama Press.

  • Vinzant, J. C., & Crothers, L. (2007). Street-level leadership: Discretion & legitimacy in front-line public service. Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly., 2(2), 197–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1991). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, D. (1987). Bureaucratic democracy: The search for democracy and efficiency in American government. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven G. Koven.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Not needed.

Informed Consent

There is no need since there are no human subjects.

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest in writing the paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koven, S.G. Administrative Evil and Street Level Discretion. Public Organiz Rev (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-023-00725-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-023-00725-1

Keywords

Navigation