Skip to main content
Log in

Trust Mediates the Relationship Between Stakeholder Behavior and Stakeholder Management of Public Private Partnership Projects in Uganda

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the mediating role of trust in the relationship between stakeholder behavior and stakeholder management of Public Private Partnership Projects in Uganda. The study adopts a cross sectional and quantitative approach. Data were collected using a questionnaire from a sample of 103 public private partnership projects. Results indicate that trust partially mediates the relationship between stakeholder behavior and stakeholder management. Results further indicate that stakeholder behavior and trust are positively associated with stakeholder management. This paper calls for a new approach of managing stakeholders with the increasing demand for the role of trust and understanding stakeholder behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akintoye, A., Beck, M., & Kumaraswamy, M. (2016). Public private partnership: A global review (Edt) Routledge, London, ISBN 978–04–415–72896–6

  • Amin, M. E. (2005). Social science research: Conception methodology and analysis. Makerere University Printeryafd, Kampala.

  • Babatunde, S. O., Opawole, A., & Akinsiku, O. E. (2012). Critical success factors in public-private partnership (PPP) on infrastructure delivery in Nigeria. Journal of Facilities Management, 10(3), 212–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various x 2 approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 16(2), 296–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beringer, C., Jonas, D., & Kock, A. (2013). Behavior of internal stakeholders in project portfolio management and its impact on success. International Journal of Project Management, 31, 830–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blagescu, M., De las Casas, L., & Lloyd, R. (2005). Pathways to accountability. Global Accountability Project (GAP), One World Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinyio, E. A., & Olomolaiye, P. (2010). Introducing stakeholder management. Construction Stakeholder Management, 1.

  • Chomeya, R. (2010). Quality of psychology test between Likert scale 5 and 6 points. Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 399–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, J. E. (2012). When and how does supplier opportunism matter for small retailers’ channel relationships with the suppliers? Journal of Small Business Management, 50(3), 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. England: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelenbos, J., & Klijn, E. H. (2007). Trust in complex decision-making networks: A theoretical and empirical exploration. Administration & Society, 39(1), 25–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Gohary, N. M., Osman, H., & El-Diraby, T. E. (2006). Stakeholder management for public private partnerships. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 595–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. P. (2006). The behavioral inhibition system and the verbal information pathway to children’s fears. Journal of abnormal psychology, 115(4), 742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A., Gupta, M. C., & Agrawal, R. (2013). Identification and ranking of critical success factors for BOT projects in India. Management Research Review, 36(11), 1040–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., Hufit, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (Pls-Sem). SAGE Publications, Inc. ISBN 978-1-4522-1744-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J., Bosse, D., & Phillips, R. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2014-0304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 2(1), 104–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoxha, D., & Capelleras, J. (2010). Fast growing firms in a transitional and extreme environment: Are they different? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 17(3), 350–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huemann, M., Eskerod, P., & Ringhofer, C. (2016). Rethink!: Project Stakeholder Management. Project Management Institute, Incorporated

  • Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrical, 39(1), 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsen, J. T., Græe, K., & Massaoud, M. J. (2008). Building trust in project-stakeholder relationships. Baltic Journal of Management, 3(1), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, D. L., Hogsette, J. A., & Müller, G. C. (2011). Comparison of various configurations of CDC-type traps for the collection of Phlebotomus papatasi Scopoli in southern Israel. Journal of Vector Ecology, 36, S212–S218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krejcie, P., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L. (2008). BEST: Bayesian estimation of species trees under the coalescent model. Bioinformatics, 24(21), 2542–2543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, Y. (2013). Stakeholder management in the Chinese hotel industry: the antecedents and impacts. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 25(4), 470–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. (2006). Opportunism in inter-firm exchanges in emerging markets. Management Organizational Review, 2(1), 121–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamoulis, N., Cheng, K. H., Yiu, M. L., & Cheung, D. W. (2006). Efficient aggregation of ranked inputs. In 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'06) (pp. 72–72). IEEE.

  • Miles, S. (2017). Stakeholder theory classification, definitions and essential contestability. Stakeholder Management (Business and Society 360, Vol. 1), Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 21.

  • Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development report. (2018).

  • Mitchell, R., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpandé, R. (1992). Relationships between providers and users of market research: The dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 314–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 20–38.

  • Mwesigwa, R., Ntayi, J., Bagire, V., & Munene, J. (2018). Stakeholder behavior, relationship building practices and stakeholder management in public private partnership projects in Uganda. Makerere Business Journal, 14(1/2), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwesigwa, R., Bagire, V., Ntayi, J., & Munene, J. (2019a). Contract completeness as a foundation to relationship building among stakeholders in public private partnership projects. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(10), 890–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwesigwa, R., Bagire, V., Ntayi, J., & Munene, J. C. (2019b). Antecedents of stakeholder management in public private partnership projects in Uganda. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 15(2), 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwesigwa, R., Nabwami, R., Mayengo, J., & Basulira, G. (2020). Contractual completeness as a cornerstone to stakeholder management in public private partnership projects in Uganda. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(3), 469–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndandiko, C. (2006). Public private partnerships as modes of procuring public infrastructure and service delivery in developing countries: lessons from Uganda. International Public Procurement Conference Proceedings, 693–710

  • Neuman, L. (2007). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (6th ed.). Pearson International London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. V., & Rose, J. (2009). Building trust—evidence from Vietnamese entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nsasira, R., Benon, C., Basheka, B. C., & Oluka, P. O. (2013). Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) and enhanced service delivery in Uganda: Implications from the energy sector. International Journal of Business Administration, 4(3)

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, B., Unerman, J., & Bradley, J. (2005). Perceptions on the emergence and future development of corporate social disclosure in Ireland. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(1), 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Dwyer, B., & Boomsma, R. (2015). The co-construction of NGO accountability: Aligning imposed and felt accountability in NGO-funder accountability relationships. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.

  • Olander, S. (2007). Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management. Construction Management and Economics, 25(3), 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D., Swift, T., & Hunt, K. (2001). Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting. Accounting Forum, 25(3), 264–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common methods biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, L. E., & Donaldson, T. (1999). Dialogue. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 619–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, G. T., Nix, T. W., Whitehead, C. J., & Blair, J. D. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. The Executive, 5(2), 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Niekerk, M. (2016). The applicability and usefulness of the stakeholder strategy matrix for festival management. Event Management, 20(2), 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., Shen, G. Q., Ho, M., Drew, D. S., & Chan, A. P. (2009). Exploring critical success factors for stakeholder management in construction projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 15(4), 337–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R. J., Wang, Y., & Jin, X. H. (2014). Stakeholders’ attributes, behaviors, and decision making strategies in construction projects: importance and correlations in practice. Project Management Journal, 45(3), 74–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2013). Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations. Evaluation, 19(3), 321–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2, 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, W. (2012). Relationship management in public private partnership infrastructure projects, (Thesis). University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eunice Kabahinda.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kabahinda, E., Mwesigwa, R. Trust Mediates the Relationship Between Stakeholder Behavior and Stakeholder Management of Public Private Partnership Projects in Uganda. Public Organiz Rev 23, 245–263 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00594-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00594-6

Keywords

Navigation