Abstract
This paper provides an empirical evidence based on conservation of resources theory that how organisational justice (OJ) forms the public employee’s embeddedness in community and how community embeddedness (CE) leads to counterproductive work behaviour (CWB). Evidence is based on 279 responses gathered from public sector employees in Malaysia. Structural equation modeling techniques was used to test the hypothesis. This study revealed that OJ is positively related to CE and its dimensions. Interestingly, CE is not found to prevent CWB; instead, it leads to CWB. Only fit dimension of CE is negatively related to CWB.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alias, M., Rasdi, R., Ismail, M., & Samah, B. (2013). Predictors of workplace deviant behaviour: HRD agenda for Malaysian support personnel. European Journal of Training and Development, Volume 37(Issue 2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591311301671
Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (2009). The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: A test of mediation. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 491 500. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013203
Ashforth, B., Gioia, D., Robinson, S., & Trevino, L. (2008). Re-Viewing Organizational Corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 670 684. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.32465714
Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393203
Bashir, S., Nasir, M., Qayyum, S., & Bashir, A. (2012). Dimensionality of Counterproductive Work Behaviors in Public Sector Organizations of Pakistan. Public Organization Review, 12(4), 357 366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-012-0177-8
Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2003). The past, present, and future of workplace deviance research. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (p. 247–281). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2006). Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 998–1012. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.998
Boyd, N., Nowell, B., Yang, Z., & Hano, M. (2018). Sense of Community, Sense of Community Responsibility, and Public Service Motivation as Predictors of Employee Well-Being and Engagement in Public Service Organizations. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(5), 428–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074017692875
Brockner, J., Wiesenfeld, B. M., & Diekmann, K. A. (2009). 4 Towards a “Fairer” Conception of Process Fairness: Why, When and How More may not Always be Better than Less. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 183 216. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520903047228
Cain, M. K., Zhang, Z., & Yuan, K.-H. (2017). Univariate and multivariate skewness and kurtosis for measuring nonnormality: Prevalence, influence and estimation. Behavior Research Methods, 49(5), 1716–1735. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0814-1
Cheah, J.-H., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Ramayah, T., & Ting, H. (2018). Convergent validity assessment of formatively measured constructs in PLS-SEM. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-10-2017-0649
Chu, L. (2014). Mediating toxic emotions in the workplace - the impact of abusive supervision. Journal of Nursing Management, 22(8), 953–963. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12071
Clark, A. K. (2017). Measuring Corruption: Transparency International’s “Corruption Perceptions Index.” Corruption, Accountability and Discretion, 29(2), 3 22. https://doi.org/10.1108/s2053-76972017000002900
Cohen, A., & Diamant, A. (2017). The role of justice perceptions in determining counterproductive work behaviors. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1340321
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., & Wesson, M. J. (2013). Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031757
Colquitt, J., Conlon, D., Wesson, M., Porter, C., & Ng, K. (2001). Justice at the Millennium: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research. The Journal of applied psychology., 86, 425–45. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.3.425.
Craen, M., & Skogan, W. G. (2016). Achieving Fairness in Policing. Police Quarterly, 20(1), 3 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611116657818
Crawshaw, J. R., Cropanzano, R., Bell, C. M., & Nadisic, T. (2013). Organizational justice: New insights from behavioural ethics. Human Relations, 66(7), 885 904. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713485609
Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The Management of Organizational Justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 34 48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2007.27895338
Dajani, M., & Mohamad, M. (2017). Perceived Organisational Injustice and Counterproductive Behaviour: The Mediating Role of Work Alienation Evidence from the Egyptian Public Sector. International Journal of Business and Management, 12(5), 192. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v12n5p192
Darrat, M. A., Amyx, D. A., & Bennett, R. J. (2017). Examining the impact of job embeddedness on salesperson deviance: The moderating role of job satisfaction. Industrial Marketing Management, 63(158), 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.10.012
Fox, S., & Spector, P. E. (Eds.). (2005). Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10893-000
Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3192–3198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008
Furnham, A., & Taylor, J. (2004). Counterproductive Behaviours at Work. The Dark Side of Behaviour at Work, (Chapter 4), 83 129. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230510104_4
Gareis, K. C., & Barnett, R. (2008). The development of a new measure for work-family research: Community resource fit. Community, Work & Family, 11(3), 273 282. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800802133925
Ghosh, D., Sekiguchi, T., & Gurunathan, L. (2017). Organizational embeddedness as a mediator between justice and in-role performance. Journal of Business Research, 75(130), 137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.02.013
Gim, G., Ramayah, T. (2019). Predicting turnover intention among auditors: Is WIPL a mediator?. The Service Industries Journal, 1–27 https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2019.1606214
Greene, J., Mero, N., & Werner, S. (2017). The negative effects of job embeddedness on performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 1(4), 71. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-02-2017-0074
Gruys, M. L., & Sackett, P. R. (2003). Investigating the Dimensionality of Counterproductive Work Behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(1), 30 42. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00224
Hair, J. F., Risher, J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2018). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 42(3), 00 00. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203
Hair, J., Sarstedt, M., Gudergan, S. P., & Ringle, C. M. (2017). Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (p. 272). Sage Publications.
Henseler, J. (2018). Partial least squares path modeling: Quo vadis? Quality & Quantity, 52(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0689-6
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.-P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of Resources in the Organizational Context: The Reality of Resources and Their Consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 103 128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
Holtom, B. C., Mitchell, T. R., & Lee, T. W. (2006). Increasing human and social capital by applying job embeddedness theory. Organizational dynamics, 35(4), 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2006.08.007.
Hulland, J., Baumgartner, H., & Smith, K. (2018). Marketing survey research best practices: evidence and recommendations from a review of JAMS articles. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(1), 92 108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0532-y
Ismail, S., Iqbal, Z., & Adeel, M. (2018). Impact of Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Employees Performance. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 8(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v8i2.13070
Jiang, K., Liu, D., McKay, P. F., Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (2012). When and how is job embeddedness predictive of turnover? A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 1077 1096. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028610
Keskin, H., Akgün, A., Ayar, H., & Kayman, Ş. (2016). Cyberbullying Victimization, Counterproductive Work Behaviours and Emotional Intelligence at Workplace. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.031
Kiazad, K., Holtom, B. C., Hom, P. W., & Newman, A. (2015). Job Embeddedness: A Multifoci Theoretical Extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 641–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038919
Kline, R. (2011). Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling. In The SAGE handbook of innovation in social research methods (pp. 562–589). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268261
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10.
Kulik, C. T., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice, Vol. 2. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 785. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094836
Lee, T., Burch, T. C., & Mitchell, T. R. (2014). The Story of Why We Stay: A Review of Job Embeddedness. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091244
Lim, S., Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2008). Personal and workgroup incivility: Impact on work and health outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.95
Liu, C., Nauta, M. M., Yang, L., & Spector, P. E. (2018). How Do Coworkers “Make the Place”? Examining Coworker Conflict and the Value of Harmony in China and the United States. Applied Psychology, 67(1), 30–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12119
Marcus, B., & Schuler, H. (2004). Antecedents of Counterproductive Behavior at Work: A General Perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 647 660. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.647
Metin, B. U., Taris, T. W., & Peeters, M. C. (2016). Measuring procrastination at work and its associated workplace aspects. Personality and Individual Differences, 101(254), 263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.006
Milliken, F. J., Schipani, C. A., Bishara, N. D., & Prado, A. M. (2015). Linking Workplace Practices to Community Engagement: The Case for Encouraging Employee Voice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(4), 405 421. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0121
Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? The Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845 855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.845
Myhill, A., & Bradford, B. (2013). Overcoming cop culture? Organizational justice and police officers’ attitudes toward the public. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 36(2), 338 356. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639511311329732
Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2014). Community embeddedness and work outcomes: The mediating role of organizational embeddedness. Human Relations, 67(1), 71–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713486946
Nguyen, T. V., Bach, T. N., Le, T. Q., & Le, C. Q. (2017). Local governance, corruption, and public service quality: evidence from a national survey in Vietnam. International Journal of Public Sector Management, Volume 30(Issue 2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-08-2016-0128
Okech, B. (2016). Corruption and Service Delivery in Public Sector of Uganda: Causes and Consequences. Texila International Journal of Management, 2(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21522/tijmg.2015.02.02.art001
Padot, R.H. (2019).How Government and Community Nonprofit Collaboration and Non-Collaboration Affects Public Sector Outcomes.International Journal of Public Administration, 1–11 https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1575851
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879.
Public Complaints Bureau Annual Report. (2018). MyGovernment. http://www.pcb.gov.my
Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 66 80. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.1.66
Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review, Volume 26(Issue 2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-10-2013-0128
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research Methods for Business. John Wiley & Sons, 488.
Siddiquee, N., & Mohamed, M. (2015). E-Government and Transformation of Service Delivery in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, 2(3), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijpada.2015070103
Siddiquee, N., Xavier, J., Mohamed, M. (2017). What Works and Why? Lessons from Public Management Reform in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Administration, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1390762
Singh, B., Shaffer, M. A., & Selvarajan, T. (2018). Antecedents of organizational and community embeddedness: The roles of support, psychological safety, and need to belong. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(3), 339 354. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2223
Tian, A., Cordery, J., & Gamble, J. (2016). Staying and performing: How human resource management practices increase job embeddedness and performance. Personnel Review, 45(5), 947 968. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-09-2014-0194
Trinkner, R., Tyler, T. R., & Goff, P. (2016). Justice from within: The relations between a procedurally just organizational climate and police organizational efficiency, endorsement of democratic policing, and officer well-being. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(2), 158 172. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000085
Voydanoff, P. (2016). Incorporating Community into Work and Family Research: A Review of Basic Relationships: Human Relations, 54(12), 1609 1637. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267015412003
Wang, Q., Bowling, N. A., Tian, Q., Alarcon, G. M., & Kwan, H. (2016). Workplace Harassment Intensity and Revenge: Mediation and Moderation Effects. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(1), 213 234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3243-2
Wheeler, A. R., & Halbesleben, J. R. (2009). A conservation of resources view of person-environment fit. In Fit Conference. Australia: Fit Conference.
Wheeler, A. R., Harris, K. J., & Sablynski, C. J. (2010). Investing Abundant Resources Through Work Effort in The Job Embeddedness -- Performance Relationship. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2010(1), 1 6. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2010.54492321
Wheeler, A. R., Harris, K. J., & Sablynski, C. J. (2012). How Do Employees Invest Abundant Resources? The Mediating Role of Work Effort in the Job-Embeddedness/Job-Performance Relationship. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(S1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01023.x
Wolfe, S. E., Rojek, J., Manjarrez, V. M., Jr., & Rojek, A. (2018). Why does organizational justice matter? Uncertainty management among law enforcement officers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 54, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.11.003.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Informed consent
None.
Conflict of Interest
None.
Ethical approval
None.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
Community Embeddedness | |
---|---|
CF1 | I really love the place where I live |
CF2 | The place where I live is a good match for me |
CF3 | The area where I live offers the leisure activities that I like (sports, outdoor activities, cultural events & arts) |
CS1 | Leaving the community where I live would be very hard |
CS2 | If I were to leave the community, I would miss my non- work friends |
CS3 | If I were to leave the area where I live, I would miss my neighbourhood |
CL1 | My family roots are in this community |
CL2 | I am active in one or more community organizations (e.g., churches, sports teams, schools, etc.) |
CL3 | I participate in cultural and recreational activities in my local area |
Organizational Justice | |
DJ1 | I am rewarded fairly, considering the responsibility assigned to me |
DJ2 | I am rewarded fairly, according to the amount of experience I had |
DJ3 | I am rewarded fairly, taking into account my education and training |
DJ4 | I am rewarded fairly for the amount of effort I put forth |
DJ5 | I am rewarded fairly for the work I have done well |
DJ6 | I am rewarded fairly for the stresses and strains of my job |
PJ1 | My organisation’s procedures provide for collecting accurate information for making decisions |
PJ2 | My organisation’s procedures provide opportunities to appeal or challenge decisions |
PJ3 | My organisation’s procedures generate standards so that decisions can be made with consistency |
PJ4 | My organisation’s procedures are constructed in a manner to hear concerns of all affected by a decision |
PJ5 | My organisation’s procedures provide for useful feedback regarding a decision and its implementation |
PJ6 | My organisation’s procedures allow for requests for clarification or additional information about the decision |
IJ1 | My immediate supervisor considers my viewpoint |
IJ2 | My immediate supervisor suppresses personal biases |
IJ3 | My immediate supervisor provides me with timely feedback on my performance about decision and implications |
IJ4 | My immediate supervisor treats me with kindness and consideration |
IJ5 | My immediate supervisor shows concerns for my rights as an employee |
IJ6 | My immediate supervisor takes steps to deal with me in a truthful manner |
Counterproductive Work Behaviour | |
ID1 | Made fun of someone at work |
ID2 | Said something hurtful to someone at work |
ID3 | Made an ethnic, religious, or racial remark at work |
ID4 | Cursed at someone at work |
ID5 | Played a mean prank on someone at work |
ID6 | Acted rudely toward someone at work |
ID7 | Publicly embarrassed someone at work |
OD1 | Taken property from work without permission |
OD2 | Spent too much time fantasizing or daydreaming instead of working |
OD3 | Falsified a receipt to get reimbursed for more money than you spent on official expenses |
OD4 | Taken an additional or longer break than is acceptable at your workplace |
OD5 | Come in late to work without permission |
OD6 | Littered your work environment |
OD7 | Neglected to follow your boss's instructions |
OD8 | Intentionally worked slower than you could have worked |
OD9 | Discussed confidential company information with an unauthorized person |
OD10 | Used an illegal drug or consumed alcohol on the job |
OD11 | Put little effort into your work |
OD12 | Dragged out work in order to get overtime |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mehmood, S.A., Nadarajah, D. & Akhtar, M.S. How community embeddedness of public sector employees is formed by organisational justice and leads to counterproductive work behaviour. Public Organiz Rev 22, 783–802 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00539-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00539-z