Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How community embeddedness of public sector employees is formed by organisational justice and leads to counterproductive work behaviour

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides an empirical evidence based on conservation of resources theory that how organisational justice (OJ) forms the public employee’s embeddedness in community and how community embeddedness (CE) leads to counterproductive work behaviour (CWB). Evidence is based on 279 responses gathered from public sector employees in Malaysia. Structural equation modeling techniques was used to test the hypothesis. This study revealed that OJ is positively related to CE and its dimensions. Interestingly, CE is not found to prevent CWB; instead, it leads to CWB. Only fit dimension of CE is negatively related to CWB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alias, M., Rasdi, R., Ismail, M., & Samah, B. (2013). Predictors of workplace deviant behaviour: HRD agenda for Malaysian support personnel. European Journal of Training and Development, Volume 37(Issue 2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591311301671

  • Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (2009). The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: A test of mediation. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 491 500. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013203

  • Ashforth, B., Gioia, D., Robinson, S., & Trevino, L. (2008). Re-Viewing Organizational Corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 670 684. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.32465714

  • Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bashir, S., Nasir, M., Qayyum, S., & Bashir, A. (2012). Dimensionality of Counterproductive Work Behaviors in Public Sector Organizations of Pakistan. Public Organization Review, 12(4), 357 366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-012-0177-8

  • Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2003). The past, present, and future of workplace deviance research. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (p. 247–281). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

  • Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2006). Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 998–1012. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.998

  • Boyd, N., Nowell, B., Yang, Z., & Hano, M. (2018). Sense of Community, Sense of Community Responsibility, and Public Service Motivation as Predictors of Employee Well-Being and Engagement in Public Service Organizations. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(5), 428–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074017692875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J., Wiesenfeld, B. M., & Diekmann, K. A. (2009). 4 Towards a “Fairer” Conception of Process Fairness: Why, When and How More may not Always be Better than Less. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 183 216. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520903047228

  • Cain, M. K., Zhang, Z., & Yuan, K.-H. (2017). Univariate and multivariate skewness and kurtosis for measuring nonnormality: Prevalence, influence and estimation. Behavior Research Methods, 49(5), 1716–1735. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0814-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheah, J.-H., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Ramayah, T., & Ting, H. (2018). Convergent validity assessment of formatively measured constructs in PLS-SEM. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-10-2017-0649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, L. (2014). Mediating toxic emotions in the workplace - the impact of abusive supervision. Journal of Nursing Management, 22(8), 953–963. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. K. (2017). Measuring Corruption: Transparency International’s “Corruption Perceptions Index.” Corruption, Accountability and Discretion, 29(2), 3 22. https://doi.org/10.1108/s2053-76972017000002900

  • Cohen, A., & Diamant, A. (2017). The role of justice perceptions in determining counterproductive work behaviors. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1340321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., & Wesson, M. J. (2013). Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J., Conlon, D., Wesson, M., Porter, C., & Ng, K. (2001). Justice at the Millennium: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research. The Journal of applied psychology., 86, 425–45. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.3.425.

  • Craen, M., & Skogan, W. G. (2016). Achieving Fairness in Policing. Police Quarterly, 20(1), 3 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611116657818

  • Crawshaw, J. R., Cropanzano, R., Bell, C. M., & Nadisic, T. (2013). Organizational justice: New insights from behavioural ethics. Human Relations, 66(7), 885 904. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713485609

  • Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The Management of Organizational Justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 34 48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2007.27895338

  • Dajani, M., & Mohamad, M. (2017). Perceived Organisational Injustice and Counterproductive Behaviour: The Mediating Role of Work Alienation Evidence from the Egyptian Public Sector. International Journal of Business and Management, 12(5), 192. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v12n5p192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darrat, M. A., Amyx, D. A., & Bennett, R. J. (2017). Examining the impact of job embeddedness on salesperson deviance: The moderating role of job satisfaction. Industrial Marketing Management, 63(158), 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.10.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S., & Spector, P. E. (Eds.). (2005). Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10893-000

  • Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3192–3198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., & Taylor, J. (2004). Counterproductive Behaviours at Work. The Dark Side of Behaviour at Work, (Chapter 4), 83 129. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230510104_4

  • Gareis, K. C., & Barnett, R. (2008). The development of a new measure for work-family research: Community resource fit. Community, Work & Family, 11(3), 273 282. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800802133925

  • Ghosh, D., Sekiguchi, T., & Gurunathan, L. (2017). Organizational embeddedness as a mediator between justice and in-role performance. Journal of Business Research, 75(130), 137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.02.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gim, G., Ramayah, T. (2019). Predicting turnover intention among auditors: Is WIPL a mediator?. The Service Industries Journal, 1–27 https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2019.1606214

  • Greene, J., Mero, N., & Werner, S. (2017). The negative effects of job embeddedness on performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 1(4), 71. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-02-2017-0074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruys, M. L., & Sackett, P. R. (2003). Investigating the Dimensionality of Counterproductive Work Behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(1), 30 42. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00224

  • Hair, J. F., Risher, J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2018). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 42(3), 00 00. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203

  • Hair, J., Sarstedt, M., Gudergan, S. P., & Ringle, C. M. (2017). Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (p. 272). Sage Publications.

  • Henseler, J. (2018). Partial least squares path modeling: Quo vadis? Quality & Quantity, 52(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0689-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.-P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of Resources in the Organizational Context: The Reality of Resources and Their Consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 103 128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640

  • Holtom, B. C., Mitchell, T. R., & Lee, T. W. (2006). Increasing human and social capital by applying job embeddedness theory. Organizational dynamics, 35(4), 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2006.08.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulland, J., Baumgartner, H., & Smith, K. (2018). Marketing survey research best practices: evidence and recommendations from a review of JAMS articles. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(1), 92 108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0532-y

  • Ismail, S., Iqbal, Z., & Adeel, M. (2018). Impact of Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Employees Performance. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 8(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v8i2.13070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, K., Liu, D., McKay, P. F., Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (2012). When and how is job embeddedness predictive of turnover? A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 1077 1096. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028610

  • Keskin, H., Akgün, A., Ayar, H., & Kayman, Ş. (2016). Cyberbullying Victimization, Counterproductive Work Behaviours and Emotional Intelligence at Workplace. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiazad, K., Holtom, B. C., Hom, P. W., & Newman, A. (2015). Job Embeddedness: A Multifoci Theoretical Extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 641–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. (2011). Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling. In The SAGE handbook of innovation in social research methods (pp. 562–589). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268261

  • Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, C. T., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice, Vol. 2. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 785. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094836

  • Lee, T., Burch, T. C., & Mitchell, T. R. (2014). The Story of Why We Stay: A Review of Job Embeddedness. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S., Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2008). Personal and workgroup incivility: Impact on work and health outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., Nauta, M. M., Yang, L., & Spector, P. E. (2018). How Do Coworkers “Make the Place”? Examining Coworker Conflict and the Value of Harmony in China and the United States. Applied Psychology, 67(1), 30–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, B., & Schuler, H. (2004). Antecedents of Counterproductive Behavior at Work: A General Perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 647 660. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.647

  • Metin, B. U., Taris, T. W., & Peeters, M. C. (2016). Measuring procrastination at work and its associated workplace aspects. Personality and Individual Differences, 101(254), 263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, F. J., Schipani, C. A., Bishara, N. D., & Prado, A. M. (2015). Linking Workplace Practices to Community Engagement: The Case for Encouraging Employee Voice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(4), 405 421. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0121

  • Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? The Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845 855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.845

  • Myhill, A., & Bradford, B. (2013). Overcoming cop culture? Organizational justice and police officers’ attitudes toward the public. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 36(2), 338 356. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639511311329732

  • Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2014). Community embeddedness and work outcomes: The mediating role of organizational embeddedness. Human Relations, 67(1), 71–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713486946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. V., Bach, T. N., Le, T. Q., & Le, C. Q. (2017). Local governance, corruption, and public service quality: evidence from a national survey in Vietnam. International Journal of Public Sector Management, Volume 30(Issue 2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-08-2016-0128

  • Okech, B. (2016). Corruption and Service Delivery in Public Sector of Uganda: Causes and Consequences. Texila International Journal of Management, 2(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21522/tijmg.2015.02.02.art001

  • Padot, R.H. (2019).How Government and Community Nonprofit Collaboration and Non-Collaboration Affects Public Sector Outcomes.International Journal of Public Administration, 1–11 https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1575851

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Public Complaints Bureau Annual Report. (2018). MyGovernment. http://www.pcb.gov.my

  • Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 66 80. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.1.66

  • Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review, Volume 26(Issue 2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-10-2013-0128

  • Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research Methods for Business. John Wiley & Sons, 488.

  • Siddiquee, N., & Mohamed, M. (2015). E-Government and Transformation of Service Delivery in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, 2(3), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijpada.2015070103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiquee, N., Xavier, J., Mohamed, M. (2017). What Works and Why? Lessons from Public Management Reform in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Administration, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1390762

  • Singh, B., Shaffer, M. A., & Selvarajan, T. (2018). Antecedents of organizational and community embeddedness: The roles of support, psychological safety, and need to belong. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(3), 339 354. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2223

  • Tian, A., Cordery, J., & Gamble, J. (2016). Staying and performing: How human resource management practices increase job embeddedness and performance. Personnel Review, 45(5), 947 968. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-09-2014-0194

  • Trinkner, R., Tyler, T. R., & Goff, P. (2016). Justice from within: The relations between a procedurally just organizational climate and police organizational efficiency, endorsement of democratic policing, and officer well-being. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(2), 158 172. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000085

  • Voydanoff, P. (2016). Incorporating Community into Work and Family Research: A Review of Basic Relationships: Human Relations, 54(12), 1609 1637. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267015412003

  • Wang, Q., Bowling, N. A., Tian, Q., Alarcon, G. M., & Kwan, H. (2016). Workplace Harassment Intensity and Revenge: Mediation and Moderation Effects. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(1), 213 234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3243-2

  • Wheeler, A. R., & Halbesleben, J. R. (2009). A conservation of resources view of person-environment fit. In Fit Conference. Australia: Fit Conference.

  • Wheeler, A. R., Harris, K. J., & Sablynski, C. J. (2010). Investing Abundant Resources Through Work Effort in The Job Embeddedness -- Performance Relationship. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2010(1), 1 6. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2010.54492321

  • Wheeler, A. R., Harris, K. J., & Sablynski, C. J. (2012). How Do Employees Invest Abundant Resources? The Mediating Role of Work Effort in the Job-Embeddedness/Job-Performance Relationship. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(S1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01023.x

  • Wolfe, S. E., Rojek, J., Manjarrez, V. M., Jr., & Rojek, A. (2018). Why does organizational justice matter? Uncertainty management among law enforcement officers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 54, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sultan Adal Mehmood.

Ethics declarations

Informed consent

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Ethical approval

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Community Embeddedness

CF1

I really love the place where I live

CF2

The place where I live is a good match for me

CF3

The area where I live offers the leisure activities that I like (sports, outdoor activities, cultural events & arts)

CS1

Leaving the community where I live would be very hard

CS2

If I were to leave the community, I would miss my non- work friends

CS3

If I were to leave the area where I live, I would miss my neighbourhood

CL1

My family roots are in this community

CL2

I am active in one or more community organizations (e.g., churches, sports teams, schools, etc.)

CL3

I participate in cultural and recreational activities in my local area

Organizational Justice

DJ1

I am rewarded fairly, considering the responsibility assigned to me

DJ2

I am rewarded fairly, according to the amount of experience I had

DJ3

I am rewarded fairly, taking into account my education and training

DJ4

I am rewarded fairly for the amount of effort I put forth

DJ5

I am rewarded fairly for the work I have done well

DJ6

I am rewarded fairly for the stresses and strains of my job

PJ1

My organisation’s procedures provide for collecting accurate information for making decisions

PJ2

My organisation’s procedures provide opportunities to appeal or challenge decisions

PJ3

My organisation’s procedures generate standards so that decisions can be made with consistency

PJ4

My organisation’s procedures are constructed in a manner to hear concerns of all affected by a decision

PJ5

My organisation’s procedures provide for useful feedback regarding a decision and its implementation

PJ6

My organisation’s procedures allow for requests for clarification or additional information about the decision

IJ1

My immediate supervisor considers my viewpoint

IJ2

My immediate supervisor suppresses personal biases

IJ3

My immediate supervisor provides me with timely feedback on my performance about decision and implications

IJ4

My immediate supervisor treats me with kindness and consideration

IJ5

My immediate supervisor shows concerns for my rights as an employee

IJ6

My immediate supervisor takes steps to deal with me in a truthful manner

Counterproductive Work Behaviour

ID1

Made fun of someone at work

ID2

Said something hurtful to someone at work

ID3

Made an ethnic, religious, or racial remark at work

ID4

Cursed at someone at work

ID5

Played a mean prank on someone at work

ID6

Acted rudely toward someone at work

ID7

Publicly embarrassed someone at work

OD1

Taken property from work without permission

OD2

Spent too much time fantasizing or daydreaming instead of working

OD3

Falsified a receipt to get reimbursed for more money than you spent on official expenses

OD4

Taken an additional or longer break than is acceptable at your workplace

OD5

Come in late to work without permission

OD6

Littered your work environment

OD7

Neglected to follow your boss's instructions

OD8

Intentionally worked slower than you could have worked

OD9

Discussed confidential company information with an unauthorized person

OD10

Used an illegal drug or consumed alcohol on the job

OD11

Put little effort into your work

OD12

Dragged out work in order to get overtime

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mehmood, S.A., Nadarajah, D. & Akhtar, M.S. How community embeddedness of public sector employees is formed by organisational justice and leads to counterproductive work behaviour. Public Organiz Rev 22, 783–802 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00539-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00539-z

Keywords

Navigation