Skip to main content

Testing Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory of Motivation in the Public Sector: Is it Applicable to Public Managers?

Abstract

Given the limitations in providing monetary rewards as an incentive in the public sector, Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory of Motivation can be promising if it is applicable to public employees. This study identifies the effects of motivators and hygiene factors on public managers’ job satisfaction, and finds out if there is difference, compared to how private-sector employees are motivated. According to the findings, a majority of identified motivators in the previous research showed positive effects on job satisfaction among public managers, and public managers’ job satisfaction was not affected by hygiene factor as predicted in Herzberg’s study. Managerial implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. National Administrative Studies Projects (NASP) data was first collected in 1992 and NASP III is a final attempt at a NASP database.

  2. Since the mean value is 2.5 when the score range is between 1 and 4, any value that is larger than 2.5 indicates that more than majority of respondents checked very important (4) or somewhat important (3) in their answers.

  3. According to this result, more than majority of public managers would strongly agree or somewhat agree that they had enough authority to determine how to get their jobs done.

  4. The term, dimension is used in this study instead of factor that is the original term, to avoid confusion with hygiene and motivating factors.

References

  • Alban Metcalfe, B. (1989). What motivates managers: an investigation by gender and sector of employment. Public Administration Quarterly, 67, 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderfer, C. P. (1969). Empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4(2), 142–175. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(69)90004-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, P., & Lewis, G. B. (2001). Public service motivation and job performance evidence from the federal sector. The American Review of Public Administration, 31(4), 363–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1960). Understanding organizational behavior. Homewood: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. N., & Farley, Q. A. (2001). Comparing the public and private sectors in the United States: a review of the empirical research. Public Administration and Public Policy, 94, 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, S., & Baum, T. (1993). Applying Herzberg’s hygiene factors to the changing accommodation environment. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 5, 32–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellé, N. (2013). Experimental evidence on the relationship between public service motivation and job performance. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private management: What’s the difference? Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 97–122. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brudney, Jeffrey L, and Stephen E Condrey. (1993). Pay for performance: Explaining the differences in managerial motivation. Public Productivity & Management Review, 17(2):129–144.

  • Buelens, M., & Van den Broeck, H. (2007). An analysis of differences in work motivation between public and private sector organizations. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 65–74. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00697.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caiden, G. E. (1991). What really is public maladministration? Public Administration Review, 51(6), 486–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camilleri, E. (2007). Antecedents affecting public service motivation. Personnel Review, 36(3), 356–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, Stephen M, and Joseph D Hagman. (2014). Transfer of learning: Contemporary research and applications. Cambridge: Academic Press.

  • Crewson, P. E. (1997). Public service motivation: building empirical evidence of incidence and effect. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7, 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSantis, V. S., & Durst, S. L. (1996). Comparing job satisfaction among public and private sector employees. American Review of Public Administration, 26, 327–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmert, M. A., & Taher, W. A. (1992). Public sector professionals: the effects of public sector jobs on motivation, job satisfaction and work involvement. American Review of Public Administration, 22(1), 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewen, R. B., Smith, P. C., & Hulin, C. L. (1966). An empirical test of the Herzberg two-factor theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 50(6), 544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. K. (2014). Improving training effectiveness in work organizations. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Forde, L., & Ferrari, K. (1999). Personality and work motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 1035–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabris, G. T., & Simo, G. (1995). Public sector motivation as an independent variable affecting career decisions. Public Personnel Management, 25, 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gore, Al. 1993. From red tape to results: creating a government that Works Better & Costs Less. Report of the National Performance Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Ricky W., and Gregory Moorhead. 2011. Organizational Behavior: Managing people and organization: OH: south-western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair Jr., J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneman, R. L., & Werner, J. M. (2005). Merit pay: Linking pay to performance in a changing world. : IAP.

  • Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: how do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 46, 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, F. A., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingraham, P. W, P. G. Joyce, and A. K. Donahue. (2003). Government performance: Why management matters. : Taylor & Francis.

  • Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 530–541. doi:10.1037/0021.9010.87.3.530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, Henry F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and psychological measurement.

  • Kennedy, P. (1992). A Guide to Econometrics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettl, D., & Fesler, J. (2009). The politics of the administrative process (4th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khojasteh, M. (1993). Motivating the private vs. public sector managers. Public Personnel Management, 22(3), 391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisink, P., & Steijn, B. (2009). Public service motivation and job performance of public sector employees in the Netherlands. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and Organisational psychology (pp. 1297–1349). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2004). What should we do ab out motivation theory? Six recommendation for the twenty-first century. Advances in motivation and achievement, 10, 175–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, L., Heinrich, C., & Hill, C. (2000). Studying governance and public management: why? How?, governance and performance: new perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, K. J., & O’Toole Jr., L. J. (2002). Public management and organizational performance: the impact of managerial quality. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(4), 629–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2005). Testing how management matters in an era of government by performance management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 421–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson-Crotty, S., & O’Toole, L. J. (2004). Public management and organizational performance: the case of law enforcement agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyame-Mireku, M. N. (2012). Determinants of job satisfaction among hospital pharmacists and their intent to leave using Herzberg’s two-factor theory. Minneapolis: Capella University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, S. K. and E. C. Stazyk (2008). Antecedents and correlates of public service motivation. In: J. L. Perry and A. Hondeghem (Eds), Motivation in public management: The call of public service, (pp. 101-117). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Parsons, E., & Broadbridge, A. (2006). Job motivation and satisfaction: unpacking the key factors for charity shop managers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13(2), 121–131. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2005.08.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. L., & Rainey, H. G. (1988). The public–private distinction in organization theory: a critique and research strategy. Academy of Management Review, 13, 182–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. L., Hondeghem, A., & Wise, L. R. (2010). Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: twenty years of research and an agenda for the future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinder, C. (2008). Work motivation in organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst, T. M., Brett, J. M., Drasgow, F. (2002). The impact of job insecurity on employee work attitudes, job adaptation, and organizational withdrawal behaviors. In: J. Brett and F. Drasgow (Eds), The psychology of work: Theoretically based empirical research, (pp. 141-168). Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.

  • Rainey, H. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: in search of the service ethic. American Review of Public Administration, 16, 288–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, H. G. (1989). Public management: recent research on the political context and managerial roles, structures and behaviors. Journal of Management, 15, 229–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, H. (2014). Understanding and managing pubic organizations. 5th ed. : Jossey-Bass.

  • Rainey, H. G., & Bozeman, B. (2000). Comparing public and private organizations: empirical research and the power of the a priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 447–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, H. G., & Steinbauer, P. (1999). Galloping elephants: developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J., Ullrich, R., & Nelson, O. (1975). A comparison of managers entering or reentering the profit and nonprofit sectors. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 616–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanjeev, MA, & Surya, A. V. (2016). Two factor theory of motivation and satisfaction: an empirical verification. Annals of Data Science, 3(2):1–19.

  • Shipley, D., & Kiely, J. (1988). Motivation and dissatisfaction of industrial salespeople-how relevant is Herzberg’s theory? European Journal of Marketing, 22(1), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel, B. S., & Warner, R. L. (1990). Job satisfaction among early labor force participants: unexpected outcomes in public and private sector comparisons. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 10, 4–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, C., Didham, J., & Theivananthampillai, P. (2011). Motivation, pay satisfaction, and job satisfaction of front-line employees. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8(2), 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1967). The bureaucracy problem. The Public Interest, 6, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittmer, D. (1991). Serving the people or serving for pay: reward preferences among government, hybrid sector and business managers. Public Productivity and Management Review, 14, 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. E. (2001). Public-sector work motivation: a review of the current literature and a revised conceptual model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(4), 559–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. E., & Davis, B. S. (2003). Job satisfaction in the public sector the role of the work environment. The American Review of Public Administration, 33(1), 70–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Yao, X., & Cheong, J. O. (2011). City managers’ job satisfaction and frustration: factors and implications. American Review of Public Administration, 41(6), 670–685. doi:10.1177/0275074010392212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongbeom Hur.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Table 3 Correlation matrix

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hur, Y. Testing Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory of Motivation in the Public Sector: Is it Applicable to Public Managers?. Public Organiz Rev 18, 329–343 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-017-0379-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-017-0379-1

Keywords

  • Satisfaction
  • Motivation
  • Hygiene
  • Herzberg’s two factor theory of motivation
  • Public managers