Understanding Public Sector Debt: Financial Vicious Circle under the Soft Budget Constraint
The article explains why debt of public sector organizations grows beyond the sustainable level by focusing on the principal-agent relationship under the soft budget constraint. Specifically, this article explores the extent to which factors affect the level of public sector debt in the context of quasi-autonomous non-governmental organizations (quangos) in Korea over the past two decades (1993–2012). The findings from the panel data analysis suggest that the level of public sector debt increases as an outcome of the financial vicious circle created by the soft budget constraint: a knock-on effect of the moral hazard of quangos as well as the opportunistic behavior of political principals. Public sector debt is positively associated with agency-specific factors as well as the factors related to the political incentives such as policy preferences and electoral considerations. However, macroeconomic factors made little difference to the general pattern of the evidence.
KeywordsPublic sector debt Soft budget constraint Principal-agent relationship Quangos Arms’ length agencies
- Aghion, P., & Bolton, P. (1990). Government domestic debt and the risk of default: A political-economic model of the strategic role of debt. In Dornbrusch & Draghi (Eds.), Public debt management: Theory and history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bartel, A. P., & Harrison A. E. (1999). “Ownership versus Environment: Why Are Public Sector Firms Inefficient?” NBER Working Paper No. 7043. Google Scholar
- Bennett, J. T. (2004). Underground government: the off-budget public sector. The Encyclopedia of Public Choice, 587–589.Google Scholar
- Bennett, J. T., & DiLorenzo, T. J. (1983, May 24). “Underground government.” Proquest Historical Newspapers: The Christian Science Monitor (1908–1999), p. 23.Google Scholar
- Bertelli, A. M. (2008). Credible governance? Transparency, political control, the personal vote and British quangos. Political Science, 56(4), 807–829.Google Scholar
- Buchanan, J. M., & Wagner, R. E. (1977). Democracy in deficit: The political legacy of Lord Keynes. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Cho, S. (2011). “Korea’s sovereign debt management and challenges.” Capital Market Opinion, Korea Capital Market Institute. http://www.kcmi.re.kr/common/downloadw.asp?fid=2924&fgu=002001&fty=004003. Accessed 9 August 2016.
- Clingermayer, J. C., & B. D. Wood. (1995). Disentangling patterns of state debt financing. The American Political Science Review, 89(1), 108–120.Google Scholar
- Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
- Epstein, D., & O’Halloran, S. (1999). Delegating powers: A transaction cost politics approach to policy making under separate powers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Fiorina, M. P. (1986). Legislator uncertainty, legislative control, and the delegation of legislative power. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2(1), 33–51.Google Scholar
- Goodsell, C. T. (2003). The case for bureaucracy: A public administration polemic. 4th Edition. Washington D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
- Hood, C. (2011). The blame game: Spin, Bureaucracy and self-preservation in government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- IMF (2011). Government finance statistics: Compilation guide for developing countries. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/gfs/manual/compil.pdf. Accessed 9 August 2016.
- IMF & World Bank (2003). Developing government bond markets: A handbook. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund and World Bank. http://www.imf.org/external/np/mfd/pdebt/2003/eng/am/120903.pdf. Accessed 9 August 2016.
- Jalan, B. (1991). India’s economic crisis. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Johnson, C. L., Kioko, S. N., & Wang, J. Q. (2010). State government debt management: the forgotten tool in the financial Manager’s triage bag. Municipal Finance Journal, 31(1), 21–40.Google Scholar
- Kappagoda, N. (2001). Public debt management: a new priority. Bulletin on Asia-Pacific.Google Scholar
- Kernell, S. (2007). Going public: New strategies of presidential leadership. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
- Krugman, P. (1998). “What happened to Asia?” January 1998. http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/DISINTER.html. Accessed 9 August 2016.
- Light, P. C. (1999). The true size of government. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Martell, C. R. (2007). Debt burdens of overlapping jurisdictions. Municipal Finance Journal, 28(2), 1–23.Google Scholar
- McCubbins, Noll, & Weingast (1987). Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 3, 243–277.Google Scholar
- Moe, T. M. (1997). The positive theory of public bureaucracy. In D. C. Mueller (Ed.), Perspectives on public choice: A handbook (pp. 455–480). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
- OECD Economic Outlook. (2014). Issue 1, May 2014. doi:10.1787/eco_outlook-v2014-1-en.
- Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (1992). “The politics of 1992: fiscal policy and European integration.” Review of Economic Studies, 59(4), 689–701.Google Scholar
- Pogue, T. F. (1970). The effect of debt limits: some new evidence. National Tax Journal, 23(1), 36–49.Google Scholar
- Pollitt, C., Talbot, C., Caulfield, J., & Smullen, A. (2004). Agencies: How government do things through semi-autonomous organizations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Poterba, J. M. (1995). Balanced budget rules and fiscal policy: evidence from the states. National Tax Journal, 48(3), 329–336.Google Scholar
- Qian, Y., & Roland, G. (1998). “Federalism and the soft budget constraint.” American Economic Review, 88(5), 143–162.Google Scholar
- Robinson, J. A. and R. Torvik. (2006). “A political economy theory of the soft budget constraint.” Working Paper Series #12133, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Rodden, J. A. (2007). Hamilton’s paradox: The promise and peril of fiscal federalism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Rogoff, K. (1990). Equilibrium political budget cycles. American Economic Review, 80(1), 21–36.Google Scholar
- Schwarcz, S. L. (2002). Restructuring subnational debt. Municipal Finance Journal, 23(3), 1–42.Google Scholar
- Skelcher, C. (1998). The appointed state: Quasi-governmental organizations and democracy. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Taylor, A. (1997). “‘Arm’s length but hands on’. Mapping the new governance: the department of national heritage and cultural politics in Britain.” Public Administration, 75(3), 441–466.Google Scholar
- The Bank of Korea. (2014). Public sector account by the new guide. Retrieved at (in Korean).Google Scholar
- Von Hagen, J. (2006). Political economy of fiscal institutions. In Barry & Wittman (Eds.), The oxford handbook of political economy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wagner, R. E. (2013). Deficits, debt, and democracy: Wrestling with tragedy on the fiscal commons. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar