Public Organization Review

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 563–580 | Cite as

Public Multichannel Management – an Integrated Framework of Off- and Online Multichannel Government Services



Government institutions have introduced multichannel environments over time following trends and technological innovations. These public multichannel environments often neglect specific channel characteristics and potentials and thus miss the opportunity to make full use of a strategic channel integration and combination with a focus on customer value creation. This study offers a systematic approach to establish an integrated public multichannel system not only taking into account user preferences, habits and their environment, but also the respective channel issuer and the characteristics of channels and public interfaces. Against this background, the study presents a systematic approach to expand services and channels according to their capacities, and provides academics and practitioners with a framework on public multichannel strategies.


Multichannel management Public services Public administration e-government 


  1. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113–124.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, J. N., Gauld, R., & Goldfinch, S. (2012). What public servants really think of E-government. Public Management Review, 14(1), 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ballantyne, D., & Varey, R. J. (2006). Creating value-in-use through marketing interaction: the exchange logic of relating, communicating and knowing. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 335–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, D. R., Gallino, S., Moreno, A. (2015). Offline Showrooms and Customer Migration in Omni-Channel Retail. The Effect of Product Information. Social Sience Research Network (SSRN)., checked on 02/12/15.
  5. Berry, L. L. (1980). Service marketing is different. Business Weekly, 30(May/June), 24–29.Google Scholar
  6. Bohlmann, J. D., Spanjol, J., Qualls, W. J., & Rosa, J. A. (2013). The interplay of customer and product innovation dynamics: an exploratory study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(2), 228–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, Y. J., & Rahman, M. S. (2013). Competing in the age of omnichannel retailing. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(4), 23–29.Google Scholar
  8. Chadwick, A., & May, C. (2003). Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the internet. “e-government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance, 16(2), 271–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chun, S. A., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R., & Hovy, E. (2010). Government 2.0: making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Polity, 15(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
  10. da Silva, R., & Batista, L. (2007). Boosting government reputation through CRM. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 20(7), 588–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness. A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 191–233.Google Scholar
  12. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dawes, S. S. (2008). The evolution and continuing challenges of E-governance. Public Administration Review, 68(Supplement), 86–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dawes, S. S. (2009). Governance in the digital age. A research and action framework for an uncertain future. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dhebar, A. (2013). Toward a compelling customer touchpoint architecture. Business Horizons, 56(2), 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dholakia, R. R., Zhao, M., & Dholakia, N. (2005). Multichannel retailing: a case study of early experiences. Journal of Interactive Marketing 19(2), 63–74.Google Scholar
  17. Ebbers, W. E., Pieterson, W. J., & Noordman, H. N. (2008). Electronic government. Rethinking channel management strategies. Government Information Quarterly, 25(2), 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elsweiler, D., Wilson, M. L., & Lunn, B. K. (2011). Chapter 9 understanding casual-leisure information behaviour. In A. Spink & H. Jannica (Eds.), New directions in information behaviour (Vol. vol. 1, pp. 211–241). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited (Library and Information Science).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. European Commission (2010). European eGovernment Action Plan 2011–2015. Harnessing ICT to promote smart, sustainable & innovative Government., checked on 17/11/15.
  20. European Commission (2013). A vision for public services. Draft version dated 13/06/2013. With assistance of EC DG Communications Networks., checked on 30/11/15.
  21. European Commission (2014). eGovernment. Digital Agenda Scoreboard2014. With assistance of EUROSTAT. European Commission., checked on 18/11/15.
  22. European Commission (2015). EU eGovernment Report 2015 shows that online public services in Europe are smart but could be smarter., updated on 6/23/2015, checked on 19/11/15.
  23. Frey, K. N., & Holden, S. H. (2005). Distribution channel management in e-government: addressing federal information policy issues. Government Information Quarterly, 22(4), 685–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gagnon, Y.-C., Posada, E., Bourgault, M., & Naud, A. (2010). Multichannel delivery of public services. A new and complex management challenge. International Journal of Public Administration, 33(5), 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grant, G., & Chau, D. (2006). Developing a generic framework for e-government. Advanced Topics in Information Management, 5(1), 72–94.Google Scholar
  26. Gualmini, E. (2008). Restructuring Weberian bureaucracy: comparing managerial reforms in Europe and the United States. Public Administration, 86(1), 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heinemann, G., & Gaiser, C. (2015). Social - Local - Mobile. The future of location-based services. Heidelberg: Springer (Management for Professionals).Google Scholar
  28. Hoehle, H., Huff, S. (Eds.) (2009). Electronic banking channels and task-channel fit. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) (ICIS 2009 Proceedings, 98). Available online at, checked on 02/12/15.
  29. Hood, C., & Margetts, H. (2007). The tools of government in the digital age (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan (Public Policy and Politics).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jansen, J., de Vries, S., & van Schaik, P. (2010). The contextual benchmark method: benchmarking e-government services. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Janssen, M., & Klievink, B. (2009). The role of intermediaries in Multi-Channel service delivery strategies. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 5(3), 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kannabiran, G., Xavier, M. J., & Anantharaaj, A. (2004). Enabling e-governance through citizen relationship management-concept, model and applications. Journal of Services Research, 4(2), 223.Google Scholar
  33. Kernaghan, K. (2005). Moving towards the virtual state. Integrating services and service channels for citizen-centred delivery. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(1), 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. King, S. F. (2007). Citizens as customers: exploring the future of CRM in UK local government. Government Information Quarterly, 24(1), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Langford, J. & Roy, J. (2008). Integrating Service Delivery Across Levels of Government: Case Studies of Canada and Other Countries. IBM Center of the Business of Government (Network and Partnership Series)., checked on 12/03/15.
  36. Lenk, K., & Traunmüller, R. (2002). Electronic government: where are we heading? In R. Traunmüller & K. Lenk (Eds.), Electronic government (Vol. vol. 2456, pp. 1–9). Berlin: Springer (Lecture Notes in Computer Science).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewis, C. W., & Gilman, S. C. (2005). The ethics challenge in public service: a problem-solving guide (2nd ed.). San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  38. Lynn, L. E. (1998). The new public management: how to transform a theme into a legacy. Public Administration Review, 58(3), 231–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Montoya-Weiss, M. M., Voss, G. B., & Grewal, D. (2003). Determinants of online channel use and overall satisfaction with a relational, multichannel service provider. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(4), 448–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moore, E. H., Bagin, D. H., & Gallagher, D. R. (2011). The school and community relations (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  41. Nygren, K. G., Axelsson, K., & Melin, U. (2014). Multi-Channel Service Management in Public Sector–Three Interpretative Frames Illustrating E-government and work practice in a Swedish state agency. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 12(1), 115–128.Google Scholar
  42. Pieterson, W. & Johnson, Z. (2011). Multi-channel management: recent developments in PES and e-government. Thematic report for multi-channel management., checked on 02/12/15.
  43. PricewaterhouseCoopers (2009). Champion for Digital Inclusion. The Economic Case for Digital Inclusion. Go ON UK. Available online at, checked on 20/06/15.
  44. Ramaswamy, R. (1996). Design and management of service processes: keeping customers for life (1st ed.). University of Michigan: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  45. Reddick, C. G. (2010). Impact of citizen relationship management (CRM) on government: Evidence from US local governments. Journal of E-Governance, 33(2), 88–99.Google Scholar
  46. Reddick, C. G. (2011). Customer relationship management (CRM) technology and organizational change: evidence for the bureaucratic and e-government paradigms. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 346–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reddick, C. G., & Turner, M. (2012). Channel choice and public service delivery in Canada: comparing e-government to traditional service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reddick, C. G., Abdelsalam, H. M. E., & Elkadi, H. A. (2012). Channel choice and the digital divide in e-government: the case of Egypt. Information Technology for Development, 18(3), 226–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rosenbloom, B. (2011). Marketing channels. A management view (8th ed.). Mason: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  50. Roy, J. (2006). E-service delivery and new governance capacities: 'Service Canada' as a case study. International Journal of Services Technology & Management, 7(3), 253–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Roy, J. (2007). Electronic service delivery in a multi-channel public sector: an assessment of the government of Canada. International Journal of Information Technology & Management, 6(2–4), 1.Google Scholar
  52. Schellong, A. (Ed.) (2005). CRM in the public sector: towards a conceptual research framework. Proceedings of the 2005 National Conference on Digital Government Research: Digital Government Society of North America.Google Scholar
  53. Scholl, H. J., & Klischewski, R. (2007). E-government integration and interoperability. Framing the research agenda. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(8–9), 889–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sebetci, Ö., & Aksu, G. (2014). Evaluating e-government systems in Turkey: the case of the 'e-movable system'. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 19(3/4), 225–243.Google Scholar
  55. Soliman, K. S., Affisco, J. F., Belanger, F., & Hiller, J. S. (2006). A framework for e-government: privacy implications. Business Process Management Journal, 12(1), 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Spengler, C., Wirth, W., & Sigrist, R. (2010). 360 touchpoint management. How important is twitter for our brand? Marketing Review St. Gallen, 2(1), 14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Teerling, M. L., & Pieterson, W. (2010). Multichannel marketing: an experiment on guiding citizens to the electronic channels. Government Information Quarterly, 27(1), 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Teerling, M. L., & Pieterson, W. (2011). How to improve e-government use: an empirical examination of multichannel marketing instruments. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 16(2), 171–187.Google Scholar
  59. The White House (2012). Obama, B. Digital Government Strategy. Building a twenty-first Century Digital Government. Edited by Office of the Press Secretary. Washington., updated on 5/23/2012, checked on 17/11/15.
  60. United Nations (2012). e-Government Survey 2012. E-Government for the People. New York (Economic and Social Affairs)., checked on 02/12/15.
  61. United Nations (2014). e-Government Survey 2014. E-Government for the Future We Want. New York (Economic and Social Affairs)., checked on 02/12/15.
  62. Valos, M. J., & Vocino, A. (2006). An integrative marketing channel performance measurement framework. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 14(1), 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. van Deursen, A., Pieterson, W. (Eds.) (2006). The Internet as a service channel in the Public Sector. ICA Conference. Dresden, Germany, 20 June 2006. Available online at, checked on 03/12/15.
  64. van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2008). Using online public services: a measurement of citizens’ operational, formal, information and strategic skills. In M. A. Wimmer, H. J. Scholl, & E. Ferro (Eds.), Electronic government (Vol. vol. 5184, pp. 195–206). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer (Lecture Notes in Computer Science).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vassilakis, C., Lepouras, G., & Halatsis, C. (2007). A knowledge-based approach for developing multi-channel e-government services. Electronic Commerce Research & Applications, 6(1), 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Verdegem, P., & Verleye, G. (2009). User-centered E-government in practice: a comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction. Government Information Quarterly, 26(3), 487–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Verhoef, P. C., Kannan, P. K., & Inman, J. J. (2015). From Multi-Channel retailing to Omni-Channel retailing: introduction to the special issue on Multi-Channel retailing. Journal of Retailing, 91(2), 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wilson, H., & Daniel, E. (2007). The multi-channel challenge: a dynamic capability approach. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(1), 10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wirtz, B. W. & Daiser, P. (2015). E-Government. Strategy Process Instruments. Textbook for the Digital Society., checked on 03/12/15.
  70. Wirtz, B. W., & Daiser, P. (2016). A meta-analysis of empirical e-government research and its future research implications. In International Review of Administrative Sciences. doi: 10.1177/0020852315599047.Google Scholar
  71. Wirtz, B. W. & Kurtz, O. T. (2016a). Citizen preferences toward e-government city portals. an empirical analysis of full online, mobile and social media services. International Public Management Review, 17(1).Google Scholar
  72. Wirtz, B. W., & Kurtz, O. T. (2016b). Local e-government and user satisfaction with city portals – the citizens’ service preference perspective. In International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing. doi: 10.1007/s12208-015-0149-0.Google Scholar
  73. Wirtz, B. W., & Piehler, R. (2015). eGovernment applications and public personnel acceptance. An empirical analysis of the public servant perspective. In International Journal of Public Administration, 39(3), 238–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wirtz, B. W., Mory, L., & Ullrich, S. (2012). eHealth in the public sector: an empirical analysis of the acceptance of Germany's electronic health card. Public Administration, 90(3), 642–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wirtz, B. W., Piehler, R., Rieger, V., & Daiser, P. (2016). E-government portal information performance and the role of local community interest. Empirical support for a model of citizen perceptions. Public Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 48–83.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair for Information and Communication ManagementGerman University of Administrative Sciences SpeyerSpeyerGermany
  2. 2.German Research Institute for Public Administration SpeyerSpeyerGermany

Personalised recommendations