Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

‘Strong Personalities’ and ‘Strong Institutions’ Mediated by a ‘Strong Third Force’: Thinking ‘Systems’ in Corruption Control

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corruption in public sector is a complex, ‘messy’ and ‘fuzzy’ phenomenon which involves calculus machinations between actors and constantly growing in sophistication. Consequently, an attempt to prevent, control or fight it requires systems thinking that ranges from public officials with integrity and personal ethics [strong personalities]; administrative rules and procedures as well as governments adopting, enforcing and monitoring appropriate systems [strong institutions]. This paper provides a systems approach to enhancing public sector ethics through ‘a corruption control tripod’ in preventing, controlling and combating corruption in all its forms. This framework discusses three overarching pillars and argues that adopting a reductionist approach in corruption control would yield futility; there is a need for synthesis so that each one would reinforce the other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-ghanaian-parliament

  2. http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/e/edmund_burke.html

References

  • Alm, J., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & McClellan, C. (2016). Corruption and firm tax evasion. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 24(124), 146–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyriades, D. (2006). Good governance, professionalism, ethics and responsibility. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 72(2), 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D. A., Robinson, S. L., & Trevino, L. K. (2008). Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 670–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayee, J. R. A. (2000). Saints, wizards, demons and systems: explaining the success and failure of public policies and programs. Accra: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, R. (2016). On the interpretation of bribery in a laboratory corruption game: moral frames and social norms. Experimental Economics, 19(1), 240–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and development: a review of issues. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1320–1346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, A., & Serra, D. (2010). Corruption and culture: an experimental analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 94(11), 862–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya, S., & Hodler, R. (2015). Media freedom and democracy in the fight against corruption. European Journal of Political Economy, 39, 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braibanti, R. (1969). Political and administrative development. North Carolina: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2000). Assessing political will for anti-corruption efforts: an analytic framework. Public Administration and Development, 20(3), 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunetti, A., & Weder, B. (2003). A free press is bad news for corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 87(7), 1801–1824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, S. K. (2004). The effect of democracy and press freedom on corruption: an empirical test. Economics Letters, 85(1), 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dexter, L. A. (1993). Complexities of corruption. Society, 30(4), 63–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di John, J. (2010). The concept, causes and consequences of failed states: a critical review of the literature and agenda for research with specific reference to sub-Saharan Africa. European Journal of Development Research, 22(1), 10–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, M. W., Smith, D. B., Grojean, M. W., & Ehrhart, M. (2001). An organizational climate regarding ethics: the outcome of leader values and the practices that reflect them. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(2), 197–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doig, A., & McIvor, S. (2003). The national integrity system: assessing corruption and reform. Public Administration and Development, 23(4), 317–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1966). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, T. R. (2008). Understanding public policy (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, A., & Weisband, E. (2007). Global accountabilities: Participation, pluralism and public ethics. UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Escobari, D. (2012). Imperfect detection of tax evasion in a corrupt tax administration. Public Organization Review, 12(4), 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. (1999). Globalization and public administration. Public Administration Review, 59, 509–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. (2001). Global crisis in public service and administration. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Handbook of crisis and emergency management (pp. 111–130). New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. (2002). Administrative ethics and professional competence: accountability and performance under globalization. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 68(1), 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freille, S., Haque, M. E., & Kneller, R. (2007). Contribution to the empirics of press freedom and corruption. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(4), 838–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebel, A. C. (2012). Human nature and morality in the anti-corruption discourse of transparency international. Public Administration and Development, 32(1), 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, S. C. (2005). Ethics codes and codes of conduct as tools for promoting an ethical and professional public service: Comparative successes and lessons. Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioacchino, D., & Franzini, M. (2008). Bureaucrats‟ corruption and competition in public administration. European Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 291–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, T. (2002). Dangerous collusion: corruption as a collective venture in contemporary China. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 35(1), 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, T. (2011). An ‘institutional turn’ in integrity management in China. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(4), 671–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, T., & Wu, A. M. (2012). Does increased civil service pay deter corruption? Evidence from China. Review of Public Personnel Administration. doi:10.1177/0734371X12438247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, D. J. (1991). Administrative corruption: incidence, causes, and remedial strategies. In A. Farazmand (Ed., 2001), Handbook of comparative and development public administration (pp. 467–480). New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.

  • Gyekye, K. (2013). Philosophy culture and vision: african perspectives: selected essays. Legon: Sub-Saharan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton-Hart, N. (2001). Anti-corruption strategies in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 37(1), 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabbra, J. G., & Dwivedi, O. P. (1988). Public service accountability: a comparative perspective. West Hartford: Kumarian Press Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Jávor, I., & Jancsics, D. (2013). The role of power in organizational corruption: an empirical study. Administration and Society. doi:10.1177/0095399713514845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M. (1998). What can be done about entrenched corruption? In Annual world bank conference on development economics 1997 (pp. 69–90). Washington DC: World Bank.

  • Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2012). Advancing ethical competence through pedagogy. In T. L. Cooper & D. C. Menzel (Eds.), Achieving ethical competency (pp. 131–153). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurkiewicz, C. L., & Giacalone, R. A. (2015). How will We know it when We see it? Conceptualizing the Ethical Organization. Public Organization Review, 1–12.

  • Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals, trans. H. J. Paton. (1956). New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. K. (2014). Anti-corruption initiatives and E-government: a cross-National Study. Public Organization Review, 14(3), 385–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., Kim, H. J., & Lee, H. (2009). An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: the case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling corruption. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J. J., & Martimort, D. (1997). Collusion under asymmetric information. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 65(4), 875–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, L. (2009). The politics of anti-corruption reform in Africa. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 47(01), 73–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. (1991). The ethics challenge in public service: a problem-solving guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, J. M. (2009). Public administration ethics for the twenty-first century. ABC CLIO-Praeger: Santa Barbara, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mashali, B. (2012). Analyzing the relationship between perceived grand corruption and petty corruption in developing countries: case study of Iran. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(4), 775–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, A. (2009). Policy mimesis in the context of global governance. Policy Studies, 30(3), 383–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1957). Utilitarianism. New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolescu, B. (2004). Gurdjieff’s philosophy of nature. In J. Needleman & G. Baker (Eds.), Gurdjieff (pp. 37–69). New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2013). Ethics training for public officials. Accessed on September, 20, 2015 from http://www.oecd.org/corruption/acn/library/EthicsTrainingforPublicOfficialsBrochureEN.pdf Accessed on 17/06/2015.

  • Ortner, J., & Chassang, S. (2014). Making collusion hard: Asymmetric information as a counter-corruption measure. Princeton University William S. Dietrich II Economic Theory Center Research Paper, (064-2014). Princeton: Princeton University..

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, H., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2011). The roles of transparency and trust in the relationship between corruption and citizen satisfaction. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 254–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, N., Sampford, C. J., & Connors, C. (2002). Encouraging ethics and challenging corruption: Reforming governance in public institutions. Australia: The Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quesada, M. G., Jiménez-Sánchez, F., & Villoria, M. (2013). Building local integrity Systems in Southern Europe: the case of urban local corruption in Spain. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(4), 618–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudla, R., Taro, K., Agu, C., & Douglas, J. W. (2015). The impact of performance audit on public sector organizations: the case of Estonia. Public Organization Review, 1–17. doi:10.1007/s11115-015-0308-0.

  • Richards, D., & Smith, M. (2002). Governance and public policy in the UK. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, S. P. (1998). The political economy of anti-corruption strategies in Africa. The European Journal of Development Research, 10(1), 129–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and government: causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W. D. (1930). The right and the good, edited by P. Stratton-Lake (2002). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, A. (2007). Performance accountability and combating corruption. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shim, D. C. & Eom, T. H (2009). Anticorruption effects of information communication and technology (ICT) and social capital. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiquee, N. A. (2010). Combating corruption and managing integrity in Malaysia: a critical overview of recent strategies and initiatives. Public Organization Review, 10(2), 153–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative behavior: a study of decision-making processes in administrative organization (1st ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1987). Satisficing. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, & P. Newman (Eds.), The new Palgrave: A dictionary of economics (Vol. 4, pp. 243–245). New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tantardini, M., & Garcia-Zamor, J. C. (2014). Organizational social capital and anticorruption policies: an exploratory analysis. Public Organization Review, 15(4), 599–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, D., & Brockbank, W. (2005). The HR value proposition. Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Ad Hoc Committee Against Corruption, & Austria. (2004). United Nations Convention Against Corruption. Accessed on 20/09/2015 from https://www.unodc.org/documents/brussels/UN_Convention_Against_Corruption.pdf.

  • White, M. D. (2004). Can ‘homo economicus’ follow Kant’s categorical imperative? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33(1), 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeboah-Assiamah, E., & Alesu-Dordzi, S. (2015). The calculus of corruption: a paradox of ‘strong’ corruption amidst ‘strong’ systems and institutions in developing administrative systems. Journal of Public Affairs (www.wileyonlinelibrary.com). doi:10.1002/pa.1576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeboah-Assiamah, E., Asamoah, K., & Osei-kojo, A. (2014). Corruption here, corruption there, corruption everywhere: a framework for understanding and addressing public sector corruption in developing African democracies. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 4(3), 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeboah-Assiamah, E., Asamoah, K., Bawole, J. N., & Buabeng, T. (2015). Public sector leadership-subordinate ethical diffusion conundrum: perspectives from developing African countries. Journal of Public Affairs, (onlinelibrary.wiley.com). doi:10.1002/pa.1589.

  • Zeng, Y., & Ji, W. (2007). Detailed account of anti-corruption issues in China in 2006. Zhengfu fazhi (Government and Law), 1, 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Leadership, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa

    Emmanuel Yeboah-Assiamah

Authors
  1. Emmanuel Yeboah-Assiamah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel Yeboah-Assiamah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yeboah-Assiamah, E. ‘Strong Personalities’ and ‘Strong Institutions’ Mediated by a ‘Strong Third Force’: Thinking ‘Systems’ in Corruption Control. Public Organiz Rev 17, 545–562 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-016-0351-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-016-0351-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation