Public Organization Review

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 545–562 | Cite as

‘Strong Personalities’ and ‘Strong Institutions’ Mediated by a ‘Strong Third Force’: Thinking ‘Systems’ in Corruption Control

Article

Abstract

Corruption in public sector is a complex, ‘messy’ and ‘fuzzy’ phenomenon which involves calculus machinations between actors and constantly growing in sophistication. Consequently, an attempt to prevent, control or fight it requires systems thinking that ranges from public officials with integrity and personal ethics [strong personalities]; administrative rules and procedures as well as governments adopting, enforcing and monitoring appropriate systems [strong institutions]. This paper provides a systems approach to enhancing public sector ethics through ‘a corruption control tripod’ in preventing, controlling and combating corruption in all its forms. This framework discusses three overarching pillars and argues that adopting a reductionist approach in corruption control would yield futility; there is a need for synthesis so that each one would reinforce the other.

Keywords

Corruption control Public sector Institutions Integrity Ethics Civil society 

References

  1. Alm, J., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & McClellan, C. (2016). Corruption and firm tax evasion. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 24(124), 146–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argyriades, D. (2006). Good governance, professionalism, ethics and responsibility. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 72(2), 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D. A., Robinson, S. L., & Trevino, L. K. (2008). Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 670–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayee, J. R. A. (2000). Saints, wizards, demons and systems: explaining the success and failure of public policies and programs. Accra: University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Banerjee, R. (2016). On the interpretation of bribery in a laboratory corruption game: moral frames and social norms. Experimental Economics, 19(1), 240–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and development: a review of issues. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1320–1346.Google Scholar
  7. Barr, A., & Serra, D. (2010). Corruption and culture: an experimental analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 94(11), 862–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhattacharyya, S., & Hodler, R. (2015). Media freedom and democracy in the fight against corruption. European Journal of Political Economy, 39, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braibanti, R. (1969). Political and administrative development. North Carolina: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2000). Assessing political will for anti-corruption efforts: an analytic framework. Public Administration and Development, 20(3), 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brunetti, A., & Weder, B. (2003). A free press is bad news for corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 87(7), 1801–1824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chowdhury, S. K. (2004). The effect of democracy and press freedom on corruption: an empirical test. Economics Letters, 85(1), 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dexter, L. A. (1993). Complexities of corruption. Society, 30(4), 63–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Di John, J. (2010). The concept, causes and consequences of failed states: a critical review of the literature and agenda for research with specific reference to sub-Saharan Africa. European Journal of Development Research, 22(1), 10–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dickson, M. W., Smith, D. B., Grojean, M. W., & Ehrhart, M. (2001). An organizational climate regarding ethics: the outcome of leader values and the practices that reflect them. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(2), 197–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Doig, A., & McIvor, S. (2003). The national integrity system: assessing corruption and reform. Public Administration and Development, 23(4), 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Downs, A. (1966). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  19. Dye, T. R. (2008). Understanding public policy (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Ebrahim, A., & Weisband, E. (2007). Global accountabilities: Participation, pluralism and public ethics. UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Escobari, D. (2012). Imperfect detection of tax evasion in a corrupt tax administration. Public Organization Review, 12(4), 317–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Farazmand, A. (1999). Globalization and public administration. Public Administration Review, 59, 509–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Farazmand, A. (2001). Global crisis in public service and administration. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Handbook of crisis and emergency management (pp. 111–130). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  24. Farazmand, A. (2002). Administrative ethics and professional competence: accountability and performance under globalization. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 68(1), 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Freille, S., Haque, M. E., & Kneller, R. (2007). Contribution to the empirics of press freedom and corruption. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(4), 838–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gebel, A. C. (2012). Human nature and morality in the anti-corruption discourse of transparency international. Public Administration and Development, 32(1), 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gilman, S. C. (2005). Ethics codes and codes of conduct as tools for promoting an ethical and professional public service: Comparative successes and lessons. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  28. Gioacchino, D., & Franzini, M. (2008). Bureaucrats‟ corruption and competition in public administration. European Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gong, T. (2002). Dangerous collusion: corruption as a collective venture in contemporary China. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 35(1), 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gong, T. (2011). An ‘institutional turn’ in integrity management in China. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(4), 671–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gong, T., & Wu, A. M. (2012). Does increased civil service pay deter corruption? Evidence from China. Review of Public Personnel Administration. doi: 10.1177/0734371X12438247.Google Scholar
  32. Gould, D. J. (1991). Administrative corruption: incidence, causes, and remedial strategies. In A. Farazmand (Ed., 2001), Handbook of comparative and development public administration (pp. 467–480). New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.Google Scholar
  33. Gyekye, K. (2013). Philosophy culture and vision: african perspectives: selected essays. Legon: Sub-Saharan Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Hamilton-Hart, N. (2001). Anti-corruption strategies in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 37(1), 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jabbra, J. G., & Dwivedi, O. P. (1988). Public service accountability: a comparative perspective. West Hartford: Kumarian Press Inc..Google Scholar
  36. Jávor, I., & Jancsics, D. (2013). The role of power in organizational corruption: an empirical study. Administration and Society. doi: 10.1177/0095399713514845.Google Scholar
  37. Johnston, M. (1998). What can be done about entrenched corruption? In Annual world bank conference on development economics 1997 (pp. 69–90). Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  38. Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2012). Advancing ethical competence through pedagogy. In T. L. Cooper & D. C. Menzel (Eds.), Achieving ethical competency (pp. 131–153). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  39. Jurkiewicz, C. L., & Giacalone, R. A. (2015). How will We know it when We see it? Conceptualizing the Ethical Organization. Public Organization Review, 1–12.Google Scholar
  40. Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals, trans. H. J. Paton. (1956). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  41. Kim, C. K. (2014). Anti-corruption initiatives and E-government: a cross-National Study. Public Organization Review, 14(3), 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kim, S., Kim, H. J., & Lee, H. (2009). An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: the case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling corruption. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  44. Laffont, J. J., & Martimort, D. (1997). Collusion under asymmetric information. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 65(4), 875–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lawson, L. (2009). The politics of anti-corruption reform in Africa. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 47(01), 73–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lewis, C. (1991). The ethics challenge in public service: a problem-solving guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  47. Martinez, J. M. (2009). Public administration ethics for the twenty-first century. ABC CLIO-Praeger: Santa Barbara, California.Google Scholar
  48. Mashali, B. (2012). Analyzing the relationship between perceived grand corruption and petty corruption in developing countries: case study of Iran. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(4), 775–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Massey, A. (2009). Policy mimesis in the context of global governance. Policy Studies, 30(3), 383–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mill, J. S. (1957). Utilitarianism. New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc..Google Scholar
  51. Nicolescu, B. (2004). Gurdjieff’s philosophy of nature. In J. Needleman & G. Baker (Eds.), Gurdjieff (pp. 37–69). New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  52. OECD (2013). Ethics training for public officials. Accessed on September, 20, 2015 from http://www.oecd.org/corruption/acn/library/EthicsTrainingforPublicOfficialsBrochureEN.pdf Accessed on 17/06/2015.
  53. Ortner, J., & Chassang, S. (2014). Making collusion hard: Asymmetric information as a counter-corruption measure. Princeton University William S. Dietrich II Economic Theory Center Research Paper, (064-2014). Princeton: Princeton University..Google Scholar
  54. Park, H., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2011). The roles of transparency and trust in the relationship between corruption and citizen satisfaction. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 254–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Preston, N., Sampford, C. J., & Connors, C. (2002). Encouraging ethics and challenging corruption: Reforming governance in public institutions. Australia: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
  56. Quesada, M. G., Jiménez-Sánchez, F., & Villoria, M. (2013). Building local integrity Systems in Southern Europe: the case of urban local corruption in Spain. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(4), 618–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Raudla, R., Taro, K., Agu, C., & Douglas, J. W. (2015). The impact of performance audit on public sector organizations: the case of Estonia. Public Organization Review, 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s11115-015-0308-0.
  58. Richards, D., & Smith, M. (2002). Governance and public policy in the UK. Oxford: Oxford University.Google Scholar
  59. Riley, S. P. (1998). The political economy of anti-corruption strategies in Africa. The European Journal of Development Research, 10(1), 129–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and government: causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ross, W. D. (1930). The right and the good, edited by P. Stratton-Lake (2002). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Shah, A. (2007). Performance accountability and combating corruption. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shim, D. C. & Eom, T. H (2009). Anticorruption effects of information communication and technology (ICT) and social capital. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 99–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Siddiquee, N. A. (2010). Combating corruption and managing integrity in Malaysia: a critical overview of recent strategies and initiatives. Public Organization Review, 10(2), 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative behavior: a study of decision-making processes in administrative organization (1st ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  66. Simon, H. A. (1987). Satisficing. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, & P. Newman (Eds.), The new Palgrave: A dictionary of economics (Vol. 4, pp. 243–245). New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  67. Tantardini, M., & Garcia-Zamor, J. C. (2014). Organizational social capital and anticorruption policies: an exploratory analysis. Public Organization Review, 15(4), 599–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ulrich, D., & Brockbank, W. (2005). The HR value proposition. Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  69. United Nations Ad Hoc Committee Against Corruption, & Austria. (2004). United Nations Convention Against Corruption. Accessed on 20/09/2015 from https://www.unodc.org/documents/brussels/UN_Convention_Against_Corruption.pdf.
  70. White, M. D. (2004). Can ‘homo economicus’ follow Kant’s categorical imperative? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33(1), 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yeboah-Assiamah, E., & Alesu-Dordzi, S. (2015). The calculus of corruption: a paradox of ‘strong’ corruption amidst ‘strong’ systems and institutions in developing administrative systems. Journal of Public Affairs (www.wileyonlinelibrary.com). doi: 10.1002/pa.1576.Google Scholar
  72. Yeboah-Assiamah, E., Asamoah, K., & Osei-kojo, A. (2014). Corruption here, corruption there, corruption everywhere: a framework for understanding and addressing public sector corruption in developing African democracies. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 4(3), 186–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yeboah-Assiamah, E., Asamoah, K., Bawole, J. N., & Buabeng, T. (2015). Public sector leadership-subordinate ethical diffusion conundrum: perspectives from developing African countries. Journal of Public Affairs, (onlinelibrary.wiley.com). doi: 10.1002/pa.1589.
  74. Zeng, Y., & Ji, W. (2007). Detailed account of anti-corruption issues in China in 2006. Zhengfu fazhi (Government and Law), 1, 14–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public LeadershipStellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations