Skip to main content
Log in

Diversity Management and Fairness in Public Organizations

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Diversity management was initially adopted in the pursuit of fairness and equality and the promotion of an inclusive workforce by public organizations. However, previous studies regarding diversity management have focused on job performance or job satisfaction. Thus, in this article, we attempt to examine whether diversity management advances organizational fairness in public organizations. By examining data from the 2013 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS), we find that diversity management is positively related to the perception of organizational fairness in the federal workplace. In addition, we also find that female and minority employees perceive diversity management in terms of fairness differently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, N. J. (2002). International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior (4th ed.). Cincinnati: South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adusah-Karikari, A., & Ohemeng, F. L. K. (2014). Representative bureaucracy in the public service? A critical analysis of the challenges confronting women in the civil service of Ghana. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(9), 568–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1(1), 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrell, M. R., & Dittrich, J. E. (1978). Equity theory: The recent literature, methodological considerations, and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 3(2), 202–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrell, M. R., & Mann, E. E. (1995). Defining workforce diversity in public sector organizations. Public Personnel Management, 24(1), 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Y. J., & Sai, N. (2013). Does Organizational Justice Matter in the Federal Workplace? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33(3), 227–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, C., & Kellough, J. E. (1994). Women and minorities in federal government agencies: Examining new evidence from panel data. Public Administration Review, 265–270.

  • Cox, T. (1993). Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research and practice. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., & Prehar, C. (1997). Procedural justice, leader-member exchange, and the consequences of performance evaluation. In Meeting of the Australian Psychological Society’s Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

  • Cropanzano, R., & Randall, M. L. (1993). Injustice and work behavior: A historical review. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 3–20). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denhardt, R., & deLeon, L. (1995). Great thinkers in personnel management. In J. Rabin et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Public Personal Administration. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin, F. (2009). Inventing equal opportunity. Princeton University Press.

  • Ely, R. J. (2004). A field study of group diversity, participation in diversity education programs, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(6), 755–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, J. P. (1999). Race, gender and rhetoric. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, D., Pang, M., & Chiu, C. (2000). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of employee outcomes in Hong Kong. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(5), 547–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foldy, E. G. (2004). Learning from diversity: A theoretical exploration. Public Administration Review, 64(5), 529–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1987). Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the means justify the ends? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(1), 55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellough, J. E. (1990). Integration in the Public Workplace: Determinants of Minority and Female Employment in Federal Agencies. Public Administration Review, 50(5), 557–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellough, J. E., & Naff, K. C. (2004). Responding to a wake-up call: An examination of federal agency diversity management programs. Administration & Society, 36(1), 62–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, E., & Dobbin, F. (1998). How Affirmative Action Became Diversity Management Employer Response to Antidiscrimination Law, 1961 to 1996. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(7), 960–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, B., Miller, W., & Reid, M. (2002). Sex‐Based Occupational Segregation in US State Bureaucracies, 1987–97. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 412–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kranz, H. (1976). The participatory bureaucracy: Women and minorities in a more representative public service. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreitz, P. A. (2008). Best practices for managing organizational diversity. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(2), 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. E. (1952). Bureaucracy and Constitutionalism. American Political Science Review, 46(03), 808–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. J. (1964). American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory. World politics, 16(04), 677–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. J. (1985). The state in politics: the relation between policy and administration. In R. Noll (Ed.), Regulatory Policy and the social sciences (pp. 67–105). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A. (1998). Diversity: A principle of human resource management. Public Personnel Management, 27(2), 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, K. J. (1975). Representative bureaucracy: An empirical analysis. The American Political Science Review, 526–542.

  • Meier, K. J., Wrinkle, R. D., & Polinard, J. L. (1999). Representative bureaucracy and distributional equity: Addressing the hard question. Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1025–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A. M. (1992). The New Leaders: Guidelines on Leadership Diversity in America. Sanfrancisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, F. (Ed.). (1968). Democracy and the public service. NewYork: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naff, K. C. (2007). Passive representation in the South African bureaucracy: A lot has happened, but it’s a lot more complicated. Paper prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 20-September 2, Chicago, IL.

  • Newman, M. A. (1994). Gender and Lowi’s thesis: Implications for career advancement. Public Administration Review, 54(3), 277–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paluck, E. L. (2011). Peer pressure against prejudice: A high school field experiment examining social network change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), 350–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, D. (2005). Diversity, representation, and performance: Evidence about race and ethnicity in public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), 615–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, D. (2009). Diversity management, job satisfaction, and performance: Evidence from U.S. Federal agencies. Public Administration Review, 69(2), 328–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, D., & Jarry, E. (2007). Ethnic diversity and organizational performance: Assessing diversity effects at the managerial and street levels. International Public Management Journal, 10(2), 233–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaut, V. C. (2010). Diversity science: Why and how difference makes a difference. Psychological Inquiry, 21(2), 77–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purdie-Vaughns, V., Steele, C. M., Davies, P. G., Ditlmann, R., & Crosby, J. R. (2008). Social identity contingencies: how diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 615–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riccucci, N. (2002). Managing diversity in public sector workforces. Westview Press.

  • Rice, M. F. (Ed.). (2010). Diversity and public administration. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, O. C., & Kirby, S. L. (1997). Attitudes of white American male students toward work force diversity programs. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(6), 784–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, F. E. (Ed.). (1978). Bureaucratic power in national politics. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, E. V. (2009). The role of procedural justice in public personnel management: Empirical results from the Department of Defense. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltzstein, G. (1979). Representative bureaucracy and bureaucratic responsibility problems and Prospects. Administration & Society, 10(4), 465–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaubroeck, J., May, D. R., & Brown, F. W. (1994). Procedural justice explanations and employee reactions to economic hardship: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(3), 455–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selden, S. C. (1997). The promise of representative bureaucracy: Diversity and responsiveness in a government agency. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soni, V. (2000). A twenty-first-century reception for diversity in the public sector: A case study. Public Administration Review, 60(5), 395–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, P. D., & McFarlin, D. B. (1993). Workers’ Evaluations of the “Ends” and the “Means”: An Examination of Four Models of Distributive and Procedural Justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55(1), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis (pp. 1141–1160). Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. R. (1990). From affirmative action to affirming diversity. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, A. B. (1979). Speaking truth to power. Transaction Publishers.

  • Wise, L. R., & Tschirhart, M. (2000). Examining Empirical Evidence on Diversity Effects: How Useful Is Diversity Research for Public‐Sector Managers? Public Administration Review, 60(5), 386–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soyoung Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S., Park, S. Diversity Management and Fairness in Public Organizations. Public Organiz Rev 17, 179–193 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0334-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0334-y

Keywords

Navigation