Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Examination of Public Private Academic Partnerships: Does Program Success Enhance University Performance Outcomes?

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In response to a steady decline in State funding, universities have become heavily involved in a variety of public private academic partnerships (PPAPs) in such areas as medical research, business incubation, technological commercialization, continuing professional education, and intercollegiate athletics. Despite this trend, research which examines if such partnerships actually enhance university funding is rare within the public organization literature. Given this, we focus on university intercollegiate athletics programs, which represent one of the largest PPAPs ever undertaken by universities, to examine whether PPAP success can potentially enhance university performance outcomes leading to increased funding levels. Such programs represent a PPAP because public, private, and academic entities all come together to form an organization (division 1 football at the bowl subdivision level) which seeks to benefit all three entities through sharing resources and responsibilities. Study results showed that athletic success positively influenced a variety of university performance outcome variables such as enrollments and endowments. While results indicate that PPAP success can enhance university funding, we also suggest modifications that should enhance the chances that PPAPs will be successful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Available at http://web1.ncaa.org.

  2. Football television appearances available at http://www.lsufootball.net/archives/tvschedule-2011.htm. Basketball television appearances available at http://mattsarzsports.com.

  3. Available at http://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator.

  4. See for example http://www.cappex.com.

  5. Available at http://www.nacubo.org/Research/NACUBO-Commonfund_Study_of_Endowments/Public_NCSE_Tables/Total_Market_Value_of_Endowments.html.

  6. Available at http://www.davemanuel.com/historical-state-unemployment-rates.php.

References

  • Anderson, K. S., & Birrer, G. E. (2011). Creating a sustainable competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis of the Gonzaga University men’s basketball program. Journal of Sport Administration & Supervision, 3(1), 10–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T., Michael, E., & Peirce, J. (2012). Innovative approaches for managing public-private academic partnerships in big science and engineering. Public Organization Review, 12(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, S. (2012). College football assistants seeing salaries surge. USA Today, http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/2012/12/18/assistant-coaches-salaries-bowl-subdivision/1777719/.

  • Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: the case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (2001). Universities in crises? knowledge economies, emanicipatory pedagogies, and the critical intellectual. Educational Theory, 51(3), 353–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I., & Kogan, M. (2007). Organization and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy, 20, 447–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, N. D., Rogers, T. M., & Finney, R. Z. (2007). Evidence of television exposure effects in AP top 25 college football rankings. Journal of Sports Economics, 8(4), 425–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaganti, R., DeCarolis, D., & Deeds, D. (1995). Predictors of capital structure in small ventures. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 20(2), 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, C., Whisenant, W., & Walsh, P. (2011). The relationship between sustained success and donations for an athletic department with a premier football program. Public Organization Review, 11(3), 255–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coxhead, F., Grauberg, J., Joyce, P., Knox, C., Lawes, T., & Massey, A. (2010). New development: adapting university education for changing expectations of public services leaders and managers-guidance for designing and delivering MPAs. Public Money & Management, 30(3), 138–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, D., & Voronov, M. (2009a). Toward a practice perspective of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial legitimacy as habitus. International Small Business Journal, 27(4), 395–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, D., & Voronov, M. (2009b). The role of cultural and symbolic capital in entrepreneurs’ ability to meet expectations about conformity and innovation. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 398–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 877–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engwall, L. (2007). Universities, the state and the market: changing patterns of university governance in Sweden and beyond. Higher Education Management and Policy, 19(3), 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertug, G., & Castellucci, F. (2013). Getting what you need: How reputation and status affect team performance, hiring, and salaries in the NBA. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 407–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B. (2009). Athletic success and institutional rankings. New Directions for Higher Education, 148, 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, R. (2003). Mapping the education industry: public companies and international higher education (pp. 9–10). Boston: Boston College Centre for International Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerdy, J. R. (2006). Air ball: American education’s failed experiment with elite athletics. Oxford: University Press of Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goff, B. (2000). Effects of university athletics on the university: a review and extension of empirical assessment. Journal of Sport Management, 14, 85–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goff, B. (2004). Effects of university athletics on the university: A review and extension of empirical assessment. economics of college sports. In J. Fizel & R. Fort (Eds.), Studies in sports economics (pp. 65–85). Westport: Greenwood, Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goidel, R. K., & Hamilton, J. M. (2006). Strengthening higher education through gridiron success? public perceptions of the impact of national football championships on academic quality. Social Science Quarterly, 87(4), 851–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D. E. (1999). The effects of tuition and state financial aid on public college enrollment. The Review of Higher Education, 23(1), 65–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, S. (2010). Analysis of the cash flow of United Kingdom universities. Public Money & Management, 30(4), 251–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R., & Macpherson, A. (2010). Sensemaking, rhetoric and the socially competent entrepreneur. International Small Business Journal, 28(1), 20–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, B. R., & Mondello, M. (2007). Intercollegiate athletic success and donations at NCAA Division I institutions. Journal of Sport Management, 21(2), 265–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khaire, M. (2010). Young and no money? never mind: the material impact of social resources on new venture growth. Organization Science, 21(1), 169–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, M., Christensen, P., & Hansen, J. (2006). Public-private partnerships and the role of Universities in ‘Sustainable Development’. Paper presented at the Environmental Management for Sustainable Universities Conference 2006, 26–30 June 2006.

  • Mainardes, E., Alves, H., & Domingues, M. (2009). Which factors are important to attract students for undergraduate administration courses? The FedUni Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 84–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainardes, E., Raposo, M., & Alves, H. (2014). Universities need a market orientation to attract non-traditional stakeholders as new financing sources. Public Organization Review, 14(2), 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mixon, F. G., Trevino, L. T., & Minto, T. L. (2004). Touchdowns and test scores: exploring the relationship between athletics and academics. Applied Economics Letters, 11(7), 421–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, S. J. (2012). Does intercollegiate athletics draw local students to a university? Journal of Sports Economics, 13(2), 198–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. M. (1994). Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 458–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, D. G., & Pope, J. C. (2009). The impact of college sports success on the quantity and quality of student applications. Southern Economic Journal, 75, 750–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads, T., & Gerking, S. (2000). Educational contributions, academic quality, and athletic success. Contemporary Economic Policy, 18(2), 248–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindova, V. P., Pollock, T. G., & Hayward, M. L. A. (2006). Celebrity firms: the social construction of market popularity. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 50–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, D., Graeff, T., & Harmon, S. (2008). Repositioning a university through NCAA Division 1-A football membership. Journal of Sport Management, 22, 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, M. W., Buller, P. F., & Stebbins, M. (2009). Ethical considerations of the legitimacy lie. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 33(4), 949–964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandy, R., and Sloane, P. (2004). Why do U.S. Colleges have sports programs? In J. Fizel and R. Fort (eds.), Economics of College Sports (pp. 87–110). Westport, Connn.

  • Schrotenboer, B. (2013). Digging into the past of NCAA President Mark Emmert. USA Today, April 3, 2013. http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaab/2013/04/02/ncaa-president-emmert-previous-cases-uconn-lsu/2047607/.

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegfried, J. J., & Burba, M. G. (2004). The college football association television broadcast cartel. Antitrust Bulletin, 49(3), 799–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slantcheva, S., & Levy, D. (2007). Private higher education in post-communist Europe: in search of legitimacy. In S. Slantcheva & D. Levy (Eds.), Private higher education in post-communist Europe (pp. 1–23). New York: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Southall, R. M., Nagel, M. S., Amis, J. M., & Southall, C. (2008). A method to march madness? institutional logics and the 2006 National Collegiate Athletic Association division men’s basketball tournament. Journal of Sport Management, 22(6), 677–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, M. A. (2000). Beer and circus: How big-time college sports is crippling undergraduate education. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessema, K. (2009). Consequences of expanding higher education in Ethiopia: massive universities, massive challenges. Higher Education Quarterly, 63(1), 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toma, J. D. (2003). Football U.: Spectator sports in the life of the American university. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toma, J. D., & Cross, M. E. (1998). Intercollegiate athletics and student college choice: exploring the impact of championship seasons on undergraduate applications. Research in Higher Education, 39, 633–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trailer, J., Rechner, P., & Hill, R. A. (2004). Compounded agency problem: an empirical examination of public-private partnerships. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 4(1), 308–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, I. B. (2004). A reexamination of the effect of big-time football and basketball success on graduation rates and alumni giving. Economics of Education Review, 23, 655–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington, M., & Ventresca, M. J. (2004). How organizations change: the role of institutional support mechanisms in the incorporation of higher education visibility strategies, 1874–1995. Organization Science, 15(1), 82–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington, M., & Zajak, E. J. (2005). Status evolution and competition: theory & evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), 282–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. In G. Roth & C. Wittich (Eds.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Zimbalist, A. (2001). Unpaid professional: Commercialism and conflict in big-time college sports. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Idaho State University, 921 S. 8th Avenue, Stop 8020, Pocatello, ID, 83209-8020, USA

    Gregory B. Murphy, Neil Tocher & Bryant Ward

Authors
  1. Gregory B. Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Neil Tocher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bryant Ward
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Tocher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murphy, G.B., Tocher, N. & Ward, B. An Examination of Public Private Academic Partnerships: Does Program Success Enhance University Performance Outcomes?. Public Organiz Rev 16, 95–115 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-014-0298-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-014-0298-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation