Skip to main content

Examining the Effects of Agency Accreditation on Police Officer Behavior

Public Organization Review volume 15, pages 139–155 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

The policy of accreditation of criminal justice organizations has grown over the last four decades. Some advocates for accreditation claim that it facilitates organizational change at all levels of the organization. To date, however, little empirical research has examined these claims, especially within criminal justice agencies. While accreditation leads agencies to adopt formal policies, the previous literature on street-level bureaucrat behavior would suggest rank-and-file employees are unlikely to follow these formal policies as intended. The Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA) is the accrediting body for law enforcement agencies in North America, and part of the formal policies CALEA accreditation requires regard engagement in community oriented policing. The present study examined whether officers on CALEA accredited agencies differed from officers with agencies not seeking accreditation, with regard to their engagement in community policing activities. The findings revealed that agency accreditation was not associated with the degree to which officers engaged in community oriented policing activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Notes

  1. Data for this study was obtained from: Haarrr, Robin N., Impact of Community Policing Training and Program Implementation on Police Personnel in Arizona, 1995–1998 [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona State University West [producer], 2001. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium of Political and Social Research [distributor], 2003.

References

  • Alpert, G. P., & MacDonald, J. (2001). Police use of force: an analysis of organizational characteristics. Justice Quarterly, 18, 393–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archbold, C. A. (2004). Police accountability, risk management, and legal advising. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianco, W., & Bates, R. (1990). Cooperation by design: leadership, structure, and collective dilemmas. American Political Science Review, 84, 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J., & Gates, S. (1993). Donut shops and speed traps: evaluating models of supervision on police behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 555–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J., & Gates, S. (1994). When supervision fails to induce compliance. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6, 323–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J., & Gates, S. (1997). Working, shirking, and sabotage. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittingham, B. (2009). Accreditation in the United States: how did we get to where we are? New Directions for Higher Education, 2009, 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casile, M., & Davis-Blake, A. (2002). When accreditation standards change: factors affecting differential responsiveness of public and private organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 180–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, A. T. (2009). The philosophical versus actual adoption of community policing. Criminal Justice Review, 34, 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA). (2006). Standards for law enforcement agencies. Fairfax: CALEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordner, G. W. (2005). Community policing: Elements and effects. In R. G. Dunham & G. P. Alpert (Eds.), Critical issues in policing: Contemporary readings (pp. 493–510). Long Grove: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejong, C., Mastrofski, S. D., & Parks, R. B. (2001). Patrol officers and problem solving: an application of expectancy theory. Justice Quarterly, 18, 31–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doerner, W. G., & Doerner, W. M. (2009). The diffusion of accreditation among Florida police agencies. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 32, 781–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doerner, W. M., & Doerner, W. G. (2012). Police accreditation and clearance rates. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 35, 6–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, R. S., & Worden, R. E. (2003). Police officers’ attitudes, behavior, and supervisory influences: an analysis of problem solving. Criminology, 41, 131–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, T. E., & Russell, G. D. (2006). Accreditation and community policing: are they neutral, hostile, or synergistic? Justice Policy Journal, 3, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, J. (1994). Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: employer involvement in work-family issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 350–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, D., & Braithwaite, J. (2008). Health sector accreditation research: a systematic review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 20, 172–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haarr, R. (2003). Impact of community policing training and program implementation on police personnel in Arizona, 1995–1998. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, N., Zhao, J., & Lovrich, N. P. (2005). Community policing: a preliminary assessment of environmental impact with panel data on program implementation in U.S. cities. Crime and Delinquency, 51, 295–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, M., & Reaves, B. (2006). Local Police Departments, 2003. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

  • Holm, P. (1995). The dynamics of institutionalization: transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 398–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B. (1982). Moral hazard in teams. Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 324–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. R. (2006). Management influences on officer traffic enforcement productivity. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 8, 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. R. (2009a). Explaining patrol officer drug arrest activity through expectancy theory. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 32, 6–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. R. (2009b). Making domestic violence arrests: a test of expectancy theory. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 33, 531–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. R. (2010). Making domestic violence arrests: a test of expectancy theory. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 33, 531–547.

  • Johnson, R. R. (2012). Police officer job satisfaction: a multidimensional analysis. Police Quarterly, 15, 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratcoski, P. C., & Noonan, S. B. (1995). An assessment of police officers’ acceptance of community policing. In P. C. Kratcoski & D. Dukes (Eds.), Issues in community policing (pp. 169–186). Cincinnati: Anderson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langworthy, R., & Travis, L. (2003). Policing in America: A Balance of Forces. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

  • Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, E. J. (1998). Developing and implementing performance-based standards for juvenile justice agencies: institutionalizing the concept that you are what you count. Corrections Management Quarterly, 2, 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marino, F. J. (1998). Risk report. Fairfax: Intergovernmental Risk Management Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastrofski, S. D. (1998). Police agency accreditation: a skeptical view. Policing: An International Journal of Strategies and Management, 21, 202–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastrofski, S. D., Ritti, R. R., & Snipes, J. (1994). Expectancy theory and police productivity in DUI enforcement. Law and Society Review, 28, 113–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastrofski, S. D., Willis, J. J., & Kochel, T. R. (2007). The challenges of implementing community policing in the United States. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 1, 223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, K. A., & Fajardo, R. G. (2001). Law enforcement accreditation: a national comparison of accredited vs. nonaccreditated agencies. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 127–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (1992). Managerial dilemmas: The political economy of hierarchy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M., Pronovost, P., Donithan, M., Zeger, S., Zhan, C., Morlock, L., et al. (2005). Relationship between performance measurement and accreditation: implications for quality of care and patient safety. American Journal of Medical Quality, 20, 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morabito, M. S. (2010). Understanding community policing as an innovation: patterns of adoption. Crime and Delinquency, 58, 564–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paoline, E. A., Lambert, E. G., & Hogan, N. L. (2006). A calm and happy keeper of the keys: the impact of ACA views, relations with coworkers, and policy views on the job stress and job satisfaction of correctional staff. The Prison Journal, 86, 182–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sack, C., Lutkes, P., Gunther, W., Erbel, R., Jockel, K. H., & Holtmann, G. (2010). Challenging the holy grail of hospital accreditation: a cross sectional study of inpatient satisfaction in the field of cardiology. BMC Health Services Research, 10, 120–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrika, 52, 591–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W. G., & Frydl, L. (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S., Winchester, D., Bunker, D., & Jamieson, R. (2010). Circuits of power: a study of mandated compliance to an information systems security de jure standard in a government organization. MIS Quarterly, 34, 463–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. W. (1994). Accreditation and community policing: passing fads or basic reforms? Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 10, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teodoro, M. P. (2009). Bureaucratic job mobility and the diffusion of innovations. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teodoro, M. P., & Hughes, A. G. (2012). Socializer or signal? How agency accreditation affects organizational culture. Public Administration Review, 72, 583–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trojanowicz, R., & Bucqueroux, B. (1990). Community policing: A contemporary perspective. Cincinnati: Anderson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1983). The boss: First-line supervision in an American police agency. In M. Punch (Ed.), Control in the police organization (pp. 275–317). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. (2001). Police accountability: The role of citizen oversight. Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S., & Katz, C. M. (2008). The police in America: An introduction (6th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Criminal Justice, University of Toledo, 2801 W. Bancroft St., MS 119, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA

    Richard R. Johnson

Authors
  1. Richard R. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard R. Johnson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, R.R. Examining the Effects of Agency Accreditation on Police Officer Behavior. Public Organiz Rev 15, 139–155 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0265-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0265-4

Keywords

  • CALEA
  • Accreditation
  • Police
  • Management
  • Supervision
  • Community policing
  • Public policy
  • Organizational behavior