Skip to main content
Log in

Empirical Research on Inter-organizational Relations within a National Disaster Management Network in the Caribbean

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research examines the member dynamics of an inter-organizational national disaster management network in the Caribbean. Investigating the structure, functions, and member roles of a collaboration provides a foundation for comprehending better network relations. This analysis contributes to the public administration, disaster management, and network literatures by clarifying, to some degree, factors affecting member relationships in practice. This is important since the present environment surrounding disaster management is such that both governments and scholars are encouraging collaborative efforts among those responding to and impacted by catastrophic events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Originally named the Caribbean Disaster Emergency Response Agency, its membership included: Anguilla, Antigua/Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, British Virgin Islands, Dominica, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, Montserrat, St. Kitts/Nevis, St. Lucia, St. Vincent/Grenadines, Trinidad/Tobago, and Turks/Caicos. In 2010, Haiti and Suriname became CDEMA members (www.cdera.org).

References

  • Agranoff, R. (2007). Managing within networks: adding value to public organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: new strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiak, K., & Thibault, L. (2009). Challenges in multiple cross-sector partnerships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly., 38, 117–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, C., Twigg, J., & Myers, M. (2001). NGO initiatives in risk reduction: an overview. Disasters., 25(3), 199–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berke, P., & Campanella, T. (2006). Planning for postdisaster resiliency. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science., 604, 192–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigley, G., & Roberts, K. (2001). The incident command system: high reliability organizing for complex and volatile tasks. Academy of Management Journal., 44(6), 1281–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder A, Witte J. 2007. Business engagement in humanitarian relief: key trends and policy implications. Overseas Development Institute: London. Available at: http://www.gppi.net/fileadmin/gppi/ODI-paper-binder-witte-2007.pdf.

  • Burby, R. (2003). Making plans that matter: citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association., 69(1), 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canton, L. G. (2007). Emergency management: concepts and strategies for effective programs. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra A, Acosta J. 2009. The Role of Nongovernmental Organizations in Long-Term Human Recovery After Disaster: Reflections From Louisiana Four Years After Hurricane Katrina. RAND Corporation: Pittsburgh, PA. Available at: www.rand.org.

  • Child, J., & Faulkner, D. (1998). Strategies of cooperation: managing alliances, networks, and joint ventures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynes, R. (2002). The importance of social capital in disaster response. Preliminary Paper #327. Newark, NJ: Disaster Research Center at University of Delaware.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehin, C. (2004). Hidden assets: harnessing the power of informal networks. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate: the theory and practice of collaborative advantage. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapucu, N. (2006). Public-nonprofit partnerships for collective action in dynamic contexts of emergencies. Public Administration., 84(1), 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenis, P., & Provan, K. (2006). The control of public networks. International Public Management Journal., 9(3), 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Vanhamme, J. (2009). Developing supply chains in disaster relief operations through cross-sector socially oriented collaborations: a theoretical model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal., 14(2), 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1989). Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milward, B., & Provan, K. (2006). A manager’s guide to using and choosing collaborative networks. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, A., & Whiteman, G. (2009). Exploring the geography of corporate philanthropic disaster response: a study of fortune global 500 firms. Journal of Business Ethics., 84, 589–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, L. (1995). Rational choice and policy implementation: implications for interorganizational network management. American Review of Public Administration., 25(1), 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poncelet, J. (1997). Disaster management in the Caribbean. Disasters., 21(3), 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour. Greenwich CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K., Veazie, M., Staten, L., & Teufel-Shone, N. (2005). The use of network analysis to strengthen community partnerships. Public Administration Review., 65(5), 603–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. (2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: a review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management., 33(3), 479–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. (2003). Governance and public administration. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance: authority, steering, and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tracy Cooper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooper, T. Empirical Research on Inter-organizational Relations within a National Disaster Management Network in the Caribbean. Public Organiz Rev 15, 1–16 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0248-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0248-5

Keywords

Navigation