Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Revisiting NASA as a High Reliability Organization

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The implementation and sustainment of High Reliability Organization (HRO) operations for large organizations, such as NASA, is problematic. Using NASA as a case study, the consistency of the intrinsic objectives of large public organizations is assessed with respect to HROs. A novel HRO model is described in terms of ten characteristic dimensions. The intrinsic public organizational objectives are found to be consistent with the HRO model only with respect to effectiveness. Additionally, NASA exhibits characteristics of a HRO only with respect to the degree of complexity and risk involved in operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, D. P., Day, R., & Salas, E. (2006). Teamwork as an essential component of high-reliability organizations. Health Services Research, 41(4P2), 1576–1598. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00566.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierly, P. E., III, Gallagher, S., & Spender, J. C. (2008). Innovation and learning in high-reliability organizations: a case study of United States and Russian nuclear attack submarines, 1970–2000. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(3), 393–408. doi:10.1109/TEM.2008.922643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigley, G. A., & Roberts, K. H. (2001). The incident command system: high-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1281–1299. doi:10.2307/3069401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourrier, M. (1996). Organizing maintenance work at two American nuclear power plants. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 4(2), 104–112. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5973.1996.tb00082.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, C. S., Wilson, K. A., & Salas, E. (2005). The use of a team-based strategy for organizational transformation: guidance for moving toward a high reliability organization. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6(6), 509–530. doi:10.1080/24639220500078682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. S., & Rudolph, J. W. (2006). Design of high reliability organizations in health care. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 15(Suppl), i4–i9. doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.015867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavaleri, S., & Obloj, K. (1993). Management systems: a global perspective. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denhardt, R. B. (2008). Theories of public organization (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson-Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, M., & Roberts, K. (1997). Risk mitigation in large-scale systems: lessons from high reliability organizations. California Management Review, 39(4), 152–162. doi:10.2307/41165914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. B. (2002). The secret of Apollo: systems management in American and European space programs. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, M., & Chisholm, D. (1995). The arrogance of optimism: notes on failure-avoidance management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 3(2), 67–80. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5973.1995.tb00059.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaPorte, T. R. (1996). High reliability organizations: unlikely, demanding, and at risk. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 4(2), 60–71. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5973.1996.tb00078.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaPorte, T. R., & Consolini, R. M. (1991). Working in practice but not in theory: theoretical challenges of “high-reliability organizations.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(1), 19–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marais, K., Dulac, N., Leveson, N. (2004, March). Beyond normal accidents and high reliability organizations: The need for an alternative approach to safety in complex systems. Paper presented at the Engineering Systems Division Symposium, Cambridge, MA.

  • Marais, K., Salah, J. H., & Leveson, N. G. (2006). Archetypes for organizational safety. Safety Science, 44, 565–582. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCurdy, H. E. (1993). Inside NASA: high technology and organizational change in the U.S. Space program. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCurdy, H. E. (2001). Faster, better, cheaper: low-cost innovation in the U.S. Space program. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NASA (2008a). Governance and strategic management handbook. (NASA Policy Directive 1000.0A).

  • NASA (2008b). NASA policy for safety and mission success (NASA Policy Directive 8700.1E).

  • NASA (2010). Lessons Learned Process (NASA Procedural Requirement 7120.6).

  • NASA (2011a). 2011 NASA strategic plan (NASA Policy Directive 1001.0A).

  • NASA (2011b). NASA general safety program requirements (NASA Procedural Requirement 8715.3C with change 7)

  • NASA (2012). The NASA organization (NASA Policy Directive 1000.3D with change 31).

  • Perrow, C. (1999). Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In search of excellence: lessons from America’s best-run companies. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. H. (1990). Managing high reliability organizations. California Management Review, 32(4), 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. H. (1993). New challenges to understanding organizations. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. H., & Bea, R. (2001). Must accidents happen? Lessons from high-reliability organizations. The Academy of Management Executive, 15(3), 70–78. doi:10.5465/AME.2001.5229613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. H., & Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Research in nearly failure-free, high-reliability organizations: having the bubble. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 36, 132–139. doi:10.1109/17.18830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. H., Yu, K. F., Desai, V., & Madsen, P. M. (2008). Employing adaptive structuring as a cognitive decision aid in high reliability organizations. In G. P. Hodgkinson & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making (pp. 194–210). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Rochlin, G. I. (1993). Defining “high reliability” organizations in practice: a taxonomic prologue. In K. H. Roberts (Ed.), New challenges to understanding organizations (pp. 11–32). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochlin, G. I. (1996). Reliable organizations: present research and future directions. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 4(2), 55–59. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5973.1996.tb00077.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochlin, G. I. (1999). Safe operation as a social construct. Ergonomics, 42(11), 1549–1560. doi:10.1080/001401399184884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochlin, G. I., La Porte, T. R., & Roberts, K. H. (1987). The self-designing high-reliability organization: aircraft carrier flight operations at sea. Naval War College Review, 40(Autumn), 76–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, E., & Schulman, P. R. (2008). High reliability management: operating on the edge. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, P. R. (1993a). The analysis of high reliability organizations: a comparative framework. In K. H. Roberts (Ed.), New challenges to understanding organizations (pp. 33–53). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, P. R. (1993b). The negotiated order of organizational reliability. Administration & Society, 25(3), 353–372. doi:10.1177/009539979302500305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, D. (1996). The Challenger launch decision: risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Weick, K. E. (1987). Organizational culture as a source of high reliability. California Management Review, 29(2), 112–127. doi:10.2307/41165243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357–381. doi:10.2307/2393372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2001). Managing the unexpected: assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2008). Organizing for high reliability: processes of collective mindfulness. In A. Boin (Ed.), Crisis management (Vol. III, pp. 31–66). London: Sage (Reprinted from Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1), pp. 81–123, by R. S Sutton & B. M. Staw, Eds., 1999, Stanford: Jai Press).

  • Welch, S., & Jensen, K. (2007). The concept of reliability in emergency medicine. American Journal of Medical Quality, 22(1), 50–58. doi:10.1177/1062860606296385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Space Studies, University of North Dakota, 4149 University Ave, Stop 9008, Grand Forks, ND, 58202-9008, USA

    James G. Casler

Authors
  1. James G. Casler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James G. Casler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Casler, J.G. Revisiting NASA as a High Reliability Organization. Public Organiz Rev 14, 229–244 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-012-0216-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-012-0216-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation