Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bureaucracy and Democracy: A Theoretical Analysis

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article addresses the relationship between bureaucracy and democracy, bureaucratic politics and democratic politics. Bureaucratic theories and politics are discussed, democratic theories and politics are analyzed, and the argument in favor of reconciling bureaucracy and democracy is analyzed with implications for democratic theory and public administration. Persistence of bureaucracy is stressed, deficiencies in democratic theory and practice are noted, and the importance of a functionally balanced and professionally competent bureaucracy is reminded for administration of sound governance in both developed and developing societies. It is hypocrisy to speak of functioning democracy without a balanced professional bureaucracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnew, J. (2005). Hegemony: The new shape of global power. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. (2007). Escape from empire. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonio, R. J. (1979). The contradiction of domination and production in bureaucracy: the contribution of organizational efficiency to the decline of the Roman Empire. American Sociological Review, 44, 895–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, B. (2007). The myth of the rational voter: Why democracies choose bad policies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. M. (1983). The Persian Empire. New York: Schoken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S. N. (1963, 1993). The political systems of empires: A study of bureaucratic societies. Glencoe: The Free Press.

  • Etzioni-Halevey, E. (1983). Bureucracyu and democracy: A political dilemma. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. (1989). Bureaucracy, the state, and revolution in modern Iran: Agrarian reform and regime politics. NY: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. (1999). Globalization and public administration. Public Administration Review, 59(6), 509–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. (2002). Privatization and globalization: a critical analysis with implications for public management education and training. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 68(3), 355–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. (2004). Sound governance: Policy and administrative innovations. Wetport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. (2009a). Building administrative capacity for the age of rapid globalization: a modest prescription for survival in the 21st century. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1007–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. (2009b). Bureaucracy, administration, and politics: An introduction. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Bureaucracy and administration (pp. 1–18). Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. (2009c). Bureaucracy and administration. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye, R. (1975). The golden age of Persia. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodsell, C. T. (2004). The case for bureaucracy (4th ed.). Washington: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, R. (1976). The bureaucratic experience. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, K. (2007). New views on north-south relations of imperialism. In A. Farazmand & J. Pinkowski (Eds.), Handbook of globalization, governance, and public administration (pp. 759–797). Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P. (1989). The rise and fall of the great powers. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsley, J. D. (1944). Representative bureaucracy. Yellow Spring: Antioch Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten, D. (2001). When corporations rule the world (2nd ed.). Westport: Kumarian P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krislov, S. (1974). The representative bureaucracy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, I. I. (1971). State and revolution. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1951, 1967). Selected works. Moscow: Progress Books.

  • Meier, K. (1993). Representative bureaucracy: a theoretical and empirical exposition. Research in Public Administration, 2, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, K., & Bohthe, J. (2007). Politics and the bureaucracy: Policy making in the fourth branch of government (5th ed.). Belmont: Thompson/Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1940, 1957). Bureaucratic structure and personality. In R. Merton (Ed.), Social theory and social structure (pp. 195–206). Glencoe: Free Press.

  • Mosca, G. (1939). The ruling class. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, F. (1968). Democracy and the public service. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Adline & Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead, A. T. (1948). History of the Persian Empire: The Achaemenid period. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parenti, M. (1988, 2010). Democracy for the few. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

  • Parsons, T. (1951). The social systems. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pharr, S., & Putnam, R. D. (2000). Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries? Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, F. (2009). Bureaucracy: A profound puzzle for Presidentialism. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Bureaucracy and administration (pp. 155–203). Boca Raton: Taylor & and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1950). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suleiman, E. N. (2003). Dismantling the democratic state. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldo, D. (1948). The administrative state. New York: Ronald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldo, D. (1992). The enterprise of public administration. Novato: Chandler and Sharp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organizations. (trans: Parsons, A.M., Parsons, T.). New York: Free Press.

  • Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society. In 3 Volumes. NY: Bedminster Press.

  • Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, N. (2006). The globalizers: The IMF, the World Bank, and their borrowers. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article benefitted from my student, Amy Elizabeth Carthwright, whose sharp eyes in proofreading the earlier drafts of the manuscript proved her contribution to be more than a superb assistance--her work is highly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Farazmand.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farazmand, A. Bureaucracy and Democracy: A Theoretical Analysis. Public Organiz Rev 10, 245–258 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-010-0137-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-010-0137-0

Keywords

Navigation