Public Organization Review

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 371–384 | Cite as

Service Delivery Through E-Governance: Perception and Expectation of Customers in Fiji and PNG



Empirical studies on e-governance are replete with evidences highlighting its potential for improving service delivery. This study was conducted in PNG and Fiji using structured questionnaires distributed to different groups of respondents. The results indicate that e-governance has the potential to improve Public Service Delivery. It is also confirmed through the findings in this research that the expectations of citizens from public services are quite high, but experience has often been negative i.e. there is a huge variance in the perception and expectation of normal citizens in PNG (Papua New Guinea) and Fiji regarding service delivery, quality of services.


E-governance Public service delivery Customer service PNG Fiji 


  1. ADB (2003). Poverty Discussion Paper as Presented to National Poverty Workshop Assessment of Hardship and Poverty: Strategies for Equitable Growth and Hardship Alleviation, Suva, Fiji. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  2. ADB (2004). Governance in PNG: A cluster evaluation of three public sector reform activities. Evaluation and Review Series No. 35 July 2004. Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID), Canberra, July 2004. Papua New Guinea National Assessment Report. Prepared for United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Commission for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmed, M. (2004). E-governance initiatives in Bangladesh: An analysis of strategy formulation for reinventing good governance. Department of Business Administration, Jahangirnagar University, 2004,
  4. Åkesson, M., & Edvardsson, B. (2008). Effects of e-government on service design as perceived by employees. Managing Service Quality, 18(5), 457–478.Google Scholar
  5. Augus, A., Barker, S., & Kandampully, J. (2007). An exploratory study of service quality in the Malaysian public service sector. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24(2), 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bassanini, F. (2003). Good governance strategies: A prospect for integration reflections from the Italian experience. Fifth Global Forum on Reinventing Government, Good Government Strategies for the 21st Century, Mexico, November 3–7.Google Scholar
  7. Bhatnagar, S. (2002). E-government: lessons from implementation in developing countries. Regional Development Dialogue, UNCRD, 24, 1–9.Google Scholar
  8. Bhatnagar, S. (2003). Administrative corruption: How does e-government help? Global Corruption Report 2003, Transparency International.Google Scholar
  9. Bhatnagar, S. (2004). E-government: From vision to implementation: A practical guide with case studies. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Borwankar, M. C. (2004). The status of e-governance in Maharashtra: an exploratory study. Ashwattha, 4(2), April–June,
  11. Brady, M. K., & Cronin, J. J. (2001). Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality: a hierarchical approach. Journal of Marketing, 65, 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cho, Y. H., & Choi, B. D. (2004). E-government to combat corruption: the case of Seoul metropolitan government. International Journal of Public Administration, 27(10), 719–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cronin, J. J., Brady, M. K., & Hult, G. T. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is free. New York: MacGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Dabholkar, P. A., Shepherd, D. C., & Thorpe, D. I. (2000). A comprehensive framework for service quality: an investigation of critical conceptual and measurement issues through a longitudinal study. Journal of Retailing, 72(2), 139–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.Google Scholar
  17. Fuliya, R. R., & Bansal, G. S. (2005). Nai-Disha Eka Sewa Kendra (NDESK): improve service delivery in government. Journal of the Eighth National Conference on eGovernance, 54–57.Google Scholar
  18. Gage, J. (2002). Some thoughts on How ICTs Could Really Change the World. In The Global Information Technology Report 2001–2002: Readiness for the Networked World, Harvard University: Center for International Development.Google Scholar
  19. Gani, A., Nakagawa, H., Duncan, R., & Toatu, T. (2007). Good Governance Indicators for Seven Pacific Island Countries. Retrieved 21 March 12, 2008,
  20. Ghosh, A., & Arora, N. (2005). Role of e-governance frameworks in effective implementation. Lahore Pakistan: ICEG.Google Scholar
  21. Gilbert, D., & Balestrini, P. (2004). Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(4), 286–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gonzalez, R., Gasco, J., & Llopis, J. (2007). E-government success: some principles from a Spanish case study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(6), 845–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gronroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its market implications. European Journal of marketing, 18(4), 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grönroos, C. (2007). Service management and marketing. Customer management in service competition. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Jones, S., Hackney, R., & Irani, Z. (2007). Towards e-government transformation: conceptualizing ’citizen engagement’ a research note. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 1(2), 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Juran, J. M. (1988) Juran’s quality control handbook (4th Ed.), (pp. 4.9–4.12). McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  27. Kang, H. B. (2001). Cleaning up the city government of Seoul: A systematic approach. The Anti-Corruption Symposium: The Role of On-line Procedures in Promoting Good Governance, Seoul Institute for Transparency, Seoul, p. 43, August 30–31.Google Scholar
  28. Kašubienė, L., & Vanagas, P. (2007). Assumptions of e-government services quality evaluation. Engineering Economics, 5(55), 68–74.Google Scholar
  29. Kavanamur, D., & Okole, H. (2004). Understanding Reform in Papua New Guinea: An Analytical Evaluation. Port Moresby: Institute of National Affairs.Google Scholar
  30. Kavanamur, D., Okole, H., Manning, M., & Lavantis, T. (2004). Understanding reform in Papua New Guinea: An analytical evaluation. A study commissioned by the Global Development Network (Washington DC) and the Foundation for Development Cooperation (Brisbane). Retrieved April 3, 2010 from
  31. Laffont, J.-J., & Martimort, D. (2002). The theory of incentives. The principal-agent model. New York: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lagrosen, S., & Lagrosen, Y. (2003). Management of service quality – differences in values, practices and outcomes. Managing Service Quality, 13(5), 370–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lane, J. E. (2003). Public principals and their agents. Retrieved 4 May, 2005,
  34. MORI. (2002). Public service reform: Measuring and understanding customer satisfaction. Retrieved 4 May, 2005,
  35. Naz, R., Pathak, R. D., Rahman, M. H., Agarwal, K. N., & Smith, R. F. I. (2006). The potential for using IT to cut corruption in service delivery: a case study of services to farmers in Fiji. International Journal of Effective Management, 3(1), 39–52.Google Scholar
  36. Page, T. J., & Spreng, R. A. (2002). Difference scores versus direct effects in service quality measurement. Journal of Service Research, 4(3), 184–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pan, S. L., Tan, C. W., & Lim, E. T. K. (2006). Customer relationship management (CRM) in e-government: a relational perspective. Decision Support Systems, 42(1), 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for further research. Journal of Marketing, 48, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.Google Scholar
  40. Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1991a). Understanding customer expectations of service. Sloan Management Review, 32, 39–48.Google Scholar
  41. Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1991b). Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, 67(4), 420–50.Google Scholar
  42. Payani, H. H. (2000). Selected problems in the Papua New Guinean public service. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 22(2), 135–160.Google Scholar
  43. Perrott, B. (1996). Managing strategic issues in the public service. Long Range Planning, 29(3), 337–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Prahalad, C. K. (2005). The fortune of the bottom of the pyramid. Eradicating poverty through profits. United States of America: Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
  45. Rodríguez, P. G., Burguete, J. L. V., Vaughan, R., & Edwards, J. (2009). Quality dimensions in the public sector: municipal services and citizens perception. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 6, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Seifert, J. W., & Bonham, G. M. (2003). The transformative potential of e-government in transitional democracies, The International Conference on Public Administration in the 21st Century: Concepts, Methods, Technologies, School of Public Administration, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 26–29 May 2003.Google Scholar
  47. Siau, K., & Long, Y. (2005). Synthesizing e-government stage models—a meta-synthesis based on the meta-ethnography approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(4), 443–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Singh, G., Pathak, R. D., Naz, R., & Belwal, R. (2010). e-governance and the potential for corruption reduction in developing countries: perceptions from India, Ethiopia and Fiji. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(3), 254–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tan, C. W., & Pan, S. L. (2003). Managing e-transformation in the public sector: an e-government study of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS). European Journal of Information Systems, 12(4), 269–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 354–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Toshifumi, N., & Himanshu, T. (2004). eGovernance initiatives in India: Citizens Would Rather Be Online Than In-Line. [online]. Retrieved 4 March, 2010 from:
  52. UNDP (2010). E-governance and access to information for citizens’ participation. Practice Notes. Retrieved 1 April, 2010 from:
  53. United Nations (2008). United Nations e-Government Survey 2008: From e-Government to Connected Governance, United Nations, New York, 2008. . Retrieved 1 April, 2010 from:
  54. United NationsN-Economic and Social Council (2003). Status and trend in the development of E-Government. Enhancing the capacity of public administration to implement the United Nations Millennium Declaration. Experts on Public Administration, Second session, New York, 7–11 April. Retrieved 4 April, 2010 from:
  55. World Bank. World Development Report (2004). Making Services Work for Poor People. A publication of the World Bank and Oxford University Press (2003). In APDIP e-note 11. (2007).. Pro-Poor Public Service Delivery With ICTs. Making Local e-Governance work towards achieving the millennium development goals. Retrieved 4 May, 2005,
  56. Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). Problems and strategies in services marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49, 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gurmeet Singh
    • 1
  • Raghuvar Dutt Pathak
    • 1
  • Rafia Naz
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Management & Public Administration, Faculty of Business and EconomicsThe University of the South PacificSuvaFiji

Personalised recommendations