Public Organization Review

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 31–47 | Cite as

E-Government in Kazakhstan: Challenges and Its Role to Development

Article

Abstract

This paper critically examines the progress made in introducing and implementing e-government programs and policies in Kazakhstan. It argues that in order to achieve the articulated development goals, the Kazakh government has moved toward e-government paradigm to ascertain a people-centered, accountable and transparent government. Available data substantiates that the initiative faces several challenges such as political support and relationship between political institutions, bureaucracy and citizens, digital divide, widespread corruption, lack of human resources, and inadequate infrastructural development, which needs to be amputated to improve public service delivery. This study illustrates some international development experiences to understand the benefit of e-government. Such experiences may serve as policy guidelines to the successful implementation of e-government to ensure overall development in Kazakhstan.

Keywords

Development E-government Kazakhstan Service delivery 

References

  1. ADB (Asian Development Bank). (2008) Asian development outlook 2008 [Kazakhstan]. Available at: http://www.adb.org/Documents/Books/ADO/2008/KAZ.pdf, last accessed December 5, 2008.
  2. Agarwal, P. (2008). Economic growth and poverty reduction: evidence from Kazakhstan. Asian Development Review, 24(2), 90–115.Google Scholar
  3. Aminuzzaman, S., Baldersheim, H., & Jamil, I. (2003). Talking back! empowerment and mobile phones in rural Bangladesh: a study of the village phone scheme of Grameen Bank. Contemporary South Asia, 12(3), 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakenova, S. (2008). Civil service in Kazakhstan: Déjà Vu? International Journal of Public Administration in Central and Eastern Europe, 1, 89–96.Google Scholar
  5. Bayes, A. Braun, J. V., & Akhter, R. (1999). Village pay phones and poverty reduction: insights from a Grameen bank initiatives in Bangladesh. ZEF Discussion Papers on Development Policy. No. 8. Bonn: ZEF, University of Bonn.Google Scholar
  6. Bhuiyan, S. H. (2006). E-government in Bangladesh: prospects and challenges. Journal of Politics & Administration, 1(1), 105–118.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, D. (2005). Electronic government and public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(2), 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cochran, J. (2008). Kazakhstan’s potential for wind and concentrated solar power. KIMEP Working Paper. No. 2. Almaty: College of Social Sciences, KIMEP.Google Scholar
  9. Cummings, S. (2005). Kazakhstan: Power and elite. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  10. egov magazine. (2007). Interview with Kuanishbek Esekeev, Chairman, Agency for Informatization and Communications. Retrieved from: http://www.egovonline.net/interview/print.asp?interviewid=184, last accessed March 27, 2008.
  11. ESCAP. (2008). Economic and social survey of Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved from: www.kazakhemb.org.il, last accessed November 18, 2008.
  12. Gleason, G. (1997). Prospects for Kazakhstan’s asian liberalism. Democratization, 5(3), 376–385.Google Scholar
  13. Haldenwang, C. (2004). Electronic Government (E-Government) and development. The European Journal of Development Research, 16(2), 417–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haque, M. S. (2002). E-Governance in India: its impact on relations among citizens, politicians and public servants. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 68, 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hasse, D. (2002). E-Government: The future of federal and municipal institution. An unpublished Master’s thesis. Magdeburg: University of Magdeburg.Google Scholar
  16. Heeks, R. 2001. Understanding e-governance for development. i-Government Working Paper Series. Paper No. 11. Manchester: IDPM, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  17. Heeks, R. (1998). Information technology and public sector corruption. Information System and Public Sector Management Working Paper Series. No. 4. Manchester: University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  18. Ho, A. T.-K. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the E-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holliday, I. (2002). Building e-government in East and Southeast Asia: regional rhetoric and national (In)action. Public Administration and Development, 22, 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holliday, I., & Yep, R. (2005). E-Government in China. Public Administration and Development, 25, 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hossain, F. (2005). E-governance initiatives in developing countries: helping the rich? or, creating opportunities for the poor? Asian Affairs, 27(4), 5–23.Google Scholar
  22. Iqbal, H. (2007). Democracy and Central Asian states. Regional Studies, 4, 66–95.Google Scholar
  23. ITU (International Telecommunication Union). (2004). ITU Data. Available at: http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/statistics/at_glance/main04.pdf, last accessed November 5, 2008.
  24. Jho, W. (2005). Challenges for e-governance: protests from civil society on the protection of privacy in e-government in Korea. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(1), 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kabir, A. (2008). Discourse on e-governance: Bottomline. The Daily Star. November 14. Retrieved from: http://www.thedailystar.net/pf_story.php?nid=63243, last accessed November 14, 2008.
  26. Keesing Record of World Events. (2005). Kazakhstan presidential elections. December.Google Scholar
  27. Knox, C. (2008). Kazakhstan: modernizing government in the context of political inertia. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(3), 477–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Makhmutova, M. (2001). Local government in Kazakhstan. In Igor Munteanu & Popa Victor (Eds.). Developing new rules in the old environment: Local government in Eastern Europe, in the Caucasus and in the Central Asia. Available at: http://lgi.osi.hu/publication/2001/842ch8-kz.pdf, last accessed October 7, 2008.
  29. Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Lazer, D. (2007). From Electronic Government to Information Society. In V. Mayer-Schönberger & D. Lazer (Eds.), Governance and information technology: From electronic government to information government. Massachusetts and London: MIT.Google Scholar
  30. Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Netchaeva, I. (2002). E-government and E-democracy. The International Communication Gazette, 64(5), 467–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide? civic engagement, information poverty and the internet in the democratic societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Perlman, B. J., & Gleason, G. (2007). Cultural determinism versus administrative logic: Asian values and administrative reform in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(12), 1327–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Robinson, A. (2001). Geopolitics and oil focus the spotlight on Central Asia. Financial Times Survey. December 17.Google Scholar
  35. Salem, F. (2006). Exploring e-government barriers in the Arab States. Policy Brief. No. 2. Dubai: Dubai School of Government.Google Scholar
  36. Sharma, T. (2002). E-governance: process reengineering approach. Indian Journal of Public Administration, XLVIII(4), 606–616.Google Scholar
  37. Tandon, H. (2005). e-governance: an Indian perspective. Policy & Society, 24(3), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Transparency International. (2008). Corruption perception index 1999–2008 (Kazakhstan). Available at: http://www.transparencykazakhstan.org/eng/content/8.html, last accessed January 7, 2009.
  39. Transparency International. (2006). Global country report, 2006 [Kazakhstan], pp.184–188. Available at: www.transparency.org/publications, last accessed November 18, 2008.
  40. UN (United Nations). (2008). United Nations e-government survey 2008: From e-government to connected governance. NY: United Nations.Google Scholar
  41. United Nations/American Society for Public Administration [UN/ASPA]. (2002). Benchmarking e-government: A global perspective: Assessing the progress of the UN member states. NY: UN/ASPA.Google Scholar
  42. UNDP (United Nations Development Program). (2007). Human development report 2007/2008 [Kazakhstan]. Available at: http://hdrstat.undp.org/countries/country_fact_sheets/cty_fs_KAZ.html, last accessed November 13, 2008.
  43. UNDP. (2001). Human development report 2001: Making new technologies work for human development. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. UNESC (United Nations Economic and Social Council). (2008). National report on the achievement of Kazakhstan’s strategic priorities to 2030 in the light of the millennium development goals. Available at: apps01.un.org/nvpcms, last accessed November 20, 2008.Google Scholar
  45. Wilson, J., Gardner, D., Kurganbaeva, G., & Sakharchuk, E. (2002). The changing role of local government managers in a transitional economy: evidence from the Republic of Kazakhstan. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(4/5), 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. The World Bank. (2008). Kazakhstan: Data and statistics. Available at: http://www.worldbank.org.kz/website/external/countries/ecaext/kazakhstan, last accessed November 13, 2008.
  47. The World Bank. (2006). Kazakhstan e-government program and the road ahead. Washington, DC: World Bank (a joint economic research program with the Government of Kazakhstan).Google Scholar
  48. The World Bank. (2002). Kazakhstan governance and service delivery: A diagnostic report. Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Unit, Europe and Central Asia Region.Google Scholar
  49. Yunus, M. (2004). Petersburg Prize 2004- acceptance speech delivered by Professor Muhammad Yunus in the Prize giving ceremony on June 27, 2004, at the Development Gateway Forum 2004, held at Petersburg Conference Center, Köngiswinter, GermanyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public AdministrationKazakhstan Institute of Management, Economics, and Strategic Research (KIMEP)AlmatyKazakhstan

Personalised recommendations