Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perceptions of Nonprofit Funding Decisions: A Survey of Local Public Administrators and Executive Directors of Community-Based Housing Organizations (CBHOs)

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article compares how local public administrators and executive directors of community-based housing organizations (CBHO) perceive nonprofit funding decisions. The article’s findings suggest that both groups shared perceptions about the scope of affordable housing and factors influencing its funding. Yet, important differences existed. Public administrators were ambivalent about nonprofit capacity and affordable housing outcomes. They also underestimated the importance of networks, partnerships, and minority leadership. Professionals in the nonprofit sector underestimated fair housing concerns and overestimated the importance of promoting homeownership. These insights improve our understanding of the connection between funding patterns, public-nonprofit sector relations, local governance, and administrative structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Neighborworks® American was originally called the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation. It changed its name to Neighborworks® America in 2005.

References

  • Bockmeyer, J. L. (2003). Devolution and the transformation of community housing activism. The Social Science Journal, 40, 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratt, R. G., & Rohe, W. M. (2004). Organizational changes among CDCs: assessing the impacts and navigating the challenges. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26(2), 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R. F., & Stoutland, S. E. (1999). Reconceiving the community development field. In R. F. Ferguson & W. T. Dickens (Eds.), Urban problems, community development (pp. 33–75). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, M., & Servon, L. (2006). CDCs and the changing context for urban community development: a review of the field and the environment. Community Development: Journal of the Community Development Society, 37(4), 88–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilderbloom, J. (1987). Rethinking rental housing. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, N. J., & Servon, L. J. (1998). More than bricks and sticks: five components of community development corporation capacity. Housing Policy Debate, 9(3), 497–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, N. J., & Servon, L. J. (2003). By the numbers: measuring community development corporation capacity. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22, 240–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grobjerg, K. A. (1993). Understanding nonprofit funding: Managing revenues in social services and community development organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempers, M. (2002). Community matters: An exploration of theory and practice. Chicago, IL: Burnham Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, L. C., Schwartz, A., Vidal, A. C., & Bratt, R. G. (1996). Networks and nonprofits: opportunities and challenges in an era of federal devolution. Housing Policy Debates, 7(2), 201–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, S. (2004). Fighting for a living wage. Ithica, NY: Cornell ILR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luksetich, W. (2008). Government funding and nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(3), 434–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, I. (2001). Dawn of the living wage: the diffusion of a redistributive municipal policy. Urban Affairs Review, 4, 470–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. G. (2004). Nonprofit foundations and grassroots organizing: reshaping urban governance. The Professional Geographer, 56(3), 394–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwell, N. P. (2004). Privatizing the welfare state: nonprofit community-based organizations as political actors. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 265–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marwell, N. P. (2007). Bargaining for Brooklyn: Community organizations in the entrepreneurial city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCCED. (2005). Reaching new heights: Trends and achievements of community-based development organizations. Washington, DC: National Congress for Community Economic Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebanck, P. L. (ed). (1986). Rent control debate. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, N., & Glickman, N. J. (2000). Working together: building capacity for community development. Housing Policy Debate, 11(1), 163–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reingold, D. A., & Johnson, C. L. (2003). The rise and failure of eastside community investments, Inc.: the life of an extraordinary community development corporation. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(5), 527–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohe, W. M., & Bratt, R. G. (2003). Failures, downsizing, and mergers among community development corporations. Housing Policy Debate, 14(1/2), 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, A., Bratt, R. G., Vidal, A. C., & Key, L. C. (1996). Nonprofit housing organizations and institutional support: the management challenge. Journal of Urban Affairs, 18(4), 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, R. M. (2001). Neighborhood characteristics, community development corporations and the community development industry system: a case study of the American Deep South. Community Development Journal, 36(3), 234–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, R. M. (2008). The influence of nonprofit networks on local affordable housing funding: findings from a national survey of local public administrators. Urban Affairs Review, 44(1), 126–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoutland, S. E. (1999). Community development corporations: Mission, strategy and accomplishments. In R. F. Ferguson & W. T. Dickens (Eds.), Urban problems, community development (pp. 193–240). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanstrom, T. (1999). The nonprofitization of United States housing policy: dilemmas of community development. Community Development Journal, 34(1), 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, A. (1992). Rebuilding communities: A national study of urban community development corporations. New York, NY: Community Development Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C. (1993). Nonprofit housing development: status, trends, and prospects. Housing Policy Debates, 4(3), 369–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, J. S. (1998). The community development industry system: a case study of politics and institutions in Cleveland, 1967–1997. Journal of Urban Affairs, 20(2), 137–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported in part by a small research grant from the Baldy Center for Law & Social Policy at the University at Buffalo. I would like to thank Maddi Zachacz, CaTyra Polland, and Michael Grimble for assistance with database development and the compilation of the mailing list for this research. I would also like to thank the two anonymous reviewers from Public Organization Review for their comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Mark Silverman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silverman, R.M. Perceptions of Nonprofit Funding Decisions: A Survey of Local Public Administrators and Executive Directors of Community-Based Housing Organizations (CBHOs). Public Organ Rev 9, 235–246 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-009-0083-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-009-0083-x

Keywords

Navigation