Advertisement

Public Organization Review

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 1–19 | Cite as

Risk Management in Public–Private Partnership Contracts

  • Tahir M. NisarEmail author
Article

Abstract

Public–private partnerships (PPPs) allow private companies to build, own and operate public projects such as schools and hospitals on behalf of the public sector. PPP contracts commonly require the private agent to take responsibilities for the performance of the asset over a long term, at least for a significant part of its useful life, so that efficiencies arising from long-term investment and asset management can be realized. However, the evidence is finely balanced on the effectiveness of such initiatives in obtaining the intended goals. This brings to the fore the challenge of designing and implementing innovative partnership plans to manage public services more effectively. More emphasis needs to be placed on strategies for the transfer of risk for the successful conclusion of PPP contracts.

Key words

Risk management Public–private partnership Value for money Secondary financing markets 

References

  1. Allen, G. 2001. The private finance initiative. House of Commons Library. Research Paper 01/117.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, A., & LSE Enterprise. 2000. Value for money drivers in the private finance initiative, report commissioned by the UK Treasury Task Force on public–private partnerships.Google Scholar
  3. Besley, T., & Maitreesh, G. 2001. Government versus private ownership of public goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4): 1343–1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloomfield, P., Westerling, D., & Carey, R. 1998. Innovation and risks in a public–private partnership financing and construction of a capital project in Massachusetts. Public Productivity and Review, 21(4): 460–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daniels, R. J., & Trebilcock. M. J. 1996. Private provision of public infrastructure: An organizational analysis of the next privatization frontier. University of Toronto Law Journal, 46: 375–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Department of Transport. 2002. Public sector comparators factsheet, http://www.railways.dtlr.gov.uk.
  7. Dutch National Audit Office. 2002. Nieuwe financiële instrumenten in publiek–private samenwerking. The Hague.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, P., & Shaoul, J. 2003. Partnerships: For better, for worse? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 16(3): 397–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Expertise Centre PPP. 2002. Voortgangsrapportage maart 2001. The Hague: Ministry of Finance.Google Scholar
  10. Fitzgerald, P. 2004. Review of partnerships Victoria provided infrastructure, final report to the Treasurer, Melbourne: Growth Solutions Group, January.Google Scholar
  11. Froud, J., & Shaoul, J. 2001. Appraising and evaluating PFI for NHS hospitals. Financial Accountability and Management, 17(3): 247–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grahame, A. 2003. The private finance initiative (PFI). London: House of Commons Library. Research paper no. 03/79.Google Scholar
  13. Greve, C. 2003. When public–private partnerships fail. The extreme case of the NPM-inspired local government of Farum in Denmark, paper for the EGPA conference, 3–6 September, Oerias, Portugal.Google Scholar
  14. Hall, J. 1998. Private opportunity, public benefit? Fiscal Studies, 19(2): 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hart, O. 2003. Incomplete contracts and public ownership: Remarks, and an application to public–private partnerships. Economic Journal, 113(486): C69–C76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Institute of Public Policy Research (IPPR). 2001. The risky business of public–private partnerships to deliver on public services, Current Topics, 25 June, http://www.ippr.org.uk, (overview of Building Better Partnerships Report).
  17. Joseph, E., & Robinson, P. (Eds.). 2001. Right up your street: Partnerships for local policy making and delivery. London: IPPR.Google Scholar
  18. Kickert, W. 2003. Beyond public management. Public Management Review, 5(3): 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klijn, E.-H., & Teisman, G. R. 2003. Institutional and strategic barriers to public–private partnership: An analysis of Dutch cases. Public Money & Management, 23(3): 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koppenjan, J. 2005. The Formation of public–private partnerships: Lessons from nine transport infrastructure projects in the Netherlands. Public Administration, 83(1): 135–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lissauer, R., & Robinson, P. (Eds.). 2001. A learning process: Public private partnerships in education. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
  22. Mott MacDonald. 2002. Review of large public procurement in the UK. London.Google Scholar
  23. National Audit Office. 1998. The private finance initiative: The first four design, build, finance and operate roads contracts, HC 476, London.Google Scholar
  24. National Audit Office. 2000a. Examining the value for money of deals under the private finance initiative. London.Google Scholar
  25. National Audit Office. 2000b. The refinancing of the Fazakerley PFI, HC 584, London.Google Scholar
  26. National Audit Office. 2001. Managing the relations to secure a successful partnership in PFI projects, a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, HC 375, London.Google Scholar
  27. National Audit Office. 2003. Managing resources to deliver better public services, HC 61-1, Session 2003–04, London.Google Scholar
  28. Osborne, S. 2000. Public private partnerships: Theory and practice in international perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. 1993. Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector from schoolhouse to state house. City Hall to Pentagon, New York: Plume.Google Scholar
  30. Pollitt, M. G. 2002. The declining role of the state in infrastructure investment in the UK. In Berg, S., Pollitt, M., & Tsuji, M. (Eds.), Private initiatives in infrastructure: Priorities, incentives and performance. Institute of Developing Economies, Chiba: Japan External Trade Organization.Google Scholar
  31. Pollock, A., Price, D., & Dunnigan, M. 2000. Deficits before patients: A report on the Worcestershire royal infirmary PFI and Worcestershire hospital configuration. London: University College.Google Scholar
  32. Rosenau, P. V. 2000. Public–private policy partnerships. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT.Google Scholar
  33. Shaoul, J. 2005. A critical financial analysis of the private finance initiative: Selecting a financing method or reallocating economic wealth? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16: 441–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Todd, M., & Ware, P. 2000. Social care, contracts and voluntary sector providers: A view from the UK. International Journal of Public–Private Partnership, 2(2): 233–250.Google Scholar
  35. Walker, B., & Walker, B.C. 2000. Privatization: Sell off or sell out? The Australian experience. Sydney: ABC Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations